Time stamp for saving file or folder? - c++

Question

Is there a simpler way to do a time stamp for saving a file/creating a directory as a date time stamp ?
only using standard library (not boost). Is there a faster way to do it ?
This is my current code
std::chrono::system_clock::time_point now = std::chrono::system_clock::now();
std::time_t tt = std::chrono::system_clock::to_time_t(now);
tm utc_tm = *gmtime(&tt);
oname.str("");
oname << (utc_tm.tm_year + 1900) << '-' << std::setfill('0') << std::setw(2) << (utc_tm.tm_mon + 1) << '-' << std::setfill('0') << std::setw(2) << utc_tm.tm_mday << " " << std::setfill('0') << std::setw(2)<< utc_tm.tm_hour <<':' << std::setfill('0') << std::setw(2) << utc_tm.tm_min <<':' << std::setfill('0') << std::setw(2) << utc_tm.tm_sec;
ts = oname.str();

Answer 1

There is a less tortuous way:
#include <string>
#include <ctime>
std::string get_timestamp()
{
auto now = std::time(nullptr);
char buf[sizeof("YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS")];
return std::string(buf,buf +
std::strftime(buf,sizeof(buf),"%F %T",std::gmtime(&now)));
}
It is very probably also faster, because it is less tortuous, but that is
also very probably immaterial in a setting where disc I/O is in play.
This gives you the same timestamps as your own code, e.g.
2015-03-28 10:48:45
See std::time and
std::strftime to
understand how the desired formatting is achieved and note that std::strftime
returns the length of the string it has composed, excluding its nul-terminator.
This code is standard, but if you are working with MS VC++ 2013 or later then
you could also consider the use of std::put_time,
as in:
#include <iomanip>
#include <sstream>
#include <string>
#include <ctime>
std::string get_timestamp()
{
auto now = std::time(nullptr);
std::ostringstream os;
os << std::put_time(std::gmtime(&now),"%F %T");
return os.str();
}
which is simpler still. (I have not tested that.) std::put_time however
is unsupported by gcc as of 4.9.
Seemingly you want your timestamps formatted as YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM:SS. If they
are to be used in filenames, it would be more prudent to keep them free of spaces:
perhaps YYYY-MM-DD_HH:MM:SS.