In Qt you can define the tab order by using the Qt Designer or by using C++. The relationships between widgets are set relatively to each other, so there is no index or such thing. What I want right now is to "break" the circular chain of widgets so that I get a beginning and an end of the chain.
A circular tab order would be:
A - B
| |
D - C
I want (note missing link between A and D):
A - B
|
D - C
which is more like a line instead of a circle:
A - B - C - D
So the user "stops" at one end and has to go back using the other direction.
Update: I have another idea now. What if i reimplement:
bool QWidget::focusNextPrevChild(bool next)
According to the documentation one can use this to implement custom focus behavior.
In my dynamic scenario where buttons in the GUI are adjusted at run-time I will have to overload the function and set, for example, an internal flag allowFocusNext and allowFocusPrev which then ignores the focus request if necessary. I will report back here, when I have tried it. Meanwhile any comments are welcome!? :-)
I found a solution, but it is a bit hacky. The QWidget::setTabOrder will not allow to chain a widget with itself, so this approach won't help (even if you are using focus proxies)
However, you can define a "Focus Forwarder":
class FocusForwarder : public QWidget
{
public:
explicit FocusForwarder(QWidget *proxy) :
QWidget((QWidget *) proxy->parent()),
m_proxy(proxy)
{
setFocusPolicy(Qt::TabFocus);
}
protected:
void focusInEvent(QFocusEvent *) {
m_proxy->setFocus();
}
private:
QWidget *m_proxy;
};
And add them at the beginning and end of you chain:
FocusForwarder *w1 = new FocusForwarder(ui->bA);
FocusForwarder *w2 = new FocusForwarder(ui->bD);
QWidget::setTabOrder(w1, ui->bA);
QWidget::setTabOrder(ui->bA, ui->bB);
QWidget::setTabOrder(ui->bB, ui->bC);
QWidget::setTabOrder(ui->bC, ui->bD);
QWidget::setTabOrder(ui->bD, w2);
Details
For setTabOrder to work, the widgets must be in the same window. To ensure this, the Forwarder is placed in the proxy's parent (in the initializer list).
For this mechanism, the focus direction (Tab or Shit+Tab) does not matter. As soon as a FocusFowarder receives the focus, it will "forward" it to its proxy.
The direction is handled by Qt internally. You just add "sentinels" around your chain.
Use in QtDesigner
When you want to use it in QtDesigner, you'd create a Widget and promote it to the forwarder. As you cannot set the proxy directly, you could add a dynamic property for the proxy's name, like this:
class FocusForwarderDesigner : public QWidget
{
Q_OBJECT
Q_PROPERTY(QString proxyName READ proxyName WRITE setProxyName)
public:
QString proxyName() {
return (m_proxy) ? m_proxy->objectName() : QString::null;
}
void setProxyName(QString name) {
m_proxy = parent()->findChild<QWidget *>(name);
}
explicit FocusForwarderDesigner(QWidget *parent = NULL) :
QWidget(parent) {}
protected:
void focusInEvent(QFocusEvent *) {
if (m_proxy) m_proxy->setFocus();
}
private:
QWidget *m_proxy;
}
In the designer, you would add a string-property with name proxyName and set it to the proxy's name. Don't forget to set the focus policy to Tab Focus in designer.
After some additional thoughts I post an answer to my own question because it is a working solution but it is not ideal. Therefore, I'm still searching for a better one! As a note, my application mainly relies on mouse wheel interactions for changing the focus of widgets.
In my question I mentioned that overriding:
bool focusNextPrevChild(bool next)
could lead to a working system. The "receiving" widget would simply ignore the focus by returning "true" if it is marked as "last item" or "first item" and the "next" parameter would lead to a circular behavior. Although this works for the tab and space+tab key combinations, there are cases where focusNextPrevChild is not called explicitly. In my case it is not called for focus changes related to mouse wheel events.
What I do instead is overriding:
void wheelEvent(QWheelEvent* event)
This gives me direct control over all the focus events related to the mouse wheel. My overridden function looks like this:
void SelectionIconButton::wheelEvent(QWheelEvent* event)
{
bool next = event->delta() > 0;
if (m_IsLastInFocusChain && next) {
event->accept();
return;
}
if (m_IsFirstInFocusChain && !next) {
event->accept();
return;
}
QPushButton::wheelEvent(event);
}
So this system's requirements are:
Each widget has to somehow implement two bools and handle their
state.
Each of those widgets has to be configured either at startup
or in dynamic screens during appliation use
Listening only to
wheelEvent does not allow me to handle tab key and space+tab key
combinations
You see that this solution works but it involves some effort to apply it to a large application. I was thinking about a more general solution. Maybe a global list that is updated when a screen is changing. This global list would then somehow decide if a focus change is allowed or not. Unfortunately, this again is problematic with mouse wheel events because some widgets are "active" and the wheel event does not even want to change focus but alter the value in an input field, for example, instead.
Edit:
I might have to add that the default implementation of QWidget::wheelEvent() and QPushButton::wheelEvent() and many more Qt-Widgets just ignore the event by setting event->ignore().
In my application all those ignored events are caught at a high level widget which then interprets the QWheelEvent and uses its delta to call focusPreNextChild() the right amount of time.
Related
I have two separate threads.
First thread for GUI, and second for application data.
Initially, I wanted to use QUndoStack and QUndoView.
But there was a problem - this view works directly with the stack:
https://code.woboq.org/qt5/qtbase/src/widgets/util/qundoview.cpp.html#_ZN10QUndoModel20setStackCurrentIndexERK11QModelIndex
In this case I got race condition.
To solve this problem I wrote custom myUndoView using QListView and QAbstractListModel.
Now all my slots using queued connections and I store a lightweight copy of the "real" undo stack in the custom view model.
This is same size and same order of the "real" undo stack elements.
A lightweight element contains only type of the undo command and text.
Now I have another problem. I'm not blame for this ))
I have a QLineEdit that emits signal on value changed when I click Enter key or lost focus.
This value in turn is sent to object (app model) with "real" undo stack. It works.
But this does not work when I interact with undo view too.
Repeat, I'm not blame for this. QUndoView has the same behavior.
Step by step:
QLineEdit in focus.
Changing value, still in focus.
Click the mouse in the undo view.
Oops.. currentIndexChanged() signal from undo view can be sent first,
or signal from QLineEdit can be sent first.
It always differs ..
If signal from QLineEdit was sent first - it works correctly.
The history of changes not lost.
I want to make enter/blur and other changes (not in history view) always invoked first. Probably I can use QTimer::singleShot() for delay of emit undo view signals . But not curentIndexChanged() because this signal emit with user interactions and when undo stack updated programmatically. We can not determine who make changes - user or application.
What I tried?
Intercept mouse clicks:
myUndoView::mousePressEvent(QMouseEvent *event)
{
event->ignore();
qDebug() << "catched!";
}
But sometimes it loses the clicks.
At the bottom of the list item (under the letters) is an area that pass a click to the item.
This may be a Qt bug, found in my environment: Debian, Mate, GTK+ Qt-style.
I think, I can place another transparent widget over list, and get coordinates of the click and use it:
http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qabstractitemview.html#indexAt
to get the selected index.
Or I make all wrong?
Maybe there is an easier way?
How to make it right?
I would try blocking the list model signals while the line edit is focused.
Let's have an event filter like this:
class EventFilter : public QObject
{
Q_OBJECT
public:
EventFilter(QObject * model) : _model(model){}
bool eventFilter(QObject *watched, QEvent *event);
private:
QObject * _model;
};
which keeps a private reference to the list model as a pointer to QObject, passed in constructor argument.
The filter implementation:
bool EventFilter::eventFilter(QObject *watched, QEvent *event)
{
if(event->type() == QEvent::FocusIn)
{
_model->blockSignals(true);
}
return false;
}
Keep a reference to an instance of the filter in the window class (Form, in my example), along with the list model instance reference:
private:
EventFilter * filter;
QAbstractListModel * model;
The filter has to be instantiated and installed in line edit, in Form constructor (don't forget to delete it in the destructor):
filter = new EventFilter(model); //the model is passed to the filter in construction
ui->lineEdit->installEventFilter(filter);
At this point, model events will be blocked when the line edit gets focus. To unlock them, use the line edit editingFinished slot:
void Form::on_lineEdit_editingFinished()
{
model->blockSignals(false);
}
I have some labels and layouts nested inside a QWidget to build a part of a sidebar. Each QWidget is its own section and one component currently looks like this:
To my understanding, you can only set hyperlinks with QLabel, but I'm trying to get the whole area between the white lines clickable. This is including the icon and the whitespace. Is there any way to achieve this?
This got marked as a duplicate to the opposite of what I was asking, so I'd like to reiterate that I'm trying to implement a hyperlink without QLabel.
You can easily have a widget open a link on click:
class Link : public QWidget {
Q_OBJECT
public:
Link(QUrl url, QWidget p = nullptr) : QWidget(p), _url(url) {}
QUrl _url;
void mouseReleaseEvent(QMouseEvent *) { QDesktopServices::openUrl(_url); }
}
You can avoid any extra signals and connections, and have each link widget store its own link internally, the url can be set on construction and changed at any time. Not using signals and slots makes it easier to change the link too, without having to disconnect previous connections.
IMO going for a signals and slots solution is only justified when you want different arbitrary behavior. In this case you always want the same - to open a particular link, so you might as well hardcode that and go for an easier and more computationally efficient solution.
I would just manually catch the SIGNAL for clicked() and use desktop services to open the url in code.
bool QDesktopServices::openUrl ( const QUrl & url ) [static]
Opens the given url in the appropriate Web browser for the user's desktop environment, and returns true if successful; otherwise returns false.
http://doc.qt.io/qt-4.8/signalsandslots.html
Using this type of syntax, or in the designer, you can also connect a signal to a slot.
connect(widgetThatRepresentsURL, SIGNAL(clicked()),
handlerThatWillOpenTheURL, SLOT(clicked_on_url()));
For widgets that don't have a signal set up for clicked (or whatever event you are interested in), you can subclass the widget in question and reimplement...
void QWidget::mousePressEvent ( QMouseEvent * event ) [virtual protected]
Specifically for creating a signal, there is emit. I've used this in the past like the following
void Cell::focusInEvent(QFocusEvent *e)
{
emit focus(this, true);
QLineEdit::focusInEvent(e);
}
with the following in the header
signals:
void focus(Cell *, bool);
I have created Qt GUI application. It consists of QGraphicsScene, and items (QGraphicsItems) are added to them by pressing or triggering pushbuttons. Each item added to the scene are members of different classes derived from QGraphicsItem. Now, my challenge is to delete an added item off the scene through one of the following mechanisms:
1) Right click an added item, create a context menu, and then use
scene->removeItem(addedItem);
2) Double click the item which deletes the item
3) Select an item using the flag ItemIsSelectable, and then delete the item by pressing the delete key on the keyboard
But having said that, as a newbie to Qt, I'm unable to do number 1 since the context menu doesn't show up when right clicked. In the case of number 2, I used signals and slots, a single emitted whenever an item is double clicked, and a slot in the mainWindow absorbs the signal and removes the item. But this way, the programs fails to compile because of the error "duplicate symbol found" when I add a Q_OBJECT macro to the header file of the item's class.
So my final option is to select an item on the screen and propane the keyboard signal to delete the item by pressing delete. How can be this done? Please give me advice if any of the above methods can be easily done in case I might be doing it completely wrong.
P.S. : I know there a lot of queries regarding deleting QGraphicsItem off QGraphicsScene, but none of them document a solid answer.
... I'm unable to do number 1 since the context menu doesn't show up when right clicked.
There are two possible methods to accomplish this:
Create a QWidget based menu, attached to the QGraphicsView.
Create your own menu item, derived from a QGraphicsItem.
Whilst the 2nd method will take more time, it's probably a better system in my opinion, as it will feel more integrated with the item you're deleting in the scene. The first method is also possible and if it's not working, then you could post an example question on SO.
2, I used signals and slots, ... because of the error "duplicate symbol found" when I add a Q_OBJECT macro to the header file
It sounds like you're trying to add the signal / slot functionality to a class derived from QGraphicsItem. You don't need to do this. Qt provides the QGraphicsObject class, which you can derive from, instead of QGraphicsItem, if you want signals and slots on items in a QGraphicsScene.
propane the keyboard signal to delete the item by pressing delete.
I assume you mean to 'propagate' keyboard signals. By overriding the QGraphicsScene and its keyPressEvent or keyReleaseEvent, you can get a list of selected items and delete them from the scene. Here's a skeleton example: -
class MyScene : public QGraphicsScene
{
protected:
void keyReleaseEvent(QKeyEvent * keyEvent);
};
void MyScene::keyReleaseEvent(QKeyEvent * keyEvent)
{
if(keyEvent->key() == Qt::Key_Backspace)
{
QList<QGraphicsItem*> selectedItems = selectedItems(); // get list of selected items
foreach(QGraphicsItem* item, selectedItems)
{
removeItem(item);
delete item;
}
}
}
You're seeking a lot of answers, Not so much how to handle QGraphicsItem or QGraphicsScene.
1) Right click an added item, create a context menu, and then use scene->removeItem(addedItem); here.
2) Double click the item, which deletes the item - you'll need to handle double clicks, and hit-testing the QGraphicsItems, you'll have to implement mouseDoubleClickEvent(QMouseEvent *e) and pass e's pos() to this to determine if a QGraphicsItem was clicked or not.
3) Select an item using the flag ItemIsSelectable and then delete the item by pressing the delete key on the keyboard - I'm not sure about the ItemIsSelectable flag. However, you'll need #2. And to learn how to handle keyboard input, by overriding this:
void QWidget::keyPressEvent( QKeyEvent *k ){
switch ( tolower(k->ascii()) ) {
case '\x08': \\backspace
break;
case '\x7F': \\delete
break;
}
}
There's also the Qt::key enumeration, which has Key_Backspace, and Key_Delete. It can be tested against the QKeyEvent::Key()'s return if you don't like dealing with ASCII character codes.
class genericTaskList : public QListWidget
{
Q_OBJECT
public:
QListWidgetItem *defaultText;
genericTaskList (QWidget *parentWidget)
{
setParent (parentWidget);
setFixedSize (445, 445);
defaultText = new QListWidgetItem ("Double click here to compose the task");
defaultText->setFlags (defaultText->flags () | Qt :: ItemIsEditable);
insertItem (0, defaultText);
QObject :: connect (this, SIGNAL (currentRowChanged (int)), this, SLOT (addDefaultText (int)));
}
public slots:
void addDefaultText (int rr)
{
std::cout << "\ndsklfjsdklfhsdklhfkjsdf\n";
insertItem (++rr, defaultText);
}
};
This code is supposed to issue a signal each time the row gets edited.
After I call "insertItem" in the constructor, the signal is issued.
But, that's it. It never gets issued after that - no matter how many times I edit the row.
What am I missing?
At first it seems like QListWidget::itemChanged is the way to go, but soon you run into a problem: the signal is sent for everything - inserts, removes, changing colors, checking boxes, etc! So then you end up trying to put in flags and filter everywhere by intercepting various signals to find out if editing was the actual event. It gets very messy.
There is also QAbstractItemModel::dataChanged , which would seem like a good solution. It even has a parameter "const QVector& lstRoles" so you could scan for Qt::EditRole and see if it was really edited. Alas, there's a catch - it gets called for everything just like QListWidget::itemChanged and unfortunately, for QListWidget anyway, the roles parameter is always empty when it's called (I tried it). So much for that idea...
Fortunately, there's still hope... This solution does the trick! :
http://falsinsoft.blogspot.com/2013/11/qlistwidget-and-item-edit-event.html
He uses QAbstractItemDelegate::closeEditor, but I prefer using QAbstractItemDelegate::commitData.
So make a connect like so...
connect(ui.pLstItems->itemDelegate(), &QAbstractItemDelegate::commitData, this, &MyWidget::OnLstItemsCommitData);
Then implement the slot like this...
void MyWidget::OnLstItemsCommitData(QWidget* pLineEdit)
{
QString strNewText = reinterpret_cast<QLineEdit*>(pLineEdit)->text();
int nRow = ui.pLstItems->currentRow();
// do whatever you need here....
}
Now you have a slot that gets called only when the list item's text has been edited!
currentRowChanged indicates the row selection has changed, not the content of the row. Perhaps you want to use currentTextChanged or itemChanged instead.
The reuse of the word current and changed in the QT docs is quite confusing.
Warning: A QListWidgetItem can only be added to a QListWidget once. Adding the same QListWidgetItem multiple times to a QListWidget will result in undefined behavior.
So even if it will emit the signal I think you should better to add newly created Item.
And when do you want the new row to be inserted ? -
as soon as item is double clicked or finishing edit - they differ.
I'm a student programmer and I am using Qt to build a GUI application. I'm trying to ensure that some check boxes are checked in order to proceed. These check boxes enable or disable the group box itself and are part of the QGroupBox class. Accepted combinations could be either or both. The problem I am running into is getting the boolean value(at least that's what I think it is) from the QGroupBox member function QGroupBox::setChecked(bool) and use it to determine whether or not to display an error message. I have tried several methods and reference Qts documentation hoping for a good example. Because the QGroupBox I'm trying to use is a member of my ui class I tried creating a new instance of QGroupBox and setting it to the values of the ui. Then; using an if statement, find out whether or not the boxes are check or not. Here's my code for this:
QGroupBox activeParticleInjection = ui->groupBoxParticleInjection;
QGroupBox activeFluidInjection = ui->groupBoxFluidInjection;
if (activeParticleInjection::setChecked(false) && activeFluidInjection(false));
{
QMessageBox noInjectionSelectedError;
noInjectionSelectedError.setText("Error: No injection type selected");
noInjectionSelectedError.exec();
}
else
{
transData.particleInjectionActive = activeParticleInjection::setChecked();
transData.fluidInjectionActive = activeFluidInjection::setChecked();
This doesn't work; starting with the way I'm trying to pass the Ui properties to the new instance of QGroupBox. I know that is question is relatively generic question but I tried passing the ui checkbox directly and that caused even more issues. I looked through the documentation and that led me to the way im trying to do it know; with no luck. I was hoping for some feedback on a better method of handling QGroupBox. Being a student sometimes its hard to see the answer especially when dealing with such unique members as the ones put together in QT.
Prior to changes I was using this method to build this process; and I received errors for the way my if parameters were setup. Compile error was : no matching function for call to 'QGroupBox::isChecked(bool)'
if (ui->groupBoxFluidInjection->isChecked(false) && ui->groupBoxParticleInjection->isChecked(false));
{
QMessageBox noInjectionSelectedError;
noInjectionSelectedError.setText("Error: No injection type selected");
noInjectionSelectedError.exec();
}
else
{
transData.particleInjectionActive = ui->groupBoxParticleInjection->isChecked();
transData.fluidInjectionActive = ui->groupBoxFluidInjection->isChecked();
}
I have been using these sites for most help:
QGroupBox
QCheckBox
You're mixing several things:
The QGroupBox instances in ui are pointers, so you must assign them to a QGroupBox* (pointer), not a QGroupBox (object on the stack).
:: is used with methods only if the method you call is static (class method), which is not the case here.
setChecked() is a setter setting the checked state of the group box. It doesn't return anything (void), so you cannot use them as conditions. What you want there is the getter bool QGroupBox::isChecked().
Your code snippet cleansed:
QGroupBox* activeParticleInjection = ui->groupBoxParticleInjection;
QGroupBox* activeFluidInjection = ui->groupBoxFluidInjection;
if (!activeParticleInjection->isChecked() && !activeFluidInjection->isChecked())
{
QMessageBox::critical(this, tr("Error"), tr("No injection type selected"));
}
else
{
transData.particleInjectionActive = activeParticleInjection->isChecked();
transData.fluidInjectionActive = activeFluidInjection->isChecked();
}
Not really sure what you tried to do in your code, but that's actually a lot easier to achieve. Also don't try to create copies (which you do in your example). Work with references or pointers in that case!
QGroupBox group("my group box"); // of course this might be a class member, too
group.setCheckable(true);
// do other things...
if(group.isChecked())
{
// do whatever if it's checked
}
else
{
// do stuff if it isn't checked
}
To check for at least one of multiple groups (or check boxes) being checked:
if(group1.isChecked() || group2.isChecked())