How to skip test case in Robot framework using keyword - python-2.7

i'm trying to skip a specific test case using keyword, is there are any keyword to do that ? what i'm trying to do is to check if file name have "skip" word then i want to skip it. is there are any keyword like : Skip Test , Skip Execution If ...
#{regex}= Get Regexp Matches ${TEST NAME} Skip
${lenght}= Get Length ${regex}
Skip Execution If '${lenght}'>'0'

Nowadays, there are the following keywords added, in Robot Framework: Skip and Skip if

Ideally, tests that should not be run should be excluded from the run using tags or other means. Another option is to still run the tests, but simply check for your skip condition at the start of the test and pass the test without executing anything. There are two keywords, Builtin.Pass Execution and Builtin.Pass Execution If, useful for that.
http://robotframework.org/robotframework/latest/libraries/BuiltIn.html#Pass%20Execution%20If

Related

Trying to eliminate second regex exec

I am wondering if there is a way to declare boundaries other start of line or end of line but based on a value in the text. I am trying to optimize my code and right now I find a section in my doc and extract it based on a regular expression. Then I run that extracted section through another expression.
For simplicity my text looks like the
<start><doc><font>123</font></doc><doc><font>234</font></doc><doc><font>345</font></doc><doc><font>456</font></doc><end>
Since my <start> is not the start but somewhere in doc I have to find that. I assume if its possible it should be more effective then running two expr exec's to get the data. Anything small will help as my script will have to run at least one million times.
Not really sure about the efficiency, if your data would be as simple and clean as it is printed in the question, this expression might be an start:
(<start>(<doc>(<font>.*?<\/font>)<\/doc>)<end>)
Otherwise, you might want to clean your data first, and maybe find some alternative solutions.
DEMO

How do I configure Jenkins to strip the leading "origin/" in git branch parameter?

I'm using Jenkins with a branch parameter to specify the branch to build from. Other stuff downstream needs the branch name to not have the leading "origin/" -- just "feature/blahblah" or "bugfix/12345" or similar. The advanced settings for the parameter let me specify a branch filter via regex, but I'm a regex newbie and the solutions I've found in searching are language-dependent. The Jenkins documentation for this is sparse.
When a user clicks on "build with parameters", for the branch I want to see branch names that omit the leading "origin/". I'm not sure how to write a regex for Jenkins that will "consume" that part of the branch name before setting the parameter value.
I solved this problem once before, I'm pretty sure using Stack Overflow, but I can't find those hints now.
For the git branch parameter, set Branch Filter to:
origin/(.*)
I found the parentheses to be counter-intuitive, because if you don't specify a filter you get:
.*
(No parens.) If you are filtering stuff out, you use parens to indicate the part to keep.
I usually use a groovy script evaluated before the job, like:
def map = [:]
map['GIT_BRANCH'] = GIT_BRANCH - 'origin/'
return map
This is using the EnvInject plugin, as described in gitlab-plugin issue 444
If you need to filter multiple patterns without origin/ section, try the following.
origin/(develop.*|feature.*|bugfix.*)
This will list the develop, feature and bugfix branches without the leading origin/.

How to run google tests completely isolated from each other?

I want to use Address Sanitizer to detect runtime errors while unit tests are running. However, Address Sanitizer terminates the app when it finds the first error so I can't see an information of all found runtime errors in one report. It would be possible if I could run google tests isolated from each other, and termination of one test woudn't influence other ones.
You can run specific test cases in Google Test, one by one.
From: https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googletest/docs/advanced.md#running-a-subset-of-the-tests
By default, a Google Test program runs all tests the user has defined.
Sometimes, you want to run only a subset of the tests (e.g. for
debugging or quickly verifying a change). If you set the GTEST_FILTER
environment variable or the --gtest_filter flag to a filter string,
Google Test will only run the tests whose full names (in the form of
TestCaseName.TestName) match the filter.
The format of a filter is a ':'-separated list of wildcard patterns
(called the positive patterns) optionally followed by a '-' and
another ':'-separated pattern list (called the negative patterns). A
test matches the filter if and only if it matches any of the positive
patterns but does not match any of the negative patterns.
A pattern may contain '' (matches any string) or '?' (matches any
single character). For convenience, the filter '-NegativePatterns'
can be also written as '-NegativePatterns'.
For example:
./foo_test Has no flag, and thus runs all its tests.
./foo_test --gtest_filter=* Also runs everything, due to the single
match-everything * value.
./foo_test --gtest_filter=FooTest.* Runs everything in test case
FooTest.
./foo_test --gtest_filter=Null:Constructor Runs any test whose
full name contains either "Null" or "Constructor".
./foo_test --gtest_filter=-DeathTest. Runs all non-death tests.
./foo_test --gtest_filter=FooTest.*-FooTest.Bar Runs everything in
test case FooTest except FooTest.Bar.

mIRC Search for multiple words in text file

I am trying to search a text file that will return a result if more than one word is found in that line. I don't see this explained in the documentation and I have tried various loops with no success.
What I would like to do is something similar to this:
$read(name.txt, s, word1|word2|word3)
or even something like this:
$read(name.txt, w, word1*|*word2*|*word3)
I don't know RegEx that well so I'm assuming this can be done with that but I don't know how to do that.
The documentation in the client self is good but I also recommend this site: http://en.wikichip.org/wiki/mirc. And with your problem there is a nice article : http://en.wikichip.org/wiki/mirc/text_files
All the info is taken from there. So credits to wikichip.
alias testForString {
while ($read(file.txt, nw, *test*, $calc($readn + 1))) {
var %line = $v1
; you can add your own words in the regex, seperate them with a pipe (|)
noop $regex(%line,/(word1|word2|word3|test)/))
echo -a Amount of results: $regml(0)
}
}
$readn is an identifier that returns the line that $read() matched. It is used to start searching for the pattern on the next line. Which is in this case test.
In the code above, $readn starts at 0. We use $calc() to start at line 1. Every match $read() will start searching on the next line. When no more matches are after the line specified $read will return $null - terminating the loop.
The w switch is used to use a wildcard in your search
The n switch prevents evaluating the text it reads as if it was mSL code. In almost EVERY case you must use the n switch. Except if you really need it. Improper use of the $read() identifier without the 'n' switch could leave your script highly vulnerable.
The result is stored in a variable named %line to use it later in case you need it.
After that we use a noop to execute a regex to match your needs. In this case you can use $regml(0) to find the amount of matches which are specified in your regex search. Using an if-statement you can see if there are two or more matches.
Hope you find this helpful, if there's anything unclear, I will try to explain it better.
EDIT
#cp022
I can't comment, so I'll post my comment here, so how does that help in any way to read content from a text file?

Maven replacer plugin - repeat while matches exist

I am using the maven replacer plugin and I've run into a situation where I have a regular expression that matches across lines which I need to run on the input file until all matches have been replaced. The configuration for this expression looks like this:
<regexFlags>
<regexFlag>DOTALL</regexFlag>
</regexFlags>
<replacements>
<replacement>
<token>\#([^\n\r=\#]+)\#=([^\n\r]*)(.*)(\#default\.\1\#=[^\n\r]*)(.*)</token>
<value>#$1#=$2$3$5</value>
<replacement>
<replacements>
The input could look like this:
#d.e.f#=y
#a.b.c#=x
#h.i.j#=aaaa
#default.a.b.c#=QQQ
#asdfasd.fasdfs.asdfa#=23423
#default.h.i.j#=234
#default.RR.TT#=393993
and I want the output to look like this:
#d.e.f#=y
#a.b.c#=x
#h.i.j#=aaaa
#asdfasd.fasdfs.asdfa#=23423
#default.RR.TT#=393993
The intention is to re-write the file, but without the tokens with a #default prefix, where another token without the prefix has already been defined.
#default.a.b.c#=QQQ and #default.h.i.j#=234 have been removed from the output because other tokens already contains a.b.c and h.i.j.
The current problem I have is that the replacer plugin only replaces the first match, so my output looks like this:
#d.e.f#=y
#a.b.c#=x
#h.i.j#=aaaa
#asdfasd.fasdfs.asdfa#=23423
#default.h.i.j#=234
#default.RR.TT#=393993
Here, #default.a.b.c=QQQ is gone, which is correct, but #default.h.i.j#=234 is still present.
If I were writing this in code, I think I could probably just loop while attempting to match on the entire output, and break when there are no matches. Is there a way to do this with the replacer plugin?
Edit: I may have over simplified my example. A more realistic one is:
#d.e.f#=y
#a.b.c#=x
#h.i.j#=aaaa
#default.a.b.c#=QQQ
#asdfasd.fasdfs.asdfa#=23423
#default.h.i.j#=234
#default.RR.TT#=393993
#x.y.z#=0
#default.q.r.s#=1
#l.m.n#=8.3
#q.r.s#=78
#blah.blah.blah#=blah
This shows that it's possible for a default.x.x.x=y to precede a x.x.x=y token (as #default.q.r.s#=1 preceedes #q.r.s#=78`), my prior example wasn't clear about this. I do actually have an expression to capture this, it looks a bit like this:
\#default\.([^\n\r=#|]+)#=([^\n\r|]*)(.*)#\1#=([^\n\r|]*)(.*)
I know line separators are missing from this even though they were in the other one - I was experimenting with removing all line separators and treating it as a single line but that hasn't helped. I can resolve this problem simply by running each replacement multiple times by copying and pasting the configurations a few times, but that is not a good solution and will fail eventually.
I don't believe you could solve this problem as is, a work-around is to reverse the order of the file top to bottom, perform lookahead regex and then reverse the result order
pattern = #default\.(.*?)#[^\r\n]+(?=[\s\S]*#\1#) Demo
another way (depending on the capabilities of "Maven") is to run this pattern
#(.*)(#[\s\S]*)#default\.\1.*
and replace with #$1$2 Demo in a loop until there are no matches
then run this pattern
#default\.(.*)#.*(?=[\s\S]*\1)
and replace with nothing Demo in a loop until there are no matches
It doesn't look like the replacer plugin can actually do what I want. I got around this by using regular expressions to build multiple filter files, and then applying them to the resource files.
My original goal had been to use regular expressions to build a single, clean, and tidy filter file. In the end, I discovered that I was able to get away with just using multiple filters (not as clean or tidy) and apply them in the correct order.