I have a problem with one task, so if you could help me a little bit.
Numbers are "lucky" or "unlucky". Number is "lucky" just if every
digit 7
or every digit is 4. So "lucky" numbers are for example 4, 44, 7, 77.
"Unlucky" are the others numbers.
You will get sequence of n-elements and number K. Your task is to
compute number of all possible k-elements subsequence, which fulfill a one
condition. The condition is that in the subsequence mustn't be two same "lucky"
numbers. So for example there mustn't 77 and 77...
Output number of all possible k-elements subsequence mod 10^9+7
0 < N,K < 10^5
Few examples:
Input:
5 2
7 7 3 7 77
Output:
7
Input:
5 3
3 7 77 7 77
Output:
4
Input:
34 17
14 14 14 ... 14 14 14
Output:
333606206
I have code which seems to work, but it is too slow when I try to compute binomial coefficient. I'm using map. In string I store number in string format. In second - int - part of the map is number which represents how many times was that number(in the first map parameter) used. So now I have stored every "unlucky" numbers stored together. Also every same "lucky" number is together. When I have it stored like this, I just compute all multiplications. For example:
Input
5 2
3 7 7 77 7
Are stored like this: map["other"] = 1 map["7"] = 3 map["77"] = 1
Because k = 2 --> result is: 1*3 + 1*1 + 1*3 = 7.
I think problem is with computing binomial coefficient. For the third example it needs to compute (34 choose 17) and it is computing very long time.I've found this article and also this , but I don't understand how they are solving this problem.
My code:
#include<iostream>
#include<string>
#include<map>
#include <algorithm>
#include <vector>
using namespace std;
int binomialCoeff(int n, int k)
{
// Base Cases
if (k == 0 || k == n)
return 1;
// Recur
return binomialCoeff(n - 1, k - 1) + binomialCoeff(n - 1, k);
}
int main()
{
int n, k;
cin >> n >> k;
map<string, int> mapa; // create map, string is a number, int represents number of used string-stored numbers ---> so if 7 was used two times, in the map it will be stored like this mapa["7"] == 2 and so on)
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) // I will load number as string, if this number is "lucky" - digist are all 7 or all 4
{ // every "unlucky" numbers are together, as well as all same "lucky" numbers ---> so 77 and 77 will be stored in one element....
string number;
cin >> number;
char digit = number[0];
bool lucky = false;
if (digit == '7' || digit == '4')
lucky = true;
for (int j = 1; j < number.length(); j++) {
if (digit != '7' && digit != '4')
break;
if (number[j] != digit) {
lucky = false;
break;
}
}
if (lucky)
mapa[number]++;
else
mapa["other"]++;
}
vector<bool> v(mapa.size());
bool lack = k > mapa.size(); //lack of elements in map --> it is when mapa.size() < k; i. e. number of elements in array can't make k-element subsequence.
int rest = lack ? k - mapa.size() + 1 : 1; // how many elements from "unlucky" numbers I must choose, so it makes base for binomial coefficient (n choose rest)
if (lack) //if lack is true, different size of vector
fill(v.begin() + mapa.size(), v.end(), true);
else
fill(v.begin() + k, v.end(), true);
int *array = new int[mapa.size()]; //easier to manipulate with array for me
int sum = 0;
int product = 1;
int index = 0;
for (map<string, int> ::iterator pos = mapa.begin(); pos != mapa.end(); ++pos) // create array from map
{
if (lack && pos->first == "other") { //if lack of elements in map, the number in elemets representing "unlucky" numbers will be binomial coefficient (mapa["other] choose rest)
array[index++] = binomialCoeff(mapa["other"], rest);
continue;
}
array[index++] = pos->second;
}
do { // this will create every posible multiplication for k-elements subsequences
product = 1;
for (int i = 0; i < mapa.size(); ++i) {
if (!v[i]) {
product *= array[i];
}
}
sum += product;
} while (next_permutation(v.begin(), v.end()));
if (mapa["other"] >= k && mapa.size() > 1) { // if number of "unlucky" numbers is bigger than k, we need to compute all possible k-elements subsequences just from "unlucky" number, so binomial coefficient (mapa["other] choose k)
sum += binomialCoeff(mapa["other"], k);
}
cout << sum % 1000000007 << endl;
}
Related
The problem is fairly simple. Given an input of N (3 <= N <= 3000) integers, find the largest sum of a 3-integer arithmetic series in the sequence. Eg. (15, 8, 1) is a larger arithmetic series than (12, 7, 2) because 15 + 8 + 1 > 12 + 7 + 2. The integers apart of the largest arithmetic series do NOT have to be adjacent, and the order they appear in is irrelevant.
An example input would be:
6
1 6 11 2 7 12
where the first number is N (in this case, 6) and the second line is the sequence N integers long.
And the output would be the largest sum of any 3-integer arithmetic series. Like so:
21
because 2, 7 and 12 has the largest sum of any 3-integer arithmetic series in the sequence, and 2 + 7 + 12 = 21. It is also guaranteed that a 3-integer arithmetic series exists in the sequence.
EDIT: The numbers that make up the sum (output) have to be an arithmetic series (constant difference) that is 3 integers long. In the case of the sample input, (1 6 11) is a possible arithmetic series, but it is smaller than (2 7 12) because 2 + 7 + 12 > 1 + 6 + 11. Thus 21 would be outputted because it is larger.
Here is my attempt at solving this question in C++:
#include <bits/stdc++.h>
using namespace std;
vector<int> results;
vector<int> middle;
vector<int> diff;
int main(){
int n;
cin >> n;
int sizes[n];
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++){
int size;
cin >> size;
sizes[i] = size;
}
sort(sizes, sizes + n, greater<int>());
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++){
for (int j = i+1; j < n; j++){
int difference = sizes[i] - sizes[j];
diff.insert(diff.end(), difference);
middle.insert(middle.end(), sizes[j]);
}
}
for (size_t i = 0; i < middle.size(); i++){
int difference = middle[i] - diff[i];
for (int j = 0; j < n; j++){
if (sizes[j] == difference) results.insert(results.end(), middle[i]);
}
}
int max = 0;
for (size_t i = 0; i < results.size(); i++) {
if (results[i] > max) max = results[i];
}
int answer = max * 3;
cout << answer;
return 0;
}
My approach was to record what the middle number and the difference was using separate vectors, then loop through the vectors and search if the middle number minus the difference is in the array, where it gets added to another vector. Then the largest middle number is found and multiplied by 3 to get the sum. This approach made my algorithm go from O(n^3) to roughly O(n^2). However, the algorithm doesn't always produce the correct output (and I can't think of a test case where this doesn't work) every time, and since I'm using separate vectors, I get a std::bad_alloc error for large N values because I am probably using too much memory. The time limit in this question is 1.4 sec per test case, and memory limit is 64 MB.
Since N can only be max 3000, O(n^2) is sufficient. So what is an optimal O(n^2) solution (or better) to this problem?
So, a simple solution for this problem is to put all elements into an std::map to count their frequencies, then iterate over the first and second element in the arithmetic progression, then search the map for the third.
Iterating takes O(n^2) and map lookups and find() generally takes O(logn).
include <iostream>
#include <map>
using namespace std;
const int maxn = 3000;
int a[maxn+1];
map<int, int> freq;
int main()
{
int n; cin >> n;
for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) {cin >> a[i]; freq[a[i]]++;} // inserting frequencies
int maxi = INT_MIN;
for (int i = 1; i <= n-1; i++)
{
for (int j = i+1; j <= n; j++)
{
int first = a[i], sec = a[j]; if (first > sec) {swap(first, sec);} //ensure that first is smaller than sec
int gap = sec - first; //calculating difference
if (gap == 0 && freq[first] >= 3) {maxi = max(maxi, first*3); } //if first = sec then calculate immidiately
else
{
int third1 = first - gap; //else there're two options for the third element
if (freq.find(third1) != freq.end() && gap != 0) {maxi = max(maxi, first + sec + third1); } //finding third element
}
}
}
cout << maxi;
}
Output : 21
Another test :
6
3 4 5 7 7 7
Output : 21
Another test :
5
10 10 9 8 7
Output : 27
You can try std::unordered_map to try and reduce the complexity even more.
Also see Why is "using namespace std;" considered bad practice?
The sum of a 3-element arithmetic progression is 3-times the middle element, so I would search around a middle element, and would start the search from the "upper" end of the "array" (and have it sorted). This way the first hit is the largest one. Also, the actual array would be a frequency-map, so elements are unique, but still track if any element has 3 copies, because that can become a hit (progression by 0).
I think it may be better to create the frequency-map first, and sort it later, simply because it may result in sorting fewer elements - though they are going to be pairs of value and count in this case.
function max3(arr){
let stats=new Map();
for(let value of arr)
stats.set(value,(stats.get(value) || 0)+1);
let array=Array.from(stats); // array of [value,count] arrays
array.sort((x,y)=>y[0]-x[0]); // sort by value, descending
for(let i=0;i<array.length;i++){
let [value,count]=array[i];
if(count>=3)
return 3*value;
for(let j=0;j<i;j++)
if(stats.has(2*value-array[j][0]))
return 3*value;
}
}
console.log(max3([1,6,11,2,7,12])); // original example
console.log(max3([3,4,5,7,7,7])); // an example of 3 identical elements
console.log(max3([10,10,9,8,7])); // an example from another answer
console.log(max3([1,2,11,6,7,12])); // example with non-adjacent elements
console.log(max3([3,7,1,1,1])); // check for finding lowest possible triplet too
I have some problems with code for my classes. Even though it works correctly, I run out of time for half of the examples.
Here's the task (I really did my best trying to translate it):
You have a permutation of numbers 1,2,...,n for some n. All consecutive numbers of permutations together create sequence a1, a2, an. Your task is to count, how many arithmetic substrings of a sequence of length 3 exist.
Input:
In first line there is a number n (1 <= n <= 200 000). In the second line there is n numbers a1, a2...an representing our permutation.
Output:
The program needs to print out amount of arithmetic substrings of length 3 for permutations from entry. You can assume that the result won't be bigger than 1 000 000.
Is there any way to make it work faster? Thanks for help!
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int main()
{
int input_length;
cin >> input_length;
int correct_sequences = 0;
bool* whether_itroduced = new bool[input_length + 1]{0}; // true - if number was already introduced and false otherwise.
for (int i = 0; i < input_length; i++)
{
int a;
cin >> a;
whether_itroduced[a] = true;
int range = min(input_length - a, a - 1); // max or min number that may be in the subsequence e.g. if introduced number a = 3, and all numbers are six, max range is 2 (3 - 2 = 1 and 3 + 2 = 5, so the longest possible subsequence is 1, 3, 5)
for (int r = range * -1; r <= range; r++) // r - there is a formula used to count arithmetic sequences -> an-1 = a1-r, an = a1, an+1 = a1+r, I have no idea how to explain it
{
if (r == 0) continue; // r cannot be 0
if (whether_itroduced[a - r] && !whether_itroduced[a + r])
correct_sequences++;
}
}
cout << correct_sequences;
}
example
input:
5
1 5 4 2 3
output:
2
// 1,2,3 and 5,4,3
I need to write a program which is printing n pairs of prime numbers and the those pairs are :
p q
where p and q are prime numbers and q = p+2.
Input example :
n = 3
3 5 //
5 7 //
11 13 //
I'm pretty much nowhere still... So, someone?
#include <iostream>
#include <cmath>
int twins(int n)
{
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++)
{
???
}
}
int main()
{
std::cout<<twins(5);
return 0;
}
Here is the top-level simple pseudo-code for such a beast:
def printTwinPrimes(count):
currNum = 3
while count > 0:
if isPrime(currNum) and isPrime(currNum + 2):
print currnum, currnum + 2
count = count - 1
currNum = currNum + 2
It simply starts at 3 (since we know 2,4 is impossible as a twin-prime pair because 4 is composite). For each possibility, it checks whether it constitutes a twin-prime pair and prints it if so.
So all you need to do (other than translating that into real code) is to create isPrime(), for which there are countless examples on the net.
For completeness, here's a simple one, by no means the most efficient but adequate for beginners:
def isPrime(num):
if num < 2:
return false
root = 2
while root * root <= num:
if num % root == 0:
return false
root = root + 1
return true
Though you could make that more efficient by using the fact that all primes other than two or three are of the form 6n±1, n >= 1(a):
def isPrime(num):
if num < 2: return false
if num == 2 or num == 3: return true
if num % 2 == 0 or num % 3 == 0: return false
if num % 6 is neither 1 nor 5: return false
root = 5
adder = 2 # initial adder 2, 5 -> 7
while root * root <= num:
if num % root == 0:
return false
root = root + adder # checks 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, ...
adder = 6 - adder # because alternate 2, 4 to give 6n±1
return true
In fact, you can use this divisibility trick to see if an arbitraily large number stored as a string is likely to be a prime. You just have to check if the number below it or above it is divisible by six. If not, the number is definitely not a prime. If so, more (slower) checks will be needed to fully ascertain primality.
A number is divisible by six only if it is divisible by both two and three. It's easy to tell the former, even numbers end with an even digit.
But it's also reasonably easy to tell if it's divisible by three since, in that case, the sum of the individual digits will also be divisible by three. For example, lets' use 31415926535902718281828459.
The sum of all those digits is 118. How do we tell if that's a multiple of three? Why, using exactly the same trick recursively:
118: 1 + 1 + 8 = 10
10: 1 + 0 = 1
Once you're down to a single digit, it'll be 0, 3, 6, or 9 if the original number was a multiple of three. Any other digit means it wasn't (such as in this case).
(a) If you divide any non-negative number by six and the remainder is 0, 2 or 4, then it's even and therefore non-prime (2 is the exception case here):
6n + 0 = 2(3n + 0), an even number.
6n + 2 = 2(3n + 1), an even number.
6n + 4 = 2(3n + 2), an even number.
If the remainder is 3, then it is divisible by 3 and therefore non-prime (3 is the exception case here):
6n + 3 = 3(2n + 1), a multiple of three.
That leaves just the remainders 1 and 5, and those numbers are all of that form 6n±1.
Might not be the most efficient but you can calculate all primes till n, store them in a vector then only print those which have a difference of 2
#include <iostream>
#include<vector>
using namespace std;
void pr(int n, vector<int>& v)
{
for (int i=2; i<n; i++)
{
bool prime=true;
for (int j=2; j*j<=i; j++)
{
if (i % j == 0)
{
prime=false;
break;
}
}
if(prime) v.push_back(i);
}
}
int main()
{
vector<int> v;
pr(50, v);
for(int i = 0;i < v.size()-1; i++) {
if(v[i+1]-v[i] == 2) {
cout << v[i+1] << " " << v[i] << endl;
}
}
return 0;
}
I think is the efficient algo for you and easy to understand. You can change the value of k as per your constraints.
#include <iostream>
#include <cstring>
using namespace std;
int n,p=2,savePrime=2,k=100000;
void printNPrime(int n)
{
bool prime[k];
memset(prime, true, sizeof(prime));
while(n>0)
{
if (prime[p] == true)
{
if(p-savePrime == 2)
{
cout<<savePrime<<" "<<p<<endl;
n--;
}
// Update all multiples of p
for (int i=p*2; i<=k; i += p)
prime[i] = false;
savePrime=p;
}
p++;
}
}
int main() {
cin>>n;
printNPrime(n);
return 0;
}
I want to find total factors of any number.
In number theory, factorization is the breaking down of a composite number into smaller non-trivial divisors, which when multiplied together equal the original integer. Your job is to calculate number of unique factorization(containing at least two positive integers greater than one) of a number.
For example: 12 has 3 unique factorizations: 2*2*3, 2*6, 3*4 . Note:
3*4 and 4*3 are not considered different.
I have attempted to find that but not getting exact for all.
Here is my code :
#include<iostream>
using namespace std;
int count=0;
void factor(int n,int c,int n1)
{
for(int i=n1; i<n ; i++)
{
if(c*i==n)
{count++;
return;}
else
if(c*i>n)
return;
else
factor(n,c*i,i+1);
}
return;
}
int main()
{
int num,n;
cin>>num;
for(int i=0 ; i<num ; i++)
{
cin>>n;
count=0;
factor(n,1,1);
cout<<count<<endl;
}
return 0;
}
Input is number of test cases followed by test-cases(Numbers).
Example : Input: 3 12 36 3150
Output: 3 8 91
I think you are looking for number of factorizations of a number which are unique.
For this I think you need to find the count of number of prime factor of that number. Say for
12 = 2, 2, 3
Total count = 3;
For 2, 2, 3 we need
(2*2)*3 ~ 4*3
2*(2*3) ~ 2*6
2*2*3 ~ 2*2*3
To solve this we have idea found in Grimaldi, discrete and combinatorial mathematics.
To find number of ways of adding to a number(n) is 2^(n-1) -1. For 3 we have...
3 =
1+1+1
2+1
1+2
Total count = 2^(3-1) -1 = 4-1 = 3
We can use analogy to see that
1+1+1 is equivalent to 2*2*3
1+2 is equivalent to 2*(2*3)
2+1 is equivalent to (2*2)*3
Say number of prime factors = n
So we have number of factorizations = 2^(n-1)-1
The code:
#include <stdio.h>
int power(int x, int y)
{
int prod =1, i ;
for(i=1; i<=y;i++) prod *= x;
return prod;
}
int main()
{
int number,div;
int count = 0, ti, t;
printf("Input: ");
scanf("%d",&t);
for(ti=1; ti<=t;ti++)
{
scanf("%d", &number);
div = 2;count = 0;
while(number != 0)
{
if(number%div!=0) div = div + 1;
else
{
number = number / div;
//printf("%d ",div);
count++;
if(number==1) break;
}
}
printf("%d ", power(2,count-1)-1);
}
return 0;
}
Using mod is really useful in attempting to factor:
for(int i = 1; i <= fnum; ++i){ //where fnum is the number you wish to factor
if(!(fnum % i)) ++count;
}
return count;
Of cross this is the number of factors, not unique factors, if you want the number of unique factors, you have to do some additional work.
The solution is to realize that of all permutations, precisely one is sorted. 2 * 4 * 7 * 3 gives the same result as 2 * 3 * 4 * 7. That means that when you've found one factor, you should not check the remainder for lower factors. However, you should check if the same factor appears again: 12 = 2 * 2 * 3. The sequence 2 2 3 is also sorted.
BTW, you should give your variables clearer names, or at least add some comments describing them.
100 - The 3n + 1 problem
http://www.spoj.com/problems/PROBTRES/
always i get this >>> runtime error (SIGSEGV) <<<
why plz help !
Background:
Problems in Computer Science are often classified as belonging to a certain class of problems (e.g., NP, Unsolvable, Recursive). In this problem you will be analyzing a property of an algorithm whose classification is not known for all possible inputs.
The Problem:
Consider the following algorithm:
1. input n
2. print n
3. if n = 1 then STOP
4. if n is odd then n = 3n + 1
5. else n = n / 2
6. GOTO 2
Given the input 22, the following sequence of numbers will be printed 22 11 34 17 52 26 13 40 20 10 5 16 8 4 2 1
It is conjectured that the algorithm above will terminate (when a 1 is printed) for any integral input value. Despite the simplicity of the algorithm, it is unknown whether this conjecture is true. It has been verified, however, for all integers n such that 0 < n < 1,000,000 (and, in fact, for many more numbers than this.)
Given an input n, it is possible to determine the number of numbers printed (including the 1). For a given n this is called the cycle-length of n. In the example above, the cycle length of 22 is 16.
For any two numbers i and j you are to determine the maximum cycle length over all numbers between i and j.
The Input:
The input will consist of a series of pairs of integers i and j, one pair of integers per line. All integers will be less than 1,000,000 and greater than 0.
You should process all pairs of integers and for each pair determine the maximum cycle length over all integers between and including i and j.
You can assume that no operation overflows a 32-bit integer.
The Output:
For each pair of input integers i and j you should output i, j, and the maximum cycle length for integers between and including i and j. These three numbers should be separated by at least one space with all three numbers on one line and with one line of output for each line of input. The integers i and j must appear in the output in the same order in which they appeared in the input and should be followed by the maximum cycle length (on the same line).
Sample Input:
1 10
100 200
201 210
900 1000
Sample Output:
1 10 20
100 200 125
201 210 89
900 1000 174
#include <iostream>
using namespace std ;
long int a[1000001];
long int F (long int n){
if(a[n]!=0)
return a[n];
else {
if(n%2 !=0)
a[n]=F(n*3+1)+1 ;
else
a[n]=F(n/2)+1 ;
return a[n];
}
}
int main(){
a[1]= 1 ;
long int i , j , MX , MN , x=0 ;
while (cin>>i >> j ){
MX=max(i,j);
MN=min(i,j);
for(;MN<=MX;MN++){
if(x<F(MN))
x=F(MN) ;
}
cout<<i<<" "<<j<<" "<<x<<endl;
x= 0;
}
return 0 ;
}
what is the difference between this and my code ?!!!
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#define MAX 1000001
static int result[MAX];
int calculate(unsigned long i);
int main()
{
unsigned long int i = 0;
unsigned long int j = 0;
unsigned long int k = 0;
int max,x,y;
result[1] = result[0] = 1;
while (scanf("%ld",&i)!= EOF)
{
scanf("%ld",&j);
if (i > j)
{
x = i;
y = j;
}
else
{
x = j;
y = i;
}
max = 0;
for (k = y; k <= x; k++)
{
if (result[k] != 0 && result[k] > max)
max = result[k];
else if (calculate(k) > max)
max = result[k];
}
printf("%ld %\ld %d\n",i,j,max);
}
return 0;
}
int calculate(unsigned long i)
{
if (i < MAX && result[i])
return result[i];
if ( i % 2 == 1 )
{
if (i < MAX)
return result[i] = 2+calculate((3*i+1)/2);
else
return 2+calculate((3*i+1)/2);
}
else
{
if( i < MAX)
return result[i] = 1 + calculate(i / 2);
else
return 1 + calculate(i /2 );
}
}
You might check the actual range of values you're getting for n, as it might be stepping outside your array long a[1000001]. Also, you might check your recursion depth. If you recurse too deeply, you'll overflow the stack.
I would consider adding an assert to test n (ie. assert(n < 1000001)), and perhaps a recursion depth variable to check your recursion depth as the first steps to diagnosing and debugging this code. You can find assert in <cassert>.