Pass FedAuth cookies from WebApi controller to RestSharp - cookies

We have a thinktecture powered identity server used for SSO. There are several services which utilize that identity server. My app uses ASP.net WebApi controllers to handle UI requests. For a particular request I have to make a REST API call to one of the mentioned above services. That service requires authentication of course. What I'm trying to do is to pass FedAuth cookies from the current request to RestSharp client:
[HttpGet]
[Route("api/testroute")]
public IHttpActionResult Test()
{
var client = new RestSharp.RestClient(_someBaseUrl);
var req = new RestSharp.RestRequest(_someUrl);
var cookies = Request
.Headers
.GetCookies()
.SelectMany(x => x.Cookies)
.Where(x => x.Name.StartsWith("FedAuth"))
.ToList();
foreach (var cookie in cookies)
{
req.AddCookie(cookie.Name, cookie.Value);
}
var resp = client.Execute(req);
return Ok(resp);
}
RestSharp client call fails with 500 error code with the following stacktrace inside:
[FormatException: Invalid length for a Base-64 char array or string.]
System.Convert.FromBase64_Decode(Char* startInputPtr, Int32 inputLength, Byte* startDestPtr, Int32 destLength) +14390795
System.Convert.FromBase64CharPtr(Char* inputPtr, Int32 inputLength) +162
System.Convert.FromBase64String(String s) +56
System.IdentityModel.Services.ChunkedCookieHandler.ReadInternal(String name, HttpCookieCollection requestCookies) +424
System.IdentityModel.Services.SessionAuthenticationModule.TryReadSessionTokenFromCookie(SessionSecurityToken& sessionToken) +99
System.IdentityModel.Services.SessionAuthenticationModule.OnAuthenticateRequest(Object sender, EventArgs eventArgs) +173
System.Web.SyncEventExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute() +80
System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously) +165
Is my approach for user authorization correct? If so, am I doing something wrong with the cookies (from the stacktrace it looks like they are being corrupted)?

I think your FedAuth cookie was encoded. Maybe you can check if your FedAuth cookie contains char like '%'. If yes, just decode FedAuth before you use it.

Related

ASP.Net Core XUnit Integration Testing when Two Factor Authenication is enabled

I've developing an Angular web application using ASP.Net Core 3.1 for the API.
So far, I've written some integration unit tests using a Custom WebApplicationFactory to create the test server.
All tests use the HttpClient to make GETs and POSTs to the API running under the Custom WebApplicationFactory. Most of these tests initially perform a login to obtain a token to use for subsequent requests.
I'd like to add Two Factor Authentication to the application, but this will inevitably break any tests, as they aren't able to get hold of the six digit code which would be sent via email.
Here is what a test currently looks like, without MFA being implemented.
Is there a way that the test can be given the MFA code so that it can continue to perform tests?
Do I simply need to seed a user that does not have MFA enabled?
I actually want all users to have MFA enabled in production.
Many thanks
using Xunit;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using MyCompany.ViewModels.Authentication;
using MyCompany.StaffPortal.Tests.Shared;
using StaffPortal;
using Newtonsoft.Json;
using MyCompany.ServiceA.ViewModels;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Net.Http;
namespace MyCompany.Tests.StaffPortal.ServiceA
{
public class ExtensionsControllerTests : TestBase
{
public ExtensionsControllerTests(CustomWebApplicationFactory<Startup> factory) : base(factory)
{
}
[Fact]
public async Task Test_GetExtensions()
{
//This line creates a new "web browser" and uses the login details provided to obtain and set up the token so that we can request information about an account.
HttpClient httpClient = await CreateAuthenticatedHttpClient("abcltd1#MyCompany.com", "test", 1);
//Perform any work and get the information from the API
//Contact the API using the token so check that it works
var getExtensionsResponse = await httpClient.GetAsync("/api/ServiceA/extensions/GetExtensions");
//Check that the response was OK
Assert.True(getExtensionsResponse.StatusCode == System.Net.HttpStatusCode.OK, "GetExtensions did not return an OK result.");
//Get and Convert the Content we received into a List of ServiceAExtensionViewModel, as that is what GetExtensions sends back to the browser.
var getExtensionsResponseContent = await getExtensionsResponse.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
List<ServiceAExtensionViewModel> extensionList = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<List<ServiceAExtensionViewModel>>(getExtensionsResponseContent);
//Check the information received matches our expectations
Assert.True(extensionList.Count == 2);
Assert.True(extensionList[0].PropertyA == 123);
Assert.True(extensionList[0].PropertyB == 0161);
Assert.True(extensionList[0].PropertyC == true);
}
}
}
Here is the content's of CreateAuthenticatedHttpClient() for reference.
protected async Task<HttpClient> CreateAuthenticatedHttpClient(string username, string password, int companyAccountId)
{
var httpClient = _factory.CreateClient(
new WebApplicationFactoryClientOptions
{
AllowAutoRedirect = false
});
//Create the Login information to send to the server
var loginInformation = new LoginRequestModel
{
Username = username,
Password = password,
ReturnUrl = ""
};
//Convert it into Json which the server will understand
var validLoginRequestJson = ConvertToJson(loginInformation);
//Send the Json Login information to the server, and put the response we receive into loginResponse
//In the code below, httpClient is like a web browser. You give it the
var loginResponse = await httpClient.PostAsync("/api/authenticate", validLoginRequestJson);
//Check the loginResponse was a CREATED response, which means that the token was made
Assert.True(loginResponse.StatusCode == System.Net.HttpStatusCode.Created, "New Token was not returned.");
//Check the response is identified as being in Json format
Assert.Equal("application/json; charset=utf-8", loginResponse.Content.Headers.ContentType.ToString());
//Next we have to convert the received Json information into whatever we are expecting.
//In this case, we are expecting a AuthenticationResponseViewModel (because that's what the API sends back to the person trying to log in)
//First we get hold of the Content (which is in Json format)
var responseJsonString = await loginResponse.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
//Second we convert the Json back into a real AuthenticationResponseViewModel
AuthenticationResponseViewModel authenticationResponseViewModel = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<AuthenticationResponseViewModel>(responseJsonString);
//Now we take the Token from AuthenticationResponseViewModel, and add it into the httpClient so that we can check the Token works.
httpClient.DefaultRequestHeaders.Authorization = new System.Net.Http.Headers.AuthenticationHeaderValue("Bearer", authenticationResponseViewModel.token);
httpClient.DefaultRequestHeaders.Add("CompanyId", companyAccountId.ToString());
return httpClient;
}

Establish SSO/set cookies with access or id token/token exchange

I'm allowing users logged in an external application to jump into our application with their access token through Keycloak's identity brokering and external to internal token exchange.
Now I'd like to establish an SSO session in an embedded JxBrowser in our application similar to a regular browser login flow, where three cookies are set in the browser: AUTH_SESSION, KEYCLOAK_SESSION(_LEGACY) and KEYCLOAK_IDENTITY(_LEGACY).
KEYCLOAK_IDENTITY contains a token of type Serialized-ID which looks somewhat similar to an ID token.
Is it possible to create the KEYCLOAK_IDENTITY cookie using the exchanged (internal) access and/or ID token and, provided that the other two cookies are correctly created as well, would this establish a valid SSO session?
Basically all I am missing is how I could obtain or create the Serialized-ID type token.
One way to achieve this:
Implement a custom endpoint following this example
Note that the provider works fine for me without registering it in standalone.xml, I'm just adding the JAR to the Keycloak Docker image.
Add a method that validates a given access token, looks up the user, gets the user session and sets the cookies in the response (most error handling omitted for brevity):
#GET
#Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
#Path("sso")
public Response sso(#Context final HttpRequest request) {
final HttpHeaders headers = request.getHttpHeaders();
final String authorization = headers.getHeaderString(HttpHeaders.AUTHORIZATION);
final String[] value = authorization.split(" ");
final String accessToken = value[1];
final AccessToken token = Tokens.getAccessToken(accessToken, keycloakSession);
if (token == null) {
throw new ErrorResponseException(Errors.INVALID_TOKEN, "Invalid access token", Status.UNAUTHORIZED);
}
final RealmModel realm = keycloakSession.getContext().getRealm();
final UriInfo uriInfo = keycloakSession.getContext().getUri();
final ClientConnection clientConnection = keycloakSession.getContext().getConnection();
final UserModel user = keycloakSession.users().getUserById(token.getSubject(), realm);
final UserSessionModel userSession = keycloakSession.sessions().getUserSession(realm, token.getSessionState());
AuthenticationManager.createLoginCookie(keycloakSession, realm, user, userSession, uriInfo, clientConnection);
return Response.noContent().build();
}
Disclaimer: I am not completely certain this implementation does not imply any security issues, but since Tokens.getAccessToken(accessToken, keycloakSession) does full validation of the access token, setting the cookies should only be possible with a valid access token.
For CORS, add:
#OPTIONS
#Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
#Path("sso")
public Response preflight(#Context final HttpRequest request) {
return Cors.add(request, Response.ok("", MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON))
.auth()
.preflight()
.allowedMethods("GET", "OPTIONS")
.build();
}
and in sso():
return Cors.add(request, Response.ok("", MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON))
.auth()
.allowedMethods("GET")
.allowedOrigins(token)
.build();
What I am uncertain about is why Firefox preflights the GET request, making it necessary to handle that.

Virtual Hosting on Next.js app with Apollo GraphQL

I have a webapp made with Next.js and Apollo as show in example with-apollo. I want to serve multiple domains with my webapp (name-based virtual hosting). Unfortunately HttpLink of ApolloClient requires absolute server URL with domain but this makes backend app unable to recognize domain which user really visited. Is there a way to configure HttpLink with a dynamic URL based on real request or use relative URL or anything else?
Either use an Apollo Link to intercept the query and set uri property on the context
const authMiddleware = setContext((operation, { uri }) => {
return refreshToken().then(res => ({
uri: this.getURI()
})
}))
Or intercept the request with Angular's HttpClient interceptor and change the endpoint.
https://github.com/apollographql/apollo-angular/tree/master/packages/apollo-angular-link-http#options
Source: Updating uri of apollo client instance
The NextPageContext object passed to getInitialProps includes the req object when called on the server-side. So you can do something like:
WithApollo.getInitialProps = async ctx => {
const { AppTree, req } = ctx
const linkBaseUrl = req ? req.protocol + '://' + req.get('host') : ''
...
}
You can then pass this base url down to createApolloClient along with the initial state and prepend your HttpLink's url with it. On the client side, this will prepend an empty string (you only need the full URL on the server).

Using MSAL to get access token and cache it in SQL DB, without having to sign in using MSAL

I want to authenticate AAD users to access powerBi resources through MSAL by using application ID and secret. So i want to get the access token and cache it in SQL Db.
went through the documentation but it explains the scenario of using MSAL for sign-in.
also went through the tutorial
i was able to to do the necessary implementations to get the token.
how can i get the access token and cache it, in a scenario like this?
As indicated in other answers, caching tokens are useful in case when you have users signing in, as once the access token expires (typically after 1 hour), you don't want to keep prompting the users to re-authenticate.
So help with these scenarios, Azure AD issues a refresh token along with an access token that is used to fetch access tokens once they expire. Caching is required to cache these refresh tokens as they are valid for 90 days.
When an app signs as itself (and not signing in a user), the client credentials flow is used and it only needs the app id (clientId) and the credential (secret/certificate) to issue an access token. The MSAL library will automatically detect when the access token expires and will use the clientId/credential combination to automatically get a new access token. So caching is not necessary.
The sample you should be looking at is this one.
I'n not sure to understand, I hope these few lines of code will help you.
First, customize token cache serialization :
public class ClientApplicationBuilder
{
public static IConfidentialClientApplication Build()
{
IConfidentialClientApplication clientApplication =
ConfidentialClientApplicationBuilder
.Create(ClientId)
.WithRedirectUri(RedirectUri)
.WithClientSecret(ClientSecret)
.Build();
clientApplication.UserTokenCache.SetBeforeAccessAsync(BeforeAccessNotification);
clientApplication.UserTokenCache.SetAfterAccessAsync(AfterAccessNotification);
return clientApplication;
}
private static async Task<byte[]> GetMsalV3StateAsync()
{
//TODO: Implement code to retrieve MsalV3 state from DB
}
private static async Task StoreMsalV3StateAsync(byte[] msalV3State)
{
//TODO: Implement code to persist MsalV3 state to DB
}
private static async Task BeforeAccessNotification(TokenCacheNotificationArgs args)
{
byte[] msalV3State = await GetMsalV3StateAsync();
args.TokenCache.DeserializeMsalV3(msalV3State);
}
private static async Task AfterAccessNotification(TokenCacheNotificationArgs args)
{
if (args.HasStateChanged)
{
byte[] msalV3State = args.TokenCache.SerializeMsalV3();
await StoreMsalV3StateAsync(msalV3State);
}
}
}
Here's an example to acquire token (by Authorization Code) :
public class MsAccountController
: Controller
{
private readonly IConfidentialClientApplication _clientApplication;
public MsAccountController()
{
_clientApplication = ClientApplicationBuilder.Build();
}
[HttpGet]
public async Task<IActionResult> Index()
{
Uri authorizationRequestUrl = await _clientApplication.GetAuthorizationRequestUrl(ClientApplicationHelper.Scopes).ExecuteAsync();
string authorizationRequestUrlStr = authorizationRequestUrl.ToString();
return Redirect(authorizationRequestUrlStr);
}
[HttpGet]
public async Task<IActionResult> OAuth2Callback(string code, string state)
{
AuthenticationResult authenticationResult = await _clientApplication.AcquireTokenByAuthorizationCode(scopes, code).ExecuteAsync();
return Ok(authenticationResult);
}
}
Finally, acquire a token silently and use auth result for your API client :
public class TaskController
: Controller
{
private readonly IConfidentialClientApplication _clientApplication;
public TaskController()
{
_clientApplication = ClientApplicationBuilder.Build();
}
[HttpGet]
public async Task<IActionResult> Index()
{
IEnumerable<IAccount> accounts = await _clientApplication.GetAccountsAsync();
AuthenticationResult result = await _clientApplication.AcquireTokenSilent(ClientApplicationHelper.Scopes, accounts.FirstOrDefault()).ExecuteAsync();
//TODO: Create your API client using authentication result
}
}
Regards
You can cache the access token (actually, the library does this already), but it is valid for 1 hour only. So it makes no sense to save it in a database, because it will expire quickly.
You should cache the credentials needed to obtain the token (user name and password, app ID and secret, or certificate) and obtain a token when needed.
I've done this for a confidential client application, where I connected to O365 in order to send email.
First, register your app in azure app as the docs say.
Then, set up your confidential client application and use as singleton.
var app = ConfidentialClientApplicationBuilder.Create(clientId)
.WithClientSecret(clientSecret)
.WithRedirectUri(redirectUri)
.WithLegacyCacheCompatibility(false)
.WithAuthority(AadAuthorityAudience.AzureAdAndPersonalMicrosoftAccount)
.Build();
app.AddDistributedTokenCache(services => {
services.AddDistributedTokenCaches();
services.AddDistributedSqlServerCache(options => {
options.SchemaName = "dbo";
options.TableName = "O365TokenCache";
options.ConnectionString = sqlCacheConnectionString;
options.DefaultSlidingExpiration = TimeSpan.FromMinutes(90);
});
});
services.AddSingleton<IConfidentialClientApplication>(app);
The first time you connect a user, you need to redirect to Microsoft identity. You can create the URL using:
var authUrl = await app.GetAuthorizationRequestUrl(new[] { "email", "offline_access", "https://outlook.office.com/SMTP.Send" }).ExecuteAsync();
(Check your scopes are what you want)
When they come back to your redirect url you then get the code from query string and acquire the refresh token:
var token = await app.AcquireTokenByAuthorizationCode(scopes, code).ExecuteAsync();
When you do this, MSAL will cache the access token and refresh token for you, but here's the thing they don't mention: you have to create the table in SQL yourself! If you don't, it just silently fails.
dotnet tool install -g dotnet-sql-cache
dotnet sql-cache create "<connection string>" dbo O365TokenCache
Once you have the access token the first time you can use the following later
var account = await app.GetAccountAsync(accountId);
var token = await app.AcquireTokenSilent(scopes, account).ExecuteAsync();
When you get the access token the first time, you need to look at token.Account.HomeAccountId.Identifier as this is the ID that you need when you call GetAccountAsync. For some reason, GetAccountsAsync (note the extra "s") always returns empty for me but passing the correct ID to GetAccountAsync does return the right one.
For me, I simply store that ID against the logged in user so that I can get that ID at a later time.

UWP WebRequest Replacement HttpClient Cookie?

As i am either too dump to find the proper answer or it is simply not out there ... how the hek i replace the "outdated" WebRequest properly with the HttpClient "replacement"?
In the WebRequest i tendet to serialize & analyze the actual cookie as the webpage returns a partial JSON cookie ... however ... i still did not found a way to get a proper CookieContainer (or whatever form of cookie) from the frking HttpClient ... also ... every google request leads me to 20000000 years old answers or outdated documents (+ some upToDate docs which all just refer to "GET" requests without any cookies involved -.-*))
would be kindfull if somebody could lead me to the correct path ...
thx
greets
X39
Windows.Web.Http.HttpClient client = new Windows.Web.Http.HttpClient();
client.DefaultRequestHeaders.UserAgent.TryParseAdd(app.Settings.UserAgent);
var response = await client.PostAsync(new Uri(app.Settings.Pr0grammUrl.Api + "user/login"), new Windows.Web.Http.HttpStringContent(postDataBuilder.ToString()));
By default, HttpClient handles cookies by itself through the default HttpBaseProtocolFilter. You can get cookies associated with a URI through GetCookies method of the HttpCookieManager class:
Gets an HttpCookieCollection that contains the HttpCookie instances
that are associated with a specific URI.
using (var protocolFilter = new HttpBaseProtocolFilter()) {
var cookieManager = protocolFilter.CookieManager;
var cookies = cookieManager.GetCookies(uri);
foreach (var cookie in cookies) {
// Here is each cookie
}
}
You should also be able to set/get cookies through HTTP request and response headers. To disallow HttpClient from handling cookies by itself, create an instance of HttpBaseProtocolFilter and set the CookieUsageBehavior to HttpCookieUsageBehavior.NoCookies:
NoCookies: Do not handle cookies automatically.
// Create http filter
httpFilter = new HttpBaseProtocolFilter();
httpFilter.CookieUsageBehavior = HttpCookieUsageBehavior.NoCookies;
// Create http client
httpClient = new HttpClient(httpFilter);
// Handle cookies through HTTP headers