I'm new here!
I have an NSArray like this ("file01_header","file01_body", "file01_xxx", ... ,"file02_header", ...).
I filter it and get 2 distinct NSArrays:
Array_header ("file01_header","file02_header",...)
Array_body
("file01_body", "file02_body", ...)
now I have to subtract from Array_header all the items that have a corresponding one in Array_body, because not all items have a fileNN_body for the fileNN_header in the original array, and I have to give the Array_header as output with only items that has no corresponding body.
How can I do this?
Thanks!!
If you're using swift you can filter pretty easily using a closure and some minor string-fu.
Here's an example:
let funkyArray = ["file01_header","file01_body", "file01_xxx", "file02_header","file03_xxx"]
let headerFilterClosure : (String) -> Bool = {fileName in
if fileName.containsString("header") {
let fileBase = fileName.componentsSeparatedByString("_")[0]
let fileBodyName = "\(fileBase)_body"
if funkyArray.contains(fileBodyName) {
return true
}
}
return false
}
funkyArray.filter(headerFilterClosure)
I think a better long term solution would be to not have such a funky array and use a data structure or at least a tuple with options to manage your file info.
Best,
Josh
Related
I'm trying to add an element list to the list of string, but I found Kotlin does not have an add function like java so please help me out how to add the items to the list.
class RetrofitKotlin : AppCompatActivity() {
var listofVechile:List<Message>?=null
var listofVechileName:List<String>?=null
var listview:ListView?=null
var progressBar:ProgressBar?=null
override fun onCreate(savedInstanceState: Bundle?) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState)
setContentView(R.layout.activity_retrofit_kotlin)
listview=findViewById<ListView>(R.id.mlist)
var apiInterfacee=ApiClass.client.create(ApiInterfacee::class.java)
val call=apiInterfacee.getTaxiType()
call.enqueue(object : Callback<TaxiTypeResponse> {
override fun onResponse(call: Call<TaxiTypeResponse>, response: Response<TaxiTypeResponse>) {
listofVechile=response.body()?.message!!
println("Sixze is here listofVechile ${listofVechile!!.size}")
if (listofVechile!=null) {
for (i in 0..listofVechile!!.size-1) {
//how to add the name only listofVechileName list
}
}
//println("Sixze is here ${listofVechileName!!.size}")
val arrayadapter=ArrayAdapter<String>(this#RetrofitKotlin,android.R.layout.simple_expandable_list_item_1,listofVechileName)
listview!!.adapter=arrayadapter
}
override fun onFailure(call: Call<TaxiTypeResponse>, t: Throwable) {
}
})
}
}
A more idiomatic approach would be to use MutableList instead of specifically ArrayList. You can declare:
val listOfVehicleNames: MutableList<String> = mutableListOf()
And add to it that way. Alternatively, you may wish to prefer immutability, and declare it as:
var listOfVehicleNames: List<String> = emptyList()
And in your completion block, simply reassign it:
listOfVehicleNames = response.body()?.message()?.orEmpty()
.map { it.name() /* assumes name() function exists */ }
Talking about an idiomatic approach... 🙄
When you can get away with only using immutable lists (which means usually in Kotlin), simply use + or plus. It returns a new list
with all elements of the original list plus the newly added one:
val original = listOf("orange", "apple")
val modified = original + "lemon" // [orange, apple, lemon]
original.plus("lemon") yields the same result as original + "lemon". Slightly more verbose but might come in handy when combining several collection operations:
return getFruit()
.plus("lemon")
.distinct()
Besides adding a single element, you can use plus to concatenate a whole collection too:
val original = listOf("orange", "apple")
val other = listOf("banana", "strawberry")
val newList = original + other // [orange, apple, banana, strawberry]
Disclaimer: this doesn't directly answer OP's question, but I feel that in a question titled "How to add an item to a list in Kotlin?", which is a top Google hit for this topic, plus must be mentioned.
If you don't want or can't use array list directly use this code for add item
itemsList.toMutableList().add(item)
itemlist : list of your items
item : item you want to add
instead of using a regular list which is immutable just use an arrayListof which is mutable
so your regular list will become
var listofVehicleNames = arrayListOf("list items here")
then you can use the add function
listOfVehicleNames.add("what you want to add")
you should use a MutableList like ArrayList
var listofVechileName:List<String>?=null
becomes
var listofVechileName:ArrayList<String>?=null
and with that you can use the method add
https://kotlinlang.org/api/latest/jvm/stdlib/kotlin.collections/-mutable-list/add.html
For any specific class, the following may help
var newSearchData = List<FIRListValuesFromServer>()
for (i in 0 until this.singleton.firListFromServer.size) {
if (searchText.equals(this.singleton.firListFromServer.get(i).FIR_SRNO)) {
newSearchData.toMutableList().add(this.singleton.firListFromServer.get(i))
}
}
val listofVechile = mutableListOf<String>()
Declare mutable list like that and you will be able to add elements to list :
listofVechile.add("car")
https://kotlinlang.org/docs/collections-overview.html
I have an Apps Script that copies the content of an template-file to the end of a document. It works with one minor annoyance: the numbered list continues from one copy to the next.
I have many different templates that users can append to the end of the document. Each template is stored in its own Document.
function addSub(template_id){
var mainBody = DocumentApp.getActiveDocument().getBody();
var tempBody = DocumentApp.openById(template_id).getBody();
for(var i = 0;i<tempBody .getNumChildren();i++){
var element = tempBody .getChild(i);
if(element.getType() == DocumentApp.ElementType.TABLE)
mainBody.appendTable(element.copy());
else if(element.getType() == DocumentApp.ElementType.PARAGRAPH)
mainBody.appendParagraph(element.copy());
else if(element.getType() == DocumentApp.ElementType.LIST_ITEM)
mainBody.appendListItem(element.copy());
else if(element.getType() == DocumentApp.ElementType.PAGE_BREAK)
mainBody.appendPageBreak(element.copy());
}
}
It could look like this: ( I want the list to reset for each new copy of the template)
table with name of this template
some raw text
List item1
List item2
table with name of this template
some raw text
List item1
List item2
Do you now that ListItems have an ID, which is a STRING and you can access it via myListItem.getListId().
It seems that all your ListItems have the same ID.
If this is the case, the numbering has to be as you described.
Why do they have the same ListID?
I don't know.
Seems that the body.appendListem method always chooses the same listId.
I didn't test it yet, but you could try to set the listID of the newly append ListItem to that of the original document, if they are different.
Yes, i know, the .copy() method should enclose this information, but the body.appendListItem method may not care.
So, you could try to first save the detached copy of the listItem.
Then append it to the new body.
And then set the id of the newly appended listItem to that of the detached copy.
It's stupid, i know, but it may help.
Didn't try it yet.
And i have little experience with listItems, bit what i saw up to now is that there seems to be only one ListId in the body of a document, if you append or insert listItems.
This could be the cause of the problem.
Hope this helps.
After Richard Gantz solved it, It was corrected by this code:
var listItemDictionary = {};//top
...
else if(element.getType() == DocumentApp.ElementType.LIST_ITEM){
var listCopy = element.copy().asListItem()
var lcID = listCopy.getListId();
if (listItemDictionary[lcID] == null){
var tempLI = mainBody.appendListItem("temp")
listItemDictionary[lcID] = tempLI;
}
Logger.log(lcID)
mainBody.insertListItem(childIndex+j, listCopy.setListId(listItemDictionary[lcID]));
}
...
if(listItemDictionary){//bottom
mainBody.appendParagraph("");
for(var key in listItemDictionary){
listItemDictionary[key].clear().removeFromParent()
}
}
Based on the answer from Niklas Ternvall/Richard Gantz, I found a simpler solution for the case of each template having no more than one list.
function addSub(template_id) {
var mainBody = DocumentApp.getActiveDocument().getBody();
var tempBody = DocumentApp.openById(template_id).getBody();
var listID = null;
for(var i = 0;i<tempBody.getNumChildren();i++){
var element = tempBody.getChild(i).copy();
var type = element.getType();
if(type == DocumentApp.ElementType.TABLE)
mainBody.appendTable(element);
else if(type == DocumentApp.ElementType.PARAGRAPH)
mainBody.appendParagraph(element);
else if(type == DocumentApp.ElementType.LIST_ITEM){
if(listID==null) // First list item
listID = mainBody.appendListItem('temp'); // Define new listID
mainBody.appendListItem(element).setListId(listID); // Apply to copy
}
else if(type == DocumentApp.ElementType.PAGE_BREAK)
mainBody.appendPageBreak(element);
}
mainBody.removeChild(listID); // Delete temporary list item
}
Each time you call the function, listID=null is the indicator for whether or not there have been any list items in the template. When you get to the first list item, appending the text 'temp' forces a new list and hence a new listID that you can apply to the list items from the template. After you finish going through the template, mainBody.removeChild(listID) removes 'temp' from the top of your list.
This solution worked for me when using one template 100 times in one document, essentially as a mail merge. I'm fairly new to Apps Script, so I would appreciate any feedback if there is a reason this wouldn't work for a single-list template.
I need your help about CouchDB reduce function.
I have some docs like:
{'about':'1', 'foo':'a1','bar':'qwe'}
{'about':'1', 'foo':'a1','bar':'rty'}
{'about':'1', 'foo':'a2','bar':'uio'}
{'about':'1', 'foo':'a1','bar':'iop'}
{'about':'2', 'foo':'b1','bar':'qsd'}
{'about':'2', 'foo':'b1','bar':'fgh'}
{'about':'3', 'foo':'c1','bar':'wxc'}
{'about':'3', 'foo':'c2','bar':'vbn'}
As you can seen they all have the same key, just the values are differents.
My purpse is to use a Map/Reduce and my return expectation would be:
'rows':[ 'keys':'1','value':{'1':{'foo':'a1', 'at':'rty'},
'2':{'foo':'a2', 'at':'uio'},
'3':{'foo':'a1', 'at':'iop'}}
'keys':'1','value':{'foo':'a1', 'bar','rty'}
...
'keys':'3','value':{'foo':'c2', 'bar',vbn'}
]
Here is the result of my Map function:
'rows':[ 'keys':'1','value':{'foo':'a1', 'bar','qwe'}
'keys':'1','value':{'foo':'a1', 'bar','rty'}
...
'keys':'3','value':{'foo':'c2', 'bar',vbn'}
]
But my Reduce function isn't working:
function(keys,values,rereduce){
var res= {};
var lastCheck = values[0];
for(i=0; i<values.length;++i)
{
value = values[i];
if (lastCheck.foo != value.foo)
{
res.append({'change':[i:lastCheck]});
}
lastCheck = value;
}
return res;
}
Is it possible to have what I expect or I need to use an other way ?
You should not do this in the reduce function. As the couchdb wiki explains:-
If you are building a composite return structure in your reduce, or only transforming the values field, rather than summarizing it, you might be misusing this feature.
There are two approaches that you can take instead
Transform the results at your application layer.
Use the list function.
Lists functions are simple. I will try to explain them here:
Lists like views are saved in design documents under the key lists. Like so:
"lists":{
"formatResults" : "function(head,req) {....}"
}
To call the list function you use a url like this
http://localhost:5984/your-database/_design/your-designdoc/_list/your-list-function/your-view-name
Here is an example of list function
function(head, req) {
var row = getRow();
if (!row){
return 'no ingredients'
}
var jsonOb = {};
while(row=getRow()){
//construct the json object here
}
return {"body":jsonOb,"headers":{"Content-Type" : "application/json"}};
}
The getRow function is of interest to us. It contains the result of the view. So we can query it like
row.key for key
row.value for value
All you have to do now is construct the json like you want and then send it.
By the way you can use log
to debug your functions.
I hope this helps a little.
Apparently now you need to use
provides('json', function() { ... });
As in:
Simplify Couchdb JSON response
I see many posts about converting the table(s) in a DataSet to a list of DataRows or other row data but I was unable to find anything about this question. This is what I came up with using .Net 3.0:
public static List<DataTable> DataSetToList(DataSet ds)
{
List<DataTable> result = new List<DataTable>();
foreach (DataTable dtbl in ds.Tables)
{
result.Add(dtbl);
}
return result;
}
Is there a better way, excluding an extension method?
Thanks
Based on Why LINQ casting with a Data.DataTableCollection this will work;
List<DataTable> result = new List<DataTable>(ds.Tables.Cast<DataTable>())
IEnumerable<DataTable> sequence = dt.AsEnumerable();
or
List<DataTable> list = dt.AsEnumerable().ToList();
When I have an array of Sitecore IDs, for example TargetIDs from a MultilistField, how can I query the ContentSearchManager to return all the SearchResultItem objects?
I have tried the following which gives an "Only constant arguments is supported." error.
using (var s = Sitecore.ContentSearch.ContentSearchManager.GetIndex("sitecore_master_index").CreateSearchContext())
{
rpt.DataSource = s.GetQueryable<SearchResultItem>().Where(x => f.TargetIDs.Contains(x.ItemId));
rpt.DataBind();
}
I suppose I could build up the Linq query manually with multiple OR queries. Is there a way I can use Sitecore.ContentSearch.Utilities.LinqHelper to build the query for me?
Assuming I got this technique to work, is it worth using it for only, say, 10 items? I'm just starting my first Sitecore 7 project and I have it in mind that I want to use the index as much as possible.
Finally, does the Page Editor support editing fields somehow with a SearchResultItem as the source?
Update 1
I wrote this function which utilises the predicate builder as dunston suggests. I don't know yet if this is actually worth using (instead of Items).
public static List<T> GetSearchResultItemsByIDs<T>(ID[] ids, bool mustHaveUrl = true)
where T : Sitecore.ContentSearch.SearchTypes.SearchResultItem, new()
{
Assert.IsNotNull(ids, "ids");
if (!ids.Any())
{
return new List<T>();
}
using (var s = Sitecore.ContentSearch.ContentSearchManager.GetIndex("sitecore_master_index").CreateSearchContext())
{
var predicate = PredicateBuilder.True<T>();
predicate = ids.Aggregate(predicate, (current, id) => current.Or(p => p.ItemId == id));
var results = s.GetQueryable<T>().Where(predicate).ToDictionary(x => x.ItemId);
var query = from id in ids
let item = results.ContainsKey(id) ? results[id] : null
where item != null && (!mustHaveUrl || item.Url != null)
select item;
return query.ToList();
}
}
It forces the results to be in the same order as supplied in the IDs array, which in my case is important. (If anybody knows a better way of doing this, would love to know).
It also, by default, ensures that the Item has a URL.
My main code then becomes:
var f = (Sitecore.Data.Fields.MultilistField) rootItem.Fields["Main navigation links"];
rpt.DataSource = ContentSearchHelper.GetSearchResultItemsByIDs<SearchResultItem>(f.TargetIDs);
rpt.DataBind();
I'm still curious how the Page Editor copes with SearchResultItem or POCOs in general (my second question), am going to continue researching that now.
Thanks for reading,
Steve
You need to use the predicate builder to create multiple OR queries, or AND queries.
The code below should work.
using (var s = Sitecore.ContentSearch.ContentSearchManager.GetIndex("sitecore_master_index").CreateSearchContext())
{
var predicate = PredicateBuilder.True<SearchResultItem>();
foreach (var targetId in f.Targetids)
{
var tempTargetId = targetId;
predicate = predicate.Or(x => x.ItemId == tempTargetId)
}
rpt.DataSource = s.GetQueryable<SearchResultItem>().Where(predicate);
rpt.DataBind();
}