I'm new using regex and, after some tutorials, I'm getting difficult to implement an match criteria like "Email contain numbers but they are not on year pattern".
So, I have this simple regex for "contain numbers":
\d+(?=#)
Considering that e-mail address does have numbers, I would like to get a match for expressions NOT being in one of these below:
\w*(19|20)\d{2}\D*(?=#)
\w*[6-9][0-9]\D*(?=#)
\w*[0-1][0-9]\D*(?=#)
How, in regex, can I express this?
Example matching inputs:
foo123#gmail.com
a22oo#hotmail.com
hoo567#outlook.com
Example non-matching inputs:
foo#gmail.com
johndoe88#hotmail.com
john1976#outlook.com
Regex is difficult to invert, i.e. to not match something.
In your simple case I would just parse an arbitrary long number, and then do the check in code, preferably after converting it to an integer.
But to your question, the following would invert the cases, just or them together
(\d)| 1 digit
([2345]\d)| 2 digits not starting with 0,1,6,7,8,9
(\d\d\d)| 3 digits
((1[^9]|2[^0]|[03-9]\d)\d\d)| 4 digits not starting with 19 or 20
(\d\d\d\d\d*) 5+ digits
Something like this. I'm sure someone can make it prettier.
EDIT
Here is the full regex now tested properly with all possible cases I can think of matching your specified criteria, and proper boundary tests (see https://regex101.com/r/sM5aF7/1):
(\b|[^\d\s])(\d|[2345]\d|\d{3}|(1[^9]|2[^0]|[03-9]\d)\d\d|\d{5,})(\D*?#|#)
This regex passes your examples:
\D(?![6-9]\d\D)\d{2,3}\D
See live demo.
Related
The first thing I tried to do, is get the regex matching what I DON'T want. This way, I could just flip it to NOT accept that same input. This is where I came up with the first part of this regex.
Accept all 9 digit numbers, where all 9 digits are identical (without dashes): "^(\d)\1{8}$". This expression works as expected (as seen here: (https://regex101.com/r/Ez8YC3/1)).
The second expression should do the same, with dashes formatted as follows xxx-xx-xxxx: "^(\d)\1{8}$". This expressions works as expected (as seen here: https://regex101.com/r/bodzIX/1).
Now what I want to do at this point, is combine them together to look for BOTH conditions. However when I do that it seems to break, and only match 9 digit numbers that are identical throughout WITH dashes: "^(\d)\1{2}-(\d)\1{1}-(\d)\1{3}$|^(\d)\1{8}$". This can be seen here: https://regex101.com/r/lPnksf/1.
I may be getting a little ahead of myself here, but in order to show my work as much as possible, I also tried flipping those regex separately, which also did not work as expected.
Condition #1 flipped: "^(?!(\d)\1{8})$". Can be seen here: https://regex101.com/r/ed51yk/1.
Condition #2 flipped: "^(?!(\d)\1{2}-(\d)\1{1}-(\d)\1{3})$". Can be seen here: https://regex101.com/r/UYfoMK/1.
I would expect the two expressions (when flipped) to match any 9 digit number (with or without dashes) where all numbers are not identical. How ever this does not happen at all.
This is the final regex that I came up with, which is clearly not doing what I would expect it to: "^(?!(\d)\1{2}-(\d)\1{1}-(\d)\1{3})$|^(?!(\d)\1{8})$". Can be seen here: https://regex101.com/r/9eHhF5/1
At the end of the day, I want to combine these 2 expressions, with this one (that already works as intended): "^(?!000|666|9\d\d)\d{3}-(?!00)\d\d-(?!0000)\d\d\d\d$". Can be seen here: https://regex101.com/r/AdRI8i/1.
I am still pretty new to regex, and really want to understand why I can't simply wrap the condition in (?!...) in order to match the opposite condition.
Thank you in advance
What you want to do is not flip, but reverse the regex logic.
Yes, to reverse the pattern logic, you should use a negative lookahead, but there are caveats.
First, the $ end of string anchor: if it was at the end of the "positive" regex, it must also be moved to the lookahead in the reverse pattern. So, your ^(?!(\d)\1{8})$ regex must be written as ^(?!(\d)\1{8}$). Same goes for your second regex.
Next, mind that each subsequent capturing group gets an incremented ID number, so you cannot keep the same backreferences when you "join" patterns with OR | operator. You must adjust these IDs to reflect their new values in the new regex.
So, you want to match a string that matches ^(?!000|666|9\d\d)\d{3}-(?!00)\d\d-(?!0000)\d\d\d\d$ first (let's note \d\d\d\d = \d{4}), then you can add restrictions with lookaheads:
(?!(\d)\1{8}$) - fails the match if, immediately from the current position, it matches identical 9 digits and then the string end comes
(?!(\d)\2\2-(\d)\2-(\d)\2{3}$) - (note the ID incrementing continuation) fails the match if, immediately from the current position, it matches identical to the first one 3 digits, -, identical 2 digits, -, identical 5 digits, and then the string end comes.
So, to follow your logic, you can use
^(?!(\d)\1{8}$)(?!(\d)\2\2-(\d)\2-(\d)\2{3}$)(?!000|666|9\d\d)\d{3}-(?!00)\d\d-(?!0000)\d{4}$
See the regex demo
As the lookaheads are non-consuming patterns, i.e. the regex index remains at the same position after matching their pattern sequences where it was before, the 3 lookaheads will all be tried at the start of the string (see the ^ anchor). If any of the three negative lookaheads at the start fails, the whole string match will be failed right away.
By this Regex you match what you dont want as social security number:
^(?:(\d)\1{8})|(?:(\d)\2{2}-\2{2}-\2{4})$
Demo
By this regex you match only what you want:
^(?!(?:(\d)\1{8})|(?:(\d)\2{2}-\2{2}-\2{4})).*$
Demo
I have the following regex expression.
[1-9][0-9]\.[0-9][0-9]
It matches numbers between 10.00 to 99.99 in increments of.01 (e.g., 11.00 or 11.44, or 65.90).
Let's say I have two numbers that I would like to be excluded from this range. 13.00 and 44.51.
How would I add this condition to the expression?
Twist: I'm using Google Forms to validate this and it doesn't recognize negative look-aheads (!?...)
Does anyone know how I would go about solving this?
Negative lookaheads are fine for this job but unfortunately not all regex engines support them. So a workaround is to do a positive match and discard instead.
Eg
(?:13\.00|44\.51)|([1-9][0-9]\.[0-9][0-9])
Accept only if group 1 is matched else discard (this means the wrong numbers were matched instead)
PS: The answer assumes one can test which part of the regex matched and discard if not group 1 is matched. It is not supposed to work without additional programming logic, only negative lookaheads could achieve that.
I've created a Regexp to validate a direction in degrees, between -359 and +359 (with optional sign). This is my regex:
const QString xWindDirectionPattern("[+-]{0,1}([0-9]{1,2}|[12][0-9]{2}|3[0-5][0-9])");
Now, I want to add two decimal numbers, in order to write numbers from -359.99 to +359.99. I've tried something like appending \.[0-9]{1,2}|[0-9]{1,3} but It does not work.
I'd like to have optional decimal point so I can have
23.3 valid
23.33 valid
23 valid
23.333 not valid
I've read some other questions, like this one, but I'm not able to modify the example to match a number range, like in my case.
How can I achieve this result?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
How can achieve this?
I've created a Regexp to validate a direction in degrees, between -359 and +359
No, you can't. You shouldn't. You are using the wrong tool. Regex cannot do the kinds of validation, which require it to dig into the semantics of the characters.
Regex can only process and match text, but cannot identify what they actually mean. Basically Regex are good for parsing regular language, and bad for almost everything else.
For e.g.:
A Regex can match 3 digits, but it would be extremely impractical to use it to match 3 digits that fall in range - [259, 634]. For that you would need to know the meaning of each individual digits in that number.
A Regex can match a pattern for date like - \d\d/\d\d/\d\d, but it cannot identify which part is date, and which part is month.
Similarly, it can find you two numbers x and y, but it cannot identify, whether x < y or not.
The task as above require you to understand the meaning of the text. Regex can't do that.
Well, of course you have come up with a regex for sure, but as you can see it is highly un-flexible. A little change in your requirement, will screw both - the regex and you.
You should better use corresponding language features - constructs like if-else to make sure you are reading degrees in that range, and not regex.
You can do this:
[+-]{0,1}((?:[0-9]{1,2}|[12][0-9]{2}|3[0-5][0-9])(?:\.[0-9]{1,2})?)
This will allow an a decimal point followed by one or two digits. You'll probably also want to use start and end anchors (^ / $) to ensure that there are no characters other than this pattern in your string—without this, 23.333 would be allowed because 23.33 matches the above pattern:
^[+-]{0,1}((?:[0-9]{1,2}|[12][0-9]{2}|3[0-5][0-9])(?:\.[0-9]{1,2})?)$
You can test it out here.
Try [+-]?([1-9]\d?|[12]\d{2}|3[0-5]\d)(\.\d{1,2})?.
[+-]? Optional Sign
[1-9]\d? 1 or 2 digit number
[12]\d{2} 100 to 299
3[0-5]\d 300 to 359
(\.\d{1,2})? Optional decimal point followed by 1 or two digits
So I wanted to limit a textbox which contains an apartment number which is optional.
Here is the regex in question:
([0-9]{1,4}[A-Z]?)|([A-Z])|(^$)
Simple enough eh?
I'm using these tools to test my regex:
Regex Analyzer
Regex Validator
Here are the expected results:
Valid
"1234A"
"Z"
"(Empty string)"
Invalid
"A1234"
"fhfdsahds527523832dvhsfdg"
Obviously if I'm here, the invalid ones are accepted by the regex. The goal of this regex is accept either 1 to 4 numbers with an optional letter, or a single letter or an empty string.
I just can't seem to figure out what's not working, I mean it is a simple enough regex we have here. I'm probably missing something as I'm not very good with regexes, but this syntax seems ok to my eyes. Hopefully someone here can point to my error.
Thanks for all help, it is greatly appreciated.
You need to use the ^ and $ anchors for your first two options as well. Also you can include the second option into the first one (which immediately matches the third variant as well):
^[0-9]{0,4}[A-Z]?$
Without the anchors your regular expression matches because it will just pick a single letter from anywhere within your string.
Depending on the language, you can also use a negative look ahead.
^[0-9]{0,4}[A-Za-z](?!.*[0-9])
Breakdown:
^[0-9]{0,4} = This look for any number 0 through 4 times at the beginning of the string
[A-Za-z] = This look for any characters (Both cases)
(?!.*[0-9]) = This will only allow the letters if there are no numbers anywhere after the letter.
I haven't quite figured out how to validate against a null character, but that might be easier done using tools from whatever language you are using. Something along this logic:
if String Doesn't equal $null Then check the Rexex
Something along those lines, just adjusted for however you would do it in your language.
I used RegEx Skinner to validate the answers.
Edit: Fixed error from comments
so basically I want to detect if in these strings:
Hello 123 My 222 dear 112 troll 12 8889
192.1.1.254:10000
the numbers are in a format like this:
[0 to 255][ANYTHING][0 to 255][ANYTHING][0 to 255][ANYTHING][0 to 255][ANYTHING][0 to 65536]
Does anyone know how I can build such a regex?
It is for detecting if anyone posts an IP:Port in unusual format to bypass default ip:port filters.
Edit: As for the first comment: I do not know regex and what I have tried is:
if(regex_match("192.168 najlepszy serwer SAMP!!1 1 join1!! 8080","/^[0-2](*)?[0-5](*)?[0-5](*).(*)[0-2](*)?[0-5](*)?[0-5](*).(*)[0-2](*)?[0-5](*)?[0-5](*).(*)[0-2](*)?[0-5](*)?[0-5](*)?$/"))
{
print("Cannot send message");
}
else
{
print("New message for everyone! :)");
}
and some other not working regexes.
If you don't want to complicate your life checking the exact ranges, the simple regex would be:
/^.*(\d)+.+(\d)+.+(\d)+.+(\d)+.+(\d)+.*$/
The first four (\d)+ parts can be replaced with more complicated check for 0-255 range:
(25[0-5]|2[0-4][0-9]|[01]?[0-9][0-9]?)
the last (\d)+ replace with next for port range check:
(6553[0-5]|655[0-2]\d|65[0-4]\d\d|6[0-4]\d\d\d|[1-5]\d\d\d\d|[1-9]\d{0,3})
An exact, simple, and direct representation of your pattern as a regular expression is not possible in the general case. The reason are the number ranges. Something like "at this place any integral number with a value from a to b" is just to complex. A regular expression is executed by a finite state machine and these (theoretical) beasts are (basically) only able to look at strings character by character. Therefore you can match something like "ignore all characters until you find the first digit, then check whether the first digit is followed by at most two more digits".
As a workaround you may try to build a list of alternations of possible digit patterns that covers your desired range of values (in the extreme case list every single value like \b(?:1|2|3|4|...|154|155|...|255)\b). I have a pattern for the range 0-255, but I have none for the range of possible port numbers. So a first approximation may be (really, this is only an approximation and not thoroughly tested):
\b(?:[0-9]|[1-9][0-9]|1[0-9][0-9]|2[0-4][0-9]|25[0-5])\b.*\b(?:[0-9]|[1-9][0-9]|1[0-9][0-9]|2[0-4][0-9]|25[0-5])\b.*\b(?:[0-9]|[1-9][0-9]|1[0-9][0-9]|2[0-4][0-9]|25[0-5])\b.*\b(?:[0-9]|[1-9][0-9]|1[0-9][0-9]|2[0-4][0-9]|25[0-5])\b[^0-9]*[0-9]{1,5}
In the above pattern (?: .... ) means a shy group (not remembered for back references) and \b means word boundary.
I'd suggest you read up on Regex syntax. For starters . is special and matches any character. Also doing something like [0-2][0-5][0-5] won't catch something like 192 as 9 is not within 0-5.
According to your requirements here's a Regex that should roughly do what you want
([0-2]?\d{1,2}).*([0-2]?\d{1,2}).*([0-2]?\d{1,2}).*([0-2]?\d{1,2}).*(\d{1,5})?
Each of the ([0-2]?\d{1,2}) portions will match 1 or 2 digits preceded optionally with a 0,1, or 2. Each () will capture a group which you can then examine using a Regex engine. You will need to examine this group as the Regex for each of those portions will match numbers above 255 (specifically 256-299).
The last group (\d{1,5})? is to catch the port number, again you will have to examine this as it will catch any 1 to 5 digit number (hence the {1,5}). The ? makes the group optional, remove it if you want it to have to match against a port number.
As far as doing Regex in C, I haven't had much experience but there should be a way to get all the grouped matches and inspect them. Unfortunately they will be strings so you will have to convert them to integers to examine them.
Are you sure you need regex for this? In my opinion, you do not need regex for this.
Just split numbers into groups which are seperated by non-numeric characters. Then analyze.
What language?
As for actually looking for valid range, take a look at this;
http://www.regular-expressions.info/numericranges.html
I would do this simple regex
((\d|\D)+)*