I've got a 2D Texture on a 3D Sphere and I want to know how to transfer a 2D coordinate on the Texture into a 3D coordinate. I know it has to do with the clipping of the texture : I'm using the auto clipping function of OpenGL to put the texture on the Sphere.
Edit:
To clarify the problem:
I have a 2D plane which is an image containing borders drawn in red now I put objects on this plane, that have a collision radius and are wildly moving around. Whenever the objects collide with the red border they bounce back.
Now I take this 2D plane and warp it around a 3D sphere. At the position of the circles I want to put 3D-Models that move on the sphere. The problem now is to get from the "simple" 2D coordinates on the plane to the more complicates 3D coordinates on the sphere to position the 3D-Models correctly.
My first approach would be to map 2D coordinates to spherical coordinates which can easily be transferred into 3D coordinates but how would I do this?
You don't "convert" the 2D coordinate to a 3D coordinate. The 2D coordinates you have are UV coordinates (from 0 to 1) and they represent a position in the texture space. What you do is to map these UV coordinates to the vertices.
You can read more about UV mapping here.
In OpenGL, it depends on which version are you using. Either you use glTexCoord calls before the glVertex calls (for old versions of OpenGL), or you set it in a VBO to be processed at the fragment shader on newer versions of OpenGL.
If you are planning to use gluSphere() function, you don't need to worry about calculating UV texture coordinates since opengl does it for you with the right functions.
Here you can check the gluSphere() documentation
Here there is an example code
If you are planning to render your own sphere, check this question
Related
So I'm supposed to Texture Map a specific model I've loaded into a scene (with a Framebuffer and a Planar Pinhole Camera), however I'm not allowed to use OpenGL and I have no idea how to do it otherwise (we do use glDrawPixels for other functionality, but that's the only function we can use).
Is anyone here able enough to give me a run-through on how to texture map without OpenGL functionality?
I'm supposed to use these slides: https://www.cs.purdue.edu/cgvlab/courses/334/Fall_2014/Lectures/TMapping.pdf
But they make very little sense to me.
What I've gathered so far is the following:
You iterate over a model, and assign each triangle "texture coordinates" (which I'm not sure what those are), and then use "model space interpolation" (again, I don't understand what that is) to apply the texture with the right perspective.
I currently have my program doing the following:
TL;DR:
1. What is model space interpolation/how do I do it?
2. What explicitly are texture coordinates?
3. How, on a high level (in layman's terms) do I texture map a model without using OpenGL.
OK, let's start by making sure we're both on the same page about how the color interpolation works. Lines 125 through 143 set up three vectors redABC, greenABC and blueABC that are used to interpolate the colors across the triangle. They work one color component at a time, and each of the three vectors helps interpolate one color component.
By convention, s,t coordinates are in source texture space. As provided in the mesh data, they specify the position within the texture of that particular vertex of the triangle. The crucial thing to understand is that s,t coordinates need to be interpolated across the triangle just like colors.
So, what you want to do is set up two more ABC vectors: sABC and tABC, exactly duplicating the logic used to set up redABC, but instead of using the color components of each vertex, you just use the s,t coordinates of each vertex. Then for each pixel, instead of computing ssiRed etc. as unsigned int values, you compute ssis and ssit as floats, they should be in the range 0.0f through 1.0f assuming your source s,t values are well behaved.
Now that you have an interpolated s,t coordinate, multiply ssis by the texel width of the texture, and ssit by the texel height, and use those coordinates to fetch the texel. Then just put that on the screen.
Since you are not using OpenGL I assume you wrote your own software renderer to render that teapot?
A texture is simply an image. A texture coordinate is a 2D position in the texture. So (0,0) is bottom-left and (1,1) is top-right. For every vertex of your 3D model you should store a 2D position (u,v) in the texture. That means that at that vertex, you should use the colour the texture has at that point.
To know the UV texture coordinate of a pixel in between vertices you need to interpolate the texture coordinates of the vertices around it. Then you can use that UV to look up the colour in the texture.
I am working on voxelisation using the rendering pipeline and now I successfully voxelise the scene using vertex+geometry+fragment shaders. Now my voxels are stored in a 3D texture which has size, for example, 128x128x128.
My original model of the scene is centered at (0,0,0) and it extends in both positive and negative axis. The texure, however, is centered at (63,63,63) in tex coordinates.
I implemented a simple ray marcing for visualizing but it doesn't take into account the camera movements (I can render only from very fixed positions because my ray have to be generated taking into account the different coordinates of the 3D texture).
My question is: how can I map my rays so that they are generated at point Po with direction D in the coordinates of my 3D model but intersect the voxels at the corresponding position in texture coordinates and every movement of the camera in the 3D world is remapped in the voxel coordinates?
Right now I generate the rays in this way:
create a quad in front of the camera at position (63,63,-20)
cast rays in direction towards (63,63,3)
I think you should store your entire view transform matrix in your shader uniform params. Then for each shader execution you can use its screen coords and view transform to compute the view ray direction for your particular pixel.
Having the ray direction and camera position you just use them the same as currently.
There's also another way to do this that you can try:
Let's say you have a cube (0,0,0)->(1,1,1) and for each corner you assign a color based on its position, like (1,0,0) is red, etc.
Now for every frame you draw your cube front faces to the texture, and cube back faces to the second texture.
In the final rendering you can use both textures to get enter and exit 3D vectors, already in the texture space, which makes your final shader much simpler.
You can read better descriptions here:
http://graphicsrunner.blogspot.com/2009/01/volume-rendering-101.html
http://web.cse.ohio-state.edu/~tong/vr/
Is there a way using OpenGL or GLUT to project a point from the model-view matrix into an associated texture matrix? If not, is there a commonly used library that achieves this? I want to modify the texture of an object according to a ray cast in 3D space.
The simplest case would be:
A ray is cast which intersects a quad, mapped with a single texture.
The point of intersection is converted to a value in texture space clamped between [0.0,1.0] in the x and y axis.
A 3x3 patch of pixels centered around the rounded value of the resulting texture point is set to an alpha value of 0.( or another RGBA value which is convenient, for the desired effect).
To illustrate here is a more complex version of the question using a sphere, the pink box shows the replaced pixels.
I just specify texture points for mapping in OpenGL, I don't actually know how the pixels are projected onto the sphere. Basically I need to to the inverse of that projection, but I don't quite know how to do that math, especially on more complex shapes like a sphere or an arbitrary convex hull. I assume that you can somehow find a planar polygon that makes up the shape, which the ray is intersecting, and from there the inverse projection of a quad or triangle would be trivial.
Some equations, articles and/or example code would be nice.
There are a few ways you could accomplish what you're trying to do:
Project a world coordinate point into normalized device coordinates (NDCs) by doing the model-view and projection transformation matrix multiplications by yourself (or if you're using old-style OpenGL, call gluProject), and perform the perspective division step. If you use a depth coordinate of zero, this would correspond to intersecting your ray at the imaging plane. The only other correction you'd need to do map from NDCs (which are in the range [-1,1] in x and y) into texture space by dividing the resulting coordinate by two, and then shifting by .5.
Skip the ray tracing all together, and bind your texture as a framebuffer attachment to a framebuffer object, and then render a big point (or sprite) that modifies the colors in the neighborhood of the intersection as you want. You could use the same model-view and projection matrices, and will (probably) only need to update the viewport to match the texture resolution.
So I found a solution that is a little complicated, but does the trick.
For complex geometry you must determine which quad or triangle was intersected, and use this as the plane. The quad must be planar(obviously).
Draw a plane in the identity matrix with dimensions 1x1x0, map the texture on points identical to the model geometry.
Transform the plane, and store the inverse of each transform matrix in a stack
Find the point at which the the plane is intersected
Transform this point using the inverse matrix stack until it returns to identity matrix(it should have no depth(
Convert this point from 1x1 space into pixel space by multiplying the point by the number of pixels and rounding. Or start your 2D combining logic here.
I'm working with OpenGL, I need to draw a plane in front of a triangle in the three dimensional space. So if one of the triangle points changes, the plane also changes
I have the 3 points, and using cross product, I can get the normal vector, so, to draw the plane, I only need to translate the triangle to the origin of the world in reference of one of the triangle points, translate a distance over the normal, rotate the normal angles in X, Y and Z, and draw the plane.
I need to know how to translate over the normal, and how to rotate the new plane, so, when one of the vertex changes, the normal changes, and the plane also changes.
As I understand, I can use the normal vector in glRotatef(angle, normal[x, y, z]), with angle =0. But the plane doesn't change when I change one of the triangle vertex.
OpenGl is not a scene graph. It will not deal with transforming objects for you. All OpenGL does is render what you tell it to render.
If you tell it to render a vertex (which YOU changed), and do not tell it to change the way it draws the plane, then of course the plane will not change.
Look into scene graphs, and how to do matrix and vector math. A simple scene graph is relatively easy to create.
The code is loading a bin file which contains (x,y,z) coordinates for a set of points.
Let say the points form a cube and that there are some points in the cube as well, how do i make the cube look like a surface cube instead of a set of points?
I read about marching cubes and barycentric coordinates, but i don't understand how to do that in C++ and opengl. Thanks.
If they form an axis-aligned cube all you need to do is draw a cube from min(x), min(y), min(z) to max(x), max(y), max(z) where min(x) represents the minimum of all x coordinates.