If I have a Renderbuffer that uses a color format without alpha, for example GL_RG8, how can I tell the alpha blender to use the green channel for alpha? This can be done in textures using a swizzle mask, but as renderbuffers don't support those, what can I do?
My current blendFunc is GL_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA.
Each user-defined output of the fragment shader contains 4 channels: RGBA. This is true regardless of the image format of the destination that the output will write to. These outputs are the source colors for the blend operation.
So just write to the alpha of the output as normal. It doesn't matter that the alpha won't be written to the framebuffer image. It's still a part of the source color, so it can still be used for blending purposes.
I am drawing a map texture and, on top of it, a colorbar texture. Both have alpha channel and I am using blending, set as
// Turn on blending
glEnable(GL_BLEND);
glBlendFunc(GL_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA);
However, the following happens:
The texture on top (colorbar) with alpha channel imposes its black pixels, which I don't want to happen. The map texture should appear behind where the colorbar alpha = 0.
Is this related to the blending definitions? How should I change it?
Assuming the texture has an alpha channel and it's transparent in the right places, I suspect the issue is with the rendering order and depth testing.
Lets say you render the scale texture first. It blends correctly with a black background. Then you render the orange texture behind it, but the pixels from the scale texture have a higher depth value and cause the orange texture there to be discarded.
So, make sure you render all your transparent stuff in back to front order, or farthest to nearest.
Without getting into order independent transparency, a common approach to alpha transparency is as follows:
Enable the depth buffer
Render all your opaque geometry
Disable depth writes (glDepthMask)
Enable alpha blending (as in the OP's code)
Render your transparent geometry in farthest to nearest order
For particles you can sometimes get away without sorting and it'll still look OK. Another approach is using the alpha test or using alpha to coverage with a multisample framebuffer.
I am having a scene containing of thousands of little planes. The setup is that the plane can occlude each other in the depth.
The planes are red and green. Now I want to do the following in a shader:
Render all the planes. As soon as a plane is red, substract 0.5 from the currently bound framebuffer and if the texture is green, add 0.5 to the framebuffer.
Therefore I should be able to see for each pixel in the texture of the framebuffer: < 0 => more red planes at this pixel, = 0 => Same amount of red and green and for the last case >0 => more green planes, as well as I can tell the difference.
This is just a very rough simplification of what I need to do, but the core is to write change a pixel of a texture/framebuffer depending on the given values of planes in the scene influencing the current fragment. This should happen in the fragment shader.
So how do I change the values of the framebuffer using GLSL? using gl_FragColor just sets a new color, but does not manipulate the color set before.
PS I also gonna deactivate depth testing.
The fragment shader cannot read the (old) value from the framebuffer; it just generates a new value to put into the framebuffer. When multiple fragments output to the same pixel (overlapping planes in your example), how those value combine is controlled by the BLEND function of the pipeline.
What you appear to want can be done by setting a custom blending function. The GL_FUNC_ADD blending function allows adding the old value and new value (with weights); what you want is probably something like:
glBlendEquationSeparate(GL_FUNC_ADD, GL_FUNC_ADD);
glBlendFuncSeparate(GL_ONE, GL_ONE, GL_ONE, GL_ONE);
this will simply add each output pixel to the old pixel in the framebuffer (in all four channels; its not clear from your question whether you're using a 1-channel, 3-channel, or 4-channel frame buffer). Then, you just have your fragment shader output 0.5 or -0.5 depending. In order for this to make sense, you need a framebuffer format that supports values outside the normal [0..1] range, such as GL_RGBA32F or GL_R32F
glAlphaFunc(GL_GEQUAL, 0.5) can display the image where alpha >= 0.5.
Can opengl display the accumulation of alpha?
Example:
2 images, they will not display some part separately, because alpha < 0.5.
Now some of them overlap, their alpha sum to 0.6, how to display this overlap part?
I try to make a metaball example use opengl, if you have any idea, please please give me some hint.
Thank you so much
I would render the images to separate buffer (with Alpha Test off, and adding their alpha). Then, render the buffer onto the screen with Alpha Test.
First, create an empty buffer and set it's alpha to 0 for every pixel.
Then, render all of your objects on said buffer, using your blend function on colors and adding alpha.
Then, re-render the buffen on screen with Alpha Test turned on.
And the answer to the "Can opengl display the accumulation of alpha ?" - yes. You can render alpha as grayscale, for example.
worked for me with glBlendFunc(GL_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE);
I am rendering to a texture through a framebuffer object, and when I draw transparent primitives, the primitives are blended properly with other primitives drawn in that single draw step, but they are not blended properly with the previous contents of the framebuffer.
Is there a way to properly blend the contents of the texture with the new data coming in?
EDIT: More information requsted, I will attempt to explain more clearly;
The blendmode I am using is GL_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA. (I believe that is typically the standard blendmode)
I am creating an application that tracks mouse movement. It draws lines connecting the previous mouse position to the current mouse position, and as I do not want to draw the lines over again each frame, I figured I would draw to a texture, never clear the texture and then just draw a rectangle with that texture on it to display it.
This all works fine, except that when I draw shapes with alpha less than 1 onto the texture, it does not blend properly with the texture's previous contents. Let's say I have some black lines with alpha = .6 drawn onto the texture. A couple draw cycles later, I then draw a black circle with alpha = .4 over those lines. The lines "underneath" the circle are completely overwritten. Although the circle is not flat black (It blends properly with the white background) there are no "darker lines" underneath the circle as you would expect.
If I draw the lines and the circle in the same frame however, they blend properly. My guess is that the texture just does not blend with it's previous contents. It's like it's only blending with the glclearcolor. (Which, in this case is <1.0f, 1.0f, 1.0f, 1.0f>)
I think there are two possible problems here.
Remember that all of the overlay lines are blended twice here. Once when they are blended into the FBO texture, and again when the FBO texture is blended over the scene.
So the first possibility is that you don't have blending enabled when drawing one line over another in the FBO overlay. When you draw into an RGBA surface with blending off, the current alpha is simply written directly into the FBO overlay's alpha channel. Then later when you blend the whole FBO texture over the scene, that alpha makes your lines translucent. So if you have blending against "the world" but not between overlay elements, it is possible that no blending is happening.
Another related problem: when you blend one line over another in "standard" blend mode (src alpha, 1 - src alpha) in the FBO, the alpha channel of the "blended" part is going to contain a blend of the alphas of the two overlay elements. This is probably not what you want.
For example, if you draw two 50% alpha lines over each other in the overlay, to get the equivalent effect when you blit the FBO, you need the FBO's alpha to be...75%. (That is, 1 - (1-.5) * (1-0.5), which is what would happen if you just drew two 50% alpha lines over your scene. But when you draw the two 50% lines, you'll get 50% alpha in the FBO (a blend of 50% with...50%.
This brings up the final issue: by pre-mixing the lines with each other before you blend them over the world, you are changing the draw order. Whereas you might have had:
blend(blend(blend(background color, model), first line), second line);
now you will have
blend(blend(first line, second line), blend(background color, model)).
In other words, pre-mixing the overlay lines into an FBO changes the order of blending and thus changes the final look in a way you may not want.
First, the simple way to get around this: don't use an FBO. I realize this is a "go redesign your app" kind of answer, but using an FBO is not the cheapest thing, and modern GL cards are very good at drawing lines. So one option would be: instead of blending lines into an FBO, write the line geometry into a vertex buffer object (VBO). Simply extend the VBO a little bit each time. If you are drawing less than, say, 40,000 lines at a time, this will almost certainly be as fast as what you were doing before.
(One tip if you go this route: use glBufferSubData to write the lines in, not glMapBuffer - mapping can be expensive and doesn't work on sub-ranges on many drivers...better to just let the driver copy the few new vertices.)
If that isn't an option (for example, if you draw a mix of shape types or use a mix of GL state, such that "remembering" what you did is a lot more complex than just accumulating vertices) then you may want to change how you draw into the VBO.
Basically what you'll need to do is enable separate blending; initialize the overlay to black + 0% alpha (0,0,0,0) and blend by "standard blending" the RGB but additive blending the alpha channels. This still isn't quite correct for the alpha channel but it's generally a lot closer - without this, over-drawn areas will be too transparent.
Then, when drawing the FBO, use "pre-multiplied" alpha, that is, (one, one-minus-src-alph).
Here's why that last step is needed: when you draw into the FBO, you have already multiplied every draw call by its alpha channel (if blending is on). Since you are drawing over black, a green (0,1,0,0.5) line is now dark green (0,0.5,0,0.5). If alpha is on and you blend normally again, the alpha is reapplied and you'l have 0,0.25,0,0.5.). By simply using the FBO color as is, you avoid the second alpha multiplication.
This is sometimes called "pre-multiplied" alpha because the alpha has already been multiplied into the RGB color. In this case you want it to get correct results, but in other cases, programmers use it for speed. (By pre-multiplying, it removes a mult per pixel when the blend op is performed.)
Hope that helps! Getting blending right when the layers are not mixed in order gets really tricky, and separate blend isn't available on old hardware, so simply drawing the lines every time may be the path of least misery.
Clear the FBO with transparent black (0, 0, 0, 0), draw into it back-to-front with
glBlendFuncSeparate(GL_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA);
and draw the FBO with
glBlendFunc(GL_ONE, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA);
to get the exact result.
As Ben Supnik wrote, the FBO contains colour already multiplied with the alpha channel, so instead of doing that again with GL_SRC_ALPHA, it is drawn with GL_ONE. The destination colour is attenuated normally with GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA.
The reason for blending the alpha channel in the buffer this way is different:
The formula to combine transparency is
resultTr = sTr * dTr
(I use s and d because of the parallel to OpenGL's source and destination, but as you can see the order doesn't matter.)
Written with opacities (alpha values) this becomes
1 - rA = (1 - sA) * (1 - dA)
<=> rA = 1 - (1 - sA) * (1 - dA)
= 1 - 1 + sA + dA - sA * dA
= sA + (1 - sA) * dA
which is the same as the blend function (source and destination factors) (GL_ONE, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA) with the default blend equation GL_FUNC_ADD.
As an aside:
The above answers the specific problem from the question, but if you can easily choose the draw order it may in theory be better to draw premultiplied colour into the buffer front-to-back with
glBlendFunc(GL_ONE_MINUS_DST_ALPHA, GL_ONE);
and otherwise use the same method.
My reasoning behind this is that the graphics card may be able to skip shader execution for regions that are already solid. I haven't tested this though, so it may make no difference in practice.
As Ben Supnik said, the best way to do this is rendering the entire scene with separate blend functions for color and alpha. If you are using the classic non premultiplied blend function try glBlendFuncSeparateOES(GL_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA, GL_ONE, GL_ONE) to render your scene to FBO. and glBlendFuncSeparateOES(GL_ONE, GL_ONE_MINUS_SRC_ALPHA) to render the FBO to screen.
It is not 100% accurate, but in most of the cases that will create no unexpected transparency.
Keep in mind that old Hardware and some mobile devices (mostly OpenGL ES 1.x devices, like the original iPhone and 3G) does not support separated blend functions. :(