I want to draw shapes with holes in OpenGL and GLFW3. How can I do this? I don't want to use gluTessBeginPolygon.
this is a rectangle with a rectangle hole in it
If the shape is always the same, then the simplest way is to change how you visualize this. It's not a polygon with a hole, it's 2 (or more) polygons with no holes. Draw that instead:
However, if the shape changes dynamically, calculating this triangulation in code is difficult.
If you can't do this because the hole shape is dynamic then you can use the stencil buffer to prevent OpenGL from drawing where the hole is. Clear the stencil buffer, set the rendering mode so that you only write the stencil, then render the hole. Then set the modes back to normal but set the stencil test so it doesn't draw where the stencil buffer isn't zero, and render the rectangle. Then go back to normal.
If you have a shape with lots of holes (like a chain-link fence) then instead of rendering zillions of vertices, you should use a texture with an alpha channel, and use alpha testing in your shader - use discard; on the transparent pixels so they don't render. The fixed-function version of this is GL_ALPHA_TEST.
If you have a formula to detect whether a pixel is in the hole, you can use discard; as well. Your shader can discard for any reason you like - it doesn't have to be based on the alpha channel of a texture.
What you cannot do is count the number of times you cross the polygon boundary when going from left to right, like a scanline renderer might. That's because OpenGL processes all pixels in parallel - not left-to-right.
I am drawing a map texture and, on top of it, a colorbar texture. Both have alpha channel and I am using blending, set as
// Turn on blending
glEnable(GL_BLEND);
glBlendFunc(GL_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA);
However, the following happens:
The texture on top (colorbar) with alpha channel imposes its black pixels, which I don't want to happen. The map texture should appear behind where the colorbar alpha = 0.
Is this related to the blending definitions? How should I change it?
Assuming the texture has an alpha channel and it's transparent in the right places, I suspect the issue is with the rendering order and depth testing.
Lets say you render the scale texture first. It blends correctly with a black background. Then you render the orange texture behind it, but the pixels from the scale texture have a higher depth value and cause the orange texture there to be discarded.
So, make sure you render all your transparent stuff in back to front order, or farthest to nearest.
Without getting into order independent transparency, a common approach to alpha transparency is as follows:
Enable the depth buffer
Render all your opaque geometry
Disable depth writes (glDepthMask)
Enable alpha blending (as in the OP's code)
Render your transparent geometry in farthest to nearest order
For particles you can sometimes get away without sorting and it'll still look OK. Another approach is using the alpha test or using alpha to coverage with a multisample framebuffer.
I'm coding a programm in C++ with glut, rendering a 3D model in a window.
I'm using glReadPixels to get the image of the scenery displayed in the windows.
And I would like to know how I can get, for a specific pixel (x, y), not directly its color but the color of the next object behind.
If I render a blue triangle, and a red triangle in front of it, glReadPixels gives me red colors from the red triangle.
I would like to know how I can get the colors from the blue triangle, the one I would get from glReadPixels if the red triangle wasn't here.
The default framebuffer only retains the topmost color. To get what you're suggesting would require a specific rendering pipeline.
For instance you could:
Create an offscreen framebuffer of the same dimensions as your target viewport
Render a depth-only pass to the offscreen framebuffer, storing the depth values in an attached texture
Re-render the scene with a special shader that only drew pixels where the post-transformation Z values was LESS than the value in the previously recorded depth buffer
The final result of the last render should be the original scene with the top layer stripped off.
Edit:
It would require only a small amount of new code to create the offscreen framebuffer and render a depth only version of the scene to it, and you could use your existing rendering pipeline in combination with that to execute steps 1 and 2.
However, I can't think of any way you could then re-render the scene to get the information you want in step 3 without a shader, because it both the standard depth test plus a test against the provided depth texture. That doesn't mean there isn't one, just that I'm not well versed in GL tricks to think of it.
I can think of other ways of trying to accomplish the same task for specific points on the screen by fiddling with the rendering system, but they're all far more convoluted than just writing a shader.
I'm hoping to draw a plane in OpenGL, using C++, with a hole in the center, much like the green of a golf course for example.
I was wondering what the easiest way to achieve this is?
It's fairly simple to draw a circle and a plane (tutorials all over google will show this for those curious), but I was wondering if there is a boolean subtraction technique like you can get when modelling in 3Ds Max or similar software? Where you create both objects, then take the intersection/union etc to leave a new object/shape? In this case subtract the circle from the plane, creating a hole.
Another way I thought of doing it is giving the circle alpha values and making it transparent, but then of course it still leaves the planes surface visible anyway.
Any help or points in the right direction?
I would avoid messing around with transparency, blending mode, and the like. Just create a mesh with the shape you need and draw it. Remember OpenGL is for graphics, not modelling.
There are a couple ways you could do this. The first way is the one you already stated which is to draw the circle as transparent. The caveat is that you must draw the circle first before you draw the plane so that the alpha blending will blend the circle with the background. Then when you render the plane the parts that are covered by the circle will be discarded in the depth test.
The second method you could try is with texture mapping. You could create a texture that is basically a mask with everything set to opaque white except the circle portion which is set to have an alpha value of 0. In your shader you would then multiply your fragment color by this mask texture color so that the portions where the circle is located are now transparent.
Both of these methods would work with shapes other than a circle as well.
I suggest the stencil buffer. Use the stencil buffer to mark the area where you want the hole to be by masking the color and depth buffers and drawing only to the stencil buffer, then unmask your color and depth, avoid drawing to the stencil buffer, and draw your plane with a stencil function telling OpenGL to discard all pixels where the stencil buffer "markings" are.
I am rendering to a texture through a framebuffer object, and when I draw transparent primitives, the primitives are blended properly with other primitives drawn in that single draw step, but they are not blended properly with the previous contents of the framebuffer.
Is there a way to properly blend the contents of the texture with the new data coming in?
EDIT: More information requsted, I will attempt to explain more clearly;
The blendmode I am using is GL_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA. (I believe that is typically the standard blendmode)
I am creating an application that tracks mouse movement. It draws lines connecting the previous mouse position to the current mouse position, and as I do not want to draw the lines over again each frame, I figured I would draw to a texture, never clear the texture and then just draw a rectangle with that texture on it to display it.
This all works fine, except that when I draw shapes with alpha less than 1 onto the texture, it does not blend properly with the texture's previous contents. Let's say I have some black lines with alpha = .6 drawn onto the texture. A couple draw cycles later, I then draw a black circle with alpha = .4 over those lines. The lines "underneath" the circle are completely overwritten. Although the circle is not flat black (It blends properly with the white background) there are no "darker lines" underneath the circle as you would expect.
If I draw the lines and the circle in the same frame however, they blend properly. My guess is that the texture just does not blend with it's previous contents. It's like it's only blending with the glclearcolor. (Which, in this case is <1.0f, 1.0f, 1.0f, 1.0f>)
I think there are two possible problems here.
Remember that all of the overlay lines are blended twice here. Once when they are blended into the FBO texture, and again when the FBO texture is blended over the scene.
So the first possibility is that you don't have blending enabled when drawing one line over another in the FBO overlay. When you draw into an RGBA surface with blending off, the current alpha is simply written directly into the FBO overlay's alpha channel. Then later when you blend the whole FBO texture over the scene, that alpha makes your lines translucent. So if you have blending against "the world" but not between overlay elements, it is possible that no blending is happening.
Another related problem: when you blend one line over another in "standard" blend mode (src alpha, 1 - src alpha) in the FBO, the alpha channel of the "blended" part is going to contain a blend of the alphas of the two overlay elements. This is probably not what you want.
For example, if you draw two 50% alpha lines over each other in the overlay, to get the equivalent effect when you blit the FBO, you need the FBO's alpha to be...75%. (That is, 1 - (1-.5) * (1-0.5), which is what would happen if you just drew two 50% alpha lines over your scene. But when you draw the two 50% lines, you'll get 50% alpha in the FBO (a blend of 50% with...50%.
This brings up the final issue: by pre-mixing the lines with each other before you blend them over the world, you are changing the draw order. Whereas you might have had:
blend(blend(blend(background color, model), first line), second line);
now you will have
blend(blend(first line, second line), blend(background color, model)).
In other words, pre-mixing the overlay lines into an FBO changes the order of blending and thus changes the final look in a way you may not want.
First, the simple way to get around this: don't use an FBO. I realize this is a "go redesign your app" kind of answer, but using an FBO is not the cheapest thing, and modern GL cards are very good at drawing lines. So one option would be: instead of blending lines into an FBO, write the line geometry into a vertex buffer object (VBO). Simply extend the VBO a little bit each time. If you are drawing less than, say, 40,000 lines at a time, this will almost certainly be as fast as what you were doing before.
(One tip if you go this route: use glBufferSubData to write the lines in, not glMapBuffer - mapping can be expensive and doesn't work on sub-ranges on many drivers...better to just let the driver copy the few new vertices.)
If that isn't an option (for example, if you draw a mix of shape types or use a mix of GL state, such that "remembering" what you did is a lot more complex than just accumulating vertices) then you may want to change how you draw into the VBO.
Basically what you'll need to do is enable separate blending; initialize the overlay to black + 0% alpha (0,0,0,0) and blend by "standard blending" the RGB but additive blending the alpha channels. This still isn't quite correct for the alpha channel but it's generally a lot closer - without this, over-drawn areas will be too transparent.
Then, when drawing the FBO, use "pre-multiplied" alpha, that is, (one, one-minus-src-alph).
Here's why that last step is needed: when you draw into the FBO, you have already multiplied every draw call by its alpha channel (if blending is on). Since you are drawing over black, a green (0,1,0,0.5) line is now dark green (0,0.5,0,0.5). If alpha is on and you blend normally again, the alpha is reapplied and you'l have 0,0.25,0,0.5.). By simply using the FBO color as is, you avoid the second alpha multiplication.
This is sometimes called "pre-multiplied" alpha because the alpha has already been multiplied into the RGB color. In this case you want it to get correct results, but in other cases, programmers use it for speed. (By pre-multiplying, it removes a mult per pixel when the blend op is performed.)
Hope that helps! Getting blending right when the layers are not mixed in order gets really tricky, and separate blend isn't available on old hardware, so simply drawing the lines every time may be the path of least misery.
Clear the FBO with transparent black (0, 0, 0, 0), draw into it back-to-front with
glBlendFuncSeparate(GL_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA);
and draw the FBO with
glBlendFunc(GL_ONE, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA);
to get the exact result.
As Ben Supnik wrote, the FBO contains colour already multiplied with the alpha channel, so instead of doing that again with GL_SRC_ALPHA, it is drawn with GL_ONE. The destination colour is attenuated normally with GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA.
The reason for blending the alpha channel in the buffer this way is different:
The formula to combine transparency is
resultTr = sTr * dTr
(I use s and d because of the parallel to OpenGL's source and destination, but as you can see the order doesn't matter.)
Written with opacities (alpha values) this becomes
1 - rA = (1 - sA) * (1 - dA)
<=> rA = 1 - (1 - sA) * (1 - dA)
= 1 - 1 + sA + dA - sA * dA
= sA + (1 - sA) * dA
which is the same as the blend function (source and destination factors) (GL_ONE, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA) with the default blend equation GL_FUNC_ADD.
As an aside:
The above answers the specific problem from the question, but if you can easily choose the draw order it may in theory be better to draw premultiplied colour into the buffer front-to-back with
glBlendFunc(GL_ONE_MINUS_DST_ALPHA, GL_ONE);
and otherwise use the same method.
My reasoning behind this is that the graphics card may be able to skip shader execution for regions that are already solid. I haven't tested this though, so it may make no difference in practice.
As Ben Supnik said, the best way to do this is rendering the entire scene with separate blend functions for color and alpha. If you are using the classic non premultiplied blend function try glBlendFuncSeparateOES(GL_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE, GL_ONE) to render your scene to FBO. and glBlendFuncSeparateOES(GL_ONE, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA) to render the FBO to screen.
It is not 100% accurate, but in most of the cases that will create no unexpected transparency.
Keep in mind that old Hardware and some mobile devices (mostly OpenGL ES 1.x devices, like the original iPhone and 3G) does not support separated blend functions. :(