I am trying to write a reverse print function as part of a doubly linked list. Here are the relevant functions that I have written:
void PLAYER::AddNode(int addID, std::string addName){
nodePtr n = new node; //creates a new node pointer
n->next = NULL; //Make next null
n->prev = NULL; // this will set this to be the ending node
n->ID = addID; //These two lines pass the information into the node
n->name = addName; // ID# and Name Information
if(head != NULL){ // This checks to see if a list is set up.
curr = head; // Make this point to the head.
while(curr->next != NULL){ // Loops through until the NULL is found
curr = curr->next;
}
curr->next = n; //Make the currnet node point to N
n->prev = curr; //Make the previous node connect to curr
n->next = tail; // connect new node to the tail.
}
else{
head = n; //If there is no list, this makes N the first node.
}
Here is the class that prototypes the functions to be used.
class PLAYER
{
public: // Functions go inside PUBLIC
PLAYER();
void AddNode(int addID, std::string addName);
void DeleteNode(int delPlayer);
void SortNode();
void PrintList();
void InsertHead(int AddID, std::string addName);
void PrintReverse();
private: //Variables go into here
typedef struct node{
// ...
std::string name;
int ID;
node* next;
node* prev;
}* nodePtr;
nodePtr head, curr, temp, prev, test, tail;
};
And finally my attempt to create a reverse traversing function to print backwards.
void PLAYER::PrintReverse()
{
curr = head;
while(curr->next != NULL) //Get to the end of the list
{
curr = curr->next;
}
while(curr->prev != NULL) //Work backward and print out the contents
{
std::cout << curr->ID << " " << curr->name << endl;
curr = curr->prev;
}
}
What I would like to do is inside the PrintReverse() function have it initialize via the tail pointer, however I can not figure out the functions to add to PrintReverse() and to AddNode() in order to have the new nodes pointed to by tail.
This is my first question posting here, I hope I covered all my bases. Thank you for any help I can find.
EDIT:
Thank you for all your input. I am relearning data structures and yes this is some self imposed homework on my part to begin to get the logic flowing again.
I will make the changes when I get home tonight.
The following changes would need to be considered.
The PrintReverse function would not need the forward pass to obtain the tail.
void PLAYER::PrintReverse()
{
curr = tail;
while(curr != NULL) //Work backward and print out the contents
{
std::cout << curr->ID << " " << curr->name << endl;
curr = curr->prev;
}
}
There is a problem in how tail is handled in the AddNode function. See the lines where the comments contain [CHANGED] and [ADDED]:
if(head != NULL){ // This checks to see if a list is set up.
curr = head; // Make this point to the head.
while(curr->next != NULL){ // Loops through until the NULL is found
curr = curr->next;
}
curr->next = n; //Make the currnet node point to N
n->prev = curr; //Make the previous node connect to curr
n->next = NULL; // [CHANGED]: we want the last node not to have a successor.
}
else{
head = n; //If there is no list, this makes N the first node.
}
tail = n; // [ADDED]: the last node added is the new tail.
However, a simpler solution is to avoid again the forward pass, and start from tail.
if(tail != NULL){ // This checks to see if a list is set up.
tail->next = n; //Make the old tail node point to N
n->prev = tail;
n->next = NULL;
}
else{
head = n; //If there is no list, this makes N the first node.
}
tail = n; // The last node added is the new tail.
Related
Bellow, I have some code that is supposed to display a linked list, reverse it, and then display the now reversed linked list, but it seems that it never displays. My only guess is that somehow the linked list is becoming null. What am I doing wrong? Both the reverse function and the function that should display the reversed array run, but there is no visual output after.
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
class Node{
public:// creation of a simple Node class
int data;
Node* next;
};
class LinkedList{
public:
Node* head;
LinkedList() { head = NULL; }
void append( int x){
Node* temp = new Node;// allocate new node
Node* end = head;//used later
temp->data = x;//giving the node data
temp->next = NULL;//since this node will be last make the next of it NULL
if(head == NULL){// if list is empty then set new Node as the head
head = temp;
return;
}
while(end->next != NULL){// go until the last node
end = end->next;
}
end->next = temp;// change the next of the last node to the new node.
}
void reverse(){
Node* current = head;
Node* next = NULL;
Node* prev = NULL;
while(current != NULL){
next = current->next;// Store next
current->next = prev;// Reverse current node's pointer
prev = current;// Move pointers one position ahead.
current = next;
}
head = prev;
}
void display(){
while(head != NULL){// print data while not out of bounds
cout<<" "<<head->data;
head = head->next;
}
}
};
int main() {
LinkedList list;
list.append(1);
list.append(10);
list.append(32);
list.append(64);
list.append(102);
list.append(93);
list.display();
cout<<endl;
list.reverse();
cout<<"list reversed"<<endl;
list.display();
cout<<"reverse display ran"<<endl;
Turns out it was an oversight on my part, I should have set up a temporary variable that represented the head, in my current program I'm changing what head references in order to loop through the linked list, and thus setting head equal to null once it reaches the end of the list a correct way to write the display function would be:
void display(){
Node* temp = head;
while(temp != NULL){// print data while not out of bounds
cout<<" "<<temp->data;
temp = temp->next;
}
}
thanks to user Retired Ninja for reminding me that debuggers exist.
I am trying to create a function for adding at the end for doubly linklist. I can't pinpoint out why it does not print out anything.
There was no error coming out when I build the program.
I am making sure
1. new node check if the head has any value first
created following pointer that is previous current
I connected previous node to new node and new node point to previous node while new node point out to nullptr as next.
#include "pch.h"
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
class list;
class node {
public:
int data;
node *next;
node *prev;
friend class list;
};
class list {//double list
node* head;
node* tail;
public:
list(){ head = nullptr; tail = nullptr; head->next = tail; tail->prev = head;}
node* pushback(int newdata) {
node* curr = new node;
curr->data = newdata;
curr->next = nullptr;
if (head == nullptr) {
head = curr;
return head;
}
node*precurr = head;
while (precurr->next != nullptr){
precurr = precurr->next;
}
precurr->next = curr;
curr->prev = precurr;
return head;
}
void print() {
while (head->next != nullptr) {
cout << head->data << " " << endl;
head = head->next;
}
}
};
int main()
{
list test;
test.pushback(1);
test.pushback(2);
test.pushback(3);
test.pushback(4);
test.pushback(5);
test.pushback(6);
test.print();
return 0;
}
You have done a lot of things correctly, but you are confused on your constructor and on your use of the ->prev and tail pointers.
You immediate issue with your constructor, as identified in the comments, is you set head and tail to nullptr and then immediately derefernce both head and tail attempting to make head and tail self-referencing (which is only needed in a circular linked-list).
list(){ head = nullptr; tail = nullptr; head->next = tail; tail->prev = head;}
With head and tail to set to nullptr, you don't have a pointer to a valid node than can be dereferenced. Your attempt to set head->next = tail; tail->prev = head; fails immediately resulting in a SegFault.
For purposes on a normal non-circular list, you simply omit setting head->next and tail->prev in your constructor, e.g.
list() { head = nullptr; tail = nullptr; }
If you want to make your list a circular list, then you will make head and tail self-referencing in:
node *pushback (int newdata) {
...
if (head == nullptr) /* for circular-list 1st node initialization */
head = tail = head->prev = head->next = tail->prev = tail->next = curr;
(note: a tail pointer is optional with a circular list as head->prev always points to the last node in the list)
Since your question pertains to a double-linked-list and not a circular list, you simply need to set both head and tail equal to the new node curr for the addition of the 1st node, e.g.
node *pushback (int newdata) {
node *curr = new node;
curr->data = newdata;
curr->next = curr->prev = nullptr;
if (head == nullptr)
head = tail = curr;
For all other nodes, there is NO iteration required (that's what a tail pointer is for), you simply set curr->prev to tail, tail->next to curr and then update the tail pointer to the new end node by setting tail = curr;, e.g.
else {
curr->prev = tail;
tail->next = curr;
tail = curr;
}
return head;
}
The purpose of a double-linked-list is to allow you to iterate in both the forward and reverse direction over your nodes. For example:
void printfwd() {
node *iter = head;
while (iter != nullptr) {
std::cout << ' ' << iter->data;
iter = iter->next;
}
std::cout.put('\n');
}
void printrev() {
node *iter = tail;
while (iter != nullptr) {
std::cout << ' ' << iter->data;
iter = iter->prev;
}
std::cout.put('\n');
}
(the iteration scheme is slightly different for a circular list since you can iterate from any node in both forward and reverse direction without needed to start from head or tail. To insert in order for a circular list, you simply insert a new tail node).
Don't develop bad habits. Why is “using namespace std;” considered bad practice? Currently all you have to deal with is cout and endl, go ahead and remove using namespace std; and simply prefix cout and endl with std::.
Putting it altogether, you would have:
#include <iostream>
class list;
class node {
public:
int data;
node *next;
node *prev;
friend class list;
};
class list {//double list
node *head;
node *tail;
public:
list() { head = nullptr; tail = nullptr; }
node *pushback (int newdata) {
node *curr = new node;
curr->data = newdata;
curr->next = curr->prev = nullptr;
if (head == nullptr)
head = tail = curr;
else {
curr->prev = tail;
tail->next = curr;
tail = curr;
}
return head;
}
void printfwd() {
node *iter = head;
while (iter != nullptr) {
std::cout << ' ' << iter->data;
iter = iter->next;
}
std::cout.put('\n');
}
void printrev() {
node *iter = tail;
while (iter != nullptr) {
std::cout << ' ' << iter->data;
iter = iter->prev;
}
std::cout.put('\n');
}
};
int main() {
list test;
for (int i = 1; i <= 10; i++)
test.pushback(i);
std::cout << "\nforward:\n";
test.printfwd();
std::cout << "\nreverse:\n";
test.printrev();
}
Example Use/Output
$ ./bin/ll_double_int
forward:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
reverse:
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Look things over and let me know if you have further questions.
Linked List PrintNode function is running on an infinite loop.
class Node{
public:
int data;
Node* next;
};
Node * head; //first variable of inked list
void Insert(int x){
//insertion at beginning
Node* p = new Node;
p->data = x;
p->next = NULL; //when list is empty
//two scenarios to insert node
//one when linked list is empty
if (head == NULL){
head = p; //head becomes the first node
}
//if linked list is not empty
if (head != NULL){
p->next = head;
head = p; //pointing head at the newly created node
}
}
void PrintNode(Node* head){
for ( Node * temp = head; temp != nullptr; temp = temp->next )
{
cout << temp->data << "->";
}
}
int main (){
head = NULL; //points nowhere
int n;int x;
cin >> n;
for(int i = 0 ; i < n ;i ++){
cout << "Enter element" << endl;
cin >> x;
Insert(x);
}
PrintNode(head);
}
I expect the output to be list printed as for example: 1->2->3-> but,
running on an infinite loop.
The first Node you add ends up pointing at itself. Take a look at this chunk of code from Insert
if (head == NULL){
head = p; //head becomes the first node
}
//if linked list is not empty
if (head != NULL){
p->next = head;
head = p; //pointing head at the newly created node
}
You'll point head at your new Node, then enter the next if since head isn't NULL. If you replace the second if with an else, you should be fine.
Look carefully at this code:
if (head == NULL){
head = p; //head becomes the first node
}
//if linked list is not empty
if (head != NULL){
p->next = head;
head = p; //pointing head at the newly created node
}
When head is NULL both branches of code get run resulting in your head node pointing to itself. The correct code would be:
if (head == nullptr){
head = p; //head becomes the first node
}
//if linked list is not empty
else{
p->next = head;
head = p; //pointing head at the newly created node
}
When you update the head pointer as you insert your first element, both if statements will be executed and the head pointer will never be empty in the second if statement, so it should be if then else, like below
if (head == NULL){
head = p; //head becomes the first node
}
//if linked list is not empty
else if (head != NULL){
p->next = head;
head = p; //pointing head at the newly created node
}
I've looked around the forums but cant seem to find an answer to this very general question. The class below is a basic singly linked list with pushBack written the standard way.
class linkedList {
private:
typedef struct node {
int data;
struct node *next;
node(int d):data(d), next(NULL){}
}*nodePtr;
nodePtr head, temp, curr;
public:
linkedList():head(NULL), temp(NULL), curr(NULL){}
void pushBack(int d) {
temp = new node(d);
curr = head;
if (curr != NULL) {
while (curr->next != NULL) {
curr = curr->next;
}
curr->next = temp;
} else head = temp;
}
void printAll() {
curr = head;
cout << "list:" << endl;
while (curr) {
cout << curr->data << " ";
curr = curr->next;
}
cout << endl;
}
};
but why cant my pushBack function be written like this?
void pushBack(int d) {
temp = new node(d);
curr = head;
while (curr != NULL) {
curr = curr->next;
}
curr = temp;
}
It should iterate through the list until curr == NULL and then set curr = temp. If the list is empty then it doesnt enter the loop and head will be set to the new node by setting temp to curr (which its self is set to head).
The logic makes perfect sense to me so it must be something else I'm missing.
Thank you for the help!
your function would fail for the first insertion or pushback, i.e, when the head pointer is null to begin with. when you assign head to curr like this:
curr = head;
curr now points to head and not vice versa .When curr is then assigned temp( i.e. when the first node isnserted into this linked list) , you have only reassigned the pointer curr with the location held by temp. Now all you have is a pointer curr pointing to the same location as temp, both of which pointers are not connected to head pointer at all!
a modified version of your code that would work is:
void pushBack(int d)
{
temp = new node(d);
curr = head;
if(curr!=NULL)
{
while (curr != NULL)
{
curr = curr->next;
}
curr = temp;
}
else head=temp;
}
I have looked at other threads here on the topic, but have no been able to use them to solve my problem.
this is the main class definition of a node in the linked list:
class node {
public:
// default constructor
node() {name = ""; prev = NULL; next = NULL;};
// default overloaded
node(string s) {name = s; prev = NULL; next = NULL;};
// item in the list
string name;
// links to prev and next node in the list
node * next, * prev;
};
the above is the node class definition, which is used in another class that generates a linked list. the linkedlist code was given to us, which we had to modify, so I know it works. I have gone through and tested the addition of new nodes in the doubly linked list to be working, and I am now working on removing nodes from this same doubly linked list.
The function to remove a node: http://pastebin.com/HAbNRM5W
^ this is the code I need help with, there is too much to retype
I was told by my instructor that the code that is the problem is the line 56, which reads:
tmp->prev = prev;
I am trying to set the link to the previous node to be the correct one. the case I am trying to work from with the similar if/else loops is whether or not the current node is the last item in the list. if it is the last item (aka curr->next = NULL), then don't set a link using curr->next and stop the loop iteration.
any help / ideas / suggestons / feedback will be greatly appreciated!
void linkedList::remove(string s)
{
bool found = false;
node * curr = getTop(), * prev = NULL;
node * tmp = new node();
while(curr != NULL)
{
// match found, delete
if(curr->name == s)
{
found = true;
// found at top
if(prev == NULL)
{
node * temp = getTop();
setTop(curr->next);
getTop()->prev = NULL;
delete(temp);
} // end if
else
{
// determine if last item in the list
if (curr->next = NULL)
{
// prev node points to next node
prev->next = curr->next;
// delete the current node
delete(curr);
} // end if
// if not last item in list, proceed as normal
else
{
// prev node points to next node
prev->next = curr->next;
// set the next node to its own name
tmp = prev->next;
// set prev-link of next node to the previous node (aka node before deleted)
tmp->prev = prev;
// delete the current node
delete(curr);
} // end else
} // end else
} // end if
// not found, advance pointers
if(!found)
{
prev = curr;
curr = curr->next;
} // end if
// found, exit loop
else curr = NULL;
} // end while
if(found)
cout << "Deleted " << s << endl;
else
cout << s << " Not Found "<< endl;
} // end remove
NULL should be replaced with nullptr
if (curr->next = NULL) { ...
That is an assignment, you want:
if (curr->next == nullptr) { ...
On line 47 I think you say: if prev == nullptr and next is not nullptr , but you use
prev->next = curr->next;
Which doesn't work since prev is nullptr.
For your code, I suggest several things. Isolate the code to find the node with the name you are looking for. The remove method SHOULD only remove a doubly linked node, provided that it is given one.
I know that your remove method takes in a string parameter, but pass that to another function and have that function return the node you are looking for.
It should look something like this:
Node *cur = find("abcd");
Node *prev = cur->prev;
prev->next = cur->next;
Node *n = cur->next;
n->next = cur->prev;
cur->next = NULL; //or nullptr
cur->prev = NULL; //or nullptr
delete cur;
Should look like:
prev->next = curr->next;
prev->next->prev = prev;
delete (curr);
I got lost in all your different conditionals. All you need to do is this:
void linkedList::remove(const std::string& s)
{
node* current = getTop(); // get head node
while (current != nullptr) // find the item you are trying to remove
{
if (current->name == s)
{
break; // when you find it, break out of the loop
}
}
if (current != nullptr) // if found, this will be non-null
{
if (current->prev) // if this is not the head node
{
current->prev->next = current->next;
}
else
{
// update head node
}
if (current->next) // if this is not the tail node
{
current->next->prev = current->prev;
}
else
{
// update tail node
}
// at this point, current is completely disconnected from the list
delete current;
}
}