In Autoit script Iam unable to do Regular expression for the below string Here the numbers will get changed always.
Actual String = _WinWaitActivate("RX_IST2_AM [PID:942564 NPID:10991 SID:498702881] sbivvrwm060.dev.ib.tor.Test.com:30000","")
Here the PID, NPID & SID : will be changing and rest of the things are always constant.
What i have tried below is
_WinWaitActivate("RX_IST2_AM [PID:'([0-9]{1,6})' NPID:'([0-9]{1,5})' SID:'([0-9]{1,9})' sbivvrwm060.dev.ib.tor.Test.com:30000","")
Can someone please help me
As stated in the documentation, you should write the prefix REGEXPTITLE: and surround everything with square brackets, but "escape" all including ones as the dots (.) and spaces () with a backslash (\) and instead of [0-9] you might use \d like "[REGEXPTITLE:RX_IST2_AM\ \[PID:(\d{1,6})\ NPID:(\d{1,5})\ SID:(\d{1,9})\] sbivvrwm060\.dev\.ib\.tor\.Test\.com:30000]" as your parameter for the Win...(...)-Functions.
You can even omit the round brackets ((...)) but keep their content if you don't want to capture the content to process it further like with StringRegExp(...) or StringRegExpReplace(...) - using the _WinWaitActivete(...)-Function it won't make sense anyways as it is only matching and not replacing or returning anything from your regular expression.
According to regex101 both work, with the round brackets and without - you should always use a tool like this site to confirm that your expression is actually working for your input string.
Not familiar with autoit, but remember that regex has to completely match your string to capture results. For example, (goat)s will NOT capture the word goat if your string is goat or goater.
You have forgotten to add a ] in your regex, so your pattern doesn't match the string and capture groups will not be extracted. Also I'm not completely sold on the usage of '. Based on this page, you can do something like StringRegExp(yourstring, 'RX_IST2_AM [PID:([0-9]{1,6}) NPID:([0-9]{1,5}) SID:([0-9]{1,9})]', $STR_REGEXPARRAYGLOBALMATCH) and $1, $2 and $3 would be your results respectively. But maybe your approach works too.
Related
I'm creating a javascript regex to match queries in a search engine string. I am having a problem with alternation. I have the following regex:
.*baidu.com.*[/?].*wd{1}=
I want to be able to match strings that have the string 'word' or 'qw' in addition to 'wd', but everything I try is unsuccessful. I thought I would be able to do something like the following:
.*baidu.com.*[/?].*[wd|word|qw]{1}=
but it does not seem to work.
replace [wd|word|qw] with (wd|word|qw) or (?:wd|word|qw).
[] denotes character sets, () denotes logical groupings.
Your expression:
.*baidu.com.*[/?].*[wd|word|qw]{1}=
does need a few changes, including [wd|word|qw] to (wd|word|qw) and getting rid of the redundant {1}, like so:
.*baidu.com.*[/?].*(wd|word|qw)=
But you also need to understand that the first part of your expression (.*baidu.com.*[/?].*) will match baidu.com hello what spelling/handle????????? or hbaidu-com/ or even something like lkas----jhdf lkja$##!3hdsfbaidugcomlaksjhdf.[($?lakshf, because the dot (.) matches any character except newlines... to match a literal dot, you have to escape it with a backslash (like \.)
There are several approaches you could take to match things in a URL, but we could help you more if you tell us what you are trying to do or accomplish - perhaps regex is not the best solution or (EDIT) only part of the best solution?
I have an example string:
*DataFromAdHoc(cbgv)
I would like to extract by RegEx:
DataFromAdHoc
So far I have figured something like that:
^[^#][^\(]+
But Unfortunately without positive result. Do you have maybe any idea why it's not working?
The regex you tried ^[^#][^\(]+ would match:
From the beginning of the string, it should not be a # ^[^#]
Then match until you encounter a parenthesis (I think you don't have to escape the parenthesis in a character class) [^\(]+
So this would match *DataFromAdHoc, including the *, because it is not a #.
What you could do, it capture this part [^\(]+ in a group like ([^(]+)
Then your regex would look like:
^[^#]([^(]+)
And the DataFromAdHoc would be in group 1.
Use ^\*(\w+)\(\w+\)$
It just gets everything between the * and the stuff in brackets.
Your answer may depend on which language you're running your regex in, please include that in your question.
I need to replace all left { and right } curly braces as well as all percentage signs % to their respective HTML entities in a document.
I'm using Sublime Text 2's nice little star icon/button in Find and Replace. I came up with (\{)|(\})|(\%) to match the chars I need. There might be better ways, but hey... it seems to work.
What would the replacement string look like for this? I mean one expression, not with a programming language.
Basically it's replacing what I find with group $1 with something and then the same for group $2 with something else. Here in pseudo-code:
(\{)|(\})|(\%) ==> $1 replace with { AND $2 replace with } AND... etc.
Is this possible? I can provide some target sample data if needed.
Back story
These three characters can't be placed as is inside an attribute's value in HAML, like
:text => "blabliblu {20% lalla...}"
etc., without being escaped.
The percentage sign could theoretically be escaped with \% but the curly braces can not be escaped with \{ and \}, at least not when i'm preprocessing the HAML with Livereload (Win7). Maybe it's a Ruby thing? Anyhow, I'm going for the HTML entity approach.
im looking to use a regular expression to parse a URL to get a specific section of the url and nothing if I cannot find the pattern.
A url example is
/te/file/value/jifle?uil=testing-cdas-feaw:jilk:&jklfe=https://value-value.jifels/temp.html/topic?id=e997aad4-92e0-j30e-a3c8-jfkaliejs5#c452fds-634d-f424fds-cdsa&bf_action=jildape
I wish to get the bolded text in it.
Currently im using the regex "d=([^#]*)" but the problem is im also running across urls of this pattern:
and im getting the bold section of it
/te/file/value/jifle?uil=testing-cdas-feaw:jilk:&jklfe=https://value-value.jifels/temp.html/topic?id=e997aad4-92e0-j30e-a3c8-jfkaliejs5&bf_action=jildape
I would prefer it have no matches of this url because it doesnt contain the #
Regexes are not a magic tool that you should always use just because the problem involves a string. In this case, your language probably has a tool to break apart URLs for you. In PHP, this is parse_url(). In Perl, it's the URI::URL module.
You should almost always prefer an existing, well-tested solution to a common problem like this rather than writing your own.
So you want to match the value of the id parameter, but only if it has a trailing section containing a '#' symbol (without matching the '#' or what's after it)?
Not knowing the specifics of what style of regexes you're using, how about something like:
id=([^#&]*)#
regex = "id=([\\w-])+?#"
This will grab everything that is character class[a-zA-Z_0-9-] between 'id=' and '#' assuming everything between 'id=' and '#' is in that character class(i.e. if an '&' is in there, the regex will fail).
id=
-Self explanatory, this looks for the exact match of 'id='
([\\w-])
-This defines and character class and groups it. The \w is an escaped \w. '\w' is a predefined character class from java that is equal to [a-zA-Z_0-9]. I added '-' to this class because of the assumed pattern from your examples.
+?
-This is a reluctant quantifier that looks for the shortest possible match of the regex.
#
-The end of the regex, the last character we are looking for to match the pattern.
If you are looking to grab every character between 'id=' and the first '#' following it, the following will work and it uses the same logic as above, but replaces the character class [\\w-] with ., which matches anything.
regex = "id=(.+?)#"
I suspect this has already been answered somewhere, but I can't find it, so...
I need to extract a string from between two tokens in a larger string, in which the second token will probably appear again meaning... (pseudo code...)
myString = "A=abc;B=def_3%^123+-;C=123;" ;
myB = getInnerString(myString, "B=", ";" ) ;
method getInnerString(inStr, startToken, endToken){
return inStr.replace( EXPRESSION, "$1");
}
so, when I run this using expression ".+B=(.+);.+"
I get "def_3%^123+-;C=123;" presumably because it just looks for the LAST instance of ';' in the string, rather than stopping at the first one it comes to.
I've tried using (?=) in search of that first ';' but it gives me the same result.
I can't seem to find a regExp reference that explains how one can specify the "NEXT" token rather than the one at the end.
any and all help greatly appreciated.
Similar question on SO:
Regex: To pull out a sub-string between two tags in a string
Regex to replace all \n in a String, but no those inside [code] [/code] tag
Replace patterns that are inside delimiters using a regular expression call
RegEx matching HTML tags and extracting text
You're using a greedy pattern by not specifying the ? in it. Try this:
".+B=(.+?);.+"
Try this:
B=([^;]+);
This matches everything between B= and ; unless it is a ;. So it matches everything between B= and the first ; thereafter.
(This is a continuation of the conversation from the comments to Evan's answer.)
Here's what happens when your (corrected) regex is applied: First, the .+ matches the whole string. Then it backtracks, giving up most of the characters it just matched until it gets to the point where the B= can match. Then the (.+?) matches (and captures) everything it sees until the next part, the semicolon, can match. Then the final .+ gobbles up the remaining characters.
All you're really interested in is the "B=" and the ";" and whatever's between them, so why match the rest of the string? The only reason you have to do that is so you can replace the whole string with the contents of the capturing group. But why bother doing that if you can access contents of the group directly? Here's a demonstration (in Java, because I can't tell what language you're using):
String s = "A=abc;B=def_3%^123+-;C=123;";
Pattern p = Pattern.compile("B=(.*?);");
Matcher m = p.matcher(s);
if (m.find())
{
System.out.println(m.group(1));
}
Why do a 'replace' when a 'find' is so much more straightforward? Probably because your API makes it easier; that's why we do it in Java. Java has several regex-oriented convenience methods in its String class: replaceAll(), replaceFirst(), split(), and matches() (which returns true iff the regex matches the whole string), but not find(). And there's no convenience method for accessing capturing groups, either. We can't match the elegance of Perl one-liners like this:
print $1 if 'A=abc;B=def_3%^123+-;C=123;' =~ /B=(.*?);/;
...so we content ourselves with hacks like this:
System.out.println("A=abc;B=def_3%^123+-;C=123;"
.replaceFirst(".+B=(.*?);.+", "$1"));
Just to be clear, I'm not saying not to use these hacks, or that there's anything wrong with Evan's answer--there isn't. I just think we should understand why we use them, and what trade-offs we're making when we do.