Starting with a string like:
String=1973251922:197325192278:abcdefgh:0xfff689990:Searching done for the string:SUCCESS.
A regular expression needed for matching all strings after the 4th colon ":" and assigning it for a variable in shell script like:
var_result="Searching done for the string:SUCCESS."
Using shell (bash or POSIX)
$ string="1973251922:197325192278:abcdefgh:0xfff689990:Searching done for the string:SUCCESS."
$ echo "${string#*:*:*:*:}"
Searching done for the string:SUCCESS.
${string#*:*:*:*:} is an example of prefix removal. It removes a prefix consisting of four colon-separated strings.
The output can be saved in a shell variable:
$ var_result=${string#*:*:*:*:}
$ echo "$var_result"
Searching done for the string:SUCCESS.
Using cut
cut works for this:
$ string="1973251922:197325192278:abcdefgh:0xfff689990:Searching done for the string:SUCCESS."
$ cut -d: -f 5- <<<"$string"
Searching done for the string:SUCCESS.
The above selects the fifth field and all succeeding fields where fields are separated by colons. More specifically, -d: tells cut to use : as the field separator and -f 5- tells it to select field 5 and everything after.
To save the output in a variable, we use command substitution:
$ var_result=$(cut -d: -f 5- <<<"$var")
$ echo "$var_result"
Searching done for the string:SUCCESS.
If you just have a POSIX shell, not bash, then we need to use echo:
$ var_result=$(echo "$var" | cut -d: -f 5-)
$ echo "$var_result"
Searching done for the string:SUCCESS.
Or, safer still, printf:
$ var_result=$(printf "%s" "$var" | cut -d: -f 5-)
$ echo "$var_result"
Searching done for the string:SUCCESS.
Using sed
The following uses sed to remove the first four fields defined by colons:
$ sed -E 's/([^:]*:){4}//' <<<"$string"
Searching done for the string:SUCCESS.
More specifically:
[^:] matches any character except :.
[^:]*: matches any number of non-colons followed by a colon.
([^:]*:){4} matches exactly four colon separated fields.
s/([^:]*:){4}// is a substitute command which looks for the first four colon-separated columns and replaces them with an empty string.
The following is the same but saves the result in a variable:
$ var_result=$(sed -E 's/([^:]*:){4}//' <<<"$string")
$ echo "$var_result"
Searching done for the string:SUCCESS.
The following is the same but good also for POSIX shells:
$ var_result=$(printf '%s' "$var" | sed -E 's/([^:]*:){4}//')
$ echo "$var_result"
Searching done for the string:SUCCESS.
Following solution may help you on same.
Let's say following is the variable's value:
var="1973251922:197325192278:abcdefgh:0xfff689990:Searching done for the string:SUCCESS."
echo "$var"
1973251922:197325192278:abcdefgh:0xfff689990:Searching done for the string:SUCCESS.
echo "$var" | awk -F":" '{$1=$2=$3=$4="";sub(/^:+/,"");print $0}' OFS=":"
Searching done for the string:SUCCESS.
With bash regex you can say:
String="1973251922:197325192278:abcdefgh:0xfff689990:Searching done for the string:SUCCESS."
if [[ $String =~ ^([^:]*:){4}(.+)$ ]]; then
echo ${BASH_REMATCH[2]}
fi
I'm trying to convert a predefined string %c# where # can be some number with another string. The catch is that the length of the other string must be truncated to # number of characters.
Ideally these set of commands would work:
FORMAT="%c10"
LAST_COMMIT="5189e42b14797b1e36ffb7fc5657c7eea08f1c0f"
echo $FORMAT | sed "s/%c\([0-9]\+\)/${LAST_COMMIT:0:\1}/g"
but clearly there is a syntax error on the \1. You can replace it with a number to see what I'm trying to get as output.
I'm open to using some other program other than sed to achieve this but ideally it should be programs that are pretty much native to most linux installations.
Thanks!
This is my idea.
echo ${LAST_COMMIT} | head -c $(echo ${FORMAT} | sed -e 's/%c//')
Get number with sed and get first some character with head.
EDIT1
This might be better.
echo ${LAST_COMMIT} | head -c $(echo ${FORMAT} | sed -e 's/%c\([0-9]\+\)/\1/')
EDIT2
I make the script because it is too tough to understand. Please try this.
$ cat sample.sh
#!/bin/bash
FORMAT="%b-%t-%c10-%c5"
LAST_COMMIT="5189e42b14797b1e36ffb7fc5657c7eea08f1c0f"
## List numbers
lengths=$(echo ${FORMAT} | sed -e "s/%[^c]//g" -e "s/-//g" -e "s/%c/ /g")
## Substitute %cXX to first XX characters of LAST_COMMIT
for n in ${lengths}
do
to_str=$(echo ${LAST_COMMIT:0:${n}})
FORMAT=$(echo ${FORMAT} | sed "s/%c${length}/${to_str}/")
done
## Print result
echo ${FORMAT}
This is the result.
$ ./sample.sh
%b-%t-5189e42b1410-5189e5
Also this is one line commands (Same contents but too long and too tough)
for n in $(echo ${FORMAT} | sed -e "s/%[^c]//g" -e "s/-//g" -e "s/%c/ /g"); do to_str=$(echo ${LAST_COMMIT:0:${n}}); FORMAT=$(echo ${FORMAT} | sed "s/%c${length}/${to_str}/"); done; echo ${FORMAT}
The value of $LAST_COMMIT gets interpolated before sed runs, so there is no backreference to refer back to yet. There is an /e extension in GNU sed which would support something like this, but I would simply use a slightly more capable tool.
perl -e '$fmt = shift; $fmt=~ s/%c(\d+)/%.$1s/g; printf("$fmt\n", #ARGV)' '%c10' "$LAST_COMMIT"
Of course, if you can let go of your own ad-hoc format string specifier, and switch to a printf-compatible format string altogether, just use the printf shell command straight off.
length=$(echo $FORMAT | sed "s/%c\([0-9]\+\)/\1/g")
echo "${LAST_COMMIT:0:$length}"
I got my research result after using sed :
zcat file* | sed -e 's/.*text=\(.*\)status=[^/]*/\1/' | cut -f 1 - | grep "pattern"
But it only shows the part that I cut. How can I print all lines after a match ?
I'm using zcat so I cannot use awk.
Thanks.
Edited :
This is my log file :
[01/09/2015 00:00:47] INFO=54646486432154646 from=steve idfrom=55516654455457 to=jone idto=5552045646464 guid=100021623456461451463 n
um=6 text=hi my number is 0 811 22 1/12 status=new survstatus=new
My aim is to find all users that spam my site with their telephone numbers (using grep "pattern") then print all the lines to get all the information about each spam. The problem is there may be matches in INFO or id, so I use sed to get the text first.
Printing all lines after a match in sed:
$ sed -ne '/pattern/,$ p'
# alternatively, if you don't want to print the match:
$ sed -e '1,/pattern/ d'
Filtering lines when pattern matches between "text=" and "status=" can be done with a simple grep, no need for sed and cut:
$ grep 'text=.*pattern.* status='
You can use awk
awk '/pattern/,EOF'
n.b. don't be fooled: EOF is just an uninitialized variable, and by default 0 (false). So that condition cannot be satisfied until the end of file.
Perhaps this could be combined with all the previous answers using awk as well.
Maybe this is what you actually want? Find lines matching "pattern" and extract the field after text= up through just before status=?
zcat file* | sed -e '/pattern/s/.*text=\(.*\)status=[^/]*/\1/'
You are not revealing what pattern actually is -- if it's a variable, you cannot use single quotes around it.
Notice that \(.*\)status=[^/]* would match up through survstatus=new in your example. That is probably not what you want? There doesn't seem to be a status= followed by a slash anywhere -- you really should explain in more detail what you are actually trying to accomplish.
Your question title says "all line after a match" so perhaps you want everything after text=? Then that's simply
sed 's/.*text=//'
i.e. replace up through text= with nothing, and keep the rest. (I trust you can figure out how to change the surrounding script into zcat file* | sed '/pattern/s/.*text=//' ... oops, maybe my trust failed.)
The seldom used branch command will do this for you. Until you match, use n for next then branch to beginning. After match, use n to skip the matching line, then a loop copying the remaining lines.
cat file | sed -n -e ':start; /pattern/b match;n; b start; :match n; :copy; p; n ; b copy'
zcat file* | sed -e 's/.*text=\(.*\)status=[^/]*/\1/' | ***cut -f 1 - | grep "pattern"***
instead change the last 2 segments of your pipeline so that:
zcat file* | sed -e 's/.*text=\(.*\)status=[^/]*/\1/' | **awk '$1 ~ "pattern" {print $0}'**
I'd like to have a substitute or print style command with a regex working across lines. And lines retained.
$ echo -e 'a\nb\nc\nd\ne\nf\ng' | tr -d '\n' | grep -or 'b.*f'
bcdef
or
$ echo -e 'a\nb\nc\nd\ne\nf\ng' | tr -d '\n' | sed -r 's|b(.*)f|y\1z|'
aycdezg
i'd like to use grep or sed because i'd like to know what people would've done before awk or perl ..
would they not have? was .* not available? had they no other equivalent?
to possibly modify some input with a regex that spans across lines, and print it to stdout or output to a file, retaining the lines.
This should do what you're looking for:
$ echo -e 'a\nb\nc\nd\ne\nf\ng' | sed ':a;$s/b\([^f]*\)f/y\1z/;N;ba'
a
y
c
d
e
z
g
It accumulates all the lines then does the replacement. It looks for the first "f". If you want it to look for the last "f", change [^f] to ..
Note that this may make use of features added to sed after AWK or Perl became available (AWK has been around a looong time).
Edit:
To do a multi-line grep requires only a little modification:
$ echo -e 'a\nb\nc\nd\ne\nf\ng' | sed ':a;$s/^[^b]*\(b[^f]*f\)[^f]*$/\1/;N;ba'
b
c
d
e
f
sed can match across newlines through the use of its N command. For example, the following sed command will replace bar followed a newline followed by foo with ###:
$ echo -e "foo\nbar\nbaz\nqux" | sed 'N;s/bar\nbaz/###/;P;D'
foo
###
qux
The N command will append the next input line to the current pattern space separated by an embedded newline (\n)
The P command will print the current pattern space up to and including the first embedded newline.
The D command will delete up to and including the first embedded newline in the pattern space. It will also start next cycle but skip reading from the input if there is still data in the pattern space.
Through the use of these 3 commands, you can essentially do any sort of s command replacement looking across N-lines.
Edit
If your question is how can I remove the need for tr in the two examples above and just use sed then here you go:
$ echo -e 'a\nb\nc\nd\ne\nf\ng' | sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/\n//g;y/ag/yz/'
ybcdefz
Proven tools to the rescue.
echo -e "foo\nbar\nbaz\nqux" | perl -lpe 'BEGIN{$/=""}s/foo\nbar/###/'
I am trying to use grep to match lines that contain two different strings. I have tried the following but this matches lines that contain either string1 or string2 which not what I want.
grep 'string1\|string2' filename
So how do I match with grep only the lines that contain both strings?
You can use
grep 'string1' filename | grep 'string2'
Or
grep 'string1.*string2\|string2.*string1' filename
I think this is what you were looking for:
grep -E "string1|string2" filename
I think that answers like this:
grep 'string1.*string2\|string2.*string1' filename
only match the case where both are present, not one or the other or both.
To search for files containing all the words in any order anywhere:
grep -ril \'action\' | xargs grep -il \'model\' | xargs grep -il \'view_type\'
The first grep kicks off a recursive search (r), ignoring case (i) and listing (printing out) the name of the files that are matching (l) for one term ('action' with the single quotes) occurring anywhere in the file.
The subsequent greps search for the other terms, retaining case insensitivity and listing out the matching files.
The final list of files that you will get will the ones that contain these terms, in any order anywhere in the file.
If you have a grep with a -P option for a limited perl regex, you can use
grep -P '(?=.*string1)(?=.*string2)'
which has the advantage of working with overlapping strings. It's somewhat more straightforward using perl as grep, because you can specify the and logic more directly:
perl -ne 'print if /string1/ && /string2/'
Your method was almost good, only missing the -w
grep -w 'string1\|string2' filename
You could try something like this:
(pattern1.*pattern2|pattern2.*pattern1)
The | operator in a regular expression means or. That is to say either string1 or string2 will match. You could do:
grep 'string1' filename | grep 'string2'
which will pipe the results from the first command into the second grep. That should give you only lines that match both.
And as people suggested perl and python, and convoluted shell scripts, here a simple awk approach:
awk '/string1/ && /string2/' filename
Having looked at the comments to the accepted answer: no, this doesn't do multi-line; but then that's also not what the author of the question asked for.
Don't try to use grep for this, use awk instead. To match 2 regexps R1 and R2 in grep you'd think it would be:
grep 'R1.*R2|R2.*R1'
while in awk it'd be:
awk '/R1/ && /R2/'
but what if R2 overlaps with or is a subset of R1? That grep command simply would not work while the awk command would. Lets say you want to find lines that contain the and heat:
$ echo 'theatre' | grep 'the.*heat|heat.*the'
$ echo 'theatre' | awk '/the/ && /heat/'
theatre
You'd have to use 2 greps and a pipe for that:
$ echo 'theatre' | grep 'the' | grep 'heat'
theatre
and of course if you had actually required them to be separate you can always write in awk the same regexp as you used in grep and there are alternative awk solutions that don't involve repeating the regexps in every possible sequence.
Putting that aside, what if you wanted to extend your solution to match 3 regexps R1, R2, and R3. In grep that'd be one of these poor choices:
grep 'R1.*R2.*R3|R1.*R3.*R2|R2.*R1.*R3|R2.*R3.*R1|R3.*R1.*R2|R3.*R2.*R1' file
grep R1 file | grep R2 | grep R3
while in awk it'd be the concise, obvious, simple, efficient:
awk '/R1/ && /R2/ && /R3/'
Now, what if you actually wanted to match literal strings S1 and S2 instead of regexps R1 and R2? You simply can't do that in one call to grep, you have to either write code to escape all RE metachars before calling grep:
S1=$(sed 's/[^^]/[&]/g; s/\^/\\^/g' <<< 'R1')
S2=$(sed 's/[^^]/[&]/g; s/\^/\\^/g' <<< 'R2')
grep 'S1.*S2|S2.*S1'
or again use 2 greps and a pipe:
grep -F 'S1' file | grep -F 'S2'
which again are poor choices whereas with awk you simply use a string operator instead of regexp operator:
awk 'index($0,S1) && index($0.S2)'
Now, what if you wanted to match 2 regexps in a paragraph rather than a line? Can't be done in grep, trivial in awk:
awk -v RS='' '/R1/ && /R2/'
How about across a whole file? Again can't be done in grep and trivial in awk (this time I'm using GNU awk for multi-char RS for conciseness but it's not much more code in any awk or you can pick a control-char you know won't be in the input for the RS to do the same):
awk -v RS='^$' '/R1/ && /R2/'
So - if you want to find multiple regexps or strings in a line or paragraph or file then don't use grep, use awk.
git grep
Here is the syntax using git grep with multiple patterns:
git grep --all-match --no-index -l -e string1 -e string2 -e string3 file
You may also combine patterns with Boolean expressions such as --and, --or and --not.
Check man git-grep for help.
--all-match When giving multiple pattern expressions, this flag is specified to limit the match to files that have lines to match all of them.
--no-index Search files in the current directory that is not managed by Git.
-l/--files-with-matches/--name-only Show only the names of files.
-e The next parameter is the pattern. Default is to use basic regexp.
Other params to consider:
--threads Number of grep worker threads to use.
-q/--quiet/--silent Do not output matched lines; exit with status 0 when there is a match.
To change the pattern type, you may also use -G/--basic-regexp (default), -F/--fixed-strings, -E/--extended-regexp, -P/--perl-regexp, -f file, and other.
Related:
How to grep for two words existing on the same line?
Check if all of multiple strings or regexes exist in a file
How to run grep with multiple AND patterns? & Match all patterns from file at once
For OR operation, see:
How do I grep for multiple patterns with pattern having a pipe character?
Grep: how to add an “OR” condition?
Found lines that only starts with 6 spaces and finished with:
cat my_file.txt | grep
-e '^ .*(\.c$|\.cpp$|\.h$|\.log$|\.out$)' # .c or .cpp or .h or .log or .out
-e '^ .*[0-9]\{5,9\}$' # numers between 5 and 9 digist
> nolog.txt
Let's say we need to find count of multiple words in a file testfile.
There are two ways to go about it
1) Use grep command with regex matching pattern
grep -c '\<\(DOG\|CAT\)\>' testfile
2) Use egrep command
egrep -c 'DOG|CAT' testfile
With egrep you need not to worry about expression and just separate words by a pipe separator.
grep ‘string1\|string2’ FILENAME
GNU grep version 3.1
Place the strings you want to grep for into a file
echo who > find.txt
echo Roger >> find.txt
echo [44][0-9]{9,} >> find.txt
Then search using -f
grep -f find.txt BIG_FILE_TO_SEARCH.txt
grep '(string1.*string2 | string2.*string1)' filename
will get line with string1 and string2 in any order
for multiline match:
echo -e "test1\ntest2\ntest3" |tr -d '\n' |grep "test1.*test3"
or
echo -e "test1\ntest5\ntest3" >tst.txt
cat tst.txt |tr -d '\n' |grep "test1.*test3\|test3.*test1"
we just need to remove the newline character and it works!
You should have grep like this:
$ grep 'string1' file | grep 'string2'
I often run into the same problem as yours, and I just wrote a piece of script:
function m() { # m means 'multi pattern grep'
function _usage() {
echo "usage: COMMAND [-inH] -p<pattern1> -p<pattern2> <filename>"
echo "-i : ignore case"
echo "-n : show line number"
echo "-H : show filename"
echo "-h : show header"
echo "-p : specify pattern"
}
declare -a patterns
# it is important to declare OPTIND as local
local ignorecase_flag filename linum header_flag colon result OPTIND
while getopts "iHhnp:" opt; do
case $opt in
i)
ignorecase_flag=true ;;
H)
filename="FILENAME," ;;
n)
linum="NR," ;;
p)
patterns+=( "$OPTARG" ) ;;
h)
header_flag=true ;;
\?)
_usage
return ;;
esac
done
if [[ -n $filename || -n $linum ]]; then
colon="\":\","
fi
shift $(( $OPTIND - 1 ))
if [[ $ignorecase_flag == true ]]; then
for s in "${patterns[#]}"; do
result+=" && s~/${s,,}/"
done
result=${result# && }
result="{s=tolower(\$0)} $result"
else
for s in "${patterns[#]}"; do
result="$result && /$s/"
done
result=${result# && }
fi
result+=" { print "$filename$linum$colon"\$0 }"
if [[ ! -t 0 ]]; then # pipe case
cat - | awk "${result}"
else
for f in "$#"; do
[[ $header_flag == true ]] && echo "########## $f ##########"
awk "${result}" $f
done
fi
}
Usage:
echo "a b c" | m -p A
echo "a b c" | m -i -p A # a b c
You can put it in .bashrc if you like.
grep -i -w 'string1\|string2' filename
This works for exact word match and matching case insensitive words ,for that -i is used
When the both strings are in sequence then put a pattern in between on grep command:
$ grep -E "string1(?.*)string2" file
Example if the following lines are contained in a file named Dockerfile:
FROM python:3.8 as build-python
FROM python:3.8-slim
To get the line that contains the strings: FROM python and as build-python then use:
$ grep -E "FROM python:(?.*) as build-python" Dockerfile
Then the output will show only the line that contain both strings:
FROM python:3.8 as build-python
If git is initialized and added to the branch then it is better to use git grep because it is super fast and it will search inside the whole directory.
git grep 'string1.*string2.*string3'
searching for two String and highlight only string1 and string2
grep -E 'string1.*string2|string2.*string1' filename | grep -E 'string1|string2'
or
grep 'string1.*string2\|string2.*string1' filename | grep -E 'string1\|string2'
ripgrep
Here is the example using rg:
rg -N '(?P<p1>.*string1.*)(?P<p2>.*string2.*)' file.txt
It's one of the quickest grepping tools, since it's built on top of Rust's regex engine which uses finite automata, SIMD and aggressive literal optimizations to make searching very fast.
Use it, especially when you're working with a large data.
See also related feature request at GH-875.