In Ubuntu 14.04, I have downloaded some source code which comes with a makefile. I have then run "make" on it to compile, which builds an executable. When executing this file, I receive the following error:
./mt_test: error while loading shared libraries: libcudart.so.7.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Now, the file libcudart.so.7.0 is located in the directory /usr/local/cuda-7.0/lib64. But in my .bashrc file, I have the line: export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/local/cuda-7.0/lib64:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Furthermore, if I run echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH from the terminal, one of the entries is this path. There are no other copies of libcudart.so.7.0 elsewhere on my system.
Is there any reason why the executable might not be able find this library, even though its directory is one of the search directories?
Strangely, this error has only happened since installing Matlab on my system. There is now a file called libcudart.so.6.5 located at /usr/local/MATLAB/R2015a/bin/glnxa64, but this path is not part of LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
As MadScientist probably correctly guessed, this is likely a 32 vs. 64-bit mismatch. Run the following command:
file -L ./mt_test /usr/local/cuda-7.0/lib64/libcudart.so.7.0
The command should report either ELF 32-bit LSB ..., or ELF 64-bit LSB ... for both files. If one of the files is 32-bit, and the other 64-bit, then they are not compatible.
You can gain further insight into where the dynamic linker is searching for libcudart.so.7.0 by running the following command:
LD_DEBUG=files,libs ./mt_test
Related
There is a laptop on which I have no root privilege.
onto the machine I have a library installed using configure --prefix=$HOME/.usr .
after that, I got these files in ~/.usr/lib :
libXX.so.16.0.0
libXX.so.16
libXX.so
libXX.la
libXX.a
when I compile a program that invokes one of function provided by the library with this command :
gcc XXX.c -o xxx.out -L$HOME/.usr/lib -lXX
xxx.out was generated without warning, but when I run it error like this was thrown:
./xxx.out: error while loading shared libraries: libXX.so.16: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory , though libXX.so.16 resides there.
my clue-less assumption is that ~/.usr/lib wasn't searched when xxx.out is invoked.
but what can I do to specify path of .so , in order that xxx.out can look there for .so file?
An addition is when I feed -static to gcc, another error happens like this:
undefined reference to `function_proviced_by_the_very_librar'
It seems .so does not matter even though -L and -l are given to gcc.
what should I do to build a usable exe with that library?
For other people who has the same question as I did
I found a useful article at tldp about this.
It introduces static/shared/dynamic loaded library, as well as some example code to use them.
There are two ways to achieve that:
Use -rpath linker option:
gcc XXX.c -o xxx.out -L$HOME/.usr/lib -lXX -Wl,-rpath=/home/user/.usr/lib
Use LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable - put this line in your ~/.bashrc file:
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/user/.usr/lib
This will work even for a pre-generated binaries, so you can for example download some packages from the debian.org, unpack the binaries and shared libraries into your home directory, and launch them without recompiling.
For a quick test, you can also do (in bash at least):
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/user/.usr/lib ./xxx.out
which has the advantage of not changing your library path for everything else.
Should it be LIBRARY_PATH instead of LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
gcc checks for LIBRARY_PATH which can be seen with -v option
I am trying to write a simple application with GLFW on Linux. Right now the main file (the only file) is basically just a few lines of code to make sure the dynamic library linked correctly. Here it is:
#include <GLFW/glfw3.h>
#include <iostream>
int main()
{
glfwInit();
std::cout << "It works this far!" << std::endl;
glfwTerminate();
}
The include files are stored in a directory labelled "include" and the library files are stored in a directory labelled "lib". As of right now, I am compiling the program with the following line:
g++ -Wl,-Rlib -Iinclude -Llib test.cpp -o test -lglfw.3.2
It compiles and links just fine, but when I try to execute it, I get the following error:
./test: error while loading shared libraries: libglfw.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
Now, before you rush to downvote this question into oblivion and mark it as a duplicate, at least allow me to explain why I believe my question is different enough to not be a duplicate. I already attempted the solutions that the other questions presented, but it was unsuccessful. As you can see, I tried setting the path to the library during linking with the -Wl,-Rlib tag. I also tried setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to point to the location of my libraries (the 'lib' folder), but it still threw the same error. (It didn't matter if the path was relative or absolute.)
So, the next thing I tried was running the ldd command on the executable. I got some other dependencies that were working just fine, but importantly, I got this:
libglfw.so.3 => not found
For some reason, it insists on looking for libglfw.so.3. It will not have it any other way. Upon renaming the library from libglfw.3.2.so to libglfw.so.3, the program executed just fine and printed It works this far! as if there were no problems at all.
Why would this happen?
For some reason, it insists on looking for libglfw.so.3. ... Upon renaming the library from libglfw.3.2.so to libglfw.so.3 ...
The ELF executables contain the exact name of the dynamic libraries used.
If the executable contains the library name "libglfw.so.3" the file must be named exactly like this.
The file naming scheme is intentionally done in a way that not the "full" version is coded into the file name: This way a later version ("libglfw.so.3.15") will work with the executable.
Normally there should be a symbolic link to the latest version of the library installed:
libglfw.so.3 -> libglfw.so.3.2
This symbolic link seems to be missing on your computer. I would say that this is an installation problem!
EDIT
The question could be: Why is the file name stored in the executable file not libglfw.3.2.so but libglfw.so.3?
The answer has to do with the backward compatibility when a new version of a library is installed:
Normally you would use the switch -lglfw and a symbolic link named libglfw.so is looked up.
If you stored the file name libglfw.so in the executable file and a new, incompatible version if this library (libglfw.so.4) is installed you would have no chance to get the program running by having both versions of the library installed.
To enable backward compatibility by having both versions of the library installed the "real" symbolic link name of the library (libglfw.so.3) must be stored in the executable file.
Therefore the "expected" file name of a library is stored in the library itself: Inside the file libglfw.so.3.2 you'll find some information that the file expects itself to be stored as libglfw.so.3.
The linker will use this information about the file name because it assumes that the library name given in the linker switch (-lglfw) is less "precise" than the name stored in the library itself.
For some reason, it insists on looking for libglfw.so.3. It will not have it any other way.
This is the Linux convention for shared libraries which is described here among other places. For Linux libfoo.so.x.y.z is considered to have the same ABI as libfoo.so.x. Usually when shared libraries are installed (e.g. via rpm, dpkg, etc.) there's an invocation of ldconfig that happens so that the just installed libraries have a symlink following the convention installed that references the library. Also these libs (if installed to a "trusted location"), are added to a linker cache for performance reasons.
It compiles and links just fine, but when I try to execute it, I get the following error:
./test: error while loading shared libraries: libglfw.so.3: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
libglfw.so.3 isn't on ld-linux.so's path.
As you can see, I tried setting the path to the library during linking with the -Wl,-Rlib
Still won't find it -- libglfw.so.3 isn't on ld-linux.so's path. You can add it by doing something like:
ldconfig -n /path/to/lib
Which should output the requisite libglfw.so.3 symlink for your lib.
IIRC setting the rpath might require a full path.
I also tried setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to point to the location of my libraries
Again, libglfw.so.3 isn't on ld-linux.so's path.
I'm having trouble finding why this library (matio) isn't working for me. In my Makefile I have this:
LIBS += -L/home/brian/.../matio-1.5.6/src/.libs/ -lmatio
When I attempt to run my code (links fine) I get this error:
error while loading shared libraries: libmatio.so.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
libmatio.so.4 exists in the directory specified by the -L flag.
I built the library and it seems to go through make check with only a handful writing errors (which is fine as I only need it for reading).
Things I've tried:
Specifying the name (i.e. -l:libmatio.so.4.0.2)
Adding the path to LD_LIBRARY_PATH
Adding the path as a line in /etc/ld.so.conf and run sudo ldconfig
Adding a new file in /etc/ld.so.conf.d with the path and run sudo ldconfig
(When I run ldconfig -p | grep matio nothing returns. Am I doing something wrong with ldconfig?)
The error is actually telling you "no compatible library with that name exists in the library cache", not "no file with that filename exists on disk".
So, confusingly, this can happen when the shared object file is in the wrong format.
Ensure that it was built for the right platform by the right compiler! You can have a look with file and verify that the dynamic link is failing using ldd on your executable.
I'm trying to build the SDL library from the source code. I've downloaded the compressed file (i.e. SDL2-2.0.3.tar.gz) and extracted it. I don't want to install the files in /usr/local. According to this link, I need to change the configure
The last command says "sudo" so we can write it to /usr/local (by
default). You can change this to a different location with the
--prefix option to the configure script. In fact, there are a LOT of good options you can use with configure! Be sure to check out its
--help option for details.
This is what I've done.
mkdir build
cd build
../configure
make
sudo make install
In install folder that I've created are the following files
share
lib
include
bin
Now I would like to run the test files. I've picked this testatomic.c and this is the command line
gcc testatomic.c -o test -I/home/xxxx/Desktop/SDL2-2.0.3/install/include/SDL2 -L/home/xxxx/Desktop/SDL2-2.0.3/install/lib -lSDL2 -lSDL2main
I get this error
error while loading shared libraries: libSDL2-2.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
In lib, these are the files
Where is the shared object file?
You're getting error when running resulting program because system's dynamic linker cannot find required library. Program requires libSDL2-2.0.so.0, linker looks for it in system-defined directories (/lib, /usr/lib, ..., - defined in /etc/ld.so.conf), but finds none - hence an error.
To inform linker where you want it to look for libraries, you can define LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable, e.g. in your case:
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH="$HOME/Desktop/SDL2-2.0.3/install/lib"
./test
Other ways is installing libraries in standard location, defining LD_LIBRARY_PATH in your .bashrc (or whatever shell you use), or using rpath, e.g. adding -Wl,-rpath=$HOME/Desktop/SDL2-2.0.3/install/lib at the end of your compilation line.
I was able to fix this problem with:
sudo apt install libsdl2-dev
I too had:
./01_hello_SDL: error while loading shared libraries: libSDL2-2.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
as a result of compiling the first C++ program (using the SDL headers) as part of the Lazy Foo tutorial. I found out that libSDL2-2.0.so.0 was just using the find command in the GUI. It turned out to be in /usr/local/lib
Then in terminal I typed:
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH="/usr/local/lib"
I checked the value of LD_LIBRARY_PATH using:
echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
I recompiled (don't know if that was necessary) and voila, it worked.
I'm trying to get my Cuda SDK samples running, but I get the following error:
./bandwidthTest: error while loading shared libraries:
libcudart.so.4: cannot open shared object file:
No such file or directory
Why can I compile the example successfully, but not run it? Is there a way to specify the path to the CUDA runtime library manually?
try:
32-bit: sudo ldconfig /usr/local/cuda/lib
64-bit: sudo ldconfig /usr/local/cuda/lib64
cheers
First these that you need is to concatenate the paths to the CUDA binaries and libraries. This is simply done by adding the following lines to your .bashrc file.
export PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/cuda/bin
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=:/usr/local/cuda/lib64
If you are using a 32-bit operating system change lib64 to lib
Second, there should have been some shared object files installed in /usr/lib or /usr/lib64, depending on your operating system. These object files should be contained in a directory called "nvidia". The two files we are concerned with are names libcuda.so.drivernumber and libOpenCL.so.somenumber. To differentiate between the actual shared object files just use ls -l. The symbolic links will show what they are actually linking to.
As root, execute the following commands:
ln -s /usr/lib64/nvidia/libcuda.so.somenumber /usr/lib64/libcuda.so
ln -s /usr/lib64/nvidia/libOpenCL.so.somenumber /usr/lib64/libOpenCL.so
That should allow you to compile all the sources in the SDK.
As of Cuda 5.5 and Ubuntu 12.04/12.10, the command above becomes (notice the Ubuntu and Cuda directory changes) for 64bit
ln -s /usr/local/cuda/lib64/libcuda.so.5.5 /usr/lib/libcuda.so.5.5
That is, the lib folders on Ubuntu as of 12.04 are lib32 and lib; the 64 is implicit, and cuda 5.5 and greater now installs to a different directory.
1 error while loading shared libraries: libcudart.so.6.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
32-bit: sudo ldconfig /usr/local/cuda/lib
64-bit: sudo ldconfig /usr/local/cuda/lib64
(refer: http://blog.csdn.net/shenchong721/article/details/21529295)
Works for me!
LD_LIBRARY_PATH is strongly deprecated. It may mess up other programs, and others may reset it. It should only be used to temporarily override the permanent paths for testing purposes (don't take my word, google it).
Instead, add a line with your cuda lib directory on it to /etc/ld.so.conf, after any existing lines.
For example, if you installed on /usr/local/cuda, you will need to add
32-bit : /usr/local/cuda/lib
64-bit : /usr/local/cuda/lib64
Save, and run ldconfig. This should permanently fix the problem.
The symbolic links are probably already set up by the installation. If not, then add them as Alex advised.
Note - I received errors referencing /lib, but I needed to add lib64 to fix them.
create a nvidia_settings.conf file in /etc/ld.so.conf.d/ and add the path to the libs in the file nvidia_settings.conf
/usr/local/cuda/lib64
/usr/local/cuda/lib
Now to update the changes run the following command:
sudo ldconfig
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/usr/local/cuda/lib
or if you are running cuda-5.0 on a 64-bit machine
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:/usr/local/cuda-5.0/lib64
the system find library with ld tool. as the top answer says, 64-bit: sudo ldconfig /usr/local/cuda-xx/lib64 ;;xx is the cuda libraryedition
In my case I was running an application using MPI. The error was:
libcudart.so.7: cannot open shared object file
CUDA was properly installed in all nodes. Also, as in the previous answers, the variables $PATH and $LD_LIBRARY_PATH were pointing to the binary and libraries respectively.
Passing the $PATH and $LD_LIBRARY_PATH in the MPI command solved the issue.
mpirun -x PATH=$PATH -x LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$LD_LIBRARY_PATH ...