I'm using AWS S3 component to store files.
I have a bucket called "mybucket" and with the following folders :
+---Mybucket
\---toto1
\---toto2
+---toto3
| \--- subfolder
| \---subsubfolder
\---toto4
I have AWS console users that need only need to access "toto3" folder.
I tried to restrict the access to this folder, but the user must have the right to list the root of bucket. If I put additional rights to acces the root folder, users can browser "toto1" and "toto2" folders and I don't want.
I want to configure something like that:
Authorize to list all buckets of my S3 account (listAllBuckets policy)
Autorize to list the root of the bucket (it's OK for me if the user see the directories names)
Deny access for all prefix bucket different from "toto3"
Autorize every actions for the user in toto3 folder
I don't want to write an inclusive rules
I tried this IAM policy without any success :
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:ListBucket",
"s3:PutObject",
"s3:GetObject"
],
"Resource": ["arn:aws:s3:::mybucket/toto3/*"]
},
{
"Sid": "Stmt1457617383000",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:GetBucketLocation",
"s3:ListBucket"
],
"Resource": ["arn:aws:s3:::mybucket"]
},
{
"Sid": "Stmt1457617230000",
"Effect": "Deny",
"Action": ["s3:*"],
"Condition": {
"StringNotLike": {
"s3:prefix": "toto3*"
}
},
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::mybucket/*"
]
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:ListAllMyBuckets"
],
"Resource": [
"*"
]
}
]
}
Here's a policy that will work for you:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:ListAllMyBuckets"
],
"Resource": [
"*"
]
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:PutObject",
"s3:GetObject"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::mybucket/toto3/*"
]
},
{
"Sid": "Stmt1457617230000",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:ListBucket"
],
"Condition": {
"StringLike": {
"s3:prefix": [
"",
"toto3/"
]
}
},
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::mybucket*"
]
}
]
}
Details:
ListAllMyBuckets is required by the Console. It shows a list of all buckets.
Any action permitted within the toto3/ path.
ListBucket (retrieve objects list) permitted in the root of the bucket and in the toto3/ path.
I successfully tested this solution.
AWS Documentation Reference: Allow Users to Access a Personal "Home Directory" in Amazon S3
I edit your code to have the following and it works ! THanks !!
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": "s3:*",
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::mybucket/toto3/*"
]
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:ListAllMyBuckets",
"s3:GetBucketLocation"
],
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::*"
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": "s3:ListBucket",
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::mybucket",
"Condition": {
"StringLike": {
"s3:prefix": [
"",
"toto3/",
"toto3*"
]
}
}
}
]
}
I need to grant an external vendor access only to a subfolder under a folder, that was under a bucket (!!!). Something like this:
bucket/folder/subfolder
Here's how I accomplished it:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Sid": "VisualEditor0",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:PutObject",
"s3:GetObject",
"s3:ListBucket",
"s3:DeleteObject",
"s3:GetBucketLocation"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::bucket/*",
"arn:aws:s3:::bucket"
]
"Condition": {
"StringLike": {
"s3:prefix": [
"bucket/folder/subfolder/*",
"bucket/folder/subfolder/",
"bucket/folder/subfolder",
"folder/subfolder/*",
"folder/subfolder/",
"folder/subfolder",
]
}
}
}
]
}
Is it possible to limit the below rule but give specific folder access? I don't want the user see the directory names/folder names with-in the specific bucket.
Autorize to list the root of the bucket (it's OK for me if the user see the directories names)
Related
why this policy is not working? it allows all command on all resources but not deny on the selected folders! how can i resolve this kind of problem?
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Sid": "VisualEditor0",
"Effect": "Deny",
"Action": "s3:*",
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::agdstorage/Storage_WK/Agedi Monaco/Banca",
"arn:aws:s3:::agdstorage/Storage_WK/Agedi Monaco/Bilanci",
"arn:aws:s3:::agdstorage/Storage_WK/Agedi Monaco/Bilanci/*",
"arn:aws:s3:::agdstorage/Storage_WK/Agedi Monaco/Contenziosi",
"arn:aws:s3:::agdstorage/Storage_WK/Agedi Monaco/Contenziosi/*",
"arn:aws:s3:::agdstorage/Storage_WK/Agedi France/Affari societari",
"arn:aws:s3:::agdstorage/Storage_WK/Agedi France/Affari societari/*",
]
},
{
"Sid": "Stmt1595519755000",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:*"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::agdstorage/*",
"arn:aws:s3:::agdstorage"
]
}
]
}
Here is an example of using Deny. (I did not test this!)
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Action": [
"s3:ListBucket"
],
"Effect": "Allow",
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::agdstorage"
],
"Condition": {
"StringNotLike": {
"s3:prefix": [
"Storage_WK/Agedi Monaco/Banca/*",
"Storage_WK/Agedi Monaco/Bilanci/*",
"Storage_WK/Agedi Monaco/Contenziosi/*",
"Storage_WK/Agedi France/Affari societari/*"
]
}
}
},
{
"Action": [
"s3:GetObject",
"s3:PutObject"
],
"Effect": "Allow",
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::agdstorage/*"
]
},
{
"Action": [
"s3:GetObject",
"s3:PutObject"
],
"Effect": "Deny",
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::agdstorage/Storage_WK/Agedi Monaco/Banca/*",
"arn:aws:s3:::agdstorage/Storage_WK/Agedi Monaco/Bilanci/*",
"arn:aws:s3:::agdstorage/Storage_WK/Agedi Monaco/Contenziosi/*",
"arn:aws:s3:::agdstorage/Storage_WK/Agedi France/Affari societari/*"
]
}
]
}
Note that ListBucket is controlled via the Prefix, so it is simply using StringNotLike.
For GetObject and PutObject, it is using the resources you listed.
The ListBucket command operates at the bucket-level, not at the object-level.
Here is an example of a policy that grants access only to a specific folder:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Action": ["s3:ListBucket"],
"Effect": "Allow",
"Resource": ["arn:aws:s3:::mybucket"],
"Condition": {"StringLike": {"s3:prefix": ["David/*"]}}
},
{
"Action": [
"s3:GetObject",
"s3:PutObject"
],
"Effect": "Allow",
"Resource": ["arn:aws:s3:::mybucket/David/*"]
}
]
}
Note that ListBucket references the Bucket, but limits access by specifying a Prefix.
This is different to GetObject and PutObject that can be limited by providing a path in Resource.
To know how each command operates, consult Actions, Resources, and Condition Keys for Amazon S3 - AWS Identity and Access Management and refer to the Resource Types column.
If possible, try to avoid using Deny since negative logic can sometimes be less obvious (just like this sentence). It is better to only grant the desired permissions, rather than granting everything and then denying some permissions. For example, the policy shown in your question actually grants permission to delete objects outside of the specified folders (eg at the root level) and to even delete the bucket itself (if it is empty).
If you are simply wanting to grant users access to their own folder, you can use IAM Policy Elements: Variables and Tags:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Action": ["s3:ListBucket"],
"Effect": "Allow",
"Resource": ["arn:aws:s3:::mybucket"],
"Condition": {"StringLike": {"s3:prefix": ["${aws:username}/*"]}}
},
{
"Action": [
"s3:GetObject",
"s3:PutObject"
],
"Effect": "Allow",
"Resource": ["arn:aws:s3:::mybucket/${aws:username}/*"]
}
]
}
This automatically adjusts the policy based upon the username of the user, so they can access folders based on their username.
I have a folder structure in an s3 bucket (my-bucket) like this:
/folder1/
/folder2/subfolder/
/folder3/subfolder/subsubfolder/
file.ext
file2.ext
etc...
I want to be able to list, put and get all folders and objects in the root of the bucket and any subfolder (and subfolder of subfolder).
Here is my current policy for the user group that needs these permissions:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": "s3:ListBucket",
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::my-bucket"
]
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": "s3:GetObject",
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::my-bucket/*"
]
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": "s3:PutObject",
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::my-bucket/*"
]
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:ListAllMyBuckets",
"s3:List*"
],
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::*"
}
]
}
Using this policy I can only get and put objects in the root of the bucket. But I also want to get and put objects into the folders within the bucket. These folder names are dynamic so I cannot have them in the policy. How do I do this? I know with S3 full access policy it work but not with my example on above. I just keep on getting Access Denied error when trying this.
Any help would be appreciated.
The full policy would look something like this. This works from AWS S3 console.
Notice, that I didn't add s3:DeleteObject. If you need that as well don't forget to add it besides s3:PutObject and s3:GetObject.
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": "s3:ListBucket",
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::my-bucket"
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": "s3:ListAllMyBuckets",
"Resource": "*"
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:PutObject",
"s3:GetObject"
],
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::my-bucket/*"
}
]
}
I want to restrict the access to a single folder in S3 bucket.
I have written a IAM role for the same. Somehow I am not upload/sync the files to this folder. Here, bucket is the bucket name and folder is the folder where I want to give access.
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Sid": "AllowUserToSeeBucketListInTheConsole",
"Action": [
"s3:ListAllMyBuckets",
"s3:GetBucketLocation"
],
"Effect": "Allow",
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::*"
]
},
{
"Sid": "AllowRootAndHomeListingOfBucket",
"Action": [
"s3:ListBucket"
],
"Effect": "Allow",
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::bucket"
],
"Condition": {
"StringEquals": {
"s3:prefix": [
""
],
"s3:delimiter": [
"/"
]
}
}
},
{
"Sid": "AllowListingOfUserFolder",
"Action": [
"s3:ListBucket",
"s3:PutObject",
"s3:PutObjectAcl",
"s3:GetObject",
"s3:GetObjectAcl",
"s3:HeadObject"
],
"Effect": "Allow",
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::bucket"
],
"Condition": {
"StringLike": {
"s3:prefix": [
"folder/*"
]
}
}
}
]
}
Please suggest where I am wrong.
This restrictive IAM policy grants only list and upload access to a particular prefix in a particular bucket. It also intends to allow multipart uploads.
References:
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/API/API_Operations.html
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/mpuAndPermissions.html
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Sid": "ListBucket",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": "s3:ListBucket",
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::mybucket",
"Condition": {
"StringLike": {
"s3:prefix": "my/prefix/is/this/*"
}
}
},
{
"Sid": "UploadObject",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:PutObject",
"s3:AbortMultipartUpload",
"s3:ListMultipartUploadParts"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::mybucket/my/prefix/is/this/*",
]
}
]
}
Note that specifying the s3:ListBucket resource compactly as "arn:aws:s3:::mybucket/my/prefix/is/this/*" didn't work.
Since you have requested to suggest, where you are wrong:
1> In AllowListingOfUserFolder, you have used the object as resource but you have used bucket level operations and "s3:prefix" will not work with object level APIs.
Please refer to the sample policies listed here:
http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/example-policies-s3.html#iam-policy-ex1
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/writing-iam-policies-grant-access-to-user-specific-folders-in-an-amazon-s3-bucket/
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Sid": "ListObjectsInBucket",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": ["s3:ListBucket"],
"Resource": ["arn:aws:s3:::bucket-name"]
},
{
"Sid": "AllObjectActions",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": "s3:*Object",
"Resource": ["arn:aws:s3:::bucket-name/*"]
}
]
}
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/IAM/latest/UserGuide/reference_policies_examples_s3_rw-bucket.html
I believe for the scenario you're describing AWS recommends Bucket Policies. AWS IAM should be used to secure AWS resources such as S3 itself, whereas Bucket policies can be used to secure S3 buckets and documents.
Check out this AWS blog post on the subject:
https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/security/iam-policies-and-bucket-policies-and-acls-oh-my-controlling-access-to-s3-resources/
I've never used AWS S3 before. We use it to automatically backup call recordings for clients. One of our clients for audit purposes needs access to their recordings.
I am using the client CyberDuck as a way to access the files.
I want to give them access to only their files.
Our file structure is as follows:
recordings/12345/COMPANYNAMEHERE/
I just learned that you build and do things based on scripts and policies. So I did some research and tried to build one but I get an access denied on listing.
Just curious if I am going about this correctly.
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": "s3:ListAllMyBuckets",
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::*"
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": "s3:*",
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::recordings/12345/COMPANYNAMEHERE",
"arn:aws:s3:::recordings/12345/COMPANYNAMEHERE/*"
]
}
]
}
You have only given them permission to ListAllMyBuckets, which means they can only list the names of your buckets, and can't do anything else.
If you have already created an IAM User for them, then giving them this policy would allow them to list and retrieve their files, but only from the given directory (or, more accurately, with the given prefix):
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Action": [
"s3:ListBucket"
],
"Effect": "Allow",
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::my-bucket"
],
"Condition": {
"StringLike": {
"s3:prefix": [
"recordings/123/*"
]
}
}
},
{
"Action": [
"s3:GetObject"
],
"Effect": "Allow",
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::my-bucket/recordings/123/*"
]
}
]
}
If you do this a lot with customers, then you can use IAM Policy Variables to create a rule that substitutes their username:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Action": [
"s3:ListBucket"
],
"Effect": "Allow",
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::my-bucket"
],
"Condition": {
"StringLike": {
"s3:prefix": [
"recordings/${aws:username}/*"
]
}
}
},
{
"Action": [
"s3:GetObject"
],
"Effect": "Allow",
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::my-bucket/recordings/${aws:username}/*"
]
}
]
}
I just setup my AWS S3.
My application works with full-admin-acces-keys, but because this can be risky, I want to setup an IAM-user with an IAM-group and allow only S3-stuff for him.
My bucket is located in eu-central-1 and its name is 'MYBCKET' in the following policy:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:ListBucket"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::MYBCKET"
]
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:PutObject",
"s3:GetObject",
"s3:DeleteObject"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::MYBCKET/*"
]
}
]
}
This is NOT working. If I give the user the following policy it's working:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:ListBucket"
],
"Resource": [
"*"
]
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:PutObject",
"s3:GetObject",
"s3:DeleteObject"
],
"Resource": [
"*"
]
}
]
}
It has to be something with the resource for sure.
Can somebody explain to me what the resource consists of so that i can understand and hopefully find errors?
Just to tell you: I am sure I spelled my buckets name right and also I tried different combinations in the resource arn:aws:s3:::MYBCKET/* AND arn:aws:s3:::MYBCKET and some other that did not work.
Thanks for your answers and time.
I don't see anything wrong with your policy, if the intent is the user should access the bucket programatically.
If the user also needs to be able to access the policy thru the console, you could try this instead which will allow the user to list the buckets:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:GetBucketLocation",
"s3:ListAllMyBuckets"
],
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::*"
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": ["s3:ListBucket"],
"Resource": ["arn:aws:s3::: MYBCKET"]
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:PutObject",
"s3:GetObject",
"s3:DeleteObject"
],
"Resource": ["arn:aws:s3::: MYBCKET/*"]
}
]
}