Is it possible MailGun gave me a soiled IP? [closed] - mailgun

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
We have just started using MailGun in earnest.
In about 16% of my emails are being dumped (550's and 530's)
When I look into the problem, I'm told that certain antispam services (spamhaus) have blacklisted the IP that we are using.
I have looked at my logs and found that we have sent about 6000 pieces of the the email over the last six months. We have had zero spam complaints. We are just testing at this point. We are using the API both SMTP and HTTP.
The only answer I can come up with is that the IP address was occupied by someone prior to me, And they had a bit of a spam problem.
Am I missing something?
Is there anyway to get the good folks at MailGUn to change the IP (I have put into support tickets over the last three days and have not gotten a response)

Related

Why my school network blocking my login to aws ec2 with putty [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
I tried to log in to my aws ec2 instance with putty. Every time I connect to my school wifi it keeps saying connection Time Out. But when I try to connect with my phone network it's working fine again.
I already set the security inbound rules to everyone, only myIP. but still not working.
Here is the error... "Network error!!!Connection Time Out"
Your School wifi must be operating behind a firewall and traffic is filtered. For example - in most companies only few sites are allowed to browse and rest all are blocked by firewall rules.
Port 22 is blocked in most of public networks. You can try connecting putty after connecting from your mobile network.

Submitting bank information in plain text - isn't this illegal? [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about programming within the scope defined in the help center.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I just logged into my online credit card account and was getting ready to make a payment, however I needed to add a new payment method. In doing so, just out of curiosity I opened the Chrome Developer Tools and looked at the network tab to view the request data I was sending, and it seems that everything I put in (credit card number, bank account number, bank routing number, etc.) is all sent directly to their servers in plain text.
Is this legal? I thought it was against the law to send/store this kind of information in your servers, let alone send it via the internet in plain text since that can be intercepted?
I'd like someone with more knowledge on the subject to explain this to me please, as I may be misinformed.
Edit: I guess a better question may be, are members of the FDIC allowed to store such information on their own servers? Because according to their legal information, they are a member of the FDIC.
The communication between your Chrome web browser and the bank site expected to be thru HTTPS, i.e. secure connection. Check this always when you need to enter clear payment details anywhere in web.
Chrome Tool as the network tool just show the HTML Forms and Items values which were sent thru HTTP/HTTPS protocol.
For sure at some stages of payment request you need to enter payment, card or bank account details. The payment services which processed such details should be PCI complain and depending of situation can store these details. Usually encrypted on their side.

AWS Domain Transfer stuck in Step 14 [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I had initiated a domain transfer on Amazon. The WHOIS records show that the domain is now transferred to GANDI (AWS technical domain provider).
However, for the past 5 days, I've been seeing the domain in "Pending Requests", and stuck in step 14 with the message: Domain transfer in progress: Sent email to registrant contact: transfer is complete (step 14 of 14).
But I didn't receive any email on the registrant contact, and neither is the domain moving to the "Registered domains" section in the AWS Route 53 console.
How long does this usually take?
It took exactly 8 working days by the clock. But the domain transfer is now complete.

creating a new a name record to point to AWS instance on port 4502 / 4503 [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I am trying to create a new A name record to point to my AEM instance on AWS.
On AWS AEM is installed on port 4502 and 4503. Author is on 4502 and publisher on 4503.
But I cannot create a A name or C name record that points to the ip address of the AWS e2 instance the add :4503
Can anyone suggest a way around this? should I be setting up something else within AWS that has a new IP address that points to the other one with a port?
I have other things setup on this AWS instance that uses port 80.
I appreciate the help as I am pretty new to all of this.
thanks in advance
a / cnames do not work at port level.
you can use the same name and just open up the ports in the Security Group (and/or) create another load balancer. this should do the trice.

Why do some web services require the client to send its IP address? [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question appears to be off-topic because it lacks sufficient information to diagnose the problem. Describe your problem in more detail or include a minimal example in the question itself.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
As an example, see the reference documentation for one of paypal's APIs:
http://www.paypalobjects.com/en_US/ebook/PP_NVPAPI_DeveloperGuide/Appx_fieldreference.html#2824913
The question is, why do they need it? Doesn't the server get it as part of the HTTP protocol?
UPDATE: Just realized the example I gave wasn't so good. I'm talking about instances where the client is talking directly to the web service. I'll close the question.
I'm not sure about PayPal specifically, but one use case for a service requiring the client's IP is that the server needs to do fraud detection (too many requests coming from the same end user), but the source IP in the packet comes from an aggregator of end user actual IPs. Perhaps the aggregator has NATted clients behind it (possibly mobile devices, who knows). The server will want the aggregator to send it the IP of its clients.
There may be other cases; this is the only one I know of.
They want to be able to identify the end user, usually to protect both you and them from abuse - both to detect fraud attempts (too many requests coming from the same IP) and to be able to find the culprit after the fact (in case of criminal activity, ISPs in many countries are required to reveal user information based on an IP to the investigating authorities).
Of course you could do the logging yourself, but considering the general state of security awareness on the internet, I understand that they're not trusting you to do it well enough.