I have a C++ program that runs nicely and it gives my output in the terminal when it runs, this is handy if the algorithm takes time.
How do I 'cout' the output in a terminal styled div in the browser (doesn't allow user to type into it as an actual terminal)
Alternatively is there a different C++ command to direct output elsewhere other than the terminal window in which it is currently running?
Kind of new to C++ so maybe this is a obvious fix but thanks anyway
Related
ok so I just started learning today, This simple code works as expected when I run it in the integrated terminal but not in the output window, I'm not able to type in the numbers, any suggestions on how to solve the issue ?
Executed in output window
Executed in terminal window
As described in this Question: Cannot edit in read-only editor VS Code. The VS Code Output window is read-only. So you cannot input any values there. And as your code requires input, it will only work in a terminal (as you can input values there).
I am trying to write up a C++ program for a class using XCode. One of the things I wish to do, is to simply clear the screen. I've looked into how to do this, however the catch is that the code needs to run on both a Windows and Macintosh computer. I've looked at some other similar questions, but none of the answers help me. I know there is no "screen" but I want the system to clear the output window. I know that the command system("clear"); does what I want it to, but when XCode tests the program, instead of clearing the screen it prints TERM Variable not set
I've tried opening up the terminal and typing clear and it does in fact respond the way I want it to, so why doesn't the 'terminal' inside of XCode do the same? I just want to get the output window in XCode to respond to clear the same way that the terminal already does.
Here is something I have already tried;
I went to the terminal and ran echo $TERM, to which the terminal responded xterm-256color. I then went over to XCode and opened the "Scheme" settings, and found an Environment Variables setting under "Arguments". I added a variable (to the blank list) called TERM and gave it value xterm-256color. Upon running the program again, the output displays ¿[H¿[2J in the output window, positioned where the TERM Variable not set used to be printed.
Last thing, as a reminder, I cannot change the source code from the way it is now, or it could cause errors when the program is run on a Windows machine.
It does not work because you are "lying": The terminal in Xcode is not a xterm-256color, but it is dumb terminal. More precise, the display represents a NSTextStorage that collects stdout and/or (depending on target switch) stderr.
A dumb terminal is not able to clean the display. If you want to change this, you can write a plug-in similar to Xcode-Colors what adds the ability to understand ansi color codes.
However, if your requirement that the code simply run at Windows and OSX, you may stick with your solution system("clear"), since it works prefectly in the "normal" OSX terminal.
I have a C++ console application that prints some output constantly while it also accepts commands (using std::cin) from the user - output and input happen in separate threads.
If I write a text while some output appears the written text is mixed with application output. How can I prevent this behaviour?
To solve this problem, I need to display the program one line above the line where the text is typed. I'd inspire myself in Minecraft Bukkit server's solution - however I need the same for C++.
Assuming you want the output to appear while things are being typed, you'll need some screen control facilities to have the output go somewhere different than the input area. If I were tasked to implement something like this writing to a terminal I would refresh my ncurses experience. I realize you are on a Windows console and I have no idea if the Windows console is capable of the screen control needed to make it happen.
You can possibly tie custom stream buffers into std::cin and std::cout using the curses functionality under the hood but it may not be worth it. In any case, it isn't entirely trivial.
There's a windows port of ncurses called pdcurses. But if you are using visual studio there's a simple function provided called SetConsoleCursorPosition()
i am new to python and am trying to call a c++ function from python, I cam across this answer from Florian Bösch and found it really helpful, i did everything as in the link but i have a small problem which really surprised me, when i run the fooWrapper.py from command prompt it displays the result "hello" but when i run the program from idle by clicking run as module the python shell opens and displays nothing, only action is the cursor moves down as when you press enter. Is this normal or is this a problem???
I use python 2.7.3(32bits),with windows 7 and MInGW complier.
The problem is that IDLE redirects standard input and output, but your C++ function writes to the original standard output and thus IDLE will not show it. If you launch IDLE from a terminal you will see the C++'s output in the terminal.
It's a problem of IDLE, and I doubt that you can do something about it.
If you want to develop something bigger than a really small script you ought to use a different IDE.
I've got a program called pgm1 which create a new process using fork.
Then in this process, I launch a new program (pgm2) using the following command:
execv( exec_path_name, argv ).
But the thing is that with this method I've got both output in the same terminal.
I've been searching for a while ans the only solution i found was this one:
Open a new terminal with a system call
Attach my pgm2 to the new terminal using this soft http://blog.nelhage.com/2011/01/reptyr-attach-a-running-process-to-a-new-terminal/comment-page-1/#comment-27264
So my question is really simple, is there a more simple way to do that ?
Thanks in advance !
PS: Distro - Ubuntu 11.10 32bit
I can think of two possible solutions:
Do The Right Thing(TM) and send your output to a file: Each process can use a different file, providing both clear separation of the output and better record-keeping. As a bonus, you are also bound to see a performance improvement - terminal output is computationally expensive, even nowadays...
Execute a terminal emulator with the proper arguments: Most terminal emulators provide a way to execute a specific program in place of the shell. For example xterm:
$ xterm top
This will launch top in an xterm instance, without a shell. Quiting top also terminates the xterm window.
If your terminal emulator of choice supports this, you can use it simply by modifying the arguments passed to execv(). Of course, in this case you will be actually executing the terminal emulator instead of your program, which will then call your own process.
Keep in mind that, depending on the terminal emulator, any open file descriptors may not be passed correctly to your program - the terminal will at least mangle the standard file descriptors.