How to properly group mixins in Django app? - django

Initial situation
I have one app, 'devices' with some views:
class DeviceUpdateView(LoginRequiredMixin, UpdateView):
model = Device
form_class = DeviceEditForm
def get_form(self, form_class=None):
form = super(DeviceUpdateView, self).get_form(form_class=None)
form.fields['beacon'].queryset=Beacon.objects.filter(customer_account=self.request.user.default_customer_account)
return form
class DeviceCreateView(LoginRequiredMixin, CreateView):
model = Device
form_class = DeviceEditForm
def get_initial(self):
initial = super(DeviceCreateView, self).get_initial()
initial['customer_account'] = self.request.user.default_customer_account
return initial
def get_form(self, form_class=None):
form = super(DeviceCreateView, self).get_form(form_class=None)
form.fields['beacon'].queryset=Beacon.objects.filter(customer_account=self.request.user.default_customer_account)
return form
I have another app ('buildings') vith this view:
class BuildingCreateView(LoginRequiredMixin, UserFormKwargsMixin, CreateView):
model = Building
form_class = BuildingEditModelForm
def get_initial(self):
initial = super(BuildingCreateView, self).get_initial()
initial["customer_account"] = self.request.user.default_customer_account
return initial
DRY Mixin
Now, I want to factorize my code in order to be more "DRY".
I then create this mixin, in my devices/views.py:
class BeaconFilterMixin(object):
def get_form(self, form_class=None):
form = super(BeaconFilterMixin, self).get_form(form_class=None)
form.fields['beacon'].queryset=Beacon.objects.filter(customer_account=self.request.user.default_customer_account)
return form
And my views become:
class DeviceUpdateView(LoginRequiredMixin, BeaconFilterMixin, UpdateView):
model = Device
form_class = DeviceEditForm
class DeviceCreateView(LoginRequiredMixin, BeaconFilterMixin, CreateView):
model = Device
form_class = DeviceEditForm
def get_initial(self):
initial = super(DeviceCreateView, self).get_initial()
initial['customer_account'] = self.request.user.default_customer_account
return initial
Nice and sweet!
Now the question
I want to do exact same thing and create a "InitialCustomerAccountMixin" that could be used by both 'buildings' and 'devices' apps.
The code will be:
class InitialCustomerAccountMixin(object):
def get_initial(self):
initial = super(InitialCustomerAccountMixin, self).get_initial()
initial['customer_account'] = self.request.user.default_customer_account
return initial
The question is: where do I put my mixins code?
For an 'app-scope' mixin, I get that I should put the code in the views.py or in a mixins.py file in the app.
But for a 'multi-app' mixin, I don't know the design principle to follow.

You should follow functional grouping principle (or whatever you call it).
If you have a UI layer in your app, it should have Mixins module (package, namespace or whatever). This module should have categories for all mixins use: Auth, Filter, View,... etc. Each category should contain respected mixins.
This is for single-app mixins.
Mixins, you have to share between your applications should be encapsulated into their own module (or whatever Python reusable packages are called). This module should be private to you, should be called appropriately and should be split into sensible categories.

Related

Django. Where to put custom methods in models.py?

I put some logic into custom methods in my model.
I did it for using those methods in views
My model:
class Quiz(models.Model):
# Some fields..
# And some example methods that contain a logic
def get_manage_questions_url(self):
return reverse('manage-questions', kwargs={'slug': self.slug})
def get_likes_count(self):
return self.likes.count()
def get_completed_count(self):
return QuizManager.objects.filter(quiz=self, completed=True).count()
def like_quiz(self, quiz, user):
data = {}
if user in quiz.likes.all():
quiz.likes.remove(user)
data['liked'] = False
else:
quiz.likes.add(user)
data['liked'] = True
data['likes'] = quiz.get_likes_count()
return data
def increase_views(self):
self.views += 1
self.save(update_fields=('views',))
I have a question:
Do I need to write all custom methods in the model or I need to put methods like these into a manager kind of QuizManager(models.Manager) and define "objects" attribute in the quiz model?

Django: Display user's previous choices for a ModelForm in the template

I am trying to create a user profile page where users can see and update their preferences for certain things, like whether they are vegetarian, or have a particular allergy, etc. I want the data to be displayed as a form, with their current preferences already populating the form fields.
So I've created the following Model:
class FoodPreferences(models.Model):
user = models.OneToOneField(User, on_delete=models.CASCADE) # One user has one set of food prefs
vegetarian = models.BooleanField()
vegan = models.BooleanField()
...
that's referenced in my forms.py:
class FoodPreferencesForm(forms.ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = FoodPreferences
exclude = ('user', )
I've tried creating a view that inherits FormView and then referencing the form, like this:
class UserProfileView(generic.FormView):
template_name = "registration/profile.html"
form_class = FoodPreferencesForm
success_url = reverse_lazy('user_profile')
This saves the form to a instance of the model correctly, but obviously it just displays the blank form again, after updating, so the user has no idea what their current preferences are.
To implement this I thought I might need to override get() and post() to get the instance of FoodPreferences for the user, and then pass those values into the form like you would a request.POST object. However, firstly, I don't know how to do that, and secondly I'd be taking responsibility for correctly updating the database, which the FormView was already doing.
This is what I've got for that solution:
def get(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
prefs = FoodPreferences.objects.get(user=request.user)
form = self.form_class(prefs)
return render(request, self.template_name, {'form': form, })
def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
form = self.form_class(request.POST)
if not form.is_valid():
return render(request, self.template_name, {'form': form, 'error': 'Something went wrong.'})
curr_prefs = FoodPreferences.objects.update_or_create(form.fields)
prefs.save()
return render(request, self.template_name, {'form': form, })
but I get a TypeError: argument of type 'FoodPreferences' is not iterable on the line in get():
form = self.form_class(prefs)
because it's not expecting a model instance.
Am I thinking about this in the right way? This seems like a common enough problem that Django would have something inbuilt to do it, but I can't find anything.
You should only rarely need to define get or post in a class-based view, and you definitely don't here.
To start with, you need to use a more appropriate base class for your view. Here you want to update an existing item, so you should use UpdateView.
Secondly, you need to tell the class how to get the existing object to update, which you can do by definining get_object. So:
class UserProfileView(generic.UpdateView):
template_name = "registration/profile.html"
form_class = FoodPreferencesForm
success_url = reverse_lazy('user_profile')
def get_object(self, queryset=None):
return self.request.user.foodpreferences
# or, if you aren't certain that the object already exists:
obj, _ = FoodPreferences.objects.get_or_create(user=self.request.user)
return obj

How to add data to context object in DetailView?

I need to write a DetailView in Django. I achieved this functionality. However, I need to add some more data along with the context object. How will I achieve this.
My generic view is:
class AppDetailsView(generic.DetailView):
model = Application
template_name = 'appstore/pages/app.html'
context_object_name = 'app'
I need to add one more variable to the context object:
response = list_categories(storeId)
How about using get_context_data
class AppDetailsView(generic.DetailView):
model = Application
def get_context_data(self, **kwargs):
context = super(AppDetailsView, self).get_context_data(**kwargs)
context['categories'] = list_categories(storeId)
return context

Django rest framework, use different serializers in the same ModelViewSet

I would like to provide two different serializers and yet be able to benefit from all the facilities of ModelViewSet:
When viewing a list of objects, I would like each object to have an url which redirects to its details and every other relation appear using __unicode __ of the target model;
example:
{
"url": "http://127.0.0.1:8000/database/gruppi/2/",
"nome": "universitari",
"descrizione": "unitn!",
"creatore": "emilio",
"accesso": "CHI",
"membri": [
"emilio",
"michele",
"luisa",
"ivan",
"saverio"
]
}
When viewing the details of an object, I would like to use the default HyperlinkedModelSerializer
example:
{
"url": "http://127.0.0.1:8000/database/gruppi/2/",
"nome": "universitari",
"descrizione": "unitn!",
"creatore": "http://127.0.0.1:8000/database/utenti/3/",
"accesso": "CHI",
"membri": [
"http://127.0.0.1:8000/database/utenti/3/",
"http://127.0.0.1:8000/database/utenti/4/",
"http://127.0.0.1:8000/database/utenti/5/",
"http://127.0.0.1:8000/database/utenti/6/",
"http://127.0.0.1:8000/database/utenti/7/"
]
}
I managed to make all this work as I wish in the following way:
serializers.py
# serializer to use when showing a list
class ListaGruppi(serializers.HyperlinkedModelSerializer):
membri = serializers.RelatedField(many = True)
creatore = serializers.RelatedField(many = False)
class Meta:
model = models.Gruppi
# serializer to use when showing the details
class DettaglioGruppi(serializers.HyperlinkedModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = models.Gruppi
views.py
class DualSerializerViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
"""
ViewSet providing different serializers for list and detail views.
Use list_serializer and detail_serializer to provide them
"""
def list(self, *args, **kwargs):
self.serializer_class = self.list_serializer
return viewsets.ModelViewSet.list(self, *args, **kwargs)
def retrieve(self, *args, **kwargs):
self.serializer_class = self.detail_serializer
return viewsets.ModelViewSet.retrieve(self, *args, **kwargs)
class GruppiViewSet(DualSerializerViewSet):
model = models.Gruppi
list_serializer = serializers.ListaGruppi
detail_serializer = serializers.DettaglioGruppi
# etc.
Basically I detect when the user is requesting a list view or a detailed view and change serializer_class to suit my needs. I am not really satisfied with this code though, it looks like a dirty hack and, most importantly, what if two users request a list and a detail at the same moment?
Is there a better way to achieve this using ModelViewSets or do I have to fall back using GenericAPIView?
EDIT:
Here's how to do it using a custom base ModelViewSet:
class MultiSerializerViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
serializers = {
'default': None,
}
def get_serializer_class(self):
return self.serializers.get(self.action,
self.serializers['default'])
class GruppiViewSet(MultiSerializerViewSet):
model = models.Gruppi
serializers = {
'list': serializers.ListaGruppi,
'detail': serializers.DettaglioGruppi,
# etc.
}
Override your get_serializer_class method. This method is used in your model mixins to retrieve the proper Serializer class.
Note that there is also a get_serializer method which returns an instance of the correct Serializer
class DualSerializerViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
def get_serializer_class(self):
if self.action == 'list':
return serializers.ListaGruppi
if self.action == 'retrieve':
return serializers.DettaglioGruppi
return serializers.Default # I dont' know what you want for create/destroy/update.
You may find this mixin useful, it overrides the get_serializer_class method and allows you to declare a dict that maps action and serializer class or fallback to the usual behavior.
class MultiSerializerViewSetMixin(object):
def get_serializer_class(self):
"""
Look for serializer class in self.serializer_action_classes, which
should be a dict mapping action name (key) to serializer class (value),
i.e.:
class MyViewSet(MultiSerializerViewSetMixin, ViewSet):
serializer_class = MyDefaultSerializer
serializer_action_classes = {
'list': MyListSerializer,
'my_action': MyActionSerializer,
}
#action
def my_action:
...
If there's no entry for that action then just fallback to the regular
get_serializer_class lookup: self.serializer_class, DefaultSerializer.
"""
try:
return self.serializer_action_classes[self.action]
except (KeyError, AttributeError):
return super(MultiSerializerViewSetMixin, self).get_serializer_class()
This answer is the same as the accepted answer but I prefer to do in this way.
Generic views
get_serializer_class(self):
Returns the class that should be used for the serializer. Defaults to returning the serializer_class attribute.
May be overridden to provide dynamic behavior, such as using different serializers for reading and write operations or providing different serializers to the different types of users.
the serializer_class attribute.
class DualSerializerViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
# mapping serializer into the action
serializer_classes = {
'list': serializers.ListaGruppi,
'retrieve': serializers.DettaglioGruppi,
# ... other actions
}
default_serializer_class = DefaultSerializer # Your default serializer
def get_serializer_class(self):
return self.serializer_classes.get(self.action, self.default_serializer_class)
Regarding providing different serializers, why is nobody going for the approach that checks the HTTP method? It's clearer IMO and requires no extra checks.
def get_serializer_class(self):
if self.request.method == 'POST':
return NewRackItemSerializer
return RackItemSerializer
Credits/source: https://github.com/encode/django-rest-framework/issues/1563#issuecomment-42357718
Based on #gonz and #user2734679 answers I've created this small python package that gives this functionality in form a child class of ModelViewset. Here is how it works.
from drf_custom_viewsets.viewsets.CustomSerializerViewSet
from myapp.serializers import DefaltSerializer, CustomSerializer1, CustomSerializer2
class MyViewSet(CustomSerializerViewSet):
serializer_class = DefaultSerializer
custom_serializer_classes = {
'create': CustomSerializer1,
'update': CustomSerializer2,
}
Just want to addon to existing solutions. If you want a different serializer for your viewset's extra actions (i.e. using #action decorator), you can add kwargs in the decorator like so:
#action(methods=['POST'], serializer_class=YourSpecialSerializer)
def your_extra_action(self, request):
serializer = self.get_serializer(data=request.data)
...
Although pre-defining multiple Serializers in or way or another does seem to be the most obviously documented way, FWIW there is an alternative approach that draws on other documented code and which enables passing arguments to the serializer as it is instantiated. I think it would probably tend to be more worthwhile if you needed to generate logic based on various factors, such as user admin levels, the action being called, perhaps even attributes of the instance.
The first piece of the puzzle is the documentation on dynamically modifying a serializer at the point of instantiation. That documentation doesn't explain how to call this code from a viewset or how to modify the readonly status of fields after they've been initated - but that's not very hard.
The second piece - the get_serializer method is also documented - (just a bit further down the page from get_serializer_class under 'other methods') so it should be safe to rely on (and the source is very simple, which hopefully means less chance of unintended side effects resulting from modification). Check the source under the GenericAPIView (the ModelViewSet - and all the other built in viewset classes it seems - inherit from the GenericAPIView which, defines get_serializer.
Putting the two together you could do something like this:
In a serializers file (for me base_serializers.py):
class DynamicFieldsModelSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
"""
A ModelSerializer that takes an additional `fields` argument that
controls which fields should be displayed.
"""
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
# Don't pass the 'fields' arg up to the superclass
fields = kwargs.pop('fields', None)
# Adding this next line to the documented example
read_only_fields = kwargs.pop('read_only_fields', None)
# Instantiate the superclass normally
super(DynamicFieldsModelSerializer, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
if fields is not None:
# Drop any fields that are not specified in the `fields` argument.
allowed = set(fields)
existing = set(self.fields)
for field_name in existing - allowed:
self.fields.pop(field_name)
# another bit we're adding to documented example, to take care of readonly fields
if read_only_fields is not None:
for f in read_only_fields:
try:
self.fields[f].read_only = True
exceptKeyError:
#not in fields anyway
pass
Then in your viewset you might do something like this:
class MyViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
# ...permissions and all that stuff
def get_serializer(self, *args, **kwargs):
# the next line is taken from the source
kwargs['context'] = self.get_serializer_context()
# ... then whatever logic you want for this class e.g:
if self.action == "list":
rofs = ('field_a', 'field_b')
fs = ('field_a', 'field_c')
if self.action == “retrieve”:
rofs = ('field_a', 'field_c’, ‘field_d’)
fs = ('field_a', 'field_b’)
# add all your further elses, elifs, drawing on info re the actions,
# the user, the instance, anything passed to the method to define your read only fields and fields ...
# and finally instantiate the specific class you want (or you could just
# use get_serializer_class if you've defined it).
# Either way the class you're instantiating should inherit from your DynamicFieldsModelSerializer
kwargs['read_only_fields'] = rofs
kwargs['fields'] = fs
return MyDynamicSerializer(*args, **kwargs)
And that should be it! Using MyViewSet should now instantiate your MyDynamicSerializer with the arguments you'd like - and assuming your serializer inherits from your DynamicFieldsModelSerializer, it should know just what to do.
Perhaps its worth mentioning that it can makes special sense if you want to adapt the serializer in some other ways …e.g. to do things like take in a read_only_exceptions list and use it to whitelist rather than blacklist fields (which I tend to do). I also find it useful to set the fields to an empty tuple if its not passed and then just remove the check for None ... and I set my fields definitions on my inheriting Serializers to 'all'. This means no fields that aren't passed when instantiating the serializer survive by accident and I also don't have to compare the serializer invocation with the inheriting serializer class definition to know what's been included...e.g within the init of the DynamicFieldsModelSerializer:
# ....
fields = kwargs.pop('fields', ())
# ...
allowed = set(fields)
existing = set(self.fields)
for field_name in existing - allowed:
self.fields.pop(field_name)
# ....
NB If I just wanted two or three classes that mapped to distinct actions and/or I didn't want any specially dynamic serializer behaviour, I might well use one of the approaches mentioned by others here, but I thought this worth presenting as an alternative, particularly given its other uses.
With all other solutions mentioned, I was unable to find how to instantiate the class using get_serializer_class function and unable to find custom validation function as well. For those who are still lost just like I was and want full implementation please check the answer below.
views.py
from rest_framework.response import Response
from project.models import Project
from project.serializers import ProjectCreateSerializer, ProjectIDGeneratorSerializer
class ProjectViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
action_serializers = {
'generate_id': ProjectIDGeneratorSerializer,
'create': ProjectCreateSerializer,
}
permission_classes = [IsAuthenticated]
def get_serializer_class(self):
if hasattr(self, 'action_serializers'):
return self.action_serializers.get(self.action, self.serializer_class)
return super(ProjectViewSet, self).get_serializer_class()
# You can create custom function
def generate_id(self, request):
serializer = self.get_serializer_class()(data=request.GET)
serializer.context['user'] = request.user
serializer.is_valid(raise_exception=True)
return Response(serializer.validated_data, status=status.HTTP_200_OK)
def create(self, request, **kwargs):
serializer = self.get_serializer_class()(data=request.data)
serializer.context['user'] = request.user
serializer.is_valid(raise_exception=True)
return Response(serializer.validated_data, status=status.HTTP_200_OK)
serializers.py
import random
from rest_framework import serializers
from project.models import Project
class ProjectIDGeneratorSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
def update(self, instance, validated_data):
pass
def create(self, validated_data):
pass
projectName = serializers.CharField(write_only=True)
class Meta:
fields = ['projectName']
def validate(self, attrs):
project_name = attrs.get('projectName')
project_id = project_name.replace(' ', '-')
return {'projectID': project_id}
class ProjectCreateSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
def update(self, instance, validated_data):
pass
def create(self, validated_data):
pass
projectName = serializers.CharField(write_only=True)
projectID = serializers.CharField(write_only=True)
class Meta:
model = Project
fields = ['projectName', 'projectID']
def to_representation(self, instance: Project):
data = dict()
data['projectName'] = instance.name
data['projectID'] = instance.projectID
data['createdAt'] = instance.createdAt
data['updatedAt'] = instance.updatedAt
representation = {
'message': f'Project {instance.name} has been created.',
}
return representation
def validate(self, attrs):
print('attrs', dict(attrs))
project_name = attrs.get('projectName')
project_id = attrs.get('projectID')
if Project.objects.filter(projectID=project_id).first():
raise serializers.ValidationError(f'Project with ID {project_id} already exist')
project = Project.objects.create(projectID=project_id,
name=project_name)
print('user', self.context['user'])
project.user.add(self.context["user"])
project.save()
return self.to_representation(project)
urls.py
from django.urls import path
from .views import ProjectViewSet
urlpatterns = [
path('project/generateID', ProjectViewSet.as_view({'get': 'generate_id'})),
path('project/create', ProjectViewSet.as_view({'post': 'create'})),
]
models.py
# Create your models here.
from django.db import models
from authentication.models import User
class Project(models.Model):
id = models.AutoField(primary_key=True)
projectID = models.CharField(max_length=255, blank=False, db_index=True, null=False)
user = models.ManyToManyField(User)
name = models.CharField(max_length=255, blank=False)
createdAt = models.DateTimeField(auto_now_add=True)
updatedAt = models.DateTimeField(auto_now=True)
def __str__(self):
return self.name
You can map your all serializers with the action using a dictionary in class and then get them from "get_serializer_class" method. Here is what I am using to get different serializers in different cases.
class RushesViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
serializer_class = DetailedRushesSerializer
queryset = Rushes.objects.all().order_by('ingested_on')
permission_classes = (IsAuthenticated,)
filter_backends = (filters.SearchFilter,
django_filters.rest_framework.DjangoFilterBackend, filters.OrderingFilter)
pagination_class = ShortResultsSetPagination
search_fields = ('title', 'asset_version__title',
'asset_version__video__title')
filter_class = RushesFilter
action_serializer_classes = {
"create": RushesSerializer,
"update": RushesSerializer,
"retrieve": DetailedRushesSerializer,
"list": DetailedRushesSerializer,
"partial_update": RushesSerializer,
}
def get_serializer_context(self):
return {'request': self.request}
def get_serializer_class(self):
try:
return self.action_serializer_classes[self.action]
except (KeyError, AttributeError):
error_logger.error("---Exception occurred---")
return super(RushesViewSet, self).get_serializer_class()

Passing arguments to ModelForm through FormSet

I'm kinda new to Formsets and I'm stuck at a problem.
I use a Modelform to allow the creation of a new object.
class AddUpdateEntryForm(forms.ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = Zeit
exclude = ('mitarbeiter', 'user_updated')
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
self.user = kwargs.pop('user')
super(AddUpdateEntryForm, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
self.fields['projekt'].queryset = Projekt.objects.filter(firma=Mitarbeiter.objects.get(user_id=self.user).firma_id)
That form gets it's arguments from the view:
form = AddUpdateEntryForm(user=entry_user, initial=initial)
Now, I want to display multiple instances of that form on a single page.
I use:
forms.py:
AddEntryFormSet = formset_factory(form=AddUpdateEntryForm)
and
views.py:
formset = AddEntryFormSet(initial=initial)
which works fine, but only when I comment out the "self.user...." and "self.fields...." lines from ModelForm Class.
I tried several ways of passing the argument from the call inside the view to the ModelForm.
Is there a proper way to do this?
Thanks in advance
Conrad
It should be possible to subclass BaseModelFormset so that the user is passed to each form when it is constructed. However, that's quite tricky.
A simpler technique is to define a function that creates a model form for a given user, and dynamically create the model form class in the view.
def create_form(user):
"""Returns a new model form which uses the correct queryset for user"""
class AddUpdateEntryForm(forms.ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = Zeit
exclude = ('mitarbeiter', 'user_updated')
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
super(AddUpdateEntryForm, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
self.fields['projekt'].queryset = Projekt.objects.filter(firma=Mitarbeiter.objects.get(user_id=user).firma_id)
return AddUpdateEntryForm
The closure of user in the function means that you can set the queryset correctly. Note that the __init__ method takes the same arguments as its parent class, so we no longer have any problems when we use modelformset_factory in the view.
AddUpdateEntryForm = create_form(user)
AddEntryFormSet = modelformset_factory(model=Zeit, form=AddUpdateEntryForm)