I want to specify the Clojure version for my project that uses Boot. According to the Boot Wiki, the way to do this is by providing a value for BOOT_CLOJURE_VERSION in a boot.properties file in my project root. So I did that:
$ cat boot.properties
BOOT_CLOJURE_VERSION=1.7.0
It seems to work just fine:
$ tail -2 ~/.boot/boot.properties
BOOT_VERSION=2.5.5
BOOT_CLOJURE_VERSION=1.8.0
$ cat build.boot
(deftask version []
(println "Clojure" (clojure-version))
(println "Boot core" *boot-version*)
(println "Boot app" *app-version*))
$ boot version
Clojure 1.7.0
Boot core 2.5.5
Boot app 2.5.5
However, that same wiki page specifically says to create the boot.properties file like this:
$ boot -V > boot.properties
This adds two lines at the beginning, which look like comments to me, and one at the end that specifies the Boot version. I have no problem with specifying the Boot version for my project, but the wiki page makes it sound as if it's required:
Note: When using boot.properties file you have to also pin the project to specific Boot version as the file must specify both variables.
I'm a bit confused about why the page specifically says to add these three lines to boot.properties when omitting them doesn't seem to cause any problems. Additionally, if I'm using revision control, I see no need to put a timestamp in boot.properties. Is it OK to omit these lines? If not, why are they needed?
This is most likely a case of outdated wiki information. From the source:
// BOOT_VERSION is decided by the loader; it will respect the
// boot.properties files, env vars, system properties, etc.
// or it will use the latest installed version.
I guess you could consider it good practice to lock both the Clojure and Boot version per project as this will prevent any future problems that may arise from incompatible versions.
The 2 comment lines added by Boot are just for information purposes and can be safely omitted.
Related
I am developing a QT GUI for my application using QT Creator (4.11.0).
Recently, our IT updated my OS to Ubuntu 20.04 (from 18.04) - maybe the error is related to that.
I have not touched to project in some month but yesterday wanted to continue developing it.
However, within the IDE there are now thousands of errors highlighted at almost every line of my code. (with highlighted I mean that there is this red background and a red dot beside the line number)
On the very top, it says:
Warning: The code model could not parse an included file, which might lead to incorrect code completion and highlighting, for example.
cstddef:50:10: fatal error: 'stddef.h' file not found
...
The errors that are listed in the IDE are very wired like:
type `QMainWindow`is not a direct or virtual base of `MainWindow` (my class is called `MainWindow`)
I'm pretty sure it is not related to my code:
the code compiles and works fine - it is really just the IDE that is highlighting errors at every line of my code.
I have the same code on a Windows Computer and there no errors are listed in the IDE.
even if I start a brand new QT Widget project the errors appear within the template code provided by the QT Creator.
Since the GCC version changed with the update of the OS, I thought maybe I have to define a new KIT but this also did not help.
Is there anything I can do to fix the issue?
Do I have to reinstall the QT Creator?
I know, pictures are not very well-liked but here I think it might help to understand what I mean with "IDE is highlighting errors":
1. First
~/.profile :
CPATH="/usr/include/clang/10/include:$CPATH"
C_INCLUDE_PATH="/usr/include/clang/10/include:$C_INCLUDE_PATH"
CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH="/usr/include/clang/10/include:$CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH"
export CPATH
export C_INCLUDE_PATH
export CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH
maybe /usr/include/clang/10/include see in you file system.
2. Second
Logout / login.
3. Third
Specifying Build Settings (Projects -> Build -> in every config build) in Build Environment section: [unset] CPATH, C_INCLUDE_PATH and CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH
or [edit] replace this variable with the necessary values
I fixed this issue by sudo apt install clang-8.
Source: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtcreator/+bug/1890434
I have an OCaml program that worked fine on Ubuntu 16 but when recompiled and run on Ubuntu 20 I get the following error:-
$ ocamldebug ./linearizer
OCaml Debugger version 4.08.1
(ocd) r
Loading program... done.
Time: 89534
Program end.
Uncaught exception: Sys_error "Illegal seek"
(ocd) b
Time: 89533 - pc: 624888 - module Netaccel_link
No source file for Netaccel_link.
I thought this was due to missing dev libraries but:-
$ sudo apt install libocamlnet-ocaml-dev
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
libocamlnet-ocaml-dev is already the newest version (4.1.6-1build6).
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 20 not upgraded.
What setup step am I missing on Ubuntu 20?
This looks like a regression bug in libocamlnet and you should report an issue there or, I am a bit pessimistic that you will get any response, you can try to debug the issue yourself.
The problem that you are facing has nothing to do with missing libraries (they will be reported during installation or, if the package is broken, end up in linker errors). It may result, however, from some misconfiguration of the system. If that is true, then you're lucky as you can fix it yourself.
I will give you some advice that might help you in debugging this issue. For more, please try using discuss.ocaml.org as a more suitable media (SO doesn't favor this kind of a discussion and we might get deleted by admins).
The illegal seek exception is thrown when the seek operation is applied on a non-regular file, aka ESPIPE Unix error. So check your inputs. It could be that what was previously regarded as a file in Ubuntu is now a pipe or a socket.
Try to use ltrace or strace to pinpoint the culprit e.g.,
ltrace ./linearizer
or, if it overwhelms you, try strace
strace ./linearizer
Instead of using ocamldebug you can use plain gdb. You can use gdb's interfaces to provide the path to the source code (though most likely it won't work since ocamlnet is not compiled with debug information). I believe that it will give you a more meaningful backtrace.
Instead of using the system installation try using opam. Install your dependencies with opam and try older versions as well as newer versions of the OCaml compiler. Also, try different versions of ocamlnet. Ideally, try to reproduce the environment that used to work for you.
When nothing else works, you can use objdump -d and look at the disassembly of your binary. OCaml is using a pretty readable and intuitive name mangling scheme (<module_name>__<function_name>_<uid>), so you can easily find the source code (search for <module_name>.ml file and look for the <function_name> there)
Finally, just use docker or any other container to run your application. Consider switching from ocamlnet to something more modern and supported.
This question already has answers here:
What is the replacement for javax.activation package in java 9?
(6 answers)
Closed 4 years ago.
After start-dfs.sh, I can navigate to http://localhost:9870. The NameNode seems to be running just fine.
Then I click on "Utilities -> Browse the file system" and I get this prompted in the web browser:
Failed to retrieve data from /webhdfs/v1/?op=LISTSTATUS: Server Error
Digging into the logfile ($HADOOP_HOME/logs/hadoop-xxx-namenode-xxx.log), I find this:
2018-11-30 16:47:25,097 WARN org.eclipse.jetty.servlet.ServletHandler: Error for /webhdfs/v1/
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javax/activation/DataSource
at com.sun.xml.bind.v2.model.impl.RuntimeBuiltinLeafInfoImpl.(RuntimeBuiltinLeafInfoImpl.java:457)
at com.sun.xml.bind.v2.model.impl.RuntimeTypeInfoSetImpl.(RuntimeTypeInfoSetImpl.java:65)
at com.sun.xml.bind.v2.model.impl.RuntimeModelBuilder.createTypeInfoSet(RuntimeModelBuilder.java:133)
So a class is missing. Why is this and how do I fix the problem?
Java 9 deprecated the java.activation module. Java 11 removed it completely.
Java 9 and Java 10 users could add the module back on Hadoop's classpath. Put this in $HADOOP_CONF_DIR/hadoop-env.sh(not tested):
export HADOOP_OPTS="${HADOOP_OPTS} --add-modules java.activation "
Java 11 users must first download the jar dependency and make it available on the classpath. But were does it go?
I found that putting the jar in any one of these locations will make Hadoop automagically pick it up with the effect that the online file explorer start working:
$HADOOP_HOME/share/hadoop/common
$HADOOP_HOME/share/hadoop/common/lib
$HADOOP_HOME/share/hadoop/mapreduce
$HADOOP_HOME/share/hadoop/mapreduce/lib
Not sure what exactly the consequences are putting the file in one or the other folder. But, I like to confine my hacks as much as possible and since I already have a separate configuration directory (i.e., not $HADOOP_HOME/etc/hadoop) I'd like to put it there. Having the jar file in any other location also requires of us to add this path to the HADOOP_CLASSPATH variable.
So, copy-paste into your terminal:
URL=https://jcenter.bintray.com/javax/activation/javax.activation-api/1.2.0/javax.activation-api-1.2.0.jar
wget $URL -P $HADOOP_CONF_DIR/lib
echo 'export HADOOP_CLASSPATH+=" $HADOOP_CONF_DIR/lib/*.jar"' >> $HADOOP_CONF_DIR/hadoop-env.sh
As a final note, I think it's safe to say that one can not expect Hadoop to work well on anything but really old Java versions. Googling reveals that still open tickets exist for Java 9, 10 and 11. So essentially, this is a Hadoop problem. Having that said, although we solved one problem of getting the online file explorer to work, there will for sure be many other issues down the line.
I am using WebStorm 2017.1.3 on Fedora 25.
I have fish set up as my default shell and installed oh-my-fish so in
Terminal I see my git branch and other information by default. omf update runs as expected.
In the WebStorm terminal emulator I still get fish, but not omf:
user#host ~> omf
fish: omf: command not found...
I'm a noob fish and omf user, can anyone help?
Thanks.
I have fish set up as my default shell and installed oh-my-fish so in Terminal I see my git branch and other information by default.
Note that you don't need omf for this. Fish ships a number of prompts that include vcs information. You can pick one with fish_config or add the __fish_vcs_prompt function to your fish_prompt.
In the WebStorm terminal emulator I still get fish, but not omf:
user#host ~> omf
fish: omf: command not found...
The "omf" function is stored in a file named "omf.fish" in a directory in $fish_function_path. This means that directory isn't included there.
The way omf works in a reasonably current (> 2.3.0) fish is that it has a bootstrap file (~/.config/fish/conf.d/omf.fish) that then sources the rest. It seems this isn't run.
I'd suggest you compare the values of $fish_function_path, $OMF_PATH and possibly $XDG_DATA_HOME in webstorm and outside of it.
An answer was given here: IntelliJ's embedded terminal does not load fish functions. I.e, add some lines of code to the app for the time being (until Jetbrains makes a fix).
I fixed this by going to Settings | Terminal then turning off Shell integration.
This allowed me to run omf and also have the bobthefish theme work with powerline/nerd fonts (after updating the terminal font at Settings | Editor | Color Scheme | Font Console)
I was using phpStorm 2017.3.4 but I assume this will also work in any IntelliJ embedded terminal.
I'd like to know in the code (.c file) how I can find the linux distribution name version (like ubuntu 10.0.4, or centOS 5.5...)?
The c function that I'm looking for should be like the uname() system call used in (.c files) to get kernel version.
it will be appreciated that the function is working for all linux distribution (standard)
I 'm not looking to get distribution name and version by the use of command line linux from code (.c file) (like the use of system("cat /etc/release");).
Any suggestion will be appreciated!
Regards
There is no standard for this yet. You can query following files or check for existence:
/etc/lsb-release
/etc/issue
/etc/*release
/etc/*version
Well, you can (and should) use fopen and fgets instead of system("cat"), for reading /etc/release.
There's no universal method though, I can even build a linux image which has no filesystem at all (except initramfs) and definitely no distribution name.
AFAIK there isn't a standard system call to get this if uname(2) doesn't give you enough info.
Safest approach is probably to check for "/proc/version" and read that
You could fopen("/etc/lsb-release") and parse its contents. It looks like this:
DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
DISTRIB_RELEASE=10.04
DISTRIB_CODENAME=lucid
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS"
This method is not universal. You'll need to make sure that it works on all distros that you care about (if it doesn't, I suggest you go with #ott--'s answer).
Is it acceptable to run some shell commands?
$ /usr/bin/lsb_release -r
Release: 11.04
$ /usr/bin/lsb_release -d
Description: Ubuntu 11.04
$ /usr/bin/lsb_release -rd
Description: Ubuntu 11.04
Release: 11.04
There is no portable way to do that, you'll have to use some OS detection tool/library.
Fortunately, there are a few out there. I know those 2 :
Facter, a professional (yet free/open) information gathering program in ruby : http://puppetlabs.com/puppet/related-projects/facter/
a shell script : http://www.novell.com/coolsolutions/feature/11251.html
(I used facter via puppet and it is very good.)
With a little additional scripting, you can use one of those program's output to generate a .h that you can then use in your code.
You can even integrate this generation as a step in your makefile.
I usually inspect /etc/issue; while (as others pointed out) it is not guaranteed, I've fount in the field that's quite reliable.
As far as I've experienced, it works on ubuntu, debian, redhat, centos, slackware and archlinux.