I found a bug yesterday in one of my Windows applications, which is built in a high level framework, which in the end, calls Windows APIs like CreateWindow, and ShowWindow, in order to display its user interface.
One one machine so far, and only one, which happened to be a customer machine, I observed the following behaviour:
For only one window in my entire application, when I first call ShowWindow(Handle,SW_SHOW ) for this window, the size which it previously had received by SetWindowPos is overridden.
Reading the MSDN Win32 API documentation, on ShowWindow(Handle,SW_SHOW) I can not see any reference it it moving the window bounds. I can work around this surprising result by having my window-show routine get the bounds before it calls the Win32 ShowWindow routine.
My question is, has anyone ever seen behaviour like this? I think it must be one of the following:
An obscure bug in Windows 7 Service Pack 1 that does not reproduce on all systems, and only reproduces perhaps for a particular version of a particular video card driver. (This affected system has dual AMD/ATI FireGL video cards)
An obscure problem caused by a side effect of some other software running on the system, which may be hooking window handles, installing trampolined code hooks somewhere (perhaps even inside my own process, thanks to some DLL or something that I am not aware of).
Something my 4 million line application is doing to me, through some weird code somewhere I have not yet identified.
I am hitting an application compatibility shim within the Win32 API layer.
If anyone who has worked in C++, C, or Delphi, or any other language, has ever seen anything like this and can think of a reason why ShowWindow would have this amazing and unexpected side effect, of moving the bounds of the window, back to a certain original position, in my case, x=175, y=175, width=320, height=240, which appears to be have been the window bounds right after the initial CreateWindow call, I'd like to know what it is.
Here is a sequence of events:
Application starts up, and creates a few top level windows parented to the desktop.
The first window created is the main application window and the second is a tool window, both have full window grabber bars and are conventional top level Win32 windows, Forms which are sizeable, draggable, and parented to the desktop.
The second window's position is loaded from disk, and the form is shown.
During the form show process, its bounds are set so that the window is at some x and y top/left position, and some height/width is given.
If I query the Win32 window handle immediately before I call ShowWindow, its bounds are where I expect.
If I query the Win32 window handle immediately after I call ShowWindow, its bounds have been reset.
According to MSDN help SW_SHOW means Activates the window and displays it in its current size and position.
This is indeed what occurs on over 100 client PCs I have observed. Only on a single customer-owned Windows 7 PC is this behaviour different.
This affected system has dual AMD/ATI FireGL video cards
I ain't sure about FireGL, but for consumers videocards, made upon the same chip lineage, video-drivers exactly have add-on to reposition windows as they think is easier for operator.
it is called HydraVision Package for Catalyst Software Suite
Related
I have ListView which items are completely drawn using my code. Of course I use data provided by NMLVCUSTOMDRAW primarily RECTs. There are two rects p->nmcd.rc and p->rcText, first one carries valid information and the other one is always 0. This issue is that nmcd.rc does not contain valid rect on Windows XP I get 0,1,0,2 or something like that.
As that did not work I tried using ListView_GetItemIndexRect which fails on Win XP, while it works on Win 7/10.
Looking at the ListView_GetItemIndexRect's msdn page I can see that apparently it works only on Vista+. While at the same time some other ListView functions that are listed as Vista+ work fine on Windows XP.
Windows XP is rare among my program's users, but still I'd like it to function perfectly. Drawing complete list view on my own would fix the problem for sure, but that is a dead end.
Check out the first comment on this page:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/bb774778%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
Handling subitem pre-paint messages on Windows XP (perhaps all
pre-Vista systems?) the handler receives incorrect top and bottom
values in NMLVCUSTOMDRAW::nmcd.rc, sometimes they are zero, sometimes
are not updated since previous handler call (so basically the idea is
that they are left uninitialized by comctl32 caller). In order to get
correct subitem position the handler has to explicitly obtain
rectangle using a separate message/call:
RECT Position; ListView.GetSubItemRect((INT) pHeader->nmcd.dwItemSpec,
pHeader->iSubItem, LVIR_BOUNDS, &Position);
I'm part of the SFML Team and we're currently looking into a feature to "request" window focus. The goal is to get very similar behavior across Windows, OS X and Linux.
For Windows one gets the rather simple SetForegroundWindow function via the WinAPI, which has a few condition as to how the window actually gets focus. The most important part to notice here is, that it only gets focus if it's from the same foreground process.
On OS X it's possible to get the focus for the active app only and otherwise let the icon bounce, i.e. notification.
Here comes the problem now, we'd like to get the same behavior on Linux as well, meaning the window should get focus if the window belongs to the active/foreground process and otherwise it should generate a notification. What would be the closest thing to that with X11?
There are already a few suggestions on the issue tracker of SFML, but none of them are actually implementing this behavior.
"User Story"
I guess developers can think of different things when being confronted with different technical names, as such here's the issue from a user perspective.
There are mainly two situations in which requesting focus is needed:
Sometimes when starting an application that uses a console window in the background, it can happen that the console window gets the focus instead of the actual GUI window. When this happens it's rather annoying for the user having to click on the window first. Since the console window and the GUI window are from the same application there's no harm done in switching the focus to the GUI window.
When one is writing an application that supports multiple windows, there might be situations where the application should decide which window gets the focus and again since the window belong to the same application there's no harm done in switching the focus from one GUI window to the other GUI window.
Further more if a different application has the focus/is being used then it's not okay to steal the focus and as such we just want to get the user's attention. For Windows that might be a blinking taskbar or for OS X that might be a jumping icon.
The current implementation seems to work fine on OS X and Windows, butwe're unsure about the X11 implementation. Thus the question is: How would one go about switching the window focus if the currently focussed window has been created by the same application that makes the focus request and otherwise create some kind of notification. For the notification we're/I'm not even sure if there's some generic way of doing it with X11.
In X11, "focus" means "the keyboard focus", that is, the window that gets the keyboard input. The window that has the focus is not necessarily in the foreground. This depends on your window manager focus policy. Most can be configured to have "click-to-focus" or "point-to-focus" policy. If you are interested in the keyboard focus, use XSetInputFocus. If you want to bring your window to the foreground, use XRaiseWindow.
It is OK to call RaiseWindow and XSetInputFocus once, when the application starts. It is also OK to bring a window to the foreground/set focus as a response to a user interaction with that or some other window of the same application. But it's not OK to do so as a response to some background event (time passed, file downloaded etc).
The standard X11 method of drawing attention to a window is setting the urgency hint. This will normally flash or bounce the icon, depending on your window manager. Do not forget to unset the hint when the user finally interacts with the window.
I think all of this has been discussed in the thread you have linked. I'm not quite sure which concerns are still left unanswered. Nothing can implement the exact same behaviour as with the other windowing systems, simply because X11 is not those windowing systems, and it's totally OK. X11, Mac OS X and Windows all behave differently and the users know and expect that. It would annoy me to no end if some application on X11 decided to behave exactly like it does on Windows, instead of toeing the X11 party line.
I have a strange issue I've been unable to diagnose and am hoping someone can at least point me in the right direction. I have a C++ MFC application that collects data from various sources and displays it on the screen. After a random interval (typically around 5-10 minutes), however, the display gets "corrupted" in a way I've never seen or have been able to track down as shown in the image below (left is normal, right is corrupt):
The basic symptoms are:
Up/down arrow images turn into "5"s and "6"s.
Opening a combo box list results in just the item text displayed (list border and scroll bar is not shown).
Background colours on some controls don't update or display correctly.
Z-order is broken and the app controls "leak" through other windows placed on top.
Pressing Print-Screen with the app in focus no longer captures the window to the clipboard.
Closing and reopening the window does nothing.
Restarting the application gets things back to normal.
Things I've tried to eliminate as a possible cause include:
Operating System & Computer: The same issue is present on a variety of systems from Windows 7-64 bit to Windows Xp-32 bit.
Multi-threading: I added a mutex to prevent the display updates from occurring at the same time but it had no effect (as expected).
Memory Corruption: This has been my assumption all along but there are no signs of memory corruption at all. The base display code has been used for years with no similar issue as well as the base networking message library.
Specific Code: I have narrowed down the issue to one specific dialog among a variety of others that show no issue. They all use the same base code which would seem to indicate the issue lies in the specific display code for the dialog. Exactly how or why the issue occurs has eluded me so far.
Any ideas on what the cause might be or how to narrow it down would be great.
Update 1:
Doing some more timing/repeatable tests and it looks like leaving this one dialog running for a short while causes the issue. The amount time is consistently between 300-400 seconds before the issue shows up.
It sounds like your application could be leaking GDI objects. To check if that is the case, open your task manager and enable the GDI Objects column. Observe the number for your process and see if it's increasing continuously.
If that is actually the case, you should read Detect and Plug GDI Leaks in Your Code with Two Powerful Tools for Windows XP. That MSDN article also offers a tool named GDILeaks.exe that should help you identify your GDI Leaks.
In the case where these symptoms surface within a short time, it should be something that is drawn repeatedly that isn't freeing GDI resources properly. Possibly in (or called within) the windows procedure (OnPaint for example).
If I'm not mistaken Windows' GUI uses a ttf(?) font for those little icons, and it looks like the font gets destroyed somehow (DeleteObject being called with font's handle?)
The Windows API provides an API GetDesktopWindow( ) which returns the window handle
But I tested with Spy++ and I find that the window handle of the desktop and the window handle of the "Windows Desktop" is not the same.
As the "Windows Desktop" is a list view, do I need to do the following
1) HANDLE hWnd = GetDesktopWindow() ;
2) FindWindow(hWnd, ..... ) with the SyslistView32 as the Window class.
Once I get the Window handle, I want to use SendMessage() for operations like getting selected file name, the number of files selected , etc.
Please give your opinions. I am doing this using the Windows SDk
In light of a recent discussion on Meta complaining that questions like this one have "not been properly answered", I'm going to try and give answering this one a whirl. Not to imply that I think meklarian's answer is bad—in fact, far from it. But it's clearly been deemed unsatisfactory, so perhaps I can fill in some of the additional details.
Your problem results from a fairly widespread confusion over what the desktop window actually is. The GetDesktopWindow function does precisely what it's documented to do: it returns a handle to the desktop window. This, however, is not the same window that contains the desktop icons. That's a completely different window that appeared for the first time in Windows 95. It's actually a ListView control set to the "Large Icons" view, with the actual desktop window as its parent.
Raymond Chen, a developer on the Windows Shell team provides some additional detail in the following Windows Confidential article: Leftovers from Windows 3.0
[ . . . ] While in Windows 3.0, icons on the desktop represented minimized windows, in Windows 95, the desktop acted as an icon container.
The Windows 95 desktop was actually a window created by Explorer that covered your screen (but sat beneath all the other windows on your desktop). That was the window that displayed your icons. There was still a window manager desktop window beneath that (the window you get if you call GetDesktopWindow), but you never saw it because it was covered by the Windows 95 desktop—the same way that the wood paneling in the basement of my colleague’s house covered the original wall and the time capsule behind the wall.
[ . . . ]
This desktop design has remained largely unchanged since its introduction in Windows 95. On a typical machine, the original desktop is still there, but it’s completely covered by the Explorer desktop.
In summary, then, the window returned by the GetDesktopWindow function is the actual desktop window, the only one we had way back in Windows 3.0. The Explorer desktop (the one that contains all your icons) is merely another window sitting on top of the desktop window (although one that completely covers the original) that wasn't added until Windows 95.
If you want to get a handle to the Explorer desktop window, you need to do some additional work beyond simply calling the GetDesktopWindow function. In particular, you need to traverse the child windows of the actual desktop window to find the one that Explorer uses to display icons. Do this by calling the FindWindowEx function to get each window in the hierarchy until you get to the one that you want. It has a class name of SysListView32. You'll also probably want to use the GetShellWindow function, which returns a handle to the Shell's desktop window, to help get you started.
The code might look like this (warning: this code is untested, and I don't recommend using it anyway!):
HWND hShellWnd = GetShellWindow();
HWND hDefView = FindWindowEx(hShellWnd, NULL, _T("SHELLDLL_DefView"), NULL);
HWND folderView = FindWindowEx(hDefView, NULL, _T("SysListView32"), NULL);
return folderView;
I noted there that I don't actually recommend using that code. Why not? Because in almost every case that you want to get a handle to the desktop window (either the actual desktop window, or the Explorer desktop), you're doing something wrong.
This isn't how you're supposed to interact with the desktop window. In fact, you're not really supposed to interact with it at all! Remember how you learned when you were a child that you're not supposed to play with things that belong to other people without their permission? Well, the desktop belongs to Windows (more specifically, to the Shell), and it hasn't given you permission to play with its toys! And like any good child, the Shell is subject to throwing a fit when you try to play with its toys without asking.
The same Raymond Chen has published another article on his blog that details a very specific case, entitled What's so special about the desktop window?
Beyond the example he gives, this is fundamentally not the way to do UI automation. It's simply too fragile, too problematic, and too subject to breaking on future versions of Windows. Instead, define what it is that you're actually trying to accomplish, and then search for the function that enables you to do that.
If such a function does not exist, the lesson to be learned is not that Microsoft simply wants to make life harder for developers. But rather that you aren't supposed to be doing that in the first place.
If you want the Desktop window as defined in GetDesktopWindow(), use that window handle. This is the window handle you should use to look for top-level windows and other related activities.
What you're seeing in Spy++ is just the content drawn as the desktop in your session. If you use the auto-locate in Spy++, you'll see that the SysListView32-declared window is a child window of your explorer shell. It is quite infrequent for someone to need access to this window. Also, the existence of this window may be subject to changes between versions of windows.
Edit (additional info)
If you are looking to interact or place things on the actual shell desktop, you may be better served by other APIs. Here are two such APIs that can accomplish this, depending on the target version of windows.
Windows Sidebar # MSDN
This is available on Vista and Windows 7
Using the Active Desktop # MSDN
This is available on Windows 2000 and XP, although frequently disabled by users and sysadmins.
I am developing an application for PocketPC. When the application starts the custom function SetScreenOrientation(270) is called which rotates the screen. When the application closes the function SetScreenOrientation(0) is called which restores the screen orientation.
This way the screen orientation isn't restored if the user minimizes the application and this is not acceptable.
Does anyone know where (in which event handlers) should SetScreenOrientation(int angle) be called to set the screen orientation on application start, restore orientation on minimize, set the orientation on maximize and restore the orientation on close?
Actually I don't know which event handler handles the Minimize and Maximize event.
The correct message is WM_SIZE, but Daemin's answer points to the wrong WM_SIZE help topic. Check the wParam. Be careful as your window may be maximized but hidden.
Going from my Windows CE experience you should handle either the WM_SIZE or WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGED messages. If you're working on PocketPC I would suggest you take a look at the WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGED message first because I'm not sure the WM_SIZE has the right parameters that you need.
From the WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGED message's WINDOWPOS structure take a look at the flags member, specifically SWP_SHOWWINDOW and SWP_HIDEWINDOW.
The specific version of the messages that you need to look at vary with what operating system you're using. The Pocket PC OS is built on Windows CE 3.0 (and lower), while Windows Mobile is now built on Windows CE 5.0 (even Windows Mobile 6), but was also built on Windows CE 4. (Source)
So just look under the relevant section in MSDN for the OS that you're writing for.
I don't know what these are called in the C++ world, but in .NET Compact Framework your application form's Resize event would be called when you minimize/maximize a window, and then in the event code you would check the WindowState property of the form to see if its minimized or mazimized.
Altering the state of your PDA from within your application is risky (although there are lots of good reasons to do it), because if your app crashes it will leave the PDA in whatever state it was in. I've done a lot of kiosk-type (full-screen) apps in Windows Mobile, and one of the tricks to doing this effectively is to hide the WM title bar (the top row with the Windows start button) to keep it from flashing up for a split second every time you open a new form. If the app crashes, the windows bar remains invisible until you reset the device, which isn't good. At least with screen rotation the user can restore it manually.
It really depends on the platform, but I'd go with WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGED or the OnShow. It's not wm_size.. That one is not always thrown on all platforms. Casio's don't throw the size event when you'd expect them to. TDS and Symbol's do.
Even though the MSDN is a great sourse for info, remember not all OS's are created equal. In the PPC world the hardware provider gets to create their own OS and sometimes the miss things, or purposfully ignore things.
I've got a platform here (name withheld to protect... well me) that has left and right buttons.. When you press them, you'd expect to be able to catch VK_LEFT, VK_RIGHT.. You'd be wrong. You actually get ';' or ':'. How's that for a kick in the pants.