I am new to django class based views and may be the way I am approaching this is a little naive, so I would appreciate if you could suggest a better way.
So my problem is here:
There are three types of users in my project. 1. Student, 2. Teacher, 3. Parent. I need to be able to show different user settings pertaining to each type of user when the user requests the settings page in their respective forms. Also, I need to be able to save the data into the respective tables as the user submits the form.
I have a class based view (UserSettingsView):
class UserSettingsView(LoginRequiredMixin, FormView):
success_url = '.'
template_name = 'accts/usersettings.html'
def get_initial(self):
if self.request.user.is_authenticated():
user_obj = get_user_model().objects.get(email=self.request.user.email)
if user_obj.profile.is_student:
return {
'first_name': user_obj.profile.first_name,
'last_name': user_obj.profile.last_name,
""" and other student field variables """
}
if user_obj.profile.is_teacher:
return {
""" Teacher field variables """
}
else:
return render_to_response('allauth/account/login.html')
def form_valid(self, form):
messages.add_message(self.request, messages.SUCCESS, 'Settings Saved!')
return super(UserSettingsView, self).form_valid(form)
def get_context_data(self, **kwargs):
context = super(UserSettingsView, self).get_context_data(**kwargs)
context['user'] = get_user_model().objects.get(email=self.request.user.email)
context['userprofile'] = UserProfile.objects.get(user_id=context['user'])
return context
def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
form_class = self.get_form_class()
form = self.get_form(form_class)
form.full_clean()
if form.is_valid():
user = request.user
user.profile.first_name = form.cleaned_data['first_name']
user.profile.last_name = form.cleaned_data['last_name']
user.profile.save()
if user.profile.is_student:
""" update student database """
user.save()
user.student.save()
if user.profile.is_teacher:
""" update teacher database """
user.save()
user.teacher.save()
return self.form_valid(form)
else:
return self.form_invalid(form)
Different instances of Usersettings view are called using the pick_settings generic view.
url(regex=r'^profilesettings/',view=pick_settings,name='profilesettings'),
And here is the pick_settings view:
def pick_settings(request):
if request.user.is_authenticated():
if request.method == 'GET':
if request.user.profile.is_student:
return UserSettingsView.as_view(form_class=StudentSettingsForm)(request)
if request.user.profile.is_teacher:
return UserSettingsView.as_view(form_class=TeacherSettingsForm)(request)
if request.user.profile.is_parent:
return UserSettingsView.as_view(form_class=ParentSettingsForm)(request)
else:
if request.method == 'POST':
"""
return ***<--- I need to know what to pass here to be able to call the appropriate post function of the UserSettingsView?---->"""***
else:
return HttpResponseRedirect('/accounts/login/')
I need to be able to call the post function of the UserSettingsView. May be using the get_context_data? But I am not sure how.
Again it will be great, if someone could suggest a better way because I am pretty sure this might be violating the DRY principle. Although, I am not too concerned with that as long as the job gets done as I am running a deadline. :) Thanks!
FormView has a method get_form_class(). It is called from get() and post(), so self.request will already be set (as will be self.request.user). Consequently,
class UserSettingsView(LoginRequiredMixin, FormView):
[...]
def get_form_class(self):
# no need to check is_authenticated() as we have LoginRequiredMixin
if request.user.profile.is_student:
return StudentSettingsForm
elif user.profile.is_teacher:
return TeacherSettingsForm
elif user.profile.is_parent:
return ParentSettingsForm
This should already to the trick as you get the correct form for each user type.
If you also need to render different templates, override get_template_names():
def get_template_names(self):
if request.user.profile.is_student:
return ['myapp/settings/student.html']
elif user.profile.is_teacher:
return ['myapp/settings/teacher.html']
elif user.profile.is_parent:
return ['myapp/settings/parent.html']
DRY can be achieved using proper inheritance in the templates combining common template fragments.
And lest I forget (I already forgot): To get rid of the if in the post() method of your view, simple override the save() method of you forms which I assume are ModelForms, anyway.
Related
I am working with a CBV that uses 2 ModelForm instances. I would like to display the individual form errors. It seems like this is a little challenging when using multiple forms in a class based view.
Heres a smaller snippet to show what I am working with...
class EmployeeCreate(CreateView):
form_class = EmployeeCreateForm
form_class_2 = AddressCreateForm
def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
employee_form = self.form_class(request.POST)
address_form = self.form_class_2(request.POST)
# Make sure both forms are validated
if employee_form.is_valid() and address_form.is_valid():
employee = employee_form.save(commit=False)
address = address_form.save(commit=False)
employee.parent = self.request.user
employee.save()
address.user = employee
address.save()
return JsonResponse({'message': 'Employee created successfully.'}, status=200)
else:
return self.form_invalid(**kwargs)
def get_context_data(self, **kwargs):
# render both forms to create an Account, and Address
context = super(EmployeeCreateView, self).get_context_data()
context['employee_form'] = self.form_class
context['address_form'] = self.form_class_2
return context
def form_invalid(self, **kwargs):
return JsonResponse({'success': False})
Now when the form is invalid, the form_invalid method is getting called and returning the JsonResponse message, but I would much rather return the specific form error.
I am trying to find a way to display each individual form error for the employee_form and the address_form. Is there a possible way to do this override in the form_invalid method?
Thank you in advance!
you are returning both forms error in single JsonResponse. Instead you should return different forms error in single JsonResponse like
return JsonResponse({'employee_form_errors': self.form_invalid(employee_form),
'address_form_errors': self.form_invalid(address_form) }, status=400)
you should use individually use form_invalid with both forms.
I am trying to create a user profile page where users can see and update their preferences for certain things, like whether they are vegetarian, or have a particular allergy, etc. I want the data to be displayed as a form, with their current preferences already populating the form fields.
So I've created the following Model:
class FoodPreferences(models.Model):
user = models.OneToOneField(User, on_delete=models.CASCADE) # One user has one set of food prefs
vegetarian = models.BooleanField()
vegan = models.BooleanField()
...
that's referenced in my forms.py:
class FoodPreferencesForm(forms.ModelForm):
class Meta:
model = FoodPreferences
exclude = ('user', )
I've tried creating a view that inherits FormView and then referencing the form, like this:
class UserProfileView(generic.FormView):
template_name = "registration/profile.html"
form_class = FoodPreferencesForm
success_url = reverse_lazy('user_profile')
This saves the form to a instance of the model correctly, but obviously it just displays the blank form again, after updating, so the user has no idea what their current preferences are.
To implement this I thought I might need to override get() and post() to get the instance of FoodPreferences for the user, and then pass those values into the form like you would a request.POST object. However, firstly, I don't know how to do that, and secondly I'd be taking responsibility for correctly updating the database, which the FormView was already doing.
This is what I've got for that solution:
def get(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
prefs = FoodPreferences.objects.get(user=request.user)
form = self.form_class(prefs)
return render(request, self.template_name, {'form': form, })
def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
form = self.form_class(request.POST)
if not form.is_valid():
return render(request, self.template_name, {'form': form, 'error': 'Something went wrong.'})
curr_prefs = FoodPreferences.objects.update_or_create(form.fields)
prefs.save()
return render(request, self.template_name, {'form': form, })
but I get a TypeError: argument of type 'FoodPreferences' is not iterable on the line in get():
form = self.form_class(prefs)
because it's not expecting a model instance.
Am I thinking about this in the right way? This seems like a common enough problem that Django would have something inbuilt to do it, but I can't find anything.
You should only rarely need to define get or post in a class-based view, and you definitely don't here.
To start with, you need to use a more appropriate base class for your view. Here you want to update an existing item, so you should use UpdateView.
Secondly, you need to tell the class how to get the existing object to update, which you can do by definining get_object. So:
class UserProfileView(generic.UpdateView):
template_name = "registration/profile.html"
form_class = FoodPreferencesForm
success_url = reverse_lazy('user_profile')
def get_object(self, queryset=None):
return self.request.user.foodpreferences
# or, if you aren't certain that the object already exists:
obj, _ = FoodPreferences.objects.get_or_create(user=self.request.user)
return obj
I've been working with Django for about 3 months now and feel I'm getting a bit better, working my way up to class based views. On the surface they seem cleaner and easier to understand and in some cases they are. In others, not so much. I am trying to use a simple drop down view via ModelChoiceField and a form. I can get it to work with a function based view as shown below in my views.py file:
def book_by_name(request):
form = BookByName(request.POST or None)
if request.method == 'POST':
if form.is_valid():
book_byname = form.cleaned_data['dropdown']
return HttpResponseRedirect(book_byname.get_absolute_url1())
return render(request,'library/book_list.html',{'form':form})
Here is my form in forms.py:
class BookByName(forms.Form):
dropdown = forms.ModelChoiceField(queryset=Book.objects.none())
def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs):
super(BookByName, self).__init__(*args, **kwargs)
self.fields['dropdown'].widget.attrs['class'] = 'choices1'
self.fields['dropdown'].empty_label = ''
self.fields['dropdown'].queryset = Book.objects.order_by('publisher')
This code works. When I have tried to convert to a Class Based View, that's when the trouble begins. I tried to do something like this in views.py:
class BookByNameView(FormView, View):
form_class = BookByName
initial = { 'Book' : Book }
template_name = 'library/book_list.html'
def get(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
form = self.form_class(initial=self.initial)
return render(request, self.template_name, {'form': form})
def get_success_url(self, *args):
return reverse_lazy('library:book_detail', args = (self.object.id,))
When using this with the same form, I receive an attribute error,
'BookByNameView' object has no attribute 'object'.
I've tried ListView as well and received several other errors along the way. The get_success_url also needs to take in a primary key and I can't figure out how to get that passed in as well. Again, I'm a 3 month Django newbie so please be gentle and thanks in advance for your thoughts and suggestions! I feel like I'm in the ballpark...just can't find my seat! I'm very open to doing this differently, if there's a cleaner/better way to do this!
Based on the latest feedback, it would appear the Class Based View should look like:
class BookNameView(FormView):
form_class = BookName
template_name = 'library/book_list.html'
def get_success_url(self, *args):
return reverse_lazy('library:book_detail')
Is this correct? I ran a test version of this and in response to your question as to why I am using self.object.id at all, I am trying to get the pk from the modelchoicefield that I am using to return the view I am trying to get. This may be where I am getting a bit lost. I am trying to get the detail view from the modelchoicefield dropdown, and return the book that is selected. However, I can't seem to pass the pk to this view successfully.
I updated my code to...
class BookByNameView(FormView, ListView):
model = Book
form_class = BookByName
template_name = 'library/book_list.html'
def get_success_url(self, *args):
return reverse_lazy('library:book_detail')
But now it says error...Reverse for 'book_detail' with no arguments not found.
Why are you using self.object there at all? You used form.cleaned_data in the original view, that's what you should use in the class based version too. Note that the form is passed to form_valid.
Note that you've done lots of other weird things too. Your getmethod is pointless, as is your definition of the initial dict; you should delete them both. Also, FormView already inherits from View, there's no need to have View in your declaration explicitly.
You can override the form_valid() function in FormView to achieve what you want. If the form is valid then it is passed to the form_valid() function.
Try this:
class BookByNameView(FormView):
model = Book
form_class = BookByName
template_name = 'library/book_list.html'
def form_valid(self, form):
bookbyname = form.cleaned_data['dropdown']
return HttpResponseRedirect(bookbyname.get_absolute_url())
I am building a TemplateView with 2 forms, one to allow user to select the customer (CustomerForm) and another to add the order (OrderForm) for the customer.
Code:
class DisplayOrdersView(TemplateView):
template_name = 'orders/orders_details_form.html'
def get_context_data(self, **kwargs):
context = kwargs
context['shippingdetailsform'] = ShippingDetailsForm(prefix='shippingdetailsform')
context['ordersform'] = OrdersForm(prefix='ordersform')
return context
def dispatch(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
return super(DisplayOrdersView, self).dispatch(request, *args, **kwargs)
def get(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
context = self.get_context_data(**kwargs)
return self.render_to_response(context)
def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
context = self.get_context_data(**kwargs)
profile=request.user.get_profile()
if context['shippingdetailsform'].is_valid():
instance = context['shippingdetailsform'].save(commit=False)
instance.profile = profile
instance.save()
messages.success(request, 'orders for {0} saved'.format(profile))
elif context['ordersform'].is_valid():
instance = ordersform.save(commit=False)
shippingdetails, created = shippingdetails.objects.get_or_create(profile=profile)
shippingdetails.save()
instance.user = customer
instance.save()
messages.success(request, 'orders details for {0} saved.'.format(profile))
else:
messages.error(request, 'Error(s) saving form')
return self.render_to_response(context)
Firstly, I can't seem to load any existing data into the forms. Assuming a onetoone relationship between UserProfile->ShippingDetails (fk: UserProfile)->Orders (fk:ShippingDetails), how can I query the appropriate variables into the form on load?
Also, how can I save the data? It throws an error when saving and I have been unable to retrieve useful debug information.
Is my approach correct for having multiple forms in a templateview?
You're not passing the POST data into the forms at any point. You need to do this when you instantiate them. I would move the instantiation out of get_context_data and do it in get and post: the first as you have it now, and the second passing request.POST.
Also note that you probably want to check both forms are valid before saving either of them, rather than checking and saving each in turn. The way you have it now, if the first one is valid it won't even check the second, let alone save it, so you won't get any errors on the template if the first is valid but the second is invalid.
So I'm in the process of working on a web application that has implemented security questions into it's registration process. Because of the way my models are setup and the fact that I am trying to use Django's Class based views (CBV), I've had a bit of problems getting this all to integrate cleanly. Here are what my models look like:
Model.py
class AcctSecurityQuestions(models.Model):
class Meta:
db_table = 'security_questions'
id = models.AutoField(primary_key=True)
question = models.CharField(max_length = 250, null=False)
def __unicode__(self):
return u'%s' % self.question
class AcctUser(AbstractBaseUser, PermissionsMixin):
...
user_questions = models.ManyToManyField(AcctSecurityQuestions, through='SecurityQuestionsInter')
...
class SecurityQuestionsInter(models.Model):
class Meta:
db_table = 'security_questions_inter'
acct_user = models.ForeignKey(AcctUser)
security_questions = models.ForeignKey(AcctSecurityQuestions, verbose_name="Security Question")
answer = models.CharField(max_length=128, null=False)
Here is what my current view looks like:
View.py
class AcctRegistration(CreateView):
template_name = 'registration/registration_form.html'
disallowed_url_name = 'registration_disallowed'
model = AcctUser
backend_path = 'registration.backends.default.DefaultBackend'
form_class = AcctRegistrationForm
success_url = 'registration_complete'
def form_valid(self, form):
context = self.get_context_data()
securityquestion_form = context['formset']
if securityquestion_form.is_valid():
self.object = form.save()
securityquestion_form.instance = self.object
securityquestion_form.save()
return HttpResponseRedirect(self.get_success_url())
else:
return self.render_to_response(self.get_context_data(form=form))
def get_context_data(self, **kwargs):
ctx = super(AcctRegistration, self).get_context_data(**kwargs)
if self.request.POST:
ctx['formset'] = SecurityQuestionsInLineFormSet(self.request.POST, instance=self.object)
ctx['formset'].full_clean()
else:
ctx['formset'] = SecurityQuestionsInLineFormSet(instance=self.object)
return ctx
And for giggles and completeness here is what my form looks like:
Forms.py
class AcctRegistrationForm(ModelForm):
password1 = CharField(widget=PasswordInput(attrs=attrs_dict, render_value=False),
label="Password")
password2 = CharField(widget=PasswordInput(attrs=attrs_dict, render_value=False),
label="Password (again)")
class Meta:
model = AcctUser
...
def clean(self):
if 'password1' in self.cleaned_data and 'password2' in self.cleaned_data:
if self.cleaned_data['password1'] != self.cleaned_data['password2']:
raise ValidationError(_("The two password fields didn't match."))
return self.cleaned_data
SecurityQuestionsInLineFormSet = inlineformset_factory(AcctUser,
SecurityQuestionsInter,
extra=2,
max_num=2,
can_delete=False
)
This post helped me a lot, however in the most recent comments of the chosen answer, its mentioned that formset data should be integrated into the form in the overidden get and post methods:
django class-based views with inline model-form or formset
If I am overiding the get and post how would I add in my data from my formset? And what would I call to loop over the formset data?
Inline formsets are handy when you already have the user object in the database. Then, when you initialize, it'll automatically preload the right security questions, etc. But for creation, a normal model formset is probably best, and one that doesn't include the field on the through table that ties back to the user. Then you can create the user and manually set the user field on the created through table.
Here's how I would do this using a just a model formset:
forms.py:
SecurityQuestionsFormSet = modelformset_factory(SecurityQuestionsInter,
fields=('security_questions', 'answer'),
extra=2,
max_num=2,
can_delete=False,
)
views.py:
class AcctRegistration(CreateView):
# class data like form name as usual
def form_valid(self):
# override the ModelFormMixin definition so you don't save twice
return HttpResponseRedirect(self.get_success_url())
def form_invalid(self, form, formset):
return self.render_to_response(self.get_context_data(form=form, formset=formset))
def get(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
self.object = None
form_class = self.get_form_class()
form = self.get_form(form_class)
formset = SecurityQuestionsFormSet(queryset=SecurityQuestionsInter.objects.none())
return self.render_to_response(self.get_context_data(form=form, formset=formset))
def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
self.object = None
form_class = self.get_form_class()
form = self.get_form(form_class)
formset = SecurityQuestionsFormSet(request.POST)
form_valid = form.is_valid()
formset_valid = formset.is_valid()
if form_valid and formset_valid:
self.object = form.save()
security_questions = formset.save(commit=False)
for security_question in security_questions:
security_question.acct_user = self.object
security_question.save()
formset.save_m2m()
return self.form_valid()
else:
return self.form_invalid(form, formset)
Regarding some questions in the comments about why this works the way it does:
I don't quite understand why we needed the queryset
The queryset defines the initial editable scope of objects for the formset. It's the set of instances to be bound to each form within the queryset, similar to the instance parameter of an individual form. Then, if the size of the queryset doesn't exceed the max_num parameter, it'll add extra unbound forms up to max_num or the specified number of extras. Specifying the empty queryset means we've said that we don't want to edit any of the model instances, we just want to create new data.
If you inspect the HTML of the unsubmitted form for the version that uses the default queryset, you'll see hidden inputs giving the IDs of the intermediary rows - plus you'll see the chosen question and answer displayed in the non-hidden inputs.
It's arguably confusing that forms default to being unbound (unless you specify an instance) while formsets default to being bound to the entire table (unless you specify otherwise). It certainly threw me off for a while, as the comments show. But formsets are inherently plural in ways that a single form aren't, so there's that.
Limiting the queryset is one of the things that inline formsets do.
or how the formset knew it was related until we set the acct_user for the formset. Why didn't we use the instance parameter
The formset actually never knows that it's related. Eventually the SecurityQuestionsInter objects do, once we set that model field.
Basically, the HTML form passes in the values of all its fields in the POST data - the two passwords, plus the IDs of two security question selections and the user's answers, plus maybe anything else that wasn't relevant to this question. Each of the Python objects we create (form and formset) can tell based on the field ids and the formset prefix (default values work fine here, with multiple formsets in one page it gets more complicated) which parts of the POST data are its responsibility. form handles the passwords but knows nothing about the security questions. formset handles the two security questions, but knows nothing about the passwords (or, by implication, the user). Internally, formset creates two forms, each of which handles one question/answer pair - again, they rely on numbering in the ids to tell what parts of the POST data they handle.
It's the view that ties the two together. None of the forms know about how they relate, but the view does.
Inline formsets have various special behavior for tracking such a relation, and after some more code review I think there is a way to use them here without needing to save the user before validating the security Q/A pairs - they do build an internal queryset that filters to the instance, but it doesn't look like they actually need to evaluate that queryset for validation. The main part that's throwing me off from just saying you can use them instead and just pass in an uncommitted user object (i.e. the return value of form.save(commit=False)) as the instance argument, or None if the user form is not valid is that I'm not 100% sure it would do the right thing in the second case. It might be worth testing if you find that approach clearer - set up your inline formset as you initially had it, initialize the formset in get with no arguments, then leave the final saving behavior in form_valid after all:
def form_valid(self, form, formset):
# commit the uncommitted version set in post
self.object.save()
form.save_m2m()
formset.save()
return HttpResponseRedirect(self.get_success_url())
def post(self, request, *args, **kwargs):
self.object = None
form_class = self.get_form_class()
form = self.get_form(form_class)
if form.is_valid():
self.object = form.save(commit=False)
# passing in None as the instance if the user form is not valid
formset = SecurityQuestionsInLineFormSet(request.POST, instance=self.object)
if form.is_valid() and formset.is_valid():
return self.form_valid(form, formset)
else:
return self.form_invalid(form, formset)
If that works as desired when the form is not valid, I may have talked myself into that version being better. Behind the scenes it's just doing what the non-inline version does, but more of the processing is hidden. It also more closely parallels the implementation of the various generic mixins in the first place - although you could move the saving behavior into form_valid with the non-inline version too.