Below is a very old function that has worked on numerous computers, never seen a bug, but now this laptop is experiencing problems. According to the tester, "Seems to be fine until I reboot and don’t have another monitor plugged in." It seems Windows 10 scales dialog content in some situations making the actual size differ from the designed size.
void ResizeComponent::SetWidth( int width /*= DEF_WIDTH*/ )
{
CRect rect;
this->GetWindowRect(rect);
this->SetWindowPos(NULL, 0,0, width, rect.Height(), /*resize only*/SWP_NOZORDER|SWP_NOMOVE);
}
Okay, usage info:
const static int WIDTH_PANEL4 = 585;
SetWidth(WIDTH_PANEL4);
According to a screenshot from that laptop, in one example the window is 581 wide, and when I run it on a development computer, it's also 581 wide. BUT: The laptop dialog is scaled larger, and so 581 is no longer the correct size.
I don't know how to deal correctly with this situation.
Because dialogs are laid out in "dialog units", I do not use hard pixel counts in my source. I base my dynamic size/position calculations based on the rendered size of the dialog and/or its controls. If your customer changes the system text size (Control Panel/Display Settings of 100% 125% 150% etc.), then you will definitely see issues if you code "hard 100% rendering" pixel values.
I am guessing that your laptop may be doing this type of "translation" when rendering with monitors that do not match the "native resolution" of the built-in laptop monitor.
Here is an example where I reposition OK/Cancel buttons based on the rendered positions (i.e. after chainback call to CDialog::OnInitDialog)
BOOL CSetupDlg::OnInitDialog()
{
CDialog::OnInitDialog();
if (m_bShowCancel)
{
// show/enable Cancel button and re-position the OK/CANCEL buttons (default is OK button is centered and cancel is hidden/disabled)
CWnd *pWndOK = GetDlgItem(IDOK);
CWnd *pWndCancel = GetDlgItem(IDCANCEL);
if (pWndOK->GetSafeHwnd() && pWndCancel->GetSafeHwnd())
{
CRect rOKOriginal;
pWndOK->GetWindowRect(&rOKOriginal);
this->ScreenToClient(rOKOriginal);
// move Cancel button to the immediate right of the centered OK button
pWndCancel->SetWindowPos(NULL, rOKOriginal.right, rOKOriginal.top, 0, 0, SWP_NOACTIVATE | SWP_NOSIZE | SWP_NOZORDER | SWP_SHOWWINDOW);
pWndCancel->EnableWindow(true);
// pWndCancel->ShowWindow(SW_SHOW);
// move OK button to the immediate left of its original/centered position
pWndOK->SetWindowPos(NULL, rOKOriginal.left - rOKOriginal.Width(), rOKOriginal.top, 0, 0, SWP_NOACTIVATE | SWP_NOSIZE | SWP_NOZORDER);
}
}
return TRUE; // return TRUE unless you set the focus to a control
// EXCEPTION: OCX Property Pages should return FALSE
}
There are several possibilities:
The dialog is specified in "dialog units" for a font that's different than the font the code is actually using.
The border style changes between Windows versions weren't accounted for in the design of the dialog, and thus you're losing a few pixels.
The screen is high-DPI and the program isn't properly accounting for high-DPI, or it is but it hasn't told the OS that it knows how to (via manifest or SetProcessDPIAware or SetProcessDPIAwareness).
There isn't enough information in the question to know for sure the exact problem. I suspect #3, based on the fact that the behavior changes depending upon whether an external monitor is connected and on the fact that Windows 10 introduced more nuanced concepts of DPI awareness, like PROCESS_PER_MONITOR_DPI_AWARE.
I'm writing a Win7 desktop app and want to have it seamlessly transition from windowed to windowed-fullscreen (and vice-versa), and have mostly accomplished this by calling SetWindowLongPtr to update its style immediately followed by MoveWindow to update its size and position. The problem is that the window flashes for one frame to show its style updated, but the new size and position are not shown. The next frame everything looks correct but I'm trying to avoid this single-frame artifact.
I've tried reversing the order in which I call the APIs but it just changes what the artifact looks like. I've also tried hiding the window, calling the APIs, and then showing the window, but this just causes the window to disappear for the one frame.
I know that one option is to create a new window with the desired properties then destroy the old one, but I wanted to find a less expensive alternative.
So is there any way to call these APIs and have them be visually reflected atomically? As a bonus, it'd be nice to also have the multiple resulting WM_SIZE messages coalesced into a single event, but I can manage that myself in the message handler.
Doing this sort of thing reliably is difficult in Windows, particularly since Vista as the DWM can complicate things. It's often a matter of trial and error until you find a solution that works for you.
SetWindowPos has an SWP_NOREDRAW flag that prevents the window from being redrawn in response to the call. So you could try changing the position first, then updating the styles, and finally a third call to redraw the window in its new location. For example,
SetWindowPos(hWnd, 0, x, y, w, h, SWP_NOREDRAW | SWP_NOZORDER);
SetWindowLongPtr(hWnd, GWL_STYLE, dwNewStyles);
RedrawWindow(hWnd, 0, 0, RDW_INVALIDATE | RDW_FRAME);
MSDN says:
Certain window data is cached, so changes you make using
SetWindowLongPtr will not take effect until you call the SetWindowPos
function.
So this should work. Perhaps try using SetWindowPos instead of MoveWindow.
Are you doing anything interesting in your window proc when you get the events that are caused by these calls? In particular, are you "fixing" the size or anything like that?
Check out WM_SETREDRAW; use it to disable redraw, change the window styles, and then call RedrawWindow(hWnd, NULL, NULL, RDW_ERASE | RDW_FRAME | RDW_INVALIDATE | RDW_ALLCHILDREN) to display them atomically.
What do you mean by "windowed-fullscreen"? Is it the same as maximized?
If so, ShowWindow(hwnd, SW_MAXIMIZE) ?
In Windows XP and above, given a window handle (HWND), how can I tell if the window position and size leaves the window irretrievably off screen? For example, if the title bar is available to the cursor, then the window can be dragged back on screen. I need to discover if the window is in fact visible or at least available to the user. I guess I also need to know how to detect and respond to resolution changes and how to deal with multiple monitors. This seems like a fairly big deal. I'm using C++ and the regular SDK, so please limit your answers to that platform rather than invoking C# or similar.
Windows makes it relatively simple to determine the size of a user's working area on the primary monitor (i.e., the area of the screen not obscured by the taskbar). Call the SystemParametersInfo function and specify the SPI_GETWORKAREA flag for the first parameter (uiAction). The pvParam parameter should point to a RECT structure that will receive the coordinates of the working area in virtual screen coordinates.
Once you've got the coordinates that describe the working area, it's a simple matter of comparing those to the current position of your application's window to determine if it lies within those bounds.
The desire to support multiple monitors makes things slightly more complicated. The documentation for SystemParametersInfo suggests that you need to call the GetMonitorInfo function instead to get the working area of a monitor other than the primary. It fills in a structure called MONITORINFOEX that contains the member rcWork that defines the working area of that monitor, again expressed in virtual screen coordinates as a RECT structure.
To do this right, you'll need to enumerate all of the monitors a user has connected to the system and retrieve the working area of each using GetMonitorInfo.
There are a few samples of this to be found around the Internet:
MSDN has some sample code for Positioning Objects on a Multiple Display Setup.
If you're using MFC, here's what looks to be an excellent example of multiple monitor support.
Even if you're not using MFC, that article refers the following link which looks be a real gem as far as explaining how multiple monitor supports works in Windows, even if it's a little bit old school. Like it or not, very little of this has changed in later versions of Windows.
Finally, you mentioned wanting to detect resolution changes. This is much simpler than you probably imagined. As you know if you've done any Windows programming, the primary way that the operating system communicates with your application is by sending messages to your WindowProc function.
In this case, you'll want to watch for the WM_DISPLAYCHANGE message, which is sent to all windows when the display resolution has changed. The wParam contains the new image depth in bits per pixel; the low-order word of the lParam specifies the horizontal resolution and the high-order word of the lParam specifies the vertical resolution of the screen.
You can use MonitorFromRect or MonitorFromPoint to check if window's top left point or bottom right point isn't contained within any display monitor (off screen).
POINT p;
p.x = x;
p.y = y;
HMONITOR hMon = MonitorFromPoint(p, MONITOR_DEFAULTTONULL);
if (hMon == NULL) {
// point is off screen
}
Visibility check is really easy.
RECT rtDesktop, rtView;
GetWindowRect( GetDesktopWindow(), &rtDesktop );
GetWindowRect( m_hWnd, &rtView );
HRGN rgn = CreateRectRgn( rtDesktop.left, rtDesktop.top, rtDesktop.right, rtDesktop.bottom );
BOOL viewIsVisible = RectInRegion( rgn, &rtView );
DeleteObject(rgn);
You don't have to use RectInRegion, I used for shorten code.
Display, resolution change monitoring is also easy if you handle WM_SETTINGCHANGE message.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms725497(v=vs.85).aspx
UPDATE
As #Cody Gray noted, I think WM_DISPLAYCHANGE is more appropriate than WM_SETTINGCHANGE. But MFC 9.0 library make use of WM_SETTINGCHANGE.
When the user grabs a corner of a resizable window, and then moves it, windows first moves the contents of the window around, then issues a WM_SIZE to the window being resized.
Thus, in a dialog where I want to control the movement of various child controls, and I want to eliminate flickering, the user first sees what windows OS thinks the window will look like (because, AFAICT, the OS uses a bitblt approach to moving things around inside the window before sending the WM_SIZE) - and only then does my dialog get to handle moving its child controls around, or resize them, etc., after which it must force things to repaint, which now causes flicker (at the very least).
My main question is: Is there a way to force windows NOT to do this stupid bitblt thing? Its definitely going to be wrong in the case of a window with controls that move as the window is resized, or that resize themselves as their parent is resized. Either way, having the OS do a pre-paint just screws the works.
I thought for a time that it might be related to CS_HREDRAW and CSVREDRAW class flags. However, the reality is that I don't want the OS to ask me to erase the window - I just want to do the repainting myself without the OS first changing the contents of my window (i.e. I want the display to be what it was before the user started resizing - without any bitblit'ing from the OS). And I don't want the OS to tell every control that it needs to be redrawn either (unless it happened to be one that was in fact obscured or revealed by the resize.
What I really want:
To move & resize child controls before anything gets updated onscreen.
Draw all of the moved or resized child controls completely so that they appear without artifacts at their new size & location.
Draw the spaces inbetween the child controls without impacting the child controls themselves.
NOTE: Steps 2 and 3 could be reversed.
The above three things appear to happen correctly when I use DeferSetWindowPos() in combination with the dialog resource marked as WS_CLIPCHILDREN.
I'd get an additional small benefit if I could do the above to a memory DC, and then only do a single bitblt at the end of the WM_SIZE handler.
I have played with this for a while now, and I cannot escape two things:
I still am unable to suppress Windows from doing a 'predictive bitblt'. Answer: See below for a solution that overrides WM_NCCALCSIZE to disable this behavior.
I cannot see how one can build a dialog where its child controls draw to a double buffer. Answer: See John's answer (marked as answer) below for how to ask Windows OS to double buffer your dialog (note: this disallows any GetDC() in-between paint operations, according to the docs).
My Final Solution (Thank you everyone who contributed, esp. John K.):
After much sweat and tears, I have found that the following technique works flawlessly, both in Aero and in XP or with Aero disabled. Flicking is non-existent(1).
Hook the dialog proc.
Override WM_NCCALCSIZE to force Windows to validate the entire client area, and not bitblt anything.
Override WM_SIZE to do all of your moves & resizes using BeginDeferWindowPos/DeferWindowPos/EndDeferWindowPos for all visible windows.
Ensure that the dialog window has the WS_CLIPCHILDREN style.
Do NOT use CS_HREDRAW|CS_VREDRAW (dialogs don't, so generally not an issue).
The layout code is up to you - its easy enough to find examples on CodeGuru or CodeProject of layout managers, or to roll your own.
Here are some code excerpts that should get you most of the way:
LRESULT ResizeManager::WinProc(HWND hwnd, UINT msg, WPARAM wparam, LPARAM lparam)
{
switch (msg)
{
case WM_ENTERSIZEMOVE:
m_bResizeOrMove = true;
break;
case WM_NCCALCSIZE:
// The WM_NCCALCSIZE idea was given to me by John Knoeller:
// see: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2165759/how-do-i-force-windows-not-to-redraw-anything-in-my-dialog-when-the-user-is-resiz
//
// The default implementation is to simply return zero (0).
//
// The MSDN docs indicate that this causes Windows to automatically move all of the child controls to follow the client's origin
// and experience shows that it bitblts the window's contents before we get a WM_SIZE.
// Hence, our child controls have been moved, everything has been painted at its new position, then we get a WM_SIZE.
//
// Instead, we calculate the correct client rect for our new size or position, and simply tell windows to preserve this (don't repaint it)
// and then we execute a new layout of our child controls during the WM_SIZE handler, using DeferWindowPos to ensure that everything
// is moved, sized, and drawn in one go, minimizing any potential flicker (it has to be drawn once, over the top at its new layout, at a minimum).
//
// It is important to note that we must move all controls. We short-circuit the normal Windows logic that moves our child controls for us.
//
// Other notes:
// Simply zeroing out the source and destination client rectangles (rgrc[1] and rgrc[2]) simply causes Windows
// to invalidate the entire client area, exacerbating the flicker problem.
//
// If we return anything but zero (0), we absolutely must have set up rgrc[0] to be the correct client rect for the new size / location
// otherwise Windows sees our client rect as being equal to our proposed window rect, and from that point forward we're missing our non-client frame
// only override this if we're handling a resize or move (I am currently unaware of how to distinguish between them)
// though it may be adequate to test for wparam != 0, as we are
if (bool bCalcValidRects = wparam && m_bResizeOrMove)
{
NCCALCSIZE_PARAMS * nccs_params = (NCCALCSIZE_PARAMS *)lparam;
// ask the base implementation to compute the client coordinates from the window coordinates (destination rect)
m_ResizeHook.BaseProc(hwnd, msg, FALSE, (LPARAM)&nccs_params->rgrc[0]);
// make the source & target the same (don't bitblt anything)
// NOTE: we need the target to be the entire new client rectangle, because we want windows to perceive it as being valid (not in need of painting)
nccs_params->rgrc[1] = nccs_params->rgrc[2];
// we need to ensure that we tell windows to preserve the client area we specified
// if I read the docs correctly, then no bitblt should occur (at the very least, its a benign bitblt since it is from/to the same place)
return WVR_ALIGNLEFT|WVR_ALIGNTOP;
}
break;
case WM_SIZE:
ASSERT(m_bResizeOrMove);
Resize(hwnd, LOWORD(lparam), HIWORD(lparam));
break;
case WM_EXITSIZEMOVE:
m_bResizeOrMove = false;
break;
}
return m_ResizeHook.BaseProc(hwnd, msg, wparam, lparam);
}
The resizing is really done by the Resize() member, like so:
// execute the resizing of all controls
void ResizeManager::Resize(HWND hwnd, long cx, long cy)
{
// defer the moves & resizes for all visible controls
HDWP hdwp = BeginDeferWindowPos(m_resizables.size());
ASSERT(hdwp);
// reposition everything without doing any drawing!
for (ResizeAgentVector::const_iterator it = m_resizables.begin(), end = m_resizables.end(); it != end; ++it)
VERIFY(hdwp == it->Reposition(hdwp, cx, cy));
// now, do all of the moves & resizes at once
VERIFY(EndDeferWindowPos(hdwp));
}
And perhaps the final tricky bit can be seen in the ResizeAgent's Reposition() handler:
HDWP ResizeManager::ResizeAgent::Reposition(HDWP hdwp, long cx, long cy) const
{
// can't very well move things that no longer exist
if (!IsWindow(hwndControl))
return hdwp;
// calculate our new rect
const long left = IsFloatLeft() ? cx - offset.left : offset.left;
const long right = IsFloatRight() ? cx - offset.right : offset.right;
const long top = IsFloatTop() ? cy - offset.top : offset.top;
const long bottom = IsFloatBottom() ? cy - offset.bottom : offset.bottom;
// compute height & width
const long width = right - left;
const long height = bottom - top;
// we can defer it only if it is visible
if (IsWindowVisible(hwndControl))
return ::DeferWindowPos(hdwp, hwndControl, NULL, left, top, width, height, SWP_NOZORDER|SWP_NOACTIVATE);
// do it immediately for an invisible window
MoveWindow(hwndControl, left, top, width, height, FALSE);
// indicate that the defer operation should still be valid
return hdwp;
}
The 'tricky' being that we avoid trying to mess with any windows that have been destroyed, and we don't try to defer a SetWindowPos against a window that is not visible (as this is documented as "will fail".
I've tested the above in a real project that hides some controls, and makes use of fairly complex layouts with excellent success. There is zero flickering(1) even without Aero, even when you resize using the upper left corner of the dialog window (most resizable windows will show the most flickering and problems when you grab that handle - IE, FireFox, etc.).
If there is interest enough, I could be persuaded to edit my findings with a real example implementation for CodeProject.com or somewhere similar. Message me.
(1) Please note that it is impossible to avoid one draw over the top of whatever used to be there. For every part of the dialog that has not changed, the user can see nothing (no flicker whatsoever). But where things have changed, there is a change visible to the user - this is impossible to avoid, and is a 100% solution.
You can't prevent painting during resizing, but you can (with care) prevent repainting which is where flicker comes from. first, the bitblt.
There a two ways to stop the bitblt thing.
If you own the class of the top level window, then just register it with the CS_HREDRAW | CS_VREDRAW styles. This will cause a resize of your window to invalidate the entire client area, rather than trying to guess which bits are not going to change and bitblting.
If you don't own the class, but do have the ability to control message handling (true for most dialog boxes). The default processing of WM_NCCALCSIZE is where the class styles CS_HREDRAW and CS_VREDRAW are handled, The default behavior is to return WVR_HREDRAW | WVR_VREDRAW from processing WM_NCCALCSIZE when the class has CS_HREDRAW | CS_VREDRAW.
So if you can intercept WM_NCCALCSIZE, you can force the return of these values after calling DefWindowProc to do the other normal processing.
You can listen to WM_ENTERSIZEMOVE and WM_EXITSIZEMOVE to know when resizing of your window starts and stops, and use that to temporarily disable or modify the way your drawing and/or layout code works to minimize the flashing. What exactly you want to do to modify this code will depend on what your normal code normally does in WM_SIZE WM_PAINT and WM_ERASEBKGND.
When you paint the background of your dialog box, you need to not paint behind any of the child windows. making sure that the dialog has WS_CLIPCHILDREN solves this, so you have this handled already.
When you do move the child windows, Make sure that you use BeginDeferWindowPos / EndDefwindowPos so that all of the repainting happens at once. Otherwise you will get a bunch of flashing as each window redraws their nonclient area on each SetWindowPos call.
If I understood the question properly, it's exactly the question Raymond addressed today.
Here's a 2018 update, since I just ran through the very same gauntlet as you.
The "final solution" in your question, and the related answers, that mention tricks with WM_NCCALCSIZE and CS_HREDRAW|CS_VREDRAW are good for preventing Windows XP/Vista/7 from doing the BitBlt that molests your client area during resizing. It might even be useful to mention a similar trick: you can intercept WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING (first passing it onto DefWindowProc) and set WINDOWPOS.flags |= SWP_NOCOPYBITS, which disables the BitBlt inside the internal call to SetWindowPos() that Windows makes during window resizing. This has the same eventual effect of skipping the BitBlt.
And some people mentioned that your WM_NCCALCSIZE trick no longer works in Windows 10. I think that might be because the code you wrote returns WVR_ALIGNLEFT|WVR_ALIGNTOP when it should be returning WVR_VALIDRECTS in order for the two rectangles you constructed (nccs_params->rgrc[1] and nccs_params->rgrc[2]) to be used by Windows, at least according to the very skimpy dox in the MSDN pages for WM_NCCALCSIZE and NCCALCSIZE_PARAMS. It's possible that Windows 10 is more strict about that return value; I would try it out.
However, even if we assume that we can convince Windows 10 not to do BitBlt inside SetWindowPos(), it turns out there's a new problem...
Windows 10 (and possibly also Windows 8) adds another layer of client area molestation on top of the old legacy molestation from XP/Vista/7.
Under Windows 10, apps do not draw directly to the framebuffer, but instead draw into offscreen buffers that the Aero Window manager (DWM.exe) composites.
It turns out that DWM will sometimes decide to "help" you by drawing its own content over your client area (sort of like a BitBlt but even more perverse and even further out of your control).
So in order to be free of client area molestation, we still need to get WM_NCCALCSIZE under control but we also need to prevent DWM from messing with your pixels.
I was fighting with exactly the same problem and created a roundup Question/Answer which brings together 10 years of posts on this topic and offers some new insights (too long to paste the content here in this question). The BitBlt mentioned above is no longer the only problem, as of Windows Vista. Enjoy:
How to smooth ugly jitter/flicker/jumping when resizing windows, especially dragging left/top border (Win 7-10; bg, bitblt and DWM)?
For some controls, you can use WM_PRINT message to make the control draw into a DC. But that doesn't really solve your primary problem, which is that you want Windows to NOT draw anything during resize, but to let you do it all.
And the answer is that you just can't do what you want as long as you have child windows.
The way I ended up solving this eventually in my own code is to switch to using Windowless Controls. Since they have no window of their own, they always draw at the same time (and into the same DC) as their parent window. This allows me to use simple double buffering to completely remove flicker. I can even trivially suppress painting of the children when I need to just by not calling their draw routine inside the parent's draw routine.
This is the only way I know of to completely get rid of flicker and tearing during resize operations.
If you can find a place to plug it in, CWnd::LockWindowUpdates() will prevent any drawing from occuring until after you unlock the updates.
But keep in mind this is a hack, and a fairly ugly one at that. Your window will look terrible during resizes. If the problem you are having is flickering during resizes, then the best thing to do is diagnose the flickering, rather than hiding the flickering by blocking paints.
One thing to look for are redraw commands that get called too often during the resize. If you r window's controls are calling RedrawWindow() with the RDW_UPDATENOW flag specified, it is going to repaint then and there. But you can strip out that flag and specify RDW_INVALIDATE instead, which tells the control to invalidate the window without repainting. It will repaint at idle time, keeping the display fresh without spazzing out.
There are various approaches, but I found the only one that can be used generally is double buffering: draw to an offscreen buffer, then blit the entire buffer to screen.
That comes for free in Vista Aero and above, so your pain might be shortlived.
I am not aware of a general double-buffering implementation for windows and system controls under XP, However, here are some things to explore:
Keith Rule's CMemDC for double-buffering anything you draw yourself with GDI
WS_EX_COMPOSITED Window style (see the remarks section, and something here on stackoverflow)
there is only one way to effectively diagnose repainting problems - remote debugging.
Get a 2nd PC. Install MSVSMON on it. Add a post build step or utility project that copies your build products to the remote PC.
Now you should be able to place breakpoints in WM_PAINT handlers, WM_SIZE handlers and so on and actually trace through your dialog code as it performs the size and redraw. If you download symbols from the MS symbol servers you will be able to see full call stacks.
Some well placed breakpoints - in your WM_PAINT, WM_ERAGEBKGND handlers and you should have a good idea of why your window is being synchronously repainted early during the WM_SIZE cycle.
There are a LOT of windows in the system that consist of a parent window with layered child controls - explorer windows are massivly complicated with listviews, treeviews preview panels etc. Explorer does not have a flicker problem on resizing, so It is celarly possible to get flicker free resizing of parent windows :- what you need to do is catch the repaints, figure out what caused them, and, well, ensure that the cause is removed.
What appears to work:
Use the WS_CLIPCHILDREN on the parent dialog (can be set in WM_INITDIALOG)
During WM_SIZE, loop through the child controls moving and resizing them using DeferSetWindowPos().
This is very close to perfect, in my testing under Windows 7 with Aero.
I'm creating a Windows Mobile custom SIP and as the user presses or "hovers" over a button on the keyboard I draw it's corresponding selected image (iPhone-esque) to the screen's DC using ::GetDC(NULL). It is developed in Win32 C++.
My problem is that I can never get the screen to repaint itself, erasing the previously drawn key. I've tried everything I could think of to force it, ::RedrawWindow() with all different combos of params using NULL or any of the Get..Window functions as the HWND, and all combo of flags (INVALIDATE | UPDATENOW | ERASENOW | ALLCHILDREN etc). I've also tried invalidating the rect and forcing a repaint of the underlying app using ::GetActiveWindow and ::GetForegroundWindow, variations using ::GetDesktopWindow, etc. I've essentially run out of ideas and it's the last thing holding me up from using it on my Windows Mobile device. Does anyone have any ideas? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
I've included some screenshots to illustrate my dilemma.
Before Screenshot
After Screenshot
Before http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/9861/cezoom1.png After http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/7481/cezoom2.png
Thanks in advance!
Rather than drawing to the background DC, why don't you create a temporary window and draw into that? When you destroy the window, the background should get repainted automatically.
I'm just guessing, because I don't know Windows Mobile, but it could be that Windows is caching the last thing that was drawn into the DC and repainting it every time you invalidate the window.
Have you tried InvalidateRect on the screen hWnd?