I'm having some trouble when I want to get current location on Google Maps Android.
I have 2 class activity this LokasiActivity http://pastebin.com/ECr9G7Vq
and this maps activity http://pastebin.com/e3zruznk
The problem is, I want to change -6.8603727, 108.6564165 value automatically based on user's current position. Can I do that?
So, the actual problem looks like you never pass the user's last location from the first activity to the map activity. Put it in the bundle extras when starting it, then retrieve in map activity's oncreate().
Related
This page for example:
https://www.facebook.com/202344606451254
Actually points to:
https://www.facebook.com/23766404924
Is there any way to detect this using GraphAPI?
GraphAPI queries with the old id, eg
https://graph.facebook.com/v2.3/202344606451254/feed?access_token=xxx
will return no data
In case the links change in the future: API queries of the respective IDs show the first is "wpp plc" and the second is "wpp". The title of the first link says these ids have been merged.
You might want to try this:
/v2.3/202344606451254?fields=best_page
I'm not sure exactly what circumstances will cause that to work, but I tested it a little on Graph Explorer. It seems to be a field that will be filled in if the user should be using a better page than the one they tried to access:
The page you mention in your first link returns a structure that contains information about the second link.
The page in the second link does not return any data for that field. I tested several pages I manage, and they also return no data for that field.
I have a BHO which on the first run is gathering activation information and storing this in the registry.
(I think) due to IE's permission's I am only able to store this in the registry branch
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\InternetRegistry\REGISTRY\USER\S-0-0-00-000000000-000000000-000000000-0000\Software\MyBHO\MyKey
Where S-0-0-00-000000000-000000000-000000000-0000 is a unique key for each user.
Which is fine using RegCreateKey() with "Software\MyBHO\MyKey". It's all created and running lovely. It determines where in space to store the Key with no problems.
The Problem:
When I carry out an uninstall I want to remove this key and as this is run outside of IE I have no way to determine where that key is / what the user string is.
Options I have in mind:
Option 1 (Ideal)
Find out this user string first to then build a new path for the key I wish to remove and remove it. How?
Option 2
At the point of activation store the path to the key in another registry value that can be accessed. Then read, and delete both (Which seems a bit backwards and probably wont work due to the access restrictions of the BHO on the registry (Thus it being written there in the first place))
Do you know if there is any way to find this User key or even how to find the parent dir.
Edit Upon continued research I've found that the thing I'm referring to as "user key" is the current Users "SID". Maybe this will yield me better results.
Call GetUserName to get the user name, and LookupAccountName to get his SID.
ConvertSidToStringSid is a useful utility function to format a SID as a S-1-5-32-00000000-00000000-00000000-00000000-0000 string
If you really want to write per-user data to the registry, use IEGetWriteableHKCU().
In general there is no good way to remove per-user data at uninstall. For example, what if you install as user A and the uninstall as user B? Are you going to go find all of them and delete them? Just leave the turds behind.
Alternatively you could consider using a different data store. Do you really need the registry? Can you store this data in a file? What about Web Storage?
I'm new to symfony2 and doctrine.
here is the problem as I see it.
i cannot use :
$repository = $this->getDoctrine()->getRepository('entity');
$my_object = $repository->findOneBy($index);
on an object that is persisted, BUT NOT FLUSHED YET !!
i think getRepository read from DB, so it will not find a not-flushed object.
my question: how to read those objects that are persisted (i think they are somewhere in a "doctrine session") to re-use them before i do flush my entire batch ?
every profile has 256 physical plumes.
every profile has 1 plumeOptions record assigned to it.
In plumeOptions, I have a cartridgeplume which is a FK for PhysicalPlume.
every plume is identified by ID (auto-generated) and an INDEX (user-generated).
rule: I say profile 1 has physical_plume_index number 3 (=index) connected to it.
now, I want to copy a profile with all its related data to another profile.
new profile is created. New 256 plumes are created and copied from older profile.
i want to link the new profile to the new plume index 3.
check here: http://pastebin.com/WFa8vkt1
I think you might want to have a look at this function:
$entityManager->getUnitOfWork()->getScheduledEntityInsertions()
Gives you back a list of entity objects which are persisting yet.
Hmm, I didn't really read your question well, with the above you will retrieve a full list (as an array) but you cannot query it like with getRepository. I will try found something for u..
I think you might look at the problem from the wrong angle. Doctrine is your persistance layer and database access layer. It is the responsibility of your domain model to provide access to objects once they are in memory. So the problem boils down to how do you get a reference to an object without the persistance layer?
Where do you create the object you need to get hold of later? Can the method/service that create the object return a reference to the controller so it can propagate it to the other place you need it? Can you dispatch an event that you listen to elsewhere in your application to get hold of the object?
In my opinion, Doctrine should be used at the startup of the application (as early as possible), to initialize the domain model, and at the shutdown of the application, to persist any changes to the domain model during the request. To use a repository to get hold of objects in the middle of a request is, in my opinion, probably a code smell and you should look at how the application flow can be refactored to remove that need.
Your is a business logic problem effectively.
Querying down the Database a findby Query on Object that are not flushed yet, means heaving much more the DB layer querying object that you have already in your function scope.
Also Keep in mind a findOneBy will retrieve also other object previously saved with same features.
If you need to find only among those new created objects, you should make f.e. them in a Session Array Variable, and iterate them with the foreach.
If you need a mix of already saved items + some new items, you should threate the 2 parts separately, one with a foreach , other one with the repository query!
I've been asked to look at windows service which retrieves data from an Active Directory tree using the win32 LDAP API and outputs JSON data to a text file. It works fine but I need to modify it so that the i get the 'pre windows 2000' login name. The service is written in c++.
The service already successfully retrieves various other attribute strings using:
PTSTR *pszValues=ldap_get_values(pLdap,pEntry,szAttribute);
and:
if (_tcscmp(szAttribute,TEXT("uUsnChanged"))==0) // uSNChanged is an example of an attribute
pItemInfo->uUsnChanged=_tcstoui64(pszValues[0],NULL,10); // pItemInfo is a struct defined elsewhere to hold the results for any given entry
i looked on http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms679021(v=VS.85).aspx to see if there is an attribute for 'pre windows 2000' login or something similar in the hope that I could just add this as another 'szAttribute' (to replace "uUsnChanged" in this example) and had no luck. Looking at the API i have been unable to come up with a way of getting this information.
i found the attribute 'sAMAccountName' which i thought would provide the information needed but it only gives me the name part of the DOMAIN/name format. Typical, it's the other part i want!
does anyone have any ideas on how to get the 'pre windows 2000' string from 'pEntry'?
#JPBlanc We are getting the correct nETBIOSName attribute now when running it on the test server. The app works on the assumption that there is a maximum of one nETBIOSName attribute per DC. It finds it by doing the following:
gets the default host using ldap_init(NULL,0)
get the 'configuration naming context' using ldap_search_s(pLdap,NULL,LDAP_SCOPE_BASE,NULL,pszAttrs,FALSE,&pResults); passing in the connection handle as the first parameter
retrieves the 'configurationNamingContext' attribute using ldap_get_values(pLdap,pEntry,TEXT("configurationNamingContext"));
concatenates "CN=Partitions," to the beggining of the string giving something like "CN=Partitions,CN=Configuration,DC=domain,DC=com,DC=au"
it then performs a search using ldap_search_s(pLdap,szPartitionNC,LDAP_SCOPE_SUBTREE,TEXT("(nETBIOSName=*)"),pszAttrs,FALSE,&pResults);
then it loops through the results looking for anything with a 'nETBIOSName' attribute and once it finds one it breaks out of the loop and returns the value.
Do you know if this is sufficient to work in any AD configuration?
Be careful, the Domain part of the 'pre windows 2000 domain' can be completly different from the user Principal Name (user#domain) use to logon onto Active-Directory. the DOMAIN is the Primary Domain Controleur name or the Netbios domain name. DOMAIN is created during domain creation, by default it's part of the DNS name, but it can be completly changed during domain creation.
You can find it with nETBIOSName attribute :
ldifde -f netbios.ldf -d "CN=Partitions,CN=Configuration,DC=your-DNS-Name" -r "(netbiosname=*)"
A best filter would be
(&(objectcategory=crossref)(dnsHostName=<DomainDNSName>)(netbiosname=*))
SAM-Account-Name Attribute (sAMAccountName)
I've got a quick question regarding the use of repositories. But the best way to ask is to show a bit of pseudocode and you guys tell me what the result should be
Get a record from the repository with ID of 1 (assume it exists)
Edit a couple of properties
Query the repository again for an item with ID of 1
Result = ??
Should I get the object with updated values or the object without (original state), bearing in mind that since updating the values of properties (step 2) I have not told the repository to update this record.
I think I should get a copy of the original item and not a reference to the edited version.
Please tell me what is correct.
Cheers
The repository pattern is suppose to act like a collection of your objects, so ideally I think it should return the same object instance which would have the updates in it.
Generally there is an identity map somewhere so your repositories can keep track of what has already been loaded. With an identity map, when you fetch an object with the same Id you should always get the already loaded object back regardless of how many times. This is how all more sophisticated ORMs work and is generally a good practice. An identity map helps keep things in sync while you are in the same transaction and saves you some data access.
NHibernate's session has an identity map it keeps track of so you don't have to worry about trying to implement your own in your repositories. Also I believe you can use NHibernate's stateless session if you want to load another instance without change tracking, but I'm not positive on that.
Judging from your past questions I'm assuming you are using LINQ/C#?
If you are using a DataContext and you haven't called SubmitChanges() then you should get back the original unchanged object.
Just tested it. I was wrong, you get back the changed object.
If you set ObjectTrackingEnabled = false on the DataContext you will get the unchanged object.