Does storongloop loopback has pluck function for a given model ?
For a Product model,
in Rails I can write
Product.where(some_condition).pluck(:name)
It will return an array of names of products matching the condition.
Is there anything similar in loopback?
PS: I know I can use fields filter and then use underscore( or lodash)'s pluck but that's a two step process.
Select specific columns:
{"fields":{"name":true, "email":true}}
Where condition:
{"where":{"id":2}}
Combining:
{"fields":{"id":true},"where":{"id":{"inq":[10,20,30]}}}
The above code works in swagger. Node.js code would be as follows:
var m = server.models.customer;
m.findOne({
fields: ['name', 'email'],
where: {
id:{inq:[10,20,30]}}
}
}, function (err, data) {
console.log(data);
})
Related
I'm trying to write a schema so that I can query models filtered by multiple keys, sorted by a custom key and paginated.
an example of my model:
type Article {
id: ID!
category: String!
area: String!
publishOn: AWSDate!
}
And an example of the query I would like to do is: retrieve all the Articles which are part of both a given category AND area, returned in descending order by publishOn in chunks of 10 items each (to implement pagination server-side, and have a lightweight UI).
The response should include also the nextToken attribute that can be used to load the "next" page of the filtered articles list.
I have multiple problems with what I can do with the automatically generated schema and can't find a way to implement manually a solution that works for all what I want to do. I try and make a list of what goes wrong:
Filtering
Let's say I want to query 10 articles that belong to the category "Holiday":
listArticles(filter: {category: {eq: "Holiday} }, limit: 10)
I won't get the first 10 articles that match that category, but instead, it seems that AppSync selects the first 10 items in the table, and then it filters these 10 items by the filter criteria.
In other words, it seems that the sequence in which filtering and sorting are applied is the opposite of what expected. Expected: firstly filter the table by the filter critaria, then return the first 10 items of the filtered result sets.
Sorting
I couldn't find a way to add sorting with AppSync, so I added searchable:
type Article (
#searchable
) {
id: ID!
category: String!
area: String!
publishOn: AWSDate!
}
Now if I sort by date, that key will be used as nextToken and brake the pagination. This is a known issue: https://github.com/aws-amplify/amplify-cli/issues/4434
Do you have any good tip on how to find a workaround to these bugs? I dag into the documentation and in couple of issue, but didn't come up with a solution that works well...
Thanks in advance,
Matteo
Filtering
You will need a Global Secondary Index in DynamoDB to achieve such a behaviour. You can create them with the #key annotation. I your case I would create a composite key consisting of the category for the partition key and area and publishOn as the sort key(s).
type Article
#model
#key(fields: ["id"])
#key(name: "byCategory", fields: ["category", "publishOn"])
#key(name: "byCategoryArea", fields: ["category", "area", "publishOn"])
{
id: ID!
category: String!
area: String!
publishOn: AWSDate!
}
Sorting
Sorting is done by the sortDirection property which is either DESC or ASC and can only be done on the sort key.
The #searchable directive enables elasticsearch on the table, which is a fulltext search engine and probably a bit pricy for small applications and wouldn't be required here unless you would want to query based on e.g. the article description text.
listArticles(filter: {category: {eq: "Holiday"} }, limit: 10, sortDirection: DESC)
Amplify AppSync: filtering with pagination
let allClubsList = async (sport) => {
try {
let clubsList;
let clubsInfoList = [];
let nextTokenInfo = null;
do{
let clubs = await client.query({
query: gql(clubBySportStatus),
variables: {
sport: sport,
eq: { status: "ACTIVE" },
},
limit: 100,
nextToken: nextTokenInfo,
fetchPolicy: "network-only",
});
clubsList = clubs.data.clubBySportStatus.items;
clubsList.forEach((item) => clubsInfoList.push(item));
nextTokenInfo = clubs.data.clubBySportStatus.nextToken;
} while (Boolean(nextTokenInfo));
if (clubsInfoList && clubsInfoList.length) {
return {
success: true,
data: clubsInfoList,
};
}
} catch (eX) {
console.error(`Error in allClubsList: ${JSON.stringify(eX)}`);
return {
success: false,
message: eX.message,
};
}
};
In loopback framework, is there a way to avoid updates for few fields
Below code allows updates for all fields that is passed in the API request body.
async updateById(
#param.path.number('id') id: number,
#requestBody({
content: {
'application/json': {
schema: getModelSchemaRef(Todo, {partial: true}),
},
},
})
todo: Todo,
): Promise<void> {
await this.todoRepository.updateById(id, todo);
}
As far as I understand from your question, you want to update some part of the object in the database.
this.repo.updateById(id,objectYouWantToUpdate)
This is going to work perfectly, just send the data you want to update and not the whole object.
exclude key can help
schema: getModelSchemaRef(Todo, {partial: true, exclude: ['title']})
I have written a (very) simple RESTFul Web service to retrieve data from MongoDB using Node, Express and Mongoose.
On the server side, I have this code:
router.route('/products').post(function(req,res){
var product = new Product(req.body);
product.save(function(err){
if(err)
res.send(err);
res.send({message:'Product Added'});
});
When I submit a request from my Ember client, the req.body contains something like the following:
{ attributes:
{ category: 1,
name: 'y',
price: 1,
active: false,
notes: null } }
The attribute names are exactly the same as my mongoose schema. I get no error but the document created in MongoDB is empty (just get the _id and __v fields).
What am I doing wrong. Should I convert the req.body further into ???
A couple things that will help debug:
1) From a quick glance (I haven't used mongoose before) it looks like call back function passed to save takes two arguments.
2) I don't know if your code got cut off, but the sample above was missing a matching });
3) I made the function short circuit itself on error, so you will not see 'Product added' unless that is truly the case.
Try these fixes.
router.route('/products').post(function(req,res){
var product = new Product(req.body);
product.save(function(err, product){
if(err){
return res.send(err);
}
return res.send({message:'Product Added'});
});
});
The issue was related to my lack of familiarity with Ember and Node+Express. The data received in the server is slightly different from what I had first indicated: (first line was missing)
{ product:
{ attributes:
{ category: ... } } }
On the server side I can access my data using req.body.product.attributes (instead of req.body):
router.route('/products').post(function(req,res){
var product = new Product(req.body.product.attributes);
product.save(function(err){
if(err)
res.send(err);
res.send({message:'Product Added'});
});
I want to make an API call for searching that looks like this:
https://myapi.com/search/<query>/<token>
where query is the search term and token (optional) is an alphanumeric set of characters which identifies the position of my latest batch of results, which is used for infinite scrolling.
This call returns the following JSON response:
{
"meta": { ... },
"results" {
"token": "125fwegg3t32",
"content": [
{
"id": "125125122778",
"text": "Lorem ipsum...",
...
},
{
"id": "125125122778",
"text": "Dolor sit amet...",
...
},
...
]
}
}
content is an array of (embedded) items that I'm displaying as search results. My models look like this:
App.Content = Em.Model.extend({
id: Em.attr(),
text: Em.attr(),
...
});
App.Results = Em.Model.extend({
token: Em.attr(),
content: Em.hasMany('App.Content', {
key: 'content',
embedded: true
})
});
In order to make that API call, I figured I have to do something like this:
App.Results.reopenClass({
adapter: Em.RESTAdapter.create({
findQuery: function(klass, records, params) {
var self = this,
url = this.buildURL(klass) + '/' + params.query;
if (params.token) {
url += '/' + params.token;
}
return this.ajax(url).then(function(data) {
self.didFindQuery(klass, records, params, data);
return records;
});
}
}),
url: 'https://myapi.com/search',
});
then somewhere in my routes do this:
App.Results.fetch({query: 'query', token: '12kgkj398512j'}).then(function(data) {
// do something
return data;
})
but because the API returns a single object and Em.RESTAdapter.findQuery expects an array, an error occurs when Ember Model tries to materialize the data. So how do I do this properly? I'm using the latest build of Ember Model.
By the way, I'm aware that it would be much more convenient if the API was designed in a way so I can just call App.Content.fetch(<object>), which would return a similar JSON response, but I would then be able to set the collectionKey option to content and my data would be properly materialized.
You simply need to override your models load() method to adjust the payload hash to what Ember.Model wants. There are no serializers in Ember.Model. There is both a class level load for handling collections and an instance level load for loading the JSON specific to a single model. You want to override the instance level load method to wrap the content key value in an array if its not one already.
I have been using Ember.Mode quite heavily and enhanced it for a number of my use cases and submitted PR's for both fixes and enhancements. Those PRs have been sitting there for a while with no response from the maintainers. I have now moved to Ember.Data which has been 'rebooted' so to speak and having a lot better result with it now.
I would strongly suggest walking away from Ember.Model as it appears dead with the new pragmatic direction Ember Data has taken and because the project maintainer doesn't appear to have any interest in it anymore.
Is it possible to find an individual record based on its property in the views in Ember 1.0.0-rc.5? I've been searching around for days, but I still can't find anything that works.
For example, I would like to be able to do this:
App.Tag.find({name: 'some tag'}) which is supposed to return one record, but instead returns an array.
The name field is unique for all tags, so it should return only one object.
How can this be done?
Thanks
Problem solved! For people who might encounter the same problem, I will answer my question here. I ended up using the filter method to select one object. Details here http://emberjs.com/api/classes/Ember.Enumerable.html#method_filter
Code:
...
tagList = App.Tag.find().filter (item, index, enumerable) ->
return item.get('slug') is "slug title"
tag = tagList.get('firstObject')
...
When passing a query to a model's find method, you're invoking the findQuery method, which is designed to populate an array.
This is findQuery's definition:
findQuery: function(store, type, query, recordArray) {
var root = this.rootForType(type),
adapter = this;
return this.ajax(this.buildURL(root), "GET", {
data: query
}).then(function(json){
adapter.didFindQuery(store, type, json, recordArray);
}).then(null, rejectionHandler);
},
Which then calls didFindQuery upon success, to populate the array which is returned:
didFindQuery: function(store, type, payload, recordArray) {
var loader = DS.loaderFor(store);
loader.populateArray = function(data) {
recordArray.load(data);
};
get(this, 'serializer').extractMany(loader, payload, type);
},
So, assuming my understanding is correct, given that each 'name' in your case is unique, just get the first key of your array:
var tags = App.Tag.find({name: 'some tag'});
var tag = tags[0];