When I run docker-compose up in my Docker project it fails with the following message:
Error starting userland proxy: listen tcp 0.0.0.0:3000: bind: address already in use
netstat -pna | grep 3000
shows this:
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:3000 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN -
I've already tried docker-compose down, but it doesn't help.
In your case it was some other process that was using the port and as indicated in the comments, sudo netstat -pna | grep 3000 helped you in solving the problem.
While in other cases (I myself encountered it many times) it mostly is the same container running at some other instance. In that case docker ps was very helpful as often I left the same containers running in other directories and then tried running again at other places, where same container names were used.
How docker ps helped me:
docker rm -f $(docker ps -aq) is a short command which I use to remove all containers.
Edit: Added how docker ps helped me.
This helped me:
docker-compose down # Stop container on current dir if there is a docker-compose.yml
docker rm -fv $(docker ps -aq) # Remove all containers
sudo lsof -i -P -n | grep <port number> # List who's using the port
and then:
kill -9 <process id> (macOS) or sudo kill <process id> (Linux).
Source: comment by user Rub21.
I had the same problem. I fixed this by stopping the Apache2 service on my host.
You can kill the process listening on that port easily with one command below :
kill -9 $(lsof -t -i tcp:<port#>)
ex :
kill -9 $(lsof -t -i tcp:<port#>)
or for ubuntu:
sudo kill -9 `sudo lsof -t -i:8000`
Man page for lsof : https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man8/lsof.8.html
-9 is for hard kill without checking any deps.
(Not related, but might be useful if its PORT 5000 mystery) - the culprit process is due to Mac OS monterery.
The port 5000 is commonly used to serve local development servers. When updating to the latest macOS operating system, I was unable the docker to bind to port 5000, because it was already in use. (You may find a message along the lines of Port 5000 already in use.)
By running lsof -i :5000, I found out the process using the port was named ControlCenter, which is a native macOS application. If this is happening to you, even if you use brute force (and kill) the application, it will restart itself. In my laptop, lsof -i :5000 returns that Control Center is being used by process id 433. I could do killall -p 433, but macOS keeps restarting the process.
The process running on this port turns out to be an AirPlay server. You can deactivate it in
System Preferences › Sharing, and unchecking AirPlay Receiver to release port 5000.
I had same problem,
docker-compose down --rmi all (in the same directory where you run docker-compose up)
helps
UPD: CAUTION - this will also delete the local docker images you've pulled (from comment)
For Linux/Unix:
Simple search for linux utility using following command
netstat -nlp | grep 8888
It'll show processing running at this port, then kill that process using PID (look for a PID in row) of that process.
kill PID
In some cases it is critical to perform a more in-depth debugging to the problem before stopping a container or killing a process.
Consider following the checklist below:
1) Check you current docker compose environment
Run docker-compose ps. If port is in use by another container, stop it with docker-compose stop <service-name-in-compose-file> or remove it by replacing stop with rm.
2) Check the containers running outside your current workspace
Run docker ps to see list of all containers running under your host.
If you find the port is in use by another container, you can stop it with docker stop <container-id>.
(*) Because you're not under the scope of the origin compose environment - it is a good practice first to use docker inspect to gather more information about the container that you're about to stop.
3) Check if port is used by other processes running on the host
For example if the port is 6379 run:
$ sudo netstat -ltnp | grep ':6379'
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:6379 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN 915/redis-server 12
tcp6 0 0 ::1:6379 :::* LISTEN 915/redis-server 12
(*) You can also use the lsof command which is mainly used to retrieve information about files that are opened by various processes (I suggest running netstat before that).
So, In case of the output above the PID is 915. Now you can run:
$ ps j 915
PPID PID PGID SID TTY TPGID STAT UID TIME COMMAND
1 915 915 915 ? -1 Ssl 123 0:11 /usr/bin/redis-server 127.0.0.1:6379
And see the ID of the parent process (PPID) and the execution command.
You can also run: $ pstree -s <PID> to a visual display of the process and its related processes.
In our case we can see that the process probably is a daemon (PPID is 1) - In that case consider running: A) $ cat /proc/<PID>/status in order to get a more in-depth information about the process like the number of threads spawned by the process, its capabilities, etc'.
B) $ systemctl status <PID> in order to see the systemd unit that caused the creation of a specific process. If the service is not critical - you can stop and disable the service.
4) Restart Docker service
Run: sudo service docker restart.
5) You reached this point and..
Only if its not placing your system at risk - consider restarting the server.
In my case it was
Error starting userland proxy: listen tcp 0.0.0.0:9000: bind: address already in use
And all that I need is turn off debug listening in php storm
Most probably this is because you are already running a web server on your host OS, so it conflicts with the web server that Docker is attempting to start.
So try this one-liner before trying anything else:
sudo service apache2 stop; sudo service nginx stop; sudo nginx -s stop;
I had apache running on my ubuntu machine. I used this command to kill it!
sudo /etc/init.d/apache2 stop
I was getting the below error when i was trying to launch a new container -
listen tcp 0.0.0.0:8080: bind: address already in use.
To check which process is running on port 8080, run below command:
netstat -tulnp | grep 8080
i got the output below
[root#ip-112-x6x-2x-xxx.xxxxx.compute.internal (aws_main) ~]# netstat -tulnp | grep 8080 tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:8080 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN **12749**/java [root#ip-112-x6x-2x-xxx.xxxxx.compute.internal (aws_main) ~]#
run
kill -9 12749
Then try to relaunch the container it should work
If redis server is started as a service, it will restart itself when you using kill -9 <process_id> or sudo kill -9 `sudo lsof -t -i:<port_number>` . In that case you will need to stop the redis service using following command.
sudo service redis-server stop
I upgraded my docker this afternoon and ran into the same problem. I tried restarting docker but no luck.
Finally, I had to restart my computer and it worked. Definitely a bug.
Check docker-compose.yml, it might be the case that the port is specified twice.
version: '3'
services:
registry:
image: mysql:5.7
ports:
- "3306:3306" <--- remove either this line or next
- "127.0.0.1:3306:3306"
Changing network_mode: "bridge" to "host" did it for me.
This with
version: '2.2'
services:
bind:
image: sameersbn/bind:latest
dns: 127.0.0.1
ports:
- 172.17.42.1:53:53/udp
- 172.17.42.1:10000:10000
volumes:
- "/srv/docker/bind:/data"
environment:
- 'ROOT_PASSWORD=secret'
network_mode: "host"
I ran into the same issue several times. Restarting docker seems to do the trick
A variation of #DmitrySandalov's answer: I had tomcat/java running on 8080, which needed to keep going. Looked at the docker-compose.yml file and altered the entry for 8080 to another of my choosing.
nginx:
build: nginx
ports:
#- '8080:80' <-- original entry
- '8880:80'
- '8443:443'
Worked perfectly. (The only wrinkle is the change will be wiped if I ever update the project, since it's coming from an external repo.)
At first, make sure which service you are running in your specific port. In your case, you are already using port number 3000.
netstat -aof | findstr :3000
now stop that process which is running on specific port
lsof -i tcp:3000
I resolve the issue by restarting Docker.
It makes more sense to change the port of the docker update instead of shutting down other services that use port 80.
Just a side note if you have the same issue and is with Windows:
In my case the process in my way is just grafana-server.exe. Because I first downloaded the binary version and double click the executable, and it now starts as a service by user SYSTEM which I cannot taskkill (no permission)
I have to go to "Service manager" of Windows and search for service "Grafana", and stop it. After that port 3000 is no longer occupied.
Hope that helps.
The one that was using the port 8888 was Jupiter and I had to change the configuration file of Jupiter notebook to run on another port.
to list who is using that specific port.
sudo lsof -i -P -n | grep 9
You can specify the port you want Jupyter to run uncommenting/editing the following line in ~/.jupyter/jupyter_notebook_config.py:
c.NotebookApp.port = 9999
In case you don't have a jupyter_notebook_config.py try running jupyter notebook --generate-config. See this for further details on Jupyter configuration.
Before it was running on :docker run -d --name oracle -p 1521:1521 -p 5500:5500 qa/oracle
I just changed the port to docker run -d --name oracle -p 1522:1522 -p 5500:5500 qa/oracle
it worked fine for me !
On my machine a PID was not being shown from this command netstat -tulpn for the in-use port (8080), so i could not kill it, killing the containers and restarting the computer did not work. So service docker restart command restarted docker for me (ubuntu) and the port was no longer in use and i am a happy chap and off to lunch.
maybe it is too rude, but works for me. restart docker service itself
sudo service docker restart
hope it works for you also!
I have run the container with another port, like... 8082 :-)
I came across this problem. My simple solution is to remove the mongodb from the system
Commands to remove mongodb in Ubuntu:
sudo apt-get purge mongodb mongodb-clients mongodb-server mongodb-dev
sudo apt-get purge mongodb-10gen
sudo apt-get autoremove
Let me add one more case, because I had the same error and none of the solutions listed so far works:
serv1:
...
networks:
privnet:
ipv4_address: 10.10.100.2
...
serv2:
...
# no IP assignment, no dependencies
networks:
privnet:
ipam:
driver: default
config:
- subnet: 10.10.100.0/24
depending on the init order, serv2 may get assigned the IP 10.10.100.2 before serv1 is started, so I just assign IPs manually for all containers to avoid the error. Maybe there are other more elegant ways.
I have the same problem and by stopping docker container it was resolved.
sudo docker container stop <container-name>
i solved with this sudo service redis-server stop
I currently have an AWS server set up with docker to run the Keycloak docker container. For SSL/TLS, there is an AWS loadbalancer configured to point https/443 traffic to the container and have it receive it over 8080, terminating the encryption connection on said load balancer.
When creating the container with the following command, I am able to browse to and log into the keycloak service by browsing to the server's IP address.
docker run --name keycloak -v keybase-storage -p 8080:8080 -e KEYCLOAK_USER=admin -e KEYCLOAK_PASSWORD=TempAdminPassword jboss/keycloak However if I try to log into the server by browsing to the URL, I am redirected to the url http://default-host:8080/auth/admin/ and the browser showing a connection error page.
When trying to find a solution to this, I found how to pass java options to the container when it is first run, and using the resources from this page I used the following command to start the container(URL replaced for privacy concerns)
docker run --name keycloak -v keybase-storage -p 8080:8080 -e KEYCLOAK_USER=admin -e KEYCLOAK_PASSWORD=TempAdminPassword -e JAVA_OPTS_APPEND="-Dkeycloak.frontendUrl=https://sso.IntendedURL.com" jboss/keycloak However this yields the same results when trying to browse to the page.
The main clue I have to go off of right now is this line near the end of the previously shown docker run command, which reads as follows:
19:23:00,039 INFO [org.wildfly.extension.undertow] (ServerService Thread Pool -- 67) WFLYUT0021: Registered web context: '/auth' for server 'default-server'
What I believe I need to do now is to either change the config of the docker container after it has been created(have been unable to edit files using docker exec, so this is less likely) or to pass a java option into the run command when the container is first started.
Please let me know if you have any questions or if I can provide any other information.
Thank you.
Environment information:
Operating system
Amazon Linux 2
Docker version
19.03.13-ce, build 4484c46
Keycloak version
12.0.1(WildFly Core 13.0.3.Final)
My Dockerfile is:
FROM nginx
I start a container on AWS docker run -d --name ng_ex -p 8082:80 nginx and :
$ sudo docker ps
CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES
6489cbb430b9 nginx "nginx -g 'daemon of…" 22 minutes ago Up 22 minutes 0.0.0.0:8082->80/tcp ng_ex
And inside a container:
service nginx status
[ ok ] nginx is running.
But when I try to send a request thought browser on my.ip.address:8082 I get a timeout error instead Nginx welcome page. What is my mistake and how to fix it?
If you're on an VM on aws, means that you must setup your security group to allow connection on port 8082 from all internet or only your IP/proxyIP. (The timeout may come from this).
Then my.ip.address:8082 should works
If you're inside your VM get the container IP:
docker inspect -f '{{range .NetworkSettings.Networks}}{{.IPAddress}}{{end}}' container_name_or_id.
Then curl < container IP >:8082
If stil not working confirm on build your container EXPOSE 80
I have a war file deployed as Docker container on linux ec2. But when I try to hit the http://ec2-elastic-ip:8080/AppName, I don't get any response.
I have all the security group inbound rules set up for both http and https. So that's not a problem.
Debugging
I tried debugging by ssh-ing the linux instance. Tried command curl localhost:8080 , this is the response:
curl: (7) Failed to connect to localhost port 8080: Connection refused
Tried with 127.0.0.1:8080 but the same response.
Next thing I did was to list the Docker container: docker ps. I get:
CONTAINER ID IMAGE COMMAND CREATED STATUS PORTS NAMES
<ID> <ecr>.amazonaws.com/<my>-registry:2019-05-16.12-17-02 "catalina.sh run" 24 minutes ago Up 24 minutes 0.0.0.0:32772->8080/tcp ecs-app-24-name
Now, I connected to this container using docker exec -it <name> /bin/bash and tried checking tomcat logs which clearly shows that my application war is there and tomcat has started.
I ever tried checking the docker-machine ip default but this gave me error:
Docker machine "default" does not exist. Use "docker-machine ls" to list machines. Use "docker-machine create" to add a new one.
Now am stuck. Not able to debug further. The result am expecting is to access the app through the url above.
What to do? Is it something am doing wrong?
Also, to mention, the entire infrastructure is managed through terraform. I first create the base image,copy the war to webapps using DockerFile, push the registry image and finally do a terraform apply to apply any changes.
Make sure that apache is listening on all IP addresses inside the docker container, not just localhost. The IP should be like 0.0.0.0.
If any service is running inside docker and is listening to only localhost, it can only be accessed inside that container, not from the host.
You can also try to start apache with port 8080 and bind docker 8080 port with host 8080 port
docker run apache -p 8080:8080
Currently your app is working on a random host port i.e 32772, see the docker ps output .You must be able to access you app on http://ec2-ip:32772 once you allow port 32772 in security groups.
In order to make it work on host port 8080, you need to bind/expose the host port during docker run -
$ docker run -p 8080:8080 ......
If you are on ECS, ideally you should use an ALB & TG with your service.
However, if you are not using ALB etc then you can try giving a static hostPort in TD "hostPort": 8080(I haven't tried this). If it works fine, you will need to make sure to change the deployment strategy as "minimum healthy percentage = 0" else you might face port conflict issues.
If the application needs a network port you must EXPOSE it in the docker file.
EXPOSE <port> [<port>/<protocol>...]
In case you need that port to be mapped to a specific port on the network, you must define that when you spin up the new container.
docker run -p 8080:8080/tcp my_app
If you use run each image separately you must bind the port every time.
If you don't want to do this every time you can use docker-compose and add the ports directive in it.
ports:
- "8080:8080/tcp"
Supposing you added expose in the dockerfile, he full docker-compose.yml would look like this:
version: '1'
services:
web:
build:
ports:
- "8080:8080"
my_app:
image: my_app
I have run the following command to forward sinatra and redis ports to my docker instance running in virtualbox on OSX:
ports=( 4567 6379 )
for port in "${ports[#]}"
do
echo "Forwarding $port"
VBoxManage modifyvm "boot2docker-vm" --natpf1 "tcpport$port,tcp,,$port,,$port"
done
However, periodically (like every 60 seconds) requests to either of these docker instances over my machine's public IP, originating from my machine, will hang for 40-60 seconds. However, my docker instance is healthy and I can connect directly via 192.168.59.103.
Thus, why would a connection such as:
redis-cli -h 192.168.1.1 PING
Periodically hang, but
redis-cli -h 192.168.59.103 PING
Always work? Is there some kind of bug in VirtualBox or boot2docker?
Moreover, during the periods where these requests hang, I have noticed that calls to
boot2docker ip
and
boot2docker ssh
Themselves both hang. I am running boot2docker 1.6.2 and VirtualBox 4.3.28 on OSX 10.10.3.
Additional debugging reveals that inter-instance connectivity is now impaired as well. I have linked two containers, and periodically HTTP requests between them will hang. I went so far as to run telnet container_name 4567, then I typed
GET /
Which, of course, is the most basic way to test a webserver. From inside of container_name, I ran curl http://localhost:4567/. The telnet request hung, but the curl http://localhost:4567/ returned immediately.
This is one of the main reasons we added the extra localhost only interface (192.168.59.103) - the virtual box bat port forwarding is woeful and very unreliable.