When compiling a project with Intel Composer 15 Update 3 on Linux, I get the following unresolved symbols on linking:
undefined reference to `__builtin_ia32_ldmxcsr'
undefined reference to `__builtin_ia32_stmxcsr'
Upon doing a Google search, I found that these functions are built in the 32-bit version of g++ which is why Intel can't find them. Firstly, I am compiling on a 64-bit OS with a 64-bit compiler; why is the linker looking for a function found only in 32-bit? Secondly, why is object code generated by Intel looking for a g++ built-in function?
Firstly, I am compiling on a 64-bit OS with a 64-bit compiler; why is the linker looking for a function found only in 32-bit?
Likely because some of your source code inappropriately references them.
First step: figure out which object(s) are referencing these builtins:
nm -A *.o *.a | egrep '__builtin_ia32_ldmxcsr|__builtin_ia32_stmxcsr'
Second step: preprocess the corresponding source to figure out where the references are coming from:
icpc -E -I ... bad_source.cpp
Related
I'm receiving C++ build errors on Ubuntu 16.04 (g++ 5.4) that I don't understand:
The linker errors are (taken a few of them and run them through c++filt)
undefined reference to symbol 'std::basic_stringbuf<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> >::str() const##GLIBCXX_3.4'
undefined reference to symbol 'std::condition_variable::notify_one()##GLIBCXX_3.4.11'
The command lanks I'm using are: gcc -std=c++11 -m64 -fPIC -std=c++11 ... (the ... has all the libs, etc.)
I assume I'm trying to link against /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6. When I run strings against it, I see GLIBCXX_3.4 and GLIBCXX_3.4.11 (but I really don't know what this is indicating.)
nm shows me that the symbols (at least the condition_variable one is defined)
$ nm -DA /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 | c++filt | grep condition_variable::notify_one
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6:00000000000b3930 T std::condition_variable::notify_one()
I've run readelf on all the libraries I'm attempting to link, and they all appear to be built for the same ABI (GCC: (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.9) 5.4.0 20160609)
Update
I noticed that the first error is resolved by explicitly linking against libstd++.so (i.e. I added stdc++ to my target_link_libraries in CMake). I was under the impression that I should never have to do this?
tl;dr: Invoke g++ rather than gcc to avoid this problem
(based on #SergeyA's comment)
GCC behaves differently depending on whether you run it as the gcc or the g++ binary. Specifically, it apparently won't automatically link against its bundled C++ standard library, libstdc++. I'm guessing it will link against its C standard library - which doesn't help you much.
So just use the appropriate binary for your language; specifying --std=c++whatever isn't enough.
Until some weeks ago, using the boost_regex library I used to compile a C++ file test.cpp using the following command.
g++-4.9 -Wall -O3 -march=native -flto -DNDEBUG -o test \
--std=c++14 test.cpp -lboost_regex -pthread
The compilation was working perfectly. But at some point, I needed to upgrade my OS (more precisely, it was Ubuntu 14.04, now it is Ubuntu 16.04).
I kept my local folders with my data, and I also installed the Boost library again in the new system, including boost_regex.
The Boost version in the new system is 1.58, unfortunately I cannot know which Boost version I was using before because it is now deleted.
I try to compile again the same file in the new system, with the same command as above, and the linker says it cannot find two functions called maybe_assign and construct_init. If I replace the -o test option with just -c (i.e. without linking) then the program is compiled without errors.
More precisely, when I try to do linking I get the following errors (they were extremely long, I hade to shorten using ... dots).
In function `boost::re_detail::perl_matcher<...>::match_match()':
undefined reference to `boost::match_results<...>::maybe_assign(boost::match_results<...> const&)'
In function `bool boost::regex_search<...>(...)':
undefined reference to `boost::re_detail::perl_matcher<...>::construct_init(...)'
In function `boost::re_detail::perl_matcher<...>::match_prefix()':
undefined reference to `boost::match_results<...>::maybe_assign(boost::match_results<...> const&)'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
I really don't know how this is possible, the libraries seem perfectly installed, nothing seems missing, and the compilation was working with a previous OS installation (then I guess older libraries).
At these point my only guess could be that Boost authors removed such functions? (maybe they are obsolete?). But I didn't find any trace of this on internet. If this is the case, how can I know the boost versions in which such functions are available?
Am I doing any mistake? Do you have any suggestions to investigate about this?
TL;DR use gcc5.
Ununtu 16.04 comes with gcc5 by default. Every C++ library in it is compiled with that compiler.
Now there was an incompatible C++ ABI change between gcc4 and gcc5. It made binaries built from C++ sources with gcc4 incompatible by default with binaries built with gcc5. This incompatibility often manifests itself as a bunch of undefined symbols that reference std::string and/or std::list.
The standard library comes built with a dual ABI to support objects built with older compilers. Other libraries like boost, hovever, don't.
I am trying to link a .o file generated using g++ and another .o file generated using gfortran.
g++ -c mycppcode.cpp
produces the file mycppcode.o and the command
gfortran -c myfortrancode.f
produces the file myfortrancode.o
When I link these two files to get an output file
g++ -O mycppcode.o myfortrancode.o
I get the following error
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
"__gfortran_pow_c8_i4", referenced from:
Could some one help me with this? Should I use another compiler? Also, I would like to know what functions or subroutines call "__gfortran_pow_c8_i4", so that I can try to avoid these functions or subroutines in fortran in future.
The following assumes you are using the GNU compiler tools. Things may be slightly different if you are using other compilers.
You can use either compiler to link the two together, but you need to provide the appropriate libraries.
Typically, you can use either
gfortran fortobj.o cppobj.o -lstdc++
or
g++ fortobj.o cppobj.o -lgfortran
This assumes that you are using a setup where both compilers know about each other's libraries (like if you installed through a linux repository).
In the case of the OP the C compilers came from XCode and gfortran is from homebrew. In that case, gfortran knows about the g++ libraries (since they were used to compile the compiler), but g++ doesn't know about the gfortran libraries. This is why using gfortran to link worked as advertised above. However, to link with g++ you need to add the path to libgfortran.* when you call the linker using the -L flag, like
g++ fortobj.o cppobj.o -L/path/to/fortran/libs -lgfortran
If for some reason your gfortran compiler is unaware of your g++ libs, you would do
gfortran fortobj.o cppobj.o -L/path/to/c++/libs -lstdc++
Note that there shouldn't be any difference in the final executable. I'm no compiler expert, but my understanding is that using the compiler to link your objects together is a convenience for calling the linker (ld on UNIX-like OS's) with the appropriate libraries associated with the language you are using. Therefore, using one compiler or the other to link shouldn't matter, as long as the right libraries are included.
I was trying to reinstall my ffmpeg, following this guide, on my ARM Ubuntu machine. Unfortunately, when I compile a program which uses this lib I get the following failure:
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/local/lib/libavcodec.a(amrnbdec.o): relocation R_ARM_MOVW_ABS_NC against `a local symbol' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
/usr/local/lib/libavcodec.a: could not read symbols: Bad value
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Now I would like to recompile it with -fPIC like the compiler is suggesting but I have no idea how. Any help is appreciated.
Briefly, the error means that you can't use a static library to be linked w/ a dynamic one.
The correct way is to have a libavcodec compiled into a .so instead of .a, so the other .so library you are trying to build will link well.
The shortest way to do so is to add --enable-shared at ./configure options. Or even you may try to disable shared (or static) libraries at all... you choose what is suitable for you!
Have a look at this page.
you can try globally adding the flag using: export CXXFLAGS="$CXXFLAGS -fPIC"
I had this problem when building FFMPEG static libraries (e.g. libavcodec.a) for Android x86_64 target platform (using Android NDK clang). When statically linking with my library the problem occured although all FFMPEG C -> object files (*.o) were compiled with -fPIC compile option:
x86_64/libavcodec.a(h264_qpel_10bit.o):
requires dynamic R_X86_64_PC32 reloc against 'ff_pw_1023'
which may overflow at runtime; recompile with -fPIC
The problem occured only for libavcodec.a and libswscale.a.
Source of this problem is that FFMPEG has assembler optimizations for x86* platforms e.g. the reported problem cause is in libavcodec/h264_qpel_10bit.asm -> h264_qpel_10bit.o.
When producing X86-64 bit static library (e.g. libavcodec.a) it looks like assembler files (e.g. libavcodec/h264_qpel_10bit.asm) uses some x86 (32bit) assembler commands which are incompatible when statically linking with x86-64 bit target library since they don't support required relocation type.
Possible solutions:
compile all ffmpeg files with no assembler optimizations (for ffmpeg this is configure option: --disable-asm)
produce dynamic libraries (e.g. libavcodec.so) and link them in your final library dynamically
I chose 1) and it solved the problem.
Reference: https://tecnocode.co.uk/2014/10/01/dynamic-relocs-runtime-overflows-and-fpic/
After the configure step you probably have a makefile. Inside this makefile look for CFLAGS (or similar). puf -fPIC at the end and run make again. In other words -fPIC is a compiler option that has to be passed to the compiler somewhere.
If you're building a shared library but need to link with static libavcodec add linker flags:
-Wl,-Bsymbolic
In case of cmake:
set(CMAKE_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS "-Wl,-Bsymbolic")
I hit this same issue trying to install Dashcast on Centos 7. The fix was adding -fPIC at the end of each of the CFLAGS in the x264 Makefile. Then I had to run make distclean for both x264 and ffmpeg and rebuild.
In addirion to the good answers here, specifically Robert Lujo's.
I want to say in my case I've been deliberately trying to statically compile a version of ffmpeg. All the required dependencies and what else heretofore required, I've done static compilation.
When I ran ./configure for the ffmpeg process I didnt notice --enable-shared was on the commandline. Removing it and running ./configure is only then I was able to compile correctly (All 56 mbs of an ffmpeg binary). Check that out as well if your intention is static compilation
I'm building ffmpeg 5.1.2 on CentOS7 with gcc4.8.5.
As mentioned in ${ffmpegRoot}/doc/platform.texi:
1)configure with option
"--enable-pic"
2)add the following option to your project LDFLAGS
"-Wl,-Bsymbolic"
Before compiling make sure that "rules.mk" file is included properly in Makefile or include it explicitly by:
"source rules.mk"
I have a brand-new off-the-cd OSX 10.6 installation.
I'd now like to compile the following trivial C program as a 64bit binary:
#include <stdio.h>
int main()
{
printf("hello world");
return 0;
}
I invoke gcc as follows:
gcc -m64 hello.c
However, this fails with the following error:
Undefined symbols:
"___gxx_personality_v0", referenced from:
_main in ccUAOnse.o
CIE in ccUAOnse.o
ld: symbol(s) not found
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
What's going on here? Why is gcc dying?
Compiling without the -m64 flag works fine.
Two things:
I don't think you actually used gcc -m64 hello.c. The error you got is usually the result of doing something like gcc -m64 hello.cc- using the C compiler to compile C++ code.
shell% gcc -m64 hello.c
shell% ./a.out
hello world [added missing newline]
shell% cp hello.c hello.cc
shell% gcc -m64 hello.cc
Undefined symbols:
"___gxx_personality_v0", referenced from:
_main in ccYaNq32.o
CIE in ccYaNq32.o
ld: symbol(s) not found
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
You can "get this to work" with the following:
shell% gcc -m64 hello.cc -lstdc++
shell% ./a.out
hello world
Second, -m64 is not the preferred way of specifying that you'd like to generate 64-bit code on Mac OS X. The preferred way is to use -arch ARCH, where ARCH is one of ppc, ppc64, i386, or x86_64. There may be more (or less) architectures available depending on how your tools are set up (i.e., iPhone ARM, ppc64 deprecated, etc). Also, on 10.6, gcc defaults to -arch x86_64, or generating 64-bit code by default.
Using this style, it's possible to have the compiler create "fat binaries" automatically- you can use -arch multiple times. For example, to create a "Universal Binary":
shell% gcc -arch x86_64 -arch i386 -arch ppc hello.c
shell% file a.out
a.out: Mach-O universal binary with 3 architectures
a.out (for architecture x86_64): Mach-O 64-bit executable x86_64
a.out (for architecture i386): Mach-O executable i386
a.out (for architecture ppc7400): Mach-O executable ppc
EDIT: The following was added to answer the OPs question "I did make a mistake and call my file .cc instead of .c. I'm still confused about why this should matter?"
Well... that's a sort of complicated answer. I'll give a brief explanation, but I'll ask that you have a little faith that "there's actually a good reason."
It's fair to say that "compiling a program" is a fairly complicated process. For both historical and practical reasons, when you execute gcc -m64 hello.cc, it's actually broken up in to several discrete steps behind the scenes. These steps, each of which usually feeds the result of each step to the next step, are approximately:
Run the C Pre-Processor, cpp, on the source code that is being compiled. This step is responsible for performing all the #include statements, various #define macro expansions, and other "pre-processing" stuff.
Run the C compiler proper on the C Pre-Processed results. The output of this step is a .s file, or the result of the C code compiled to assembly language.
Run the as assembler on the .s source. This assembles the assembly language in to a .o object file.
Run the ld linker on the .o file(s) to link the various compiled object files and various static and dynamically linked libraries in to a useable executable.
Note: This is a "typical" flow for most compilers. An individual implementation of a compiler doesn't have to follow the above steps. Some compilers combine multiple steps in to one for performance reasons. Modern versions of gcc, for example, don't use a separate cpp pass. The tcc compiler, on the other hand, performs all the above steps in one pass, using no additional external tools or intermediate steps.
In the above, traditional compiler tool chain flow, the cc (or, in our case, gcc) command is called a "compiler driver". It's a "logical front end" to all of the above tools and steps and knows how to intelligently apply all the steps and tools (like the assembler and linker) in order to create a final executable. In order to do this, though, it usually needs to know "the kind of" file it is dealing with. You can't really feed an assembled .o file to the C compiler, for example. Therefore, there are a couple of "standard" .* designations used to specify the "kind" of file (see man gcc for more info):
.c, .h C source code and C header files.
.m Objective-C source code.
.cc, .cp, .cpp, .cxx, .c++ C++ Source code.
.hh C++ header file.
.mm, .M Objective-C++ source code.
.s Assembly language source code.
.o Assembled object code.
.a ar archive or static library.
.dylib Dynamic shared library.
It's also possible to over-ride this "automatically determined file type" using various compiler flags (see man gcc for how to do this), but it's generally MUCH easier to just stick with the standard conventions so that everything "just works" automatically.
And, in a round about way, if you had used the C++ "compiler driver", or g++, in your original example, you wouldn't have encountered this problem:
shell% g++ -m64 hello.cc
shell% ./a.out
hello world
The reason for this is gcc essentially says "Use C rules when driving the tool chain" and g++ says "Use C++ rules when driving the tool chain". g++ knows that to create a working executable, it needs to pass -lstdc++ to the linker stage, whereas gcc obviously doesn't think this is necessary even though it knew to use the C++ compiler at the "Compile the source code" stage because of the .cc file ending.
Some of the other C/C++ compilers available to you on Mac OS X 10.6 by default: gcc-4.0, gcc-4.2, g++-4.0, g++-4.2, llvm-gcc, llvm-g++, llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-g++-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, llvm-g++-4.2, clang. These tools (usually) swap out the first two steps in the tool chain flow and use the same lower-level tools like the assembler and linker. The llvm- compilers use the gcc front end to parse the C code and turn it in to an intermediate representation, and then use the llvm tools to transform that intermediate representation in to code. Since the llvm tools use a "low-level virtual machine" as its near-final output, it allows for a richer set of optimization strategies, the most notable being that it can perform optimizations across different, already compiled .o files. This is typically called link time optimization. clang is a completely new C compiler that also targets the llvm tools as its output, allowing for the same kinds of optimizations.
So, there you go. The not so short explanation of why gcc -m64 hello.cc failed for you. :)
EDIT: One more thing...
It's a common "compiler driver technique" to have commands like gcc and g++ sym-link to the same "all-in-one" compiler driver executable. Then, at run time, the compiler driver checks the path and file name that was used to create the process and dynamically switch rules based on whether that file name ends with gcc or g++ (or equivalent). This allows the developer of the compiler to re-use the bulk of the front end code and then just change the handful of differences required between the two.
I don't know why this happens (works fine for me), but
Try compile with g++, or link to libstdc++. ___gxx_personality_v0 is a symbol used by GNU C++ to set up the SjLj callback for the destructors, so for some reason C++ code creeps into your C code. or
Remove the -m64 flag. Binaries generated by GCC 4.2 on 10.6 defaults to 64-bit as far as I know. You can check by file the output and ensure it reads "Mach-O 64-bit executable x86_64". or
Reinstall the latest Xcode from http://developer.apple.com/technology/xcode.html.
OK:
adding -m64 doesn't do anything, a normal gcc with no options is a 64-bit compile
if you are really just off-the-cd then you should update and install a new xcode
your program works fine for me with or without -m64 on 10.6.2
We had a similar issue when working with CocoaPods when creating and using a pod that contained Objective-C++ code so I thought it's also worth mentioning:
You should edit the .podspec of the pod that contains the c++ code, and add a line like:
s.xcconfig = {
'OTHER_LDFLAGS' => '$(inherited) -lstdc++',
}