SetupDiEnumDriverInfo returns different results on Windows 7 and Windows 8 / 10 - c++

Question

I am debugging an application that should retrieve information about all smart card reader drivers installed on a Windows system.
The code below works on Windows 7 (64 bit):
QSet<QString> getSmartCardDriverModuleNames()
{
QSet<QString> moduleNames;
// the GUID for the smart card reader device setup class
wchar_t deviceClassGuidString[] = L"{50dd5230-ba8a-11d1-bf5d-0000f805f530}";
GUID deviceClass;
CLSIDFromString(deviceClassGuidString, &deviceClass);
HDEVINFO deviceInfoSet = SetupDiGetClassDevs(&deviceClass, NULL, NULL, 0);
if (deviceInfoSet == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE)
{
return moduleNames;
}
SP_DEVINFO_DATA deviceInfoData;
deviceInfoData.cbSize = sizeof(deviceInfoData);
for (DWORD deviceIndex = 0;
SetupDiEnumDeviceInfo(deviceInfoSet, deviceIndex,
&deviceInfoData);
deviceIndex++)
{
if (SetupDiBuildDriverInfoList(deviceInfoSet, &deviceInfoData,
SPDIT_COMPATDRIVER))
{
SP_DRVINFO_DATA_W driverInfoData;
driverInfoData.cbSize = sizeof(driverInfoData);
for (DWORD driverIndex = 0;
SetupDiEnumDriverInfo(deviceInfoSet, &deviceInfoData,
SPDIT_COMPATDRIVER, driverIndex,
&driverInfoData);
driverIndex++)
{
// Omitted: get service name and add to moduleNames.
}
SetupDiDestroyDriverInfoList(deviceInfoSet, &deviceInfoData,
SPDIT_COMPATDRIVER);
}
}
SetupDiDestroyDeviceInfoList(deviceInfoSet);
return moduleNames;
}
This code correctly finds the installed drivers when run on Windows 7, but finds no driver at all on Windows 8 or Windows 10 (both 64 bit), even though some drivers are installed.
It turns out (by adding extra logging and debug code) that under Windows 8 and 10 the first call to SetupDiEnumDriverInfo fails. In this case, by adding a call to GetLastError() I get ERROR_NO_MORE_ITEMS, which is the normal behaviour expected when the end of the list is reached (see the documentation).
So, no errors are detected, but the result is empty.
In the documentation of the Windows API I have found no changes from Windows 7 to Windows 8, 10, so no adaptation to the above code should be needed.
Have I overlooked something? Do you have any hint as to what I should check next?