Grep for lines not beginning with "//" - regex

I'm trying but failing to write a regex to grep for lines that do not begin with "//" (i.e. C++-style comments). I'm aware of the "grep -v" option, but I am trying to learn how to pull this off with regex alone.
I've searched and found various answers on grepping for lines that don't begin with a character, and even one on how to grep for lines that don't begin with a string, but I'm unable to adapt those answers to my case, and I don't understand what my error is.
> cat bar.txt
hello
//world
> cat bar.txt | grep "(?!\/\/)"
-bash: !\/\/: event not found
I'm not sure what this "event not found" is about. One of the answers I found used paren-question mark-exclamation-string-paren, which I've done here, and which still fails.
> cat bar.txt | grep "^[^\/\/].+"
(no output)
Another answer I found used a caret within square brackets and explained that this syntax meant "search for the absence of what's in the square brackets (other than the caret). I think the ".+" means "one or more of anything", but I'm not sure if that's correct and if it is correct, what distinguishes it from ".*"
In a nutshell: how can I construct a regex to pass to grep to search for lines that do not begin with "//" ?
To be even more specific, I'm trying to search for lines that have "#include" that are not preceeded by "//".
Thank you.

The first line tells you that the problem is from bash (your shell). Bash finds the ! and attempts to inject into your command the last you entered that begins with \/\/. To avoid this you need to escape the ! or use single quotes. For an example of !, try !cat, it will execute the last command beginning with cat that you entered.
You don't need to escape /, it has no special meaning in regular expressions. You also don't need to write a complicated regular expression to invert a match. Rather, just supply the -v argument to grep. Most of the time simple is better. And you also don't need to cat the file to grep. Just give grep the file name. eg.
grep -v "^//" bar.txt | grep "#include"
If you're really hungup on using regular expressions then a simple one would look like (match start of string ^, any number of white space [[:space:]]*, exactly two backslashes /{2}, any number of any characters .*, followed by #include):
grep -E "^[[:space:]]*/{2}.*#include" bar.txt

You're using negative lookahead which is PCRE feature and requires -P option
Your negative lookahead won't work without start anchor
This will of course require gnu-grep.
You must use single quotes to use ! in your regex otherwise history expansion is attempted with the text after ! in your regex, the reason of !\/\/: event not found error.
So you can use:
grep -P '^(?!\h*//)' file
hello
\h matches 0 or more horizontal whitespace.
Without -P or non-gnu grep you can use grep -v:
grep -v '^[[:blank:]]*//' file
hello

To find #include lines that are not preceded by // (or /* …), you can use:
grep '^[[:space:]]*#[[:space:]]*include[[:space:]]*["<]'
The regex looks for start of line, optional spaces, #, optional spaces, include, optional spaces and either " or <. It will find all #include lines except lines such as #include MACRO_NAME, which are legitimate but rare, and screwball cases such as:
#/*comment*/include/*comment*/<stdio.h>
#\
include\
<stdio.h>
If you have to deal with software containing such notations, (a) you have my sympathy and (b) fix the code to a more orthodox style before hunting the #include lines. It will pick up false positives such as:
/* Do not include this:
#include <does-not-exist.h>
*/
You could omit the final [[:space:]]*["<] with minimal chance of confusion, which will then pick up the macro name variant.
To find lines that do not start with a double slash, use -v (to invert the match) and '^//' to look for slashes at the start of a line:
grep -v '^//'

You have to use the -P (perl) option:
cat bar.txt | grep -P '(?!//)'

For the lines not beginning with "//", you could use (^[^/]{2}.*$).

If you don't like grep -v for this then you could just use awk:
awk '!/^\/\//' file
Since awk supports compound conditions instead of just regexps, it's often easier to specify what you want to match with awk than grep, e.g. to search for a and b in any order with grep:
grep -E 'a.*b|b.*a`
while with awk:
awk '/a/ && /b/'

Related

Can I perform a 'non-global' grep and capture only the first match found for each line of input?

I understand that what I'm asking can be accomplished using awk or sed, I'm asking here how to do this using GREP.
Given the following input:
.bash_profile
.config/ranger/bookmarks
.oh-my-zsh/README.md
I want to use GREP to get:
.bash_profile
.config/
.oh-my-zsh/
Currently I'm trying
grep -Po '([^/]*[/]?){1}'
Which results in output:
.bash_profile
.config/
ranger/
bookmarks
.oh-my-zsh/
README.md
Is there some simple way to use GREP to only get the first matched string on each line?
I think you can grep non / letters like:
grep -Eo '^[^/]+'
On another SO site there is another similar question with solution.
You don't need grep for this at all.
cut -d / -f 1
The -o option says to print every substring which matches your pattern, instead of printing each matching line. Your current pattern matches every string which doesn't contain slashes (optionally including a trailing slash); but it's easy to switch to one which only matches this pattern at the beginning of a line.
grep -o '^[^/]*' file
Notice the addition of the ^ beginning of line anchor, and the omission of the -P option (which you were not really using anyway) as well as the silly beginner error {1}.
(I should add that plain grep doesn't support parentheses or repetitions; grep -E would support these constructs just fine, of you could switch to toe POSIX BRE variation which requires a backslash to use round or curly parentheses as metacharacters. You can probably ignore these details and just use grep -E everywhere unless you really need the features of grep -P, though also be aware that -P is not portable.)

Difference between using grep regex pattern with or without quotes?

I'm learning from Linux Academy and the tutorial shows how to use grep and regex.
He is putting his regex pattern in between quotes something like this:
grep 'pattern' file.txt
This seems to be the same than doing it without quotes:
grep pattern file.txt
But when he does something like this, he needs to escape the { and }:
grep '^A\{1,4\}' file.txt
And after doing some testing these scape characters don't seem to be needed when writing the pattern without the quotes.
grep ^A{1,4} file.txt
So what is the difference between these two methods?
Are the quotations necessary?
Why in the first case the escape characters are needed?
Lastly, I've also seen other methods like grep -E and egrep, which is the most common method that people use to grep with regex?
Edit: Thanks for the reminder that the pattern goes before the file.
Many thanks!
You can sometimes get away with omitting quotes, but it's safest not to. This is because the syntax of regular expressions overlaps that of filename wildcard patterns, and when the shell sees something that looks like a wildcard pattern (and it isn't in quotes), the shell will try to "expand" it into a list of matching filenames. If there are no matching files, it gets passed through unchanged, but if there are matches it gets replaced with the matching filenames.
Here's a simple example. Suppose we're trying to search file.txt for an "a" followed optionally by some "b"s, and print only the matches. So you run:
grep -o ab* file.txt
Now, "ab* could be interpreted as a wildcard pattern looking for files that start with "ab", and the shell will interpret it that way. If there are no files in the current directory that start with "ab", this won't cause a problem. But suppose there are two, "abcd.txt" and "abcdef.jpg". Then the shell expands this to the equivalent of:
grep -o abcd.txt abcdef.jpg file.txt
...and then grep will search the files abcdef.jpg and file.txt for the regex pattern abcd.txt.
So, basically, using an unquoted regex pattern might work, but is not safe. So don't do it.
BTW, I'd also recommend using single-quotes instead of double-quotes, because there are some regex characters that're treated specially by the shell even when they're in double-quotes (mostly dollar sign and backslash/escape). Again, they'll often get passed through unchanged, but not always, and unless you understand the (somewhat messy) parsing rules, you might get unexpected results.
BTW^2, for similar reasons you should (almost) always put double-quotes around variable references (e.g. grep -O 'ab* "$filename" instead of grep -O 'ab*' $filename). Single-quotes don't allow variable references at all; unquoted variable references are subject to word splitting and wildcard expansion, both of which can cause trouble. Double-quoted variables get expanded and nothing else.
BTW^3, there are a bunch of variants of regular expression syntax. The reason the curly braces in your example expression need to be escaped is that, by default, grep uses POSIX "basic" regular expression syntax ("BRE"). In BRE syntax, some regex special characters (including curly brackets and parentheses) must be escaped to have their special meaning (and some others, like alternation with |, are just not available at all). grep -E, on the other hand, uses "extended" regular expression syntax ("ERE"), in which those characters have their special meanings unless they're escaped.
And then there's the Perl-compatible syntax (PCRE), and many other variants. Using the wrong variant of the syntax is a common cause of trouble with regular expressions (e.g. using perl extensions in an ERE context, as here and here). It's important to know which variant the tool you're using understands, and write your regex to that syntax.
Here's a simple example: "a", followed by 1 to 3 space-like characters, followed by "b", in various regex syntax variants:
a[[:space:]]\{1,3\}b # BRE syntax
a[[:space:]]{1,3}b # ERE syntax
a\s{1,3}b # PCRE syntax
Just to make things more complicated, some tools will nominally accept one syntax, but also allow some extensions from other syntax variants. In the example above, you can see that perl added the shorthand \s for a space-like character, which is not part of either POSIX standard syntax. But in fact many tools that nominally use BRE or ERE will actually accept the \s shorthand.
Actually, there are two completely unrelated aspects of escaping in your question. The first has to do how to represent strings in bash. This is about readability, which usually means personal taste. For example, I don't like escaping, hence I prefer writing ab\ cd as 'ab cd'. Hence, I would write
echo 'ab cd'
grep -F 'ab cd' myfile.txt
instead of
echo ab\ cd
grep -F ab\ cd myfile.txt
but there is nothing wrong with either one, and you can choose whichever looks simpler to you.
The other aspect indeed is related to grep, at least as long as you do not use the -F option in grep, which always interprets the search argument literally. In this case, the shell is not involved, and the question is whether a certain character is interpreted as a regexp character or as a literal. Gordon Davisson has already explained this in detail, so I give only an example which combines both aspects:
Say you want to grep for a space, followed by one or more periods, followed by another space. You can't write this as
grep -E .+ myfile.txt
because the spaces would be eaten by bash and the . would have special meaning to grep. Hence, you have to choose some escape mechanism. My personal style would be
grep -E ' [.]+ ' myfile.txt
but many people dislike the [.] and prefer \. instead. This would then become
grep -E ' \.+ ' myfile.txt
This still uses quotes to salvage the spaces from the shell, but escapes the period for grep. If you prefer to use no quotes at all, you can write
grep -E \ \\.+\ myfile.txt
Note that you need to prefix the \ which is intended for grep by another \, because the backslash has, like a space, a special meaning for the shell, and if you would not write \\., grep would not see a backslash-period, but just a period.

Regular Expressions - Finding missing currency symbols when price might contain forward slash

So I thought this would be easy, but I can't wrap my head around it.
I need to GREP the following list and only find the strings where there is a missing euro symbol.
x80/90
x90€
x80/95
x80/95€
x80/90
x90
Then I need to add the missing euro symbol.
I really thought I could manage such a simple example, but it has me stumped.
Thanks all.
To find lines with a missing euro symbol you can use grep with inverted matching (parameter -v)
grep -v '€' < ./your/file
To replace them you can use sed like this:
sed -e '/€/!s/.\+/\0€/' < ./your/file
Here...
/€/ tries to find the euro symbol as a precondition.
!s/.\+/\0€/ carries out substitution only on those lines where the precondition was not met.
.\+ requires at least one character so that empty lines will not get an euro symbol.
If that distinction is not necessary for your case, !s/$/€/ would work as well.
Here is a one-line to do all the task you need using perl
perl -pi -e 's/^(?!.*€)(.*)/\1€/g' inputFile
-p process and print line by line
-i for inplace replacement
If you only want to detect those lines using grep you can use -P option to for support of Perl regex and use negative lookahead like
grep -P '^(?!.*€)' inputFile

Grep Search Specific Character Trouble

I have searched extensively and cannot figure out what I am doing wrong here. I have a text file that may contain a string similar to the following:
/dev/dir1/dir2 200G 22G 179G 11% /usr/dir3/dir4
I generally know what the sting will look like up until the disk percentage indicator (i.e. 11%), but in the final part of the string I need to figure out if it ends in the usr (or sub) directories.
I want to use grep to do this search but am having problems. For example, the following command gives me output, but once i replace any of the "." characters where the "G" or "%" would be, or if I try to add "/usr/.*" at the end it refuses to return anything.
$ egrep ^/dev/dir1/dir2\s*\d*.\s*\d*.\s*\d*.\s*\d*.\s*.*$ testfile
/dev/dir1/dir2 200G 22G 179G 11% /usr/dir3/dir4
grep's extended regular expressions do not support using \d to match digits. Instead, use [0-9] or [:digit:]. You can use the following grep command:
egrep '^/dev/dir1/dir2\s*[0-9]*G\s*[0-9]*G\s*[0-9]*G\s*[0-9]*%\s*.*$'
You can also pass grep the -P option to enable Perl compatible regular expressions, which do support \d:
grep -P '^/dev/dir1/dir2\s*\d*G\s*\d*G\s*\d*G\s*\d*%\s*.*$'
Note the use of grep instead of egrep in the above command; -P is incompatible with egrep.
As a side note, I prefer to use + instead of * when I can, because it is stricter and can cause errors to become apparent sooner. For example, I assume there will always be at least one space and one digit in each place in the input, so you can use \s+ and [0-9]+ (or \d+). If your original pattern had used +, it would not have matched at all in the first place (whether it was quoted or not), and you would have known you had a problem even before adding the G or % to it. A working example is
egrep '^/dev/dir1/dir2\s+[0-9]+.\s+[0-9]+.\s+[0-9]+.\s+[0-9]+.\s+.+$'

Use grep to find strings at the beginning of a line or after a delimiter in Git Bash for Windows

I have such file:
blue|1|red|2
green|3|blue|4
darkblue|0|yellow|3
I want to use grep to find anything containg blue| at the beginning of line or |blue| anywhere, but not any darkblue| or |darkblue| or |blueberry|
I tried to use grep [^|\|]blue\| but Git Bash gives me error:
$ grep [^|\|]blue\| *.*
grep: Unmatched [ or [^
sh.exe": |]blue|: command not found
What did I do wrong? What's the proper way to do it?
Here's a quick & dirty one:
grep -E '(^|\|)blue\|' *
Matches start of line or |, followed by blue|. The important note is that you need extended regular expressions (via egrep or the -E flag) to use the | (or) construct.
Also, note the single quotes around the regular expression.
So, in answer to the OP's "What did I do wrong?",
You forgot to put the regexp in single quotes;
You chose the wrong type of brackets to enclose the alternate expressions; and finally
You forgot to use egrep or the -E flag
It's always easier to see other people's errors; I wish I was a quick to spot my own :-|