I'm making a 2D game with SFML in C++ and I have a problem with collision. I have a player and a map made of tiles. Thing that doesn't work is that my collision detection is not accurate. When I move player up and then down towards tiles, it ends up differently.
I am aware that source of this problem may be calculating player movement with use of delta time between frames - so it is not constant. But it smooths movement, so I don't know how to do it other way. I tried with constant speed valuses and to make collision fully accurate - speed had to be very low and I am not satisfied with that.
void Player::move() {
sf::Vector2f offsetVec;
if (sf::Keyboard::isKeyPressed(sf::Keyboard::W))
offsetVec += sf::Vector2f(0, -10);
if (sf::Keyboard::isKeyPressed(sf::Keyboard::S))
offsetVec += sf::Vector2f(0, 10);
if (sf::Keyboard::isKeyPressed(sf::Keyboard::A))
offsetVec += sf::Vector2f(-10, 0);
if (sf::Keyboard::isKeyPressed(sf::Keyboard::D))
offsetVec += sf::Vector2f(10, 0);
this->moveVec += offsetVec;
}
void Player::update(float dt, Map *map) {
sf::Vector2f offset = sf::Vector2f(this->moveVec.x * this->playerSpeed * dt,
this->moveVec.y * this->playerSpeed * dt);
sf::Sprite futurePos = this->sprite;
futurePos.move(offset);
if (map->isCollideable(this->pos.x, this->pos.y, futurePos.getGlobalBounds())) {
this->moveVec = sf::Vector2f(0, 0);
return;
}
this->sprite.move(offset);
this->pos += offset;
this->moveVec = sf::Vector2f(0, 0);
return;
}
In player position update I create future sprite object, which is object after applying movement, to get it's boundaries and pass it to collision checker. To collision checker I also pass player pos, because my map is stored in 2d array of tile pointers, so I check only these in player range.
bool Map::isCollideable(float x, float y, const sf::FloatRect &playerBounds) {
int startX = int(x) / Storage::tileSize;
int startY = int(y) / Storage::tileSize;
Tile *tile;
for (int i = startX - 10; i <= startX + 10; ++i) {
for (int j = startY - 10; j <= startY + 10; ++j) {
if (i >= 0 && j >= 0) {
tile = getTile(i, j);
if (tile != nullptr && playerBounds.intersects(tile->getGlobalBounds()))
return true;
}
}
}
return false;
}
Full project on Github
My solution
I have changed if statement in update function to while statement, which decreases my offset vector till no collision is present. I still have to make some adjustments, but general idea is:
void Player::update(float dt, Map *map) {
int repeats = 0;
sf::Vector2f offset = sf::Vector2f(this->moveVec.x * this->playerSpeed * dt,
this->moveVec.y * this->playerSpeed * dt);
sf::Sprite futurePos = this->sprite;
while (map->isCollideable(this->pos.x, this->pos.y, futurePos, offset)) {
offset = 0.7f * offset;
repeats++;
if (repeats > 5) {
this->moveVec = sf::Vector2f(0, 0);
return;
}
}
this->sprite.move(offset);
this->pos += offset;
this->moveVec = sf::Vector2f(0, 0);
return;
}
I also had to rework isCollideable method a little, so it accepts sf::Sprite and offset vector so it can calculate boundaries on it's own.
When the player collides with a tile, you should calculate the penetration, that is, the value of "how much the player went into the tile". When you have this value, nudge your player back that much.
This is just a thought but you could have some inaccuracies in your collision detection when you typecast the float x, and y to integers and then divide them. This could cause problems because some of the data in the float could be lost. If the float was 3.5 or 3.3 or 3.9 then it would become 3 which throws off your collision calculations.
Related
notes:
room1Collisions is a 1D array containing 1s and 0s representing collidable tiles.
+/- 0.1 is used so that the player can still move when against a collidable tile.
size is an SFML vector that holds the width and height of the player.
I understand that this code is not in great shape, but I'm trying to get collisions working to then refactor.
The issue (described below) occurs more frequently when the player collides diagonally
code:
void Player::Update(float dt) {
// 0 is a collidable tile
// change room1Collisions to a pointer of current level
if (sf::Keyboard::isKeyPressed(sf::Keyboard::A))
{
// a is top left and b is bottom left
sf::Vector2u a(position.x/tileSize.x, (position.y+size.y/2)/tileSize.y);
sf::Vector2u b(position.x/tileSize.x, (position.y+size.y-0.1)/tileSize.y);
int tileNumberA = room1Collisions[(a.x) + a.y*(tilemapBounds.x/tileSize.x)];
int tileNumberB = room1Collisions[(b.x) + b.y*(tilemapBounds.x/tileSize.x)];
if (tileNumberA != 0 && tileNumberB != 0 && position.x >= 0) {
position.x -= speed * dt;
//animation.resumeAnimation();
}
direction = LEFT;
//animation.resumeAnimation();
}
if (sf::Keyboard::isKeyPressed(sf::Keyboard::D))
{
sf::Vector2u a((position.x+size.x)/tileSize.x, (position.y+size.y/2)/tileSize.y);
sf::Vector2u b((position.x+size.x)/tileSize.x, (position.y+size.y-0.1)/tileSize.y);
int tileNumberA = room1Collisions[(a.x) + a.y*(tilemapBounds.x/tileSize.x)];
int tileNumberB = room1Collisions[(b.x) + b.y*(tilemapBounds.x/tileSize.x)];
if (tileNumberA != 0 && tileNumberB != 0 && position.x+size.x <= tilemapBounds.x) {
position.x += speed * dt;
//animation.resumeAnimation();
}
direction = RIGHT;
}
if (sf::Keyboard::isKeyPressed(sf::Keyboard::W))
{
sf::Vector2u a((position.x+0.1)/tileSize.x, (position.y+(size.y/3))/tileSize.y);
sf::Vector2u b((position.x+size.x-0.1)/tileSize.x, (position.y+(size.y/3))/tileSize.y);
int tileNumberA = room1Collisions[(a.x) + a.y*(tilemapBounds.x/tileSize.x)];
int tileNumberB = room1Collisions[(b.x) + b.y*(tilemapBounds.x/tileSize.x)];
if (tileNumberA != 0 && tileNumberB != 0 && position.y >= 0) {
position.y -= speed * dt;
//animation.resumeAnimation();
}
direction = UP;
//animation.resumeAnimation();
}
if (sf::Keyboard::isKeyPressed(sf::Keyboard::S))
{
sf::Vector2u a((position.x+0.1)/tileSize.x, (position.y+size.y)/tileSize.y);
sf::Vector2u b((position.x+size.x-0.1)/tileSize.x, (position.y+size.y)/tileSize.y);
int tileNumberA = room1Collisions[(a.x) + a.y*(tilemapBounds.x/tileSize.x)];
int tileNumberB = room1Collisions[(b.x) + b.y*(tilemapBounds.x/tileSize.x)];
if (tileNumberA != 0 && tileNumberB != 0 && position.y+size.y <= tilemapBounds.y) {
position.y += speed * dt;
//animation.resumeAnimation();
}
direction = DOWN;
}
//animation.setAnimation(direction);
//animation.Update(dt, 0.2f);
//animation.setPosition(position);
box.setPosition(position);
}
The problem is that when the game is run on slower computers, sometimes the player will skip (?) a collision check and it becomes stuck in a collidable tile, preventing it from moving orthogonally with respect to the collidable tile. On faster computers this issue is not present unless the player speed (currently 30) is increased significantly.
Below is an image showing the player inside a collidable tile. Please note that in this example the player is not able to move left/right since those directions are perpendicular to the collidable tile, but can still move up.
What you need is to regulate the FPS so that it is consistent for all computers.
Frame rate regulation example(This uses the SDL2 library for SDL_GetTicks and SDL_Delay but there are probably alternatives to that depending on your graphics library):
const int FPS = 60;
const int frameDelay = 1000/FPS;
Uint32 frameStart;
int frameTime;
//Main game loop
while (true)
{
//Gets the amount of milliseconds elapsed since the program was first run
frameStart = SDL_GetTicks();
//YOUR MAIN GAME LOOP HERE
//Gets the amount of milliseconds that it took to run the game loop
frameTime = SDL_GetTicks() - frameStart;
//Checks if the game loop was run faster than the max frame time
if(frameDelay > frameTime)
{
//Delays the game loop so that it takes that the frame time always is the same
SDL_Delay(frameDelay - frameTime);
}
}
(Keep in mind that this is just an example there are lots of ways to regulate the FPS)
After implementing FPS regulation you might need to tweak the speed and collision sensitivity a little but once you have it it should be consistent on ALL computers
I'm working on a small "game" like project as a practice, and I've managed to get my framerate down to not even 3 FPS. While the only thing that is being drawn is screen filling tiles and a minimap.
Now I've found that the problem is with the minimap, without it caps at 60 FPS. But unfortunately I'm not experienced enough to find out what the real problem is with it...
My draw function:
void StateIngame::draw()
{
m_gui.removeAllWidgets();
m_window.setView(m_view);
// Frame counter
float ct = m_clock.restart().asSeconds();
float fps = 1.f / ct;
m_time = ct;
char c[10];
sprintf(c, "%f", fps);
std::string fpsStr(c);
sf::String str(fpsStr);
auto fpsText = tgui::Label::create();
fpsText->setText(str);
fpsText->setTextSize(16);
fpsText->setPosition(15, 15);
m_gui.add(fpsText);
//////////////
// Draw map //
//////////////
int camOffsetX, camOffsetY;
int tileSize = m_map.getTileSize();
Tile tile;
sf::IntRect bounds = m_camera.getTileBounds(tileSize);
camOffsetX = m_camera.getTileOffset(tileSize).x;
camOffsetY = m_camera.getTileOffset(tileSize).y;
// Loop and draw each tile
// x and y = counters, tileX and tileY is the coordinates of the tile being drawn
for (int y = 0, tileY = bounds.top; y < bounds.height; y++, tileY++)
{
for (int x = 0, tileX = bounds.left; x < bounds.width; x++, tileX++)
{
try {
// Normal view
m_window.setView(m_view);
tile = m_map.getTile(tileX, tileY);
tile.render((x * tileSize) - camOffsetX, (y * tileSize) - camOffsetY, &m_window);
} catch (const std::out_of_range& oor)
{}
}
}
bounds = sf::IntRect(bounds.left - (bounds.width * 2), bounds.top - (bounds.height * 2), bounds.width * 4, bounds.height * 4);
for (int y = 0, tileY = bounds.top; y < bounds.height; y++, tileY++)
{
for (int x = 0, tileX = bounds.left; x < bounds.width; x++, tileX++)
{
try {
// Mini map
m_window.setView(m_minimap);
tile = m_map.getTile(tileX, tileY);
sf::RectangleShape miniTile(sf::Vector2f(4, 4));
miniTile.setFillColor(tile.m_color);
miniTile.setPosition((x * (tileSize / 4)), (y * (tileSize / 4)));
m_window.draw(miniTile);
} catch (const std::out_of_range& oor)
{}
}
}
// Gui
m_window.setView(m_view);
m_gui.draw();
}
The Tile class has a variable of type sf::Color which is set during map generating. This color is then used to draw the minimap instead of the 16x16 texture that is used for the map itself.
So when I leave out the minimap drawing, and only draw the map itself, it's more fluid than I could wish for...
Any help is appreciated!
You are generating the view completly new for every frame. Do this once on startup should be enought.
I would like to receive some insight as to how I can make an AI, that can walk smoothly around the map(between window size). Like, if the AI reached that defined spot, then it will walk to another spot.
Here is what I have tried,
First, I get a random float number from 0.0f to 608.0f because my window size is 640,640.
void AIntelligence::GenRandom()
{
MapX = static_cast <float> (rand()) / (static_cast <float> (RAND_MAX / 608.0f));
MapY = MapX;
}
Then,I pass in the current position of my sprite to this function
void AIntelligence::RandomMove(float PosX, float PosY)
{
this->PosX = PosX;
this->PosY = PosY;
if (PosX == MapX || PosY == MapY) //If the current is the same as the generated random, then
{ generate it again.
GenRandom();
}
else
{
if (PosX < MapX || PosY < MapY) //If not then I see if the position less than the
{ generated and translate it.
this->PosX += 8.0f;
this->PosY += 8.0f;
}
else if (PosX > MapX || PosY > MapY)
{
this->PosX -= 8.0f;
this->PosY -= 8.0f;
}
else
this->PosX += 0.0f;
this->PosY += 0.0f;
}
}
In my message loop, here is how I call the method
while (GetMessage(&Msg, NULL, 0, 0))
{
TranslateMessage(&Msg);
DispatchMessage(&Msg);
Inputs->GetInput(); //Not related
Moving->RandomMove(PosX,PosY);
D3DXVECTOR2 SpritePos = D3DXVECTOR2(Moving->getPosX(), Moving->getPosY());
PosX = Moving->getPosX();
PosY = Moving->getPosY();
Graphic->ClearBegin(); //Begin the direct3d scene
Sprite->Begin(D3DXSPRITE_ALPHABLEND);
float Radian = D3DXToRadian(Rotation);
D3DXMatrixTransformation2D(&Mat, NULL, 0.0f, &SpriteScaling, &SpriteCenter, Radian, &SpritePos); // This is where the transformation is set.
Sprite->SetTransform(&Mat);
Sprite->Draw(Texture, NULL, NULL, NULL, D3DCOLOR_XRGB(255, 255, 255));
Sprite->End();
Graphic->EndPresent();
}
The sprite did move but only moving downward right. And once it reached the same certain spot, it will only stay and vibrate there.... Sorry if my explanation is not clear enough or did not provide enough information needed.
Here are a few things that should help you:
1) In RandomMove, your last else doesn't have braces, since you're performing two operations, you should wrap both of them in braces like you did elsewhere
2) float comparison is tricky. It's very unlikely that your PosX == MapX || PosY == MapY will ever trigger. A better idea would be to calculate the distance between your current position and the random position and then execute the code if the distance is less than an epsilon (small value). Here is a pretty detailed post about float comparison (link)
3) GenRandom always assigns the same value to MapX and MapY. You should try to execute two random calls instead (and probably use a const float to define your max value or make it configurable instead of hardcoding that width
4) Your RandomMove method is a bit misleading. It's not performing random movement, it's going towards MapX and MapY. You should separate the calls to GenRandom from your movement code.
5) Your movement code is meant to work only in diagonals since you always increment or decrement your position in both axes at the same time, in the same direction.
Here is a suggestion (not tested) of what your code could look like:
void AIntelligence::GenRandom(const float in_MaxValueX, const float in_MaxValueY)
{
MapX = in_MaxValueX * (float)rand() / (float)RAND_MAX;
MapY = in_MaxValueY * (float)rand() / (float)RAND_MAX;
}
bool AIntelligence::MoveTowards(const float in_PosX, const float in_PosY)
{
// how far are we from our objective
const float distX = in_PosX - PosX; // by calculating the distance from the target position, it makes our speed calculations easier later on
const float distY = in_PosY - PosY;
// tolerance in pixels
const float tolerance = 1.0f;
const float absDistX = abs(distX);
const float absDistY = abs(distY);
if(absDistX <= tolerance && absDistY <= tolerance) // destination reached
return true;
else
{
// here, normally, you would use a desired speed AND a delta time (your message loop is not really good for that though) to compute how much movement you can execute in a given frame
const float movement = min(10.f, absDistX + absDistY); // by using min, we're making sure not to overshoot our destination
// compute how this movement is spread on each axis
const float movementX = movement * distX / (absDistX + absDistY);
const float movementY = movement * distY / (absDistX + absDistY);
PosX += movementX;
PosY += movementY;
}
return false;
}
// in your loop
if(Moving->MoveTowards(MapX, MapY))
{
Moving->GenRandom(608.f, 608.f); // you should definitely not hardcode these values
}
Feel free to comment if there's parts you don't quite understand
I have some sprites (2d-boxes) of the same type stored in a formation vector. Now i want to move them around with the mouse, that works well. But the code should prevent the player to move one sprite onto another already existing sprite of the vector.
My solution is quite ugly and does not work. Whenever a sprite is moved around, i test with the spriteoverlap function if the sprite is moved onto another. The Problem:
Whenever the sprite is directly close to the it stops moving, which is what wanted.
But i can't move it anymore afterwards because the overlapfunction sets the bool always to false.
while (App.pollEvent(Event))
{
//Moving the playerbuttons on the formation screen
for (size_t k = 0; k < formation.size(); k++)
{
bool drag_onto_otherplayer = false;
if (isMouseOver(formation[k], App) == true)
{
//The next loop tests if the sprite being moved with the mouse overlaps with another sprite from the formation vector
for (size_t j = 0; j < formation.size(); j++)
{
if (spriteOverlap(formation[j], formation[k], App) == true && k!=j)
{
std::cout << drag_onto_otherplayer << std::endl;
drag_onto_otherplayer = true;
std::cout << drag_onto_otherplayer <<std::endl;
}
if (drag_onto_otherplayer == false)
//(If the sprite does not overlap getting the new sprite position from the mouseposition)
{
Mouseposition =sf::Vector2f(sf::Mouse::getPosition(App));
Mouseposition.x = Mouseposition.x - formation[k].getLocalBounds().width / 2;
Mouseposition.y = Mouseposition.y - formation[k].getLocalBounds().height / 2;
formation[k].setPosition(sf::Vector2f(Mouseposition));
Formation_playernames.clear();
Formation_playerinformation.clear();
Formation_Playernames(Font, Formation_playernames, formation, playerlist);
Formation_Playerinformation(Font, Formation_playerinformation, formation, playerlist);
}
So the problem are my loops and the bool test i guess, but i don't know how to solve it.
Any ideas ?
Here is my spriteoverlap function:
bool spriteOverlap(sf::Sprite &sprite1, sf::Sprite &sprite2, sf::RenderWindow &App)
{
float x_min1 = sprite1.getPosition().x;
float x_max1 = sprite1.getPosition().x + sprite1.getLocalBounds().width;
float y_min1 = sprite1.getPosition().y;
float y_max1 = sprite1.getPosition().y + sprite1.getLocalBounds().height;
float x_min2 = sprite2.getPosition().x;
float x_max2 = sprite2.getPosition().x + sprite2.getLocalBounds().width;
float y_min2 = sprite2.getPosition().y;
float y_max2 = sprite2.getPosition().y + sprite2.getLocalBounds().height;
if (x_min1 > x_max2 | x_max1 < x_min2 | y_min1 > y_max2 | y_max1 < y_max2)
return false;
else
return true;
};
And my isMouseover function:
bool isMouseOver(sf::Sprite &sprite, sf::RenderWindow &App)
{
float pos_x = sprite.getPosition().x;
float pos_y = sprite.getPosition().y;
if (sf::Mouse::getPosition(App).x > pos_x && sf::Mouse::getPosition(App).x < pos_x+sprite.getLocalBounds().width &&
sf::Mouse::getPosition(App).y >pos_y && sf::Mouse::getPosition(App).y < pos_y + sprite.getLocalBounds().height)
{
return true;
}
else
return false;
};
Check for collision is already included somewhat in sfml:
bool spriteOverlap(sf::Sprite& sprite1, sf::Sprite& sprite2) // possibly const, dunno
{
return sprite1.getGlobalBounds().intersects(sprite2.getGlobalBounds());
}
Generally try this: Only move, if the position of the next frame is valid. This prevents objects being stuck, because you already moved them into an invalid position, thus preventing any further movement
edit:
//untested
bool spritesWillOverlap(sf::Sprite& sprite1, sf::Sprite& sprite2, sf::Vector2f vel)
{
top1 = sprite1.getGobalBounds().top + vel.y;
left1 = sprite1.getGlobalBounds().left + vel.x;
right1 = left1 + sprite1.getGlobalBounds().width;
bottom1 = top1 + sprite1.getGlobalBounds().height;
top2 = sprite2.getGobalBounds().top + vel.y;
left2 = sprite2.getGlobalBounds().left + vel.x;
right2 = left2 + sprite1.getGlobalBounds().width;
bottom2 = top2 + sprite1.getGlobalBounds().height;
sf::FloatRect rect1(top1, left1, right1 - left1, bottom1 - top1);
sf::FloatRect rect2(top2, left2, right2 - left2, bottom2 - top2);
return rect1.intersects(rect2);
}
vel: velocity -> an object is moved by this 2D vector every frame
If the concept of "frames" is unfamiliar, read up on framerates/fixed framerate and/or timestep. here's an example article to get started: Fix Your Timestep!
I want to implement the algorithm for a 2D water surface described here and here.
But instead of using two int arrays and calculating on the CPU I would like to use SFML's sf::RenderTexture's (FBO's basically) and a GLSL shader to run everything on the GPU. I want to use SFML, because it's so simple and I have worked with it before, so I know my way around it a little.
I've made some good progress so far. I was able to set up 3 sf::RenderTextures and ping-pong between them correctly (because other than int array you can't read and write to the same sf::RenderTexture at the same time). I was also able to adapt the algorithm for the height field creation form being in the range -32.767 to 32.767 to the range 0 to 1 (or to be more precise -0.5 to 0.5 for the calculation). Also adding new ripples works to some extend. So up to this point you can actually see a little of waves going on.
Here comes my problem now: The waves disappear really, really fast and I don't even apply any damping yet. According to the algorithm the ripples are not stopping if there is no damping applied. It's even the other way around. If I apply "amplification" the waves look close to what you would expect them to look like (but they still disappear without any damping applied to them). My first thought was that this is, because I use float's in range 0 - 1 instead of integers, but I only see this being a problem if multiplication is used, but I only use addition and subtraction.
Here is my SFML C++ code :
#include <SFML/Graphics.hpp>
#include <iostream>
int main()
{
sf::RenderWindow window(sf::VideoMode(1000, 1000), "SFML works!");
window.setFramerateLimit(12);
sf::RenderTexture buffers[3];
buffers[0].create(500, 500);
buffers[1].create(500, 500);
buffers[2].create(500, 500);
sf::RenderTexture* firstBuffer = buffers;
sf::RenderTexture* secondBuffer = &buffers[1];
sf::RenderTexture* finalBuffer = &buffers[2];
firstBuffer->clear(sf::Color(128, 128, 128));
secondBuffer->clear(sf::Color(128, 128, 128));
finalBuffer->clear(sf::Color(128, 128, 128));
sf::Shader waterHeightmapShader;
waterHeightmapShader.loadFromFile("waterHeightmapShader.glsl", sf::Shader::Fragment);
sf::Sprite spritefirst;
spritefirst.setPosition(0, 0);
spritefirst.setTexture(firstBuffer->getTexture());
sf::Sprite spritesecond;
spritesecond.setPosition(500, 0);
spritesecond.setTexture(secondBuffer->getTexture());
sf::Sprite spritefinal;
spritefinal.setPosition(0, 500);
spritefinal.setTexture(finalBuffer->getTexture());
while (window.isOpen())
{
sf::Event event;
while (window.pollEvent(event))
{
if(event.type == sf::Event::Closed)
window.close();
if(event.type == sf::Event::KeyReleased && event.key.code == sf::Keyboard::Escape)
window.close();
}
waterHeightmapShader.setParameter("mousePosition", sf::Vector2f(-1.f, -1.f));
// if mouse button is pressed add new ripples
if(sf::Mouse::isButtonPressed(sf::Mouse::Left))
{
sf::Vector2i mousePosition = sf::Mouse::getPosition(window);
if(mousePosition.x < 500 && mousePosition.y < 500)
{
sf::Vector2f mouse(mousePosition);
mouse.x /= 500.f;
mouse.y /= 500.f;
mouse.y = 1 - mouse.y;
std::cout << mouse.x << " " << mouse.y << std::endl;
waterHeightmapShader.setParameter("mousePosition", mouse);
}
}
waterHeightmapShader.setParameter("textureTwoFramesAgo", firstBuffer->getTexture());
waterHeightmapShader.setParameter("textureOneFrameAgo", secondBuffer->getTexture());
// create the heightmap
secondBuffer->display();
finalBuffer->clear(sf::Color(128, 128, 128));
finalBuffer->draw(sf::Sprite(secondBuffer->getTexture()), &waterHeightmapShader);
finalBuffer->display();
spritefirst.setTexture(firstBuffer->getTexture());
spritesecond.setTexture(secondBuffer->getTexture());
spritefinal.setTexture(finalBuffer->getTexture());
window.clear();
window.draw(spritefirst);
window.draw(spritesecond);
window.draw(spritefinal);
window.display();
// swap the buffers around, first becomes second, second becomes third and third becomes first
sf::RenderTexture* swapper = firstBuffer;
firstBuffer = secondBuffer;
secondBuffer = finalBuffer;
finalBuffer = swapper;
}
return 0;
}
And here is my GLSL shader code :
uniform sampler2D textureTwoFramesAgo;
uniform sampler2D textureOneFrameAgo;
uniform vec2 mousePosition;
const float textureSize = 500.0;
const float pixelSize = 1.0 / textureSize;
void main()
{
// pixels position
vec2 position = gl_TexCoord[0].st;
vec4 finalColor = ((texture2D(textureOneFrameAgo, vec2(position.x - pixelSize, position.y)) +
texture2D(textureOneFrameAgo, vec2(position.x + pixelSize, position.y)) +
texture2D(textureOneFrameAgo, vec2(position.x, position.y + pixelSize)) +
texture2D(textureOneFrameAgo, vec2(position.x, position.y - pixelSize)) - 2.0) / 2) -
(texture2D(textureTwoFramesAgo, position) - 0.5);
// damping
// finalColor.rgb *= 1.9; // <---- uncomment this for the "amplifiction" ie. to see the waves better
finalColor.rgb += 0.5;
// add new ripples
if(mousePosition.x > 0.0)
{
if(distance(position, mousePosition) < pixelSize * 5)
{
finalColor = vec4(0.9, 0.9, 0.9, 1.0);
}
}
gl_FragColor = finalColor;
}
Please remember that this is all just about the height field creation. There is no shading of the water yet.
Do you know why the waves disappear by them self without damping?
If I am reading the code correctly you sample the previous frame for the texture's colors/height and use four neighboring pixels/texels to determine the color/height of the current pixel.
As you are calculating (scaling) these neighbors you might run into missing the texel that contains the color/height you are looking for. It might not be the heighest texel, just one next to it a little bit lower causing the unexpected damping.
This is where you do not just use addition and subtraction:
const float pixelSize = 1.0 / textureSize;
By using this value you could just miss the texel you are looking for.
EDIT
Also: you are averaging the samples so the result will always be less than the maximum value of the samples. So instead of averaging you could select the maximum value. That might give weird results but also extra insight.
Here are some "Processing" codes which implements the same algorithm you've posted above, and its damping is correct, I hope you can get some points from it :
// codes begin
int Width = 800;
int Height = 600;
int FullSize = 0;
//int Spacing = 10;
int[] source, dest;
PImage bg;
void setup()
{
// if you want to run these codes by "Processing"
// please make a picture named "HelloWorld.png"
bg = loadImage("HelloWorld.png");
Width = bg.width;
Height = bg.height;
FullSize = Width * Height;
size(Width, Height);
source = new int[FullSize];
dest = new int[FullSize];
for (int i=0; i< FullSize; i++)
source[i] = dest[i] = 0;
}
void draw()
{
for (int i=Width; i< FullSize-Width; i++)
{
// check for bounds
int xi = i % Width;
if ((xi==0) || (xi==Width-1)) continue;
dest[i] = (
((source[i-1]+
source[i+1]+
source[i-Width]+
source[i+Width]) >>1) ) -dest[i];
int dampFactor = 1000;
dest[i] -= (dest[i] >> dampFactor); // Damping - Quick divde by 32 (5 bits)
}
//image(bg, 0, 0);
loadPixels();
for (int i=Width; i< FullSize-Width; i++)
{
// check for bounds
int xi = i % Width;
if ((xi==0) || (xi==Width-1)) continue;
int xoffset = dest[i-1] - dest[i+1];
int yoffset = dest[i-Width] - dest[i+Width];
int offset = i+xoffset+yoffset*Width;
if (offset>0 && offset<FullSize)
{
// TODO: make better map
pixels[i] = bg.pixels[offset];
}
}
//bg.updatePixels();
updatePixels();
//swap
int[] temp = source;
source = dest;
dest = temp;
}
void mouseDragged()
{
if (mouseX > 0 && mouseX < Width && mouseY > 0 && mouseY < Height)
source[mouseY*Width+mouseX] = (int)random(50, 100);
}
void mousePressed()
{
// TODO: make a area pulse value, like a radius circle
if (mouseX > 0 && mouseX < Width && mouseY > 0 && mouseY < Height)
source[mouseY*Width+mouseX] = (int)random(50, 100);
}
// codes end