Testing Motor calls with IOLoop - python-2.7

I'm running unittests in the callbacks for motor database calls, and I'm successfully catching AssertionErrors and having them surface when running nosetests, but the AssertionErrors are being caught in the wrong test. The tracebacks are to different files.
My unittests look generally like this:
def test_create(self):
#self.callback
def create_callback(result, error):
self.assertIs(error, None)
self.assertIsNot(result, None)
question_db.create(QUESTION, create_callback)
self.wait()
And the unittest.TestCase class I'm using looks like this:
class MotorTest(unittest.TestCase):
bucket = Queue.Queue()
# Ensure IOLoop stops to prevent blocking tests
def callback(self, func):
def wrapper(*args, **kwargs):
try:
func(*args, **kwargs)
except Exception as e:
self.bucket.put(traceback.format_exc())
IOLoop.current().stop()
return wrapper
def wait(self):
IOLoop.current().start()
try:
raise AssertionError(self.bucket.get(block = False))
except Queue.Empty:
pass
The errors I'm seeing:
======================================================================
FAIL: test_sync_user (app.tests.db.test_user_db.UserDBTest)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/----/Documents/app/app-Server/app/tests/db/test_user_db.py", line 39, in test_sync_user
self.wait()
File "/Users/----/Documents/app/app-Server/app/tests/testutils/mongo.py", line 25, in wait
raise AssertionError(self.bucket.get(block = False))
AssertionError: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Users/----/Documents/app/app-Server/app/tests/testutils/mongo.py", line 16, in wrapper
func(*args, **kwargs)
File "/Users/----/Documents/app/app-Server/app/tests/db/test_question_db.py", line 32, in update_callback
self.assertEqual(result["question"], "updated question?")
TypeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute '__getitem__'
Where the error is reported to be in UsersDbTest but is clearly in test_questions_db.py (which is QuestionsDbTest)
I'm having issues with nosetests and asynchronous tests in general, so if anyone has any advice on that, it'd be greatly appreciated as well.

I can't fully understand your code without an SSCCE, but I'd say you're taking an unwise approach to async testing in general.
The particular problem you face is that you don't wait for your test to complete (asynchronously) before leaving the test function, so there's work still pending in the IOLoop when you resume the loop in your next test. Use Tornado's own "testing" module -- it provides convenient methods for starting and stopping the loop, and it recreates the loop between tests so you don't experience interference like what you're reporting. Finally, it has extremely convenient means of testing coroutines.
For example:
import unittest
from tornado.testing import AsyncTestCase, gen_test
import motor
# AsyncTestCase creates a new loop for each test, avoiding interference
# between tests.
class Test(AsyncTestCase):
def callback(self, result, error):
# Translate from Motor callbacks' (result, error) convention to the
# single arg expected by "stop".
self.stop((result, error))
def test_with_a_callback(self):
client = motor.MotorClient()
collection = client.test.collection
collection.remove(callback=self.callback)
# AsyncTestCase starts the loop, runs until "remove" calls "stop".
self.wait()
collection.insert({'_id': 123}, callback=self.callback)
# Arguments passed to self.stop appear as return value of "self.wait".
_id, error = self.wait()
self.assertIsNone(error)
self.assertEqual(123, _id)
collection.count(callback=self.callback)
cnt, error = self.wait()
self.assertIsNone(error)
self.assertEqual(1, cnt)
#gen_test
def test_with_a_coroutine(self):
client = motor.MotorClient()
collection = client.test.collection
yield collection.remove()
_id = yield collection.insert({'_id': 123})
self.assertEqual(123, _id)
cnt = yield collection.count()
self.assertEqual(1, cnt)
if __name__ == '__main__':
unittest.main()
(In this example I create a new MotorClient for each test, which is a good idea when testing applications that use Motor. Your actual application must not create a new MotorClient for each operation. For decent performance you must create one MotorClient when your application begins, and use that same one client throughout the process's lifetime.)
Take a look at the testing module, and particularly the gen_test decorator:
http://tornado.readthedocs.org/en/latest/testing.html
These test conveniences take care of many details related to unittesting Tornado applications.
I gave a talk and wrote an article about testing in Tornado, there's more info here:
http://emptysqua.re/blog/eventually-correct-links/

Related

How to extend Django's test database with custom SQL view?

I'm using Django 2.1 with MySQL.
I have one custom SQL view, which is bound with a model with Meta managed = False. Django's TestCase has no idea how the view is created, so I'd like to provide SQL command to create this view. The best option would be to do this on database create, but I have no idea how to do that.
What I've done so far was to override TestCase's setUp method. It looks like that:
class TaskDoneViewTest(TestCase):
def setUp(self):
"""
Create custom SQL view
"""
cursor = connection.cursor()
file_handle = open('app/tests/create_sql_view.sql', 'r+')
sql_file = File(file_handle)
sql = sql_file.read()
cursor.execute(sql)
cursor.close()
def test_repeatable_task_done(self):
# ...
def test_one_time_task_done(self):
# ...
I've got this solution from similar SO post: How to use database view in test cases. It would be a nice temporary solution, but the problem is with all those 2 test cases active I'm getting following error:
$ python manage.py test app.tests
Creating test database for alias 'default'...
System check identified no issues (0 silenced).
...E..
======================================================================
ERROR: test_repeatable_task_done (app.tests.test_views.TaskDoneViewTest)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/asmox/AppDev/Python/bubblechecklist/project_root/app/tests/test_views.py", line 80, in setUp
cursor.execute(sql)
File "/home/asmox/AppDev/Python/bubblechecklist/env/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/backends/utils.py", line 68, in execute
return self._execute_with_wrappers(sql, params, many=False, executor=self._execute)
File "/home/asmox/AppDev/Python/bubblechecklist/env/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/backends/utils.py", line 77, in _execute_with_wrappers
return executor(sql, params, many, context)
File "/home/asmox/AppDev/Python/bubblechecklist/env/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/backends/utils.py", line 80, in _execute
self.db.validate_no_broken_transaction()
File "/home/asmox/AppDev/Python/bubblechecklist/env/lib/python3.6/site-packages/django/db/backends/base/base.py", line 437, in validate_no_broken_transaction
"An error occurred in the current transaction. You can't "
django.db.transaction.TransactionManagementError: An error occurred in the current transaction. You can't execute queries until the end of the 'atomic' block.
For some reason this error doesn't happen when I have only one test case active (why?).This error remains until I change my test's base class from TestCase to TransactionTestCase.
Well, I would ask why this happen and if there is any solution to get it okay with simple TestCase class, because my test for now has nothing to do with transactions and I find this working solutions a bit too dirty, but...
I would more likely stick to the main issue, that is, to globally (for all my test cases) do the following thing:
When testing database is created, do one more custom SQL from provided file. It is going to create required view
Can you please help me how to do that?
If you read the documentation for TestCase, you'll see that it wraps each test in a double transaction, one at the class level and one at the test level. The setUp() method runs for each test and is thus inside this double wrapping.
As shown in the above mentioned docs, it is suggested you use setUpTestData() to set up your db at the class level. This is also where you'd add initial data to your db for all your tests to use.

Encountering remote error using grpc with protobuf2.6 in python

I am using grpc with protobuf 2.6.1 in python 2.7, and when I run my client side code, I have the following errors:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "debate_client.py", line 31, in <module>
run_client()
File "debate_client.py", line 17, in run_client
reply = stub.Answer(debate_pb2.AnswerRequest(question=question, timeout=timeout), 30)
File "/Users/elaine/Desktop/gitHub/grpc/python2.7_virtual_environment/lib/python2.7/site-packages/grpc/framework/crust/implementations.py", line 73, in __call__
protocol_options, metadata, request)
File "/Users/elaine/Desktop/gitHub/grpc/python2.7_virtual_environment/lib/python2.7/site-packages/grpc/framework/crust/_calls.py", line 109, in blocking_unary_unary
return next(rendezvous)
File "/Users/elaine/Desktop/gitHub/grpc/python2.7_virtual_environment/lib/python2.7/site-packages/grpc/framework/crust/_control.py", line 412, in next
raise self._termination.abortion_error
grpc.framework.interfaces.face.face.RemoteError: RemoteError(code=StatusCode.UNKNOWN, details="")
Here is my client side code:
from grpc.beta import implementations
import debate_pb2
import sys
def run_client():
params = sys.argv
print params
how = params[1]
question = params[2]
channel = implementations.insecure_channel('localhost', 29999)
stub = debate_pb2.beta_create_Candidate_stub(channel)
if how.lower() == "answer":
timeout = int(params[3])
reply = stub.Answer(debate_pb2.AnswerRequest(question=question, timeout=timeout), 30)
elif how.lower() == "elaborate":
blah = params[3:len(sys.argv)]
for i in range(0, len(blah)):
blah[i] = int(blah[i])
reply = stub.Elaborate(debate_pb2.ElaborateRequest(topic=question, blah_run=blah), 30)
if reply is None:
print "No comment"
else:
print reply.answer
if __name__ == "__main__":
run_client()
And here is my server side code:
import debate_pb2
import consultation_pb2
import re
import random
from grpc.beta import implementations
class Debate(debate_pb2.BetaCandidateServicer):
def Answer(self, request, context=None):
#Answer implementation
def Elaborate(self, request, context=None):
#Elaborate implementation
def run_server():
server = debate_pb2.beta_create_Candidate_server(Debate())
server.add_insecure_port('localhost:29999')
server.start()
if __name__ == "__main__":
run_server()
Any idea where the remote error comes from? Thank you so much!
Hello Elaine and thank you for trying out gRPC Python.
Nothing leaps out at me as an obvious smoking gun, but a couple of things I see are:
gRPC Python isn't known to work with protobuf 2.6.1. Have you tried working with the very latest protobuf release (3.0.0a3 at this time)?
context isn't an optional keyword parameter in servicer methods; it's a required, positional parameter. Does dropping =None from your servicer method implementations effect any change?
The same happened to me just now, and I figured out why.
Make sure the messages in your proto definition and the message in your implementations match the format.
For example, my Response message had a message= param in my python server, but not in my proto definition.
I think your function implementations should be outside class Debate or might be your functions are not correctly implemented to give the desired result.
I faced a similar error because my functions were inside the class but moving it outside the class fixed it.

Twisted getPage, exceptions.OSError: [Errno 24] Too many open files

I'm trying to run the following script with about 3000 items. The script takes the link provided by self.book and returns the result using getPage. It loops through each item in self.book until there are no more items in the dictionary.
Here's the script:
from twisted.internet import reactor
from twisted.web.client import getPage
from twisted.web.error import Error
from twisted.internet.defer import DeferredList
import logging
from src.utilitybelt import Utility
class getPages(object):
""" Return contents from HTTP pages """
def __init__(self, book, logger=False):
self.book = book
self.data = {}
util = Utility()
if logger:
log = util.enable_log("crawler")
def start(self):
""" get each page """
for key in self.book.keys():
page = self.book[key]
logging.info(page)
d1 = getPage(page)
d1.addCallback(self.pageCallback, key)
d1.addErrback(self.errorHandler, key)
dl = DeferredList([d1])
# This should stop the reactor
dl.addCallback(self.listCallback)
def errorHandler(self,result, key):
# Bad thingy!
logging.error(result)
self.data[key] = False
logging.info("Appended False at %d" % len(self.data))
def pageCallback(self, result, key):
########### I added this, to hold the data:
self.data[key] = result
logging.info("Data appended")
return result
def listCallback(self, result):
#print result
# Added for effect:
if reactor.running:
reactor.stop()
logging.info("Reactor stopped")
About halfway through, I experience this error:
File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/twisted/internet/posixbase.py", line 303, in _handleSignals
File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/twisted/internet/posixbase.py", line 205, in __init__
File "/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/twisted/internet/posixbase.py", line 138, in __init__
exceptions.OSError: [Errno 24] Too many open files
libgcc_s.so.1 must be installed for pthread_cancel to work
libgcc_s.so.1 must be installed for pthread_cancel to work
As of right now, I'll try to run the script with less items to see if that resolves the issue. However, there must be a better way to do it & I'd really like to learn.
Thank you for your time.
It looks like you are hitting the open file descriptors limit (ulimit -n) which is likely to be 1024.
Each new getPage call opens a new file handle which maps to the client TCP socket opened for the HTTP request. You might want to limit the amount of getPage calls you run concurrently. Another way around is to up the file descriptor limit for your process, but then you might still exhaust ports or FDs if self.book grows beyond 32K items.

ReactorNotRestartable error

I have a tool, where i am implementing upnp discovery of devices connected in network.
For that i have written a script and used datagram class in it.
Implementation:
whenever scan button is pressed on tool, it will run that upnp script and will list the devices in the box created in tool.
This was working fine.
But when i again press the scan button, it gives me following error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "tool\ui\main.py", line 508, in updateDevices
upnp_script.main("server", localHostAddress)
File "tool\ui\upnp_script.py", line 90, in main
reactor.run()
File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\base.py", line 1191, in run
self.startRunning(installSignalHandlers=installSignalHandlers)
File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\base.py", line 1171, in startRunning
ReactorBase.startRunning(self)
File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\base.py", line 683, in startRunning
raise error.ReactorNotRestartable()
twisted.internet.error.ReactorNotRestartable
Main function of upnp script:
def main(mode, iface):
klass = Server if mode == 'server' else Client
obj = klass
obj(iface)
reactor.run()
There is server class which is sending M-search command(upnp) for discovering devices.
MS = 'M-SEARCH * HTTP/1.1\r\nHOST: %s:%d\r\nMAN: "ssdp:discover"\r\nMX: 2\r\nST: ssdp:all\r\n\r\n' % (SSDP_ADDR, SSDP_PORT)
In server class constructor, after sending m-search i am stooping reactor
reactor.callLater(10, reactor.stop)
From google i found that, we cannot restart a reactor beacause it is its limitation.
http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/wiki/FrequentlyAskedQuestions#WhycanttheTwistedsreactorberestarted
Please guide me how can i modify my code so that i am able to scan devices more than 1 time and don't get this "reactor not restartable error"
In response to "Please guide me how can i modify my code...", you haven't provided enough code that I would know how to specifically guide you, I would need to understand the (twisted part) of the logic around your scan/search.
If I were to offer a generic design/pattern/mental-model for the "twisted reactor" though, I would say think of it as your programs main loop. (thinking about the reactor that way is what makes the problem obvious to me anyway...)
I.E. most long running programs have a form something like
def main():
while(True):
check_and_update_some_stuff()
sleep 10
That same code in twisted is more like:
def main():
# the LoopingCall adds the given function to the reactor loop
l = task.LoopingCall(check_and_update_some_stuff)
l.start(10.0)
reactor.run() # <--- this is the endless while loop
If you think of the reactor as "the endless loop that makes up the main() of my program" then you'll understand why no-one is bothering to add support for "restarting" the reactor. Why would you want to restart an endless loop? Instead of stopping the core of your program, you should instead only surgically stop the task inside that is complete, leaving the main loop untouched.
You seem to be implying that the current code will keep "sending m-search"s endlessly when the reactor is running. So change your sending code so it stops repeating the "send" (... I can't tell you how to do this because you didn't provide code, but for instance, a LoopingCall can be turned off by calling its .stop method.
Runnable example as follows:
#!/usr/bin/python
from twisted.internet import task
from twisted.internet import reactor
from twisted.internet.protocol import Protocol, ServerFactory
class PollingIOThingy(object):
def __init__(self):
self.sendingcallback = None # Note I'm pushing sendToAll into here in main()
self.l = None # Also being pushed in from main()
self.iotries = 0
def pollingtry(self):
self.iotries += 1
if self.iotries > 5:
print "stoping this task"
self.l.stop()
return()
print "Polling runs: " + str(self.iotries)
if self.sendingcallback:
self.sendingcallback("Polling runs: " + str(self.iotries) + "\n")
class MyClientConnections(Protocol):
def connectionMade(self):
print "Got new client!"
self.factory.clients.append(self)
def connectionLost(self, reason):
print "Lost a client!"
self.factory.clients.remove(self)
class MyServerFactory(ServerFactory):
protocol = MyClientConnections
def __init__(self):
self.clients = []
def sendToAll(self, message):
for c in self.clients:
c.transport.write(message)
# Normally I would define a class of ServerFactory here but I'm going to
# hack it into main() as they do in the twisted chat, to make things shorter
def main():
client_connection_factory = MyServerFactory()
polling_stuff = PollingIOThingy()
# the following line is what this example is all about:
polling_stuff.sendingcallback = client_connection_factory.sendToAll
# push the client connections send def into my polling class
# if you want to run something ever second (instead of 1 second after
# the end of your last code run, which could vary) do:
l = task.LoopingCall(polling_stuff.pollingtry)
polling_stuff.l = l
l.start(1.0)
# from: https://twistedmatrix.com/documents/12.3.0/core/howto/time.html
reactor.listenTCP(5000, client_connection_factory)
reactor.run()
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
This script has extra cruft in it that you might not care about, so just focus on the self.l.stop() in PollingIOThingys polling try method and the l related stuff in main() to illustrates the point.
(this code comes from SO: Persistent connection in twisted check that question if you want to know what the extra bits are about)

Why can't an object use a method as an attribute in the Python package ComplexNetworkSim?

I'm trying to use the Python package ComplexNetworkSim, which inherits from networkx and SimPy, to simulate an agent-based model of how messages propagate within networks.
Here is my code:
from ComplexNetworkSim import NetworkSimulation, NetworkAgent, Sim
import networkx as nx
#define constants for our example of states
NO_MESSAGE = 0
MESSAGE = 1
class Message(object):
def __init__(self,topic_pref):
self.relevance = topic_pref
class myAgent(NetworkAgent):
def __init__(self, state, initialiser):
NetworkAgent.__init__(self, state, initialiser)
self.state = MESSAGE
self.topic_pref = 0.5
def Run(self):
while True:
if self.state == MESSAGE:
self.message = self.Message(topic_pref, self, TIMESTEP)
yield Sim.hold, self, NetworkAgent.TIMESTEP_DEFAULT
elif self.state == NO_MESSAGE:
yield Sim.hold, self, NetworkAgent.TIMESTEP_DEFAULT
# Network and initial states of agents
nodes = 30
G = nx.scale_free_graph(nodes)
states = [MESSAGE for n in G.nodes()]
# Simulation constants
MAX_SIMULATION_TIME = 25.0
TRIALS = 2
def main():
directory = 'test' #output directory
# run simulation with parameters
# - complex network structure
# - initial state list
# - agent behaviour class
# - output directory
# - maximum simulation time
# - number of trials
simulation = NetworkSimulation(G,
states,
myAgent,
directory,
MAX_SIMULATION_TIME,
TRIALS)
simulation.runSimulation()
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
(There may be other problems downstream with this code and it is not fully tested.)
My problem is that the myAgent object is not properly calling the method Run as an attribute. Specifically, this is the error message that I get when I try to run the above code:
Starting simulations...
---Trial 0 ---
set up agents...
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "simmessage.py", line 55, in <module>
main()
File "simmessage.py", line 52, in main
simulation.runSimulation()
File "/Library/Frameworks/EPD64.framework/Versions/7.3/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ComplexNetworkSim-0.1.2-py2.7.egg/ComplexNetworkSim/simulation.py", line 71, in runSimulation
self.runTrial(i)
File "/Library/Frameworks/EPD64.framework/Versions/7.3/lib/python2.7/site-packages/ComplexNetworkSim-0.1.2-py2.7.egg/ComplexNetworkSim/simulation.py", line 88, in runTrial
self.activate(agent, agent.Run())
AttributeError: 'myAgent' object has no attribute 'Run'
Does anybody know why this is? I can't figure how my code differs substantially from the example in ComplexNetworkSim.
I've run your code on my machine and there the Run method gets called.
My best guess is what Paulo Scardine wrote, but since i can't reproduce the problem i can't actually debug it.