I'm trying to compile a simple program utilizing literals from the std::literals namespace, but Clang is generating errors when I try to compile it.
The code I'm trying to compile:
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
using namespace std::literals;
int main()
{
std::cout << "Hello World!"s << std::endl;
return 0;
}
and the compilation command:
clang++ -stdlib=libstdc++ -std=c++1y a.cpp
which leads to this output:
a.cpp:4:22: error: expected namespace name
using namespace std::literals;
~~~~~^
a.cpp:8:29: error: no matching literal operator for call to 'operator "" s' with arguments of
types 'const char *' and 'unsigned long', and no matching literal operator template
std::cout << "Hello World!"s << std::endl;
^
2 errors generated.
Using g++ or libc++ are out of the question for various reasons, and I've confirmed that other C++14 features (ie. return type deduction and binary literals) work, so it's not an issue with the compiler, making me believe it involves libstdc++.
What can I do to fix this? I'm on Linux Mint 17.1 if it makes any difference.
Remember to ensure that you're compiling the source according to C++14 (the chrono literals are not provided in C++11).
clang++ -stdlib=libstdc++ -std=c++14 a.cpp
Related
I have the following very simple program that seems to fail on the Intel compiler but not gcc when using boost::lexical_cast (boost version 1.67.0):
#include <boost/lexical_cast.hpp>
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
float getSomeNumber()
{
return 10.0;
}
int main(int argc, char** argv)
{
std::string mystring("Hello: " + boost::lexical_cast<std::string>(getSomeNumber());
std::cout << mystring << std::endl;
return 0;
}
When compiling, Intel returns the following error:
/boost/1.67.0/include/boost/type_traits/is_complete.hpp(45): warning #70: incomplete type is not allowed
ok_tag<sizeof(T)> check_is_complete(int);
detected during ....
...
/boost/1.67.0/include/boost/type_traits/is_complete.hpp(51): error: template instantiation resulted in unexpected function type of "boost::detail::ok_tag<1U> (int)" (the meaning of a name may have changed since the template declaration -- the type of the template is "boost::detail::ok_tag<sizeof(T)> (int)")
...
detected during:
instantiation of "boost::detail::check_is_complete" based on template argument <void> at line 51
instantiation of class "boost::is_complete<T> [with T=void]" at line 484 of "/Path/to/boost/include/boost/type_traits/is_convertible.hpp"
...
instantiation of "Target boost::lexical_cast<Target, Source>(const Source &) [with Target=std::string, Source=float]" at line 11 of "boostTest.cc"
The best I can tell from this error is it seems like the compiler can't complete the template resolution, but then the very end it seems like it does? I tried compiling the same thing under gcc (version 4.8.5) and it worked fine. This code also previously worked fine under boost 1.64.0 with both gcc and Intel.
Is this a bug in the Intel Compiler, or perhaps a bug in boost? Is there a way to modify my program as a workaround?
Software versions
gcc: 4.8.5
Intel Compiler: 2015.3.187
Boost: 1.67.0
OS: RHEL 7.5 (Maipo)
Compile line:
icpc/gcc --std=c++11 boostTest.cc -o boostTest -Ipath/to/boost/include -lstdc++
When I run this code on ideone.com, it prints (2,3):
#include <iostream>
#include <complex>
int main() {
std::complex<double> val = 2 + 3i;
std::cout << val << std::endl;
return 0;
}
But when I use clang on macOS 10.11.6, I get no errors or warnings, but the output is (2,0):
$ clang --version
Apple LLVM version 7.3.0 (clang-703.0.31)
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin15.6.0
$ clang -lc++ test.cpp && ./a.out
(2,0)
What happened to the imaginary part? Am I doing something wrong?
I believe for this first example the compiler is using a GNU extension:
-fext-numeric-literals (C++ and Objective-C++ only)
Accept imaginary, fixed-point, or machine-defined literal number
suffixes as GNU extensions. When this option is turned off these
suffixes are treated as C++11 user-defined literal numeric suffixes.
This is on by default for all pre-C++11 dialects and all GNU dialects:
-std=c++98, -std=gnu++98, -std=gnu++11, -std=gnu++14. This option is off by default for ISO C++11 onwards (-std=c++11, ...).
When I run it with clang I get (are you using -Wall -pedantic? :)):
warning: imaginary constants are a GNU extension
[-Wgnu-imaginary-constant]
Either way, your code is not standard compliant. To use C++14 literals make the code:
#include <iostream>
#include <complex>
using namespace std::complex_literals;
int main() {
std::complex<double> val = 2.0 + 3i;
std::cout << val << std::endl;
return 0;
}
From the documentation:
These operators are declared in the namespace
std::literals::complex_literals, where both literals and
complex_literals are inline namespaces. Access to these operators can
be gained with using namespace std::literals, using namespace
std::complex_literals, and using namespace
std::literals::complex_literals.
This question already has answers here:
printf with std::string?
(9 answers)
Closed 7 years ago.
I was reading this. That question contains following program.
#include <iostream>
#include <cstdio>
#include <string>
int main()
{
using namespace std;
string myString = "Press ENTER to quit program!";
cout << "Come up and C++ me some time." << endl;
printf("Follow this command: %s", myString);
cin.get();
return 0;
}
I tried it on g++ 4.8.1 & it fails in compilation. g++ 4.8.1 gives following diagnosis.
9 47 [Error] cannot pass objects of non-trivially-copyable type 'std::string {aka class std::basic_string<char>}' through '...'
9 47 [Warning] format '%s' expects argument of type 'char*', but argument 2 has type 'std::string {aka std::basic_string<char>}' [-Wformat=]
What does this error mean? Should this program compile successfully or not? Which compiler is correct (g++ or MSVS 2010) ? Why MSVS 2010 accepts this code? Is the code invokes undefined behavior when compiled on MSVS 2010?
Surprising: I tried it on ideone which uses g++ 5.0 & surprisingly it compiles & runs fine. (See live demo here.). g++ 5.2.0 gives warning when I compile this code. (See live demo here). Why it compiles fine on ideone but fails on g++ 4.8.1? g++ 4.8.2(gives same diagnosis as g++ 4.8.1, 4.9.0,4.9.1,4.9.2 (gives error not warning). g++ 5.1.0 gives warning but program still compiles & runs fine.
Why different versions of g++ behave differently when compiling above program? Is this bug in g++ ? Clang also rejects this code to compile in response to answer given by #TemplateRex
Clang errors out with "error: cannot pass non-trivial object of type 'string' (aka 'basic_string') to variadic function; expected type from format string was 'char *' [-Wnon-pod-varargs]" and suggests the fix "note: did you mean to call the c_str() method?"
#include <iostream>
#include <cstdio>
#include <string>
int main()
{
using namespace std;
string myString = "Press ENTER to quit program!";
cout << "Come up and C++ me some time." << endl;
printf("Follow this command: %s", myString.c_str());
cin.get();
}
and it seems to work.
I've been learning C++ and using the Terminal for the last couple of months. My code was compiling and running fine using g++ and C++11, but in the last couple of days it started giving errors and I have had problems compiling since. The only programs I can compile and run depend on older C++ standards.
The errors I first got related to #include < array > in the header file. Not sure why this happened, but I got around it by using boost/array instead. Another error I can't solve is with std::stoi. Both array and stoi should be in the C++11 standard library. I made the following simple code to demonstrate what's going on:
//
// stoi_test.cpp
//
// Created by ecg
//
#include <iostream>
#include <string> // stoi should be in here
int main() {
std::string test = "12345";
int myint = std::stoi(test); // using stoi, specifying in standard library
std::cout << myint << '\n'; // printing the integer
return(0);
}
Try to compile using ecg$ g++ -o stoi_trial stoi_trial.cpp -std=c++11
array.cpp:13:22: error: no member named 'stoi' in namespace 'std'; did you mean
'atoi'?
int myint = std::stoi(test);
~~~~~^~~~
atoi
/usr/include/stdlib.h:149:6: note: 'atoi' declared here
int atoi(const char *);
^
array.cpp:13:27: error: no viable conversion from 'std::string' (aka
'basic_string') to 'const char *'
int myint = std::stoi(test);
^~~~
/usr/include/stdlib.h:149:23: note: passing argument to parameter here
int atoi(const char *);
^
2 errors generated.
I also get these errors at compilation when using gcc or clang++ and with -std=gnu++11 (I guess they all depend on the same file structure). I also get the same error whether I specify std:: in the code, or if I specify using namespace std;
I worry that these issues arose because of the September Command Line Tools update via Xcode or because I installed boost and this somehow messed up my C++11 libraries. Hopefully there is a simple solution.
My system:
Configured with: --prefix=/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/usr --with-gxx-include-> dir=/usr/include/c++/4.2.1
Apple LLVM version 5.0 (clang-500.2.76) (based on LLVM 3.3svn)
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin12.5.0
Thread model: posix
Thanks for any insight you can offer.
clang has a weird stdlib, you need to add the following flag when you compile
-stdlib=libc++
your snippet works on my mac with
g++ -std=gnu++11 -stdlib=libc++ test.cpp -o test
This answer describes the problem
I am completely new to C++ and I am now following the C++ Primer book.
I wrote a small example about strings, here is the code:
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <cctype>
using std::cin;
using std::cout;
using std::endl;
using std::string;
int main() {
string s("Hello World");
for (auto &c : s)
c = toupper(c);
cout << s << endl;
return 0;
}
I am on Linux with GCC version 4.4.6 and I tried to compile this code with:
g++ test_strings.c -std=c++0x
but got the following errors:
test_strings.c: In function 'int main()':
test_strings.c:14: error: expected initializer before ':' token
test_strings.c:19: error: expected primary-expression before 'return'
test_strings.c:19: error: expected ')' before 'return'
I copied the program from the textbook, so I though it was a misspelling but after a check and trying searching on the web and updating my gcc the error reminds. Help will be greatly appreciated, thanks in advance.
As per the C++0x/C++11 Support in GCC page, you need to be running gcc 4.6 to get the range-for feature.
The 4.6 changes page contains:
Improved experimental support for the upcoming C++0x ISO C++ standard, including support for constexpr (thanks to Gabriel Dos Reis and Jason Merrill), nullptr (thanks to Magnus Fromreide), noexcept, unrestricted unions, range-based for loops (thanks to Rodrigo Rivas Costa), opaque enum declarations (thanks also to Rodrigo), implicitly deleted functions and implicit move constructors.
Since you're running gcc 4.4.6, it's not available to you.