I am trying to use S3 as maven repo. I created 2 IAM users for write and read, and used the Policy Generator to create the following bucket policy, which I added to the bucket.
{
"Id": "Policy1442851625435",
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Sid": "Stmt1442851437396",
"Action": "s3:*",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::closeup-maven/*",
"Principal": {
"AWS": [
"arn:aws:iam::642063966117:user/maven-write"
]
}
},
{
"Sid": "Stmt1442851517972",
"Action": [
"s3:GetObject"
],
"Effect": "Allow",
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::closeup-maven/*",
"Principal": {
"AWS": [
"arn:aws:iam::642063966117:user/maven-read"
]
}
},
{
"Sid": "Stmt1442851587864",
"Action": [
"s3:ListBucket"
],
"Effect": "Allow",
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::closeup-maven",
"Principal": {
"AWS": [
"arn:aws:iam::642063966117:user/maven-write",
"arn:aws:iam::642063966117:user/maven-read"
]
}
}
]
}
[anonymized]
When I run the Policy Simulator, I get denied for both users.
When I go to the bucket and set Everyone-access for everything, I still get denied in the Policy Simulator, when I am testing with these two users.
What am I missing?
I noticed a disclaimer in the IAM Policy Simulator that says it does not take into account policies attached to resources, like your bucket policy. Maybe if you had the policy attached separately to the IAM users, the simulator would evaluate them.
This action belongs to a service that supports access control mechanisms attached to resources.The policy simulator does not model these mechanisms, so results may differ in your production environment.
Related
Can you write an s3 bucket policy that will deny access to all principals except a particular IAM role and AWS service role (e.g. billingreports.amazonaws.com).
I have tried using 'Deny' with 'NotPrincipal', but none of the below examples work as I don't think the ability to have multiple types of principals is supported by AWS?
This allows you to save the policy but locks out the bucket (warning: only root user can then update policy to unlock)
"Effect": "Deny",
"NotPrincipal": {
"AWS": [
"arn:aws:iam::<account_id>:root",
"arn:aws:iam::<account_id>:role/specialBillingRole"
],
"Service": "billingreports.amazonaws.com"
}
Therefore I am trying to use conditions but can't find the right combinations that will work. Here is an example policy.
{
"Version": "2008-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Principal": {
"Service": "billingreports.amazonaws.com"
},
"Action": "s3:*",
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::my-bucket/*"
},
{
"Sid": "",
"Effect": "Deny",
"Principal": "*",
"Action": "s3:*",
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::my-bucket/*",
"arn:aws:s3:::my-bucket"
],
"Condition": {
"StringNotLike": {
"aws:PrincipalArn": [
"arn:aws:iam::<account_id>:role/specialBillingRole",
"billingreports.amazonaws.com",
"<account_id>"
]
}
}
}
]
}
UPDATED the question as per some comment suggestions.
2nd UPDATE Also tried the below, which still gives access to all roles/users in the account (can't use wildcards in the Principal).
{
"Effect": "Deny",
"Principal": {
"AWS": "arn:aws:iam::<account_id>:root"
},
"Action": "s3:*",
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::my-bucket/*",
"arn:aws:s3:::my-bucket"
],
"Condition": {
"ArnNotEquals": {
"aws:PrincipalArn": [
"arn:aws:iam::<account_id>:role/specialBillingRole",
"<account_id>"
]
}
}
}
You can certainly create a bucket policy that grants access only to a service role and an IAM role, but to be clear, a service role will still begin with "arn:aws:iam:::role...".
Are you instead trying to create a bucket policy that grants access both to a particular service and a service role? I'm asking because if you have a role created with billingreports.amazonaws.com as its trusted entity, and if that role is what's intended to access the bucket, then you do not need to list the service separately in your bucket policy (if the scenario is as I imagine).
Please do note, also, that you can indeed use wildcards with the principal, combined with a condition - I do so all the time (see my example policy below). When I want to restrict bucket access to a specific role, I simply include an Allow statement with a Principal of just the role I want to allow, and then a Deny statement with a Principal of "AWS": "*", followed by a condition, like so:
{
"Version": "2008-10-17",
"Id": "PolicyScopedToSecurity",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Principal": {
"AWS": "arn:aws:iam::[accountID]:role/[roleName]",
},
"Action": "s3:*",
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::[bucketName]",
"arn:aws:s3:::[bucketName]/*"
]
},
{
"Effect": "Deny",
"Principal": {
"AWS": "*"
},
"Action": "s3:*",
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::[bucketName]",
"arn:aws:s3:::[bucketName]/*"
],
"Condition": {
"StringNotLike": {
"aws:PrincipalArn": [
"arn:aws:iam::[accountID]:role/[roleName]",
"[accountID]"
]
}
}
}
]
}
If you truly need the service itself to access the bucket, the solution will be slightly different. My response assumes the service role needs access.
I am trying to give a programmatic IAM user access to a single bucket.
I setup the following policy and attached it to the user:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:ListBucket"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::mybucket"
]
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:PutObject",
"s3:GetObject",
"s3:DeleteObject"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::mybucket/*"
]
}
]
}
Trying to programatically upload a file I got a 403.
I got this policy from here:
Writing IAM Policies: How to Grant Access to an Amazon S3 Bucket
I verified that everything else is working by then adding an AWS managed policy, AmazonS3FullAccess, after which my upload succeeded. But I would rather not give this user full access.
There are no other policies attached to this user.
Nothing is wrong with your policy. Make sure you're using the right bucket name in the IAM policy and to add the policy to the user.
You can test it with IAM Policy Simulator. Maybe you should consider the time to policies take effect, but it's "almost immediately". See this answer.
You can try this policy to give full access to a particular bucket:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [{
"Action": "s3:*",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::<BUCKETNAME>/*"
]
},
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": "s3:ListAllMyBuckets",
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::*"
}
]
}
Since you are providing Put, Get, Delete, You might as well provide full access to the particular bucket.
I have created a bucket name "A" with following permissions:
1. Grantee: B List Update/delete
2. Grantee: Everyone List view/download
From IOS(front-end), they are uploading a video to this Bucket.After uploaded only the 1st permission is applied, second is not, So we nobody can download that video from S3.
Please share your ideas. Thanks in advance.
I can't see any view/download option in the S3 Permissions pane.
As a general rule, AWS recommends using S3 bucket policies or IAM
policies for access control. S3 ACLs is a legacy access control
mechanism that predates IAM.
AWS Security Blog
If you wish to use a bucket policy instead, you can do the following:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Sid": "Stmt1420667647000",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Principal": {
"AWS": "*"
},
"Action": [
"s3:GetObject"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::YOUR-BUCKET-NAME/*"
]
},
{
"Sid": "Stmt1420667680000",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Principal": {
"AWS": "arn:aws:iam::account-number-without-hyphens:user/username"
},
"Action": [
"s3:DeleteObject",
"s3:PutObject"
],
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::YOUR-BUCKET-NAME/*"
]
}
]
}
I'd have some experience with S3 bucket policies but recently I've started experimenting with IAM users/groups and S3 bucket ACLs. What bothers me is that I fail to understand how they work together. Who overwrites what? What I want to accomplish is to have specific IAM user (with credentials) that will be used as for uploading in my application. I've attached IAM Policy to it that looks like this:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Effect": "Allow",
"Action": [
"s3:PutObject",
"s3:GetObject",
"s3:DeleteObject"
],
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::*"
}
]
}
This policy is attached to the IAM user. Then I've created following policy on S3 Bucket:
{
"Version": "2012-10-17",
"Statement": [
{
"Sid": "DefaultPrivate",
"Effect": "Deny",
"Principal": "*",
"Action": "*",
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::xxxxx-xxxxxx-xxxx/*"
},
{
"Sid": "ThumbnailAndGaleryReadOnly",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Principal": "*",
"Action": "s3:GetObject",
"Resource": [
"arn:aws:s3:::xxxx-xxx-xxxx-xxxx/*/xxxxx/*",
"arn:aws:s3:::xxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxx/*/xxxxxxx/*"
]
},
{
"Sid": "S3UploaderWrite",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Principal": {"AWS":"arn:aws:iam::xxxxxxxxxx:user/xxxxxxxx"},
"Action": [
"s3:GetObject",
"s3:PutObject",
"s3:DeleteObject"
],
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::xxxxxxxxxxxx/*"
}
]
}
Unfortunately as long as "Deny" block is present in the S3 policy - it doesn't allow my S3 user to upload files. Is it possible that I can't "override" Deny for specific user with the "Allow" block (IAM identifier is ok - I've double checked). Removing "Deny" blocks get it to work but ... That's not the point.
Any comments about the issue? How to explicitly deny everything and then allow only certain actions for certain IAM users/groups/roles ?
Thanks.
U could remove deny principal *. U could specify ur denied user or roles like "Principal": {"AWS":"arn:aws:iam::xxxxxxxxxx:user/xxxxxxxx"}. Its solve ur problem.
I've got images on S3 that I'd like to share with my Rails app. I can get access to the images by setting the permission: Everybody - Open/Download on the S3 UI. I want to set this permission for all objects in the bucket. The bucket permission UI doesn't have the option of Open/Download for users. What is the action I need to assign in the bucket config command to allow this? Here is my current command:
{
"Version": "2008-10-17",
"Id": "anid",
"Statement": [
{
"Sid": "ansid",
"Effect": "Allow",
"Principal": {
"AWS": "*"
},
"Action": "s3:GetObject",
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::haggard/akey"
}
]
}
Your policy is probably wrong, this one is working fine for Everyone (Anonymous) users:
{
"Id": "Policy1416915063227",
"Statement": [
{
"Sid": "AddCannedAcl",
"Action": [
"s3:GetObject"
],
"Effect": "Allow",
"Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::examplebucket/*",
"Principal": {
"AWS": [
"*"
]
}
}
]
}
I recommend to use the policy generator at the following link:
http://awspolicygen.s3.amazonaws.com/policygen.html