I've 2 mfc buttons that I want to hide when a 3D stl file is being loaded and then show the buttons again when the stl loading is complete. This is to prevent user from re-loading the model when the loading is currently taking place.
The snippet of the code is as below
{ // change control state when model loads
((CButton *)this->GetDlgItem(IDC_RELOAD_STOCK_BUTTON))->ShowWindow(SW_HIDE);
((CButton *)this->GetDlgItem(IDOK))->ShowWindow(SW_HIDE);
UpdateWindow();
}
// this process takes few seconds to load the file in the memory
customStockModel.LoadFile(pathName.GetBuffer(pathName.GetLength()));
{
// change control state when the model has loaded
((CButton *)this->GetDlgItem(IDC_RELOAD_STOCK_BUTTON))->ShowWindow(SW_SHOW);
((CButton *)this->GetDlgItem(IDOK))->ShowWindow(SW_SHOW);
UpdateWindow();
}
The buttons do get hidden and reappear as I expect, but when I click the button area while it's hidden, the onclick handler gets called immediately when the button control reappears on the screen. it seems like the click message is queued and mfc calls the handler once the buttons are activated. What am I doing wrong here?
Ideally you should read your file in a thread - this would allow your application to refresh itself normally and process messages.
Now if you are unsure about this (multi-threading is hard), you can call regularly the following function in your lenghty function to clear up the message loops.
BOOL YourClass::DoEvents()
{
MSG msg;
while (::PeekMessage(&msg, NULL, 0, 0, PM_REMOVE))
{
if (msg.message == WM_QUIT)
{
return FALSE;
}
if (!AfxGetApp()->PreTranslateMessage(&msg))
{
::TranslateMessage(&msg);
::DispatchMessage(&msg);
}
}
return TRUE;
}
It will work but "proper programmers" will scream when they see this!
Good luck
Related
I have a Modeless dialog which shows a bunch of buttons; some of these are customized to draw stuff with GDI.
Now, when the user clicks on a customized one under certain conditions, a message box appears to alert user of the error and this is fine.
The problem is that after accepting the Message Box (showed as MB_ICON_ERROR), everywhere I click in the dialog, I always get the error message as if the whole dialog send the message to the customized button and the only way to get rid this is to press tab and give the focus to another control.
This is a strange behaviour and knowing why happens wouldn't be bad, but a simple workaround for now should do the job.
Since the moment that is probably a matter of focus, I've tried to set it on another control (in the owner dialog) by doing:GetDlgItem( IDC_BTN_ANOTHER_BUTTON )->SetFocus();
and then, inside the customized control by adding:KillFocus( NULL );but had no results.
How should I use these functions?
Thanks in advance.
PS: if I comment the AfxMessageBox, the control does not show this bizarre behaviour.
EDITI'll show some code as requested.
// This is where Message Box is popping out. It is effectively inside the dialog code.
void CProfiloSuolaDlg::ProcessLBtnDownGraphProfilo(PNT_2D &p2dPunto)
{
// m_lboxProfiles is a customized CListBox
if(m_lboxProfiles.GetCurSel() == 0)
{
// This profile cannot be modified.
/*
CString strMessage;
strMessage.Format( _T("Default Profile cannot be edited.") );
AfxMessageBox( strMessaggio, MB_ICONERROR );
*/
return;
}
// Selecting a node from sole perimeter.
SelectNodo(p2dPoint);
}
Actually, the message is commented to keep the dialog working.
// This is inside the customization of CButton
void CMyGraphicButton::OnLButtonDown(UINT nFlags, CPoint point)
{
PNT_2D p2dPunto;
CProfiloSuolaDlg* pDlg = (CProfiloSuolaDlg*)GetParent();
m_pVD->MapToViewport(point,p2dPunto);
switch(m_uType)
{
case GRF_SEZIONE:
pDlg->ProcessLBtnDownGraphProfilo(p2dPunto);
break;
case GRF_PERIMETRO:
pDlg->ProcessLBtnDownGraphPerimetro(p2dPunto);
break;
}
CButton::OnLButtonDown(nFlags, point);
}
Since you are handling the button down event in the button handler for the custom control, you don't need to call the base class. Just comment out CButton::OnLButtonDown(nFlags, point).
I want to make program work while handle is available. I thinking about setting timer on initialization... and insert all source of program in to it, but if I got lost handle when program processing in while loop it will not let me close dialog box immediately.
BOOL WaitProcessDlg::OnInitDialog()
{
CDialogEx::OnInitDialog();
SetTimer(IDC_PROGRESS1, 0, NULL);
return TRUE;
}
void WaitProcessDlg::OnTimer(UINT nIDEvent)
{
if(::FindWindow(NULL, str)){
tempHWND = ::FindWindow(NULL, str);
while(tempHWND){
----------------------->>>>>>>>>>>> A LOT OF CODING <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<----------------------
}
EndDialog( 0 );
KillTimer(IDC_PROGRESS1);
}
CDialog::OnTimer(nIDEvent);
}
So my question is what the best way to close dialog when handle of external application may lost, maybe insert thread or there are any other way to do that?
It sounds like you need a windows hook.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms644959(v=vs.85).aspx#whgetmessagehook
with WH_GETMESSAGE you get to see the windows events being processed by the other application's window, you could then wait for the WM_CLOSE to show up, and kill your dialog.
How can I suppress to close the form when hitting the OK button? I have the following code:
void __fastcall TfrmTillegg_velg::btnOkClick(TObject *Sender)
{
if (exp1)
ShowMessage("Not allowed"); // Don't close form
else if (exp2)
ShowMessage("Not allowed"); // Don't close form
else
{
// Do something here
Close();
}
}
The project is written in Borland c++builder.
If you mean keeping the dialog created by ShowMessage open. then as far as I am aware, you cannot do this. The dialog displayed by ShowMessage will close whenever you click any of its buttons. If you want a popup dialog that will not close in this way, you will need to create a custom form yourself and control its behaviour according to your needs.
Just in case your question is referring to your main form closing, then you do have an explicit call to Close() within your button click event handler above that will cause your form to close whenever both of your exp1 and exp2 conditions are false.
else {
// Do something here
Close(); // THIS WILL CLOSE YOUR MAIN FORM.
}
So I thought this would be pretty simple, but I forgot it's MFC. Instead of registering a notification listener for data model changes that would possibly require a GUI update on each individual control I figure why not register it once and then send a message to all the open dock panes and allow them to update their controls as needed on their own terms for efficiency.
My callback function for handling the notification from the server looks something like this:
void CMainFrame::ChangeCallback(uint32_t nNewVersion, const std::vector<uint32_t>& anChangedObjectTypes)
{
CObList panes;
GetDockingManager()->GetPaneList(panes); // assert failure
if (!panes.IsEmpty())
{
POSITION pos = panes.GetHeadPosition();
while (pos)
{
CDockablePane* pPane = dynamic_cast<CDockablePane*>(panes.GetNext(pos));
if (pPane)
pPane->PostMessage(DM_REFRESH, nNewVersion);
}
}
}
The error I am getting is an assertion failure on line 926 of wincore.cpp
CHandleMap* pMap = afxMapHWND();
ASSERT(pMap != NULL); // right here
There is a comment below this saying this can happen if you pass controls across threads however this is a single threaded MFC application and this is all being done from the main frame.
Does anyone know what else can cause this?
If there is another way to go about sending a message to all the open CDockablePane derived windows in MFC that works as well ...
Here's the obvious workaround that I didn't want to have to do but after hours of debugging and no response here I guess this is a viable answer:
I added std::vector<CDockPane*> m_dockList; to the members of CMainFrame
Now after each call to AddPane in various places that can create and open new dock panes I make a subsequent call to push_back and then I override CDockablePane::OnClose like so:
CMainFrame* pMainFrame = reinterpret_cast<CMainFrame*>(AfxGetMainWnd());
if (pMainFrame)
{
std::vector<CDockPane*>::const_iterator found(
std::find(pMainFrame->DockList()->begin(), pMainFrame->DockList()->end(), this));
if (found != pMainFrame->DockList()->end())
pMainFrame->DockList()->erase(found);
}
CDockablePane::OnClose();
Now this list will only contain pointers to open dock panes which allows me to handle the event notification in my callback and simply do a for loop and PostMessage to each.
The main form opens a child form that has a handful of button CONTROLs on it. I need to trap keyboard events so I subclassed one of the controls. All is good until the control loses focus of course.
Ideally, as long as this child form is open I would like to assign the focus to this control and thus trap all the keystrokes, no matter where the user clicks.
I suspect superclassing might be a better way to go but I am not as familiar with it.
Perhaps what I should do is use accelerators on the main form?
ADDED:
I should mention that the main form has a large listview control that is subclassed to recover up/down arrows and mousewheel etc.
The traditional way is to install a keyboard hook (SetWindowsHookEx), but you need to inject it into every application, and it doesn't work across 32/64 bit boundaries.
What you can do however, and quite easily at that, is to poll the keyboard with GetKeyboardState on a timer and check whether your f1-f12 keys are activated. The timer can be as slow ticking as 100ms and it will catch almost everything while using virtually no resources.
Assuming that this is within Windows and the Win32 API, one option is to look for messages in your main GetMessage, TranslateMessage, DispatchMessage loop. You can special-case any message within this loop, irrespective of which window it's aimed at.
You should probably use IsChild to check that the message is intended for a control on your main window (as opposed to some dialog box or message box that might be displayed separately). Getting the logic right can be fiddly, too. It would be best to only intercept messages when you know your control has lost the focus, and only intercept the exact messages you need to.
Years ago, I wrote a library message loop with a lot of this built in. I had a simple manager class that held pointers to instances of my own little window class. The loop knew the difference between dialogs and normal windows, gave each window class a chance to spy on its childrens messages, and so on. You won't be able to run this directly and the conventions are a bit strange, but you might find this useful...
int c_Window_List::Message_Loop (void)
{
MSG msg;
bool l_Handled;
while (GetMessage (&msg, NULL, 0, 0))
{
l_Handled = false;
c_Windows::c_Cursor l_Cursor;
bool ok;
for (ok = l_Cursor.Find_First (g_Windows); ok; ok = l_Cursor.Step_Next ())
{
if (IsChild (l_Cursor.Key (), msg.hwnd))
{
if (l_Cursor.Data ().f_Accelerators != NULL)
{
l_Handled = TranslateAccelerator (l_Cursor.Key (), l_Cursor.Data ().f_Accelerators, &msg);
if (l_Handled) break;
}
if (l_Cursor.Data ().f_Manager != 0)
{
l_Handled = l_Cursor.Data ().f_Manager->Spy_Msg (l_Cursor.Key (), msg);
}
if (l_Handled) break;
if (l_Cursor.Data ().f_Is_Dialog)
{
l_Handled = IsDialogMessage (l_Cursor.Key (), &msg);
if (l_Handled) break;
}
}
}
if (!l_Handled)
{
TranslateMessage (&msg);
DispatchMessage (&msg);
}
if (g_Windows.Size () == 0)
{
// When all windows have closed, exit
PostQuitMessage (0);
}
}
return msg.wParam;
}
The f_ prefixes mean field - I picked up the m_ convention later, but this code hasn't been revisited in a very long time. f_Manager in particular points to an instance of my c_Window_Base class. The c_Cursor class is a kind of iterator, used to step through all the windows stored in the g_Windows variable (actually a static class member rather than a global).