i tried to read ntfs partition.
main function:
int main(int argc, char** argv)
{
BYTE sector[512];
ReadSector(L"\\\\.\\E:", 0, sector);
PrintBPB(ReadBPB(sector));
BYTE sector2[512];
ReadSector(L"\\\\.\\E:", 0, sector2);
PrintBPB(ReadBPB(sector2));
return 0;
}
ReadSector function:
int ReadSector(LPCWSTR drive, long readPoint, BYTE sector[Sector_Size])
{
int retCode = 0;
DWORD bytesRead;
HANDLE device = NULL;
device = CreateFile(drive, // Drive to open
GENERIC_READ, // Access mode
FILE_SHARE_READ | FILE_SHARE_WRITE, // Share Mode
NULL, // Security Descriptor
OPEN_EXISTING, // How to create
0, // File attributes
NULL); // Handle to template
if (device == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE) // Open Error
{
printf("CreateFile: %u\n", GetLastError());
return 1;
}
SetFilePointer(device, readPoint, NULL, FILE_BEGIN);//Set a Point to Read
if (!ReadFile(device, sector, 512, &bytesRead, NULL))
{
printf("ReadFile: %u\n", GetLastError());
}
else
{
printf("Success!\n");
}
CloseHandle(device);
}
I think the way I copy those bytes into my BPB bpb is fine.
So what happend? Why they are different?
I can figure out that its relate to winapi, readfile, createfile but I still dont understand it :(
sorry for my bad english.
The bug is in the code we cannot see: PrintBPB. Apparently it switches to hexadecimal output (for the "Volume serial number") and then fails to switch back to decimal until later.
When the code calls PrintBPB a second time the output mode is still in hexadecimal format, and printing "Bytes per Sector" now displays 200 (0x200 is the same value as 512).
If you need to know whether two chunks of memory hold identical values, just memcmp them. This avoids introducing a bug in a transformation (such as console output).
EDIT: The fix, as suggested by Harry Johnston, was to close the Child_In_Write handle.
Somewhat ironically, I had earlier tried closing the Child_In_Read handle. This does NOT work, the write handle is the only one that should be closed.
For the tool I'm trying to make, I need to be able to launch a process and give it data through stdin - as if I was calling it via command line with piping
Simple enough idea.
I've primarily I've followed this guide from Microsoft and got things "working".
In my own test program I can read from stdin just fine. But when I try to use other programs, like cat for instance, they do nothing but hang - as if they are still waiting for input.
The full repo is here.
Here are the relevant code bits:
Initialize the pipes.
// From Cao/Main.cpp
static HANDLE Child_In_Read = NULL;
static HANDLE Child_In_Write = NULL;
static HANDLE Child_Out_Read = NULL;
static HANDLE Child_Out_Write = NULL;
// Create and initialize standard in pipe.
{
bool createPipeSuccess =
CreatePipe(
&Child_In_Read,
&Child_In_Write,
&secAttr,
0);
if (!createPipeSuccess)
{
// #logging log error.
printf("Could not create standard in pipe!\n");
goto textData_cleanup;
}
bool setPipeFlagSuccess = SetHandleInformation(Child_In_Write, HANDLE_FLAG_INHERIT, 0);
if (!setPipeFlagSuccess)
{
// #logging log error.
printf("Could not set standard in pipe information!\n");
goto textData_cleanup;
}
}
Write to the pipe that was just initialized then start the process.
// From Cao/Main.cpp
// Write to the processes' standard in.
{
DWORD inBytesWritten = 0;
bool writeSuccess =
WriteFile(
Child_In_Write,
text, // Simple char array.
text_numBytes,
&inBytesWritten,
NULL);
if (!writeSuccess)
{
// #logging log error.
printf("Could not write to child's standard in!\n");
goto textData_cleanup;
}
}
// Create the child process.
{
STARTUPINFO startupInfo = { 0 };
startupInfo.cb = sizeof(startupInfo);
startupInfo.hStdInput = Child_In_Read;
startupInfo.hStdError = Child_Out_Write;
startupInfo.hStdOutput = Child_Out_Write;
startupInfo.dwFlags = STARTF_USESTDHANDLES;
bool createProcessSuccess = CreateProcessW(
NULL,
commandLine,
NULL,
NULL,
true,
0,
NULL,
NULL,
&startupInfo,
&ChildProcInfo);
if (!createProcessSuccess)
{
printf("Could not start child process with command line: %ls", commandLine);
goto textData_cleanup;
}
isChildRunning = true;
ModifyMenu(IconMenu, IconMenu_RunCancel, MF_BYCOMMAND, IconMenu_RunCancel, L"Cancel");
// newHandle is always 0x00000000 so I'm assuming I don't need to clean it up.
HANDLE newHandle;
RegisterWaitForSingleObject(&newHandle, ChildProcInfo.hProcess, LaunchedProcessExitedOrCancelled, NULL, INFINITE, WT_EXECUTEONLYONCE);
}
My reading code that appears to work fine:
// From Echoer/Main.cpp
printf("via stdin:\n");
{
const int readBuffer_size = 5000;
char *readBuffer[readBuffer_size];
{
HANDLE standardIn = GetStdHandle(STD_INPUT_HANDLE);
DWORD bytesRead = 0;
bool readSuccess =
ReadFile(
standardIn,
readBuffer,
readBuffer_size,
&bytesRead,
NULL);
if (!readSuccess)
{
printf("Could not read from standard in!\n");
}
CloseHandle(standardIn);
}
printf("%s", readBuffer);
}
Am I missing something that needs to be sent to "get the ball rolling"? Do I need to append "\r\n" or something like that? How do shells manage this?
Some applications, including cat, will wait for end-of-file on standard input before exiting. You can make this happen by closing your end of the pipe.
(You must also make certain that the handle to your end of the pipe has not been inherited by the child or by any other process, but your code already handles this correctly.)
I have several processes that try to read and write the same file. I want each of them to lock the file so that only one of them accesses it at a time.
I tried this (edit: this is a complete test code this time):
#include "stdafx.h"
#include "Windows.h"
bool test()
{
const char* path = "test.txt";
HANDLE hFile = CreateFileA(path,
GENERIC_READ | GENERIC_WRITE,
FILE_SHARE_READ | FILE_SHARE_WRITE,
NULL,
OPEN_ALWAYS,
FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL,
NULL);
if (hFile == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE)
{
printf("ERROR: Cannot open file %s\n", path);
return false;
}
// Lock the file
{
OVERLAPPED overlapped = {0};
BOOL res = LockFileEx(hFile, LOCKFILE_EXCLUSIVE_LOCK, 0, ~0, ~0, &overlapped);
if (!res)
{
printf("ERROR: Cannot lock file %s\n", path);
return false;
}
}
DWORD fileSize = GetFileSize(hFile, NULL);
if (fileSize > 0)
{
char* content = new char[fileSize+1];
// Read the file
BOOL res = ReadFile(hFile, content, fileSize, NULL, NULL);
if (!res)
{
printf("ERROR: Cannot read file %s\n", path);
}
delete[] content;
}
const char* newContent = "bla";
int newContentSize = 3;
// Write the file
BOOL res = WriteFile(hFile, newContent, newContentSize, NULL, NULL);
if (!res)
{
//int err = GetLastError();
printf("ERROR: Cannot write to file\n");
}
// Unlock the file
{
OVERLAPPED overlapped = {0};
UnlockFileEx(hFile, 0, ~0, ~0, &overlapped);
}
CloseHandle(hFile);
return true;
}
int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[])
{
bool res = test();
return 0;
}
This works fine on my computer, which has Windows 8. But on my colleague's computer, which has Windows 7, it crashes. Specifically, the calls to ReadFile and WriteFile crash, always.
Note that it never enters the code paths with the error printfs. This code triggers no error except for a write at location 0x00000000 in ReadFile (when run on Windows 7).
We tried to also pass the overlapped struct to the ReadFile and WriteFile calls. It prevents the crash but the lock doesn't work anymore, the file is all scrambled (not with this test code, with the real code).
What am I doing wrong?
Looks like your problem is:
lpNumberOfBytesRead [out, optional] argument is null in your call.
This parameter can be NULL only when the lpOverlapped parameter is not NULL.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365467%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
Heres your problem :
You are missing a necessary struct-member and:
0 and ~0 and {0} are all bad code, constant expressions like these will always produce unepected results -- WINAPI doesnt work like libc, parameters are not always compared against constants, instead they are tested against/via macros and other preprocessor-definitions themselves so passing constant values or initializing WINAPI structs with constants will often lead to errors like these.
After years of experimenting i have found that there is only one surefire way of avoiding them, i will express it in corrected code :
OVERLAPPED overlapped;
overlapped.hEvent = CreateEvent( ........... ); // put valid parameters here!
UnlockFileEx(hFile, 0 /*"reserved"*/, ULONG_MAX, ULONG_MAX, &overlapped);
please read this carefully : http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365716%28v=vs.85%29.aspx
I don't have much experience with Serial I/O, but have recently been tasked with fixing some highly flawed serial code, because the original programmer has left the company.
The application is a Windows program that talks to a scientific instrument serially via a virtual COMM port running on USB. Virtual COMM port USB drivers are provided by FTDI, since they manufacture the USB chip we use on the instrument.
The serial code is in an unmanaged C++ DLL, which is shared by both our old C++ software, and our new C# / .Net (WinForms) software.
There are two main problems:
Fails on many XP systems
When the first command is sent to the instrument, there's no response. When you issue the next command, you get the response from the first one.
Here's a typical usage scenario (full source for methods called is included below):
char szBuf [256];
CloseConnection ();
if (OpenConnection ())
{
ClearBuffer ();
// try to get a firmware version number
WriteChar ((char) 'V');
BOOL versionReadStatus1 = ReadString (szBuf, 100);
...
}
On a failing system, the ReadString call will never receive any serial data, and times out. But if we issue another, different command, and call ReadString again, it will return the response from the first command, not the new one!
But this only happens on a large subset of Windows XP systems - and never on Windows 7. As luck would have it, our XP dev machines worked OK, so we did not see the problem until we started beta testing. But I can also reproduce the problem by running an XP VM (VirtualBox) on my XP dev machine. Also, the problem only occurs when using the DLL with the new C# version - works fine with the old C++ app.
This seemed to be resolved when I added a Sleep(21) to the low level BytesInQue method before calling ClearCommError, but this exacerbated the other problem - CPU usage. Sleeping for less than 21 ms would make the failure mode reappear.
High CPU usage
When doing serial I/O CPU use is excessive - often above 90%. This happens with both the new C# app and the old C++ app, but is much worse in the new app. Often makes the UI very non-responsive, but not always.
Here's the code for our Port.cpp class, in all it's terrible glory. Sorry for the length, but this is what I'm working with. Most important methods are probably OpenConnection, ReadString, ReadChar, and BytesInQue.
//
// Port.cpp: Implements the CPort class, which is
// the class that controls the serial port.
//
// Copyright (C) 1997-1998 Microsoft Corporation
// All rights reserved.
//
// This source code is only intended as a supplement to the
// Broadcast Architecture Programmer's Reference.
// For detailed information regarding Broadcast
// Architecture, see the reference.
//
#include <windows.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <assert.h>
#include "port.h"
// Construction code to initialize the port handle to null.
CPort::CPort()
{
m_hDevice = (HANDLE)0;
// default parameters
m_uPort = 1;
m_uBaud = 9600;
m_uDataBits = 8;
m_uParity = 0;
m_uStopBits = 0; // = 1 stop bit
m_chTerminator = '\n';
m_bCommportOpen = FALSE;
m_nTimeOut = 50;
m_nBlockSizeMax = 2048;
}
// Destruction code to close the connection if the port
// handle was valid.
CPort::~CPort()
{
if (m_hDevice)
CloseConnection();
}
// Open a serial communication port for writing short
// one-byte commands, that is, overlapped data transfer
// is not necessary.
BOOL CPort::OpenConnection()
{
char szPort[64];
m_bCommportOpen = FALSE;
// Build the COM port string as "COMx" where x is the port.
if (m_uPort > 9)
wsprintf(szPort, "\\\\.\\COM%d", m_uPort);
else
wsprintf(szPort, "COM%d", m_uPort);
// Open the serial port device.
m_hDevice = CreateFile(szPort,
GENERIC_WRITE | GENERIC_READ,
0,
NULL, // No security attributes
OPEN_EXISTING,
FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL,
NULL);
if (m_hDevice == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE)
{
SaveLastError ();
m_hDevice = (HANDLE)0;
return FALSE;
}
return SetupConnection(); // After the port is open, set it up.
} // end of OpenConnection()
// Configure the serial port with the given settings.
// The given settings enable the port to communicate
// with the remote control.
BOOL CPort::SetupConnection(void)
{
DCB dcb; // The DCB structure differs betwwen Win16 and Win32.
dcb.DCBlength = sizeof(DCB);
// Retrieve the DCB of the serial port.
BOOL bStatus = GetCommState(m_hDevice, (LPDCB)&dcb);
if (bStatus == 0)
{
SaveLastError ();
return FALSE;
}
// Assign the values that enable the port to communicate.
dcb.BaudRate = m_uBaud; // Baud rate
dcb.ByteSize = m_uDataBits; // Data bits per byte, 4-8
dcb.Parity = m_uParity; // Parity: 0-4 = no, odd, even, mark, space
dcb.StopBits = m_uStopBits; // 0,1,2 = 1, 1.5, 2
dcb.fBinary = TRUE; // Binary mode, no EOF check : Must use binary mode in NT
dcb.fParity = dcb.Parity == 0 ? FALSE : TRUE; // Enable parity checking
dcb.fOutX = FALSE; // XON/XOFF flow control used
dcb.fInX = FALSE; // XON/XOFF flow control used
dcb.fNull = FALSE; // Disable null stripping - want nulls
dcb.fOutxCtsFlow = FALSE;
dcb.fOutxDsrFlow = FALSE;
dcb.fDsrSensitivity = FALSE;
dcb.fDtrControl = DTR_CONTROL_ENABLE;
dcb.fRtsControl = RTS_CONTROL_DISABLE ;
// Configure the serial port with the assigned settings.
// Return TRUE if the SetCommState call was not equal to zero.
bStatus = SetCommState(m_hDevice, &dcb);
if (bStatus == 0)
{
SaveLastError ();
return FALSE;
}
DWORD dwSize;
COMMPROP *commprop;
DWORD dwError;
dwSize = sizeof(COMMPROP) + sizeof(MODEMDEVCAPS) ;
commprop = (COMMPROP *)malloc(dwSize);
memset(commprop, 0, dwSize);
if (!GetCommProperties(m_hDevice, commprop))
{
dwError = GetLastError();
}
m_bCommportOpen = TRUE;
return TRUE;
}
void CPort::SaveLastError ()
{
DWORD dwLastError = GetLastError ();
LPVOID lpMsgBuf;
FormatMessage(FORMAT_MESSAGE_ALLOCATE_BUFFER |
FORMAT_MESSAGE_FROM_SYSTEM |
FORMAT_MESSAGE_IGNORE_INSERTS,
NULL,
dwLastError,
MAKELANGID(LANG_NEUTRAL, SUBLANG_DEFAULT), // Default language
(LPTSTR) &lpMsgBuf,
0,
NULL);
strcpy (m_szLastError,(LPTSTR)lpMsgBuf);
// Free the buffer.
LocalFree( lpMsgBuf );
}
void CPort::SetTimeOut (int nTimeOut)
{
m_nTimeOut = nTimeOut;
}
// Close the opened serial communication port.
void CPort::CloseConnection(void)
{
if (m_hDevice != NULL &&
m_hDevice != INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE)
{
FlushFileBuffers(m_hDevice);
CloseHandle(m_hDevice); ///that the port has been closed.
}
m_hDevice = (HANDLE)0;
// Set the device handle to NULL to confirm
m_bCommportOpen = FALSE;
}
int CPort::WriteChars(char * psz)
{
int nCharWritten = 0;
while (*psz)
{
nCharWritten +=WriteChar(*psz);
psz++;
}
return nCharWritten;
}
// Write a one-byte value (char) to the serial port.
int CPort::WriteChar(char c)
{
DWORD dwBytesInOutQue = BytesInOutQue ();
if (dwBytesInOutQue > m_dwLargestBytesInOutQue)
m_dwLargestBytesInOutQue = dwBytesInOutQue;
static char szBuf[2];
szBuf[0] = c;
szBuf[1] = '\0';
DWORD dwBytesWritten;
DWORD dwTimeOut = m_nTimeOut; // 500 milli seconds
DWORD start, now;
start = GetTickCount();
do
{
now = GetTickCount();
if ((now - start) > dwTimeOut )
{
strcpy (m_szLastError, "Timed Out");
return 0;
}
WriteFile(m_hDevice, szBuf, 1, &dwBytesWritten, NULL);
}
while (dwBytesWritten == 0);
OutputDebugString(TEXT(strcat(szBuf, "\r\n")));
return dwBytesWritten;
}
int CPort::WriteChars(char * psz, int n)
{
DWORD dwBytesWritten;
WriteFile(m_hDevice, psz, n, &dwBytesWritten, NULL);
return dwBytesWritten;
}
// Return number of bytes in RX queue
DWORD CPort::BytesInQue ()
{
COMSTAT ComStat ;
DWORD dwErrorFlags;
DWORD dwLength;
// check number of bytes in queue
ClearCommError(m_hDevice, &dwErrorFlags, &ComStat ) ;
dwLength = ComStat.cbInQue;
return dwLength;
}
DWORD CPort::BytesInOutQue ()
{
COMSTAT ComStat ;
DWORD dwErrorFlags;
DWORD dwLength;
// check number of bytes in queue
ClearCommError(m_hDevice, &dwErrorFlags, &ComStat );
dwLength = ComStat.cbOutQue ;
return dwLength;
}
int CPort::ReadChars (char* szBuf, int nMaxChars)
{
if (BytesInQue () == 0)
return 0;
DWORD dwBytesRead;
ReadFile(m_hDevice, szBuf, nMaxChars, &dwBytesRead, NULL);
return (dwBytesRead);
}
// Read a one-byte value (char) from the serial port.
int CPort::ReadChar (char& c)
{
static char szBuf[2];
szBuf[0] = '\0';
szBuf[1] = '\0';
if (BytesInQue () == 0)
return 0;
DWORD dwBytesRead;
ReadFile(m_hDevice, szBuf, 1, &dwBytesRead, NULL);
c = *szBuf;
if (dwBytesRead == 0)
return 0;
return dwBytesRead;
}
BOOL CPort::ReadString (char *szStrBuf , int nMaxLength)
{
char str [256];
char str2 [256];
DWORD dwTimeOut = m_nTimeOut;
DWORD start, now;
int nBytesRead;
int nTotalBytesRead = 0;
char c = ' ';
static char szCharBuf [2];
szCharBuf [0]= '\0';
szCharBuf [1]= '\0';
szStrBuf [0] = '\0';
start = GetTickCount();
while (c != m_chTerminator)
{
nBytesRead = ReadChar (c);
nTotalBytesRead += nBytesRead;
if (nBytesRead == 1 && c != '\r' && c != '\n')
{
*szCharBuf = c;
strncat (szStrBuf,szCharBuf,1);
if (strlen (szStrBuf) == nMaxLength)
return TRUE;
// restart timer for next char
start = GetTickCount();
}
// check for time out
now = GetTickCount();
if ((now - start) > dwTimeOut )
{
strcpy (m_szLastError, "Timed Out");
return FALSE;
}
}
return TRUE;
}
int CPort::WaitForQueToFill (int nBytesToWaitFor)
{
DWORD start = GetTickCount();
do
{
if (BytesInQue () >= nBytesToWaitFor)
break;
if (GetTickCount() - start > m_nTimeOut)
return 0;
} while (1);
return BytesInQue ();
}
int CPort::BlockRead (char * pcInputBuffer, int nBytesToRead)
{
int nBytesRead = 0;
int charactersRead;
while (nBytesToRead >= m_nBlockSizeMax)
{
if (WaitForQueToFill (m_nBlockSizeMax) < m_nBlockSizeMax)
return nBytesRead;
charactersRead = ReadChars (pcInputBuffer, m_nBlockSizeMax);
pcInputBuffer += charactersRead;
nBytesRead += charactersRead;
nBytesToRead -= charactersRead;
}
if (nBytesToRead > 0)
{
if (WaitForQueToFill (nBytesToRead) < nBytesToRead)
return nBytesRead;
charactersRead = ReadChars (pcInputBuffer, nBytesToRead);
nBytesRead += charactersRead;
nBytesToRead -= charactersRead;
}
return nBytesRead;
}
Based on my testing and reading, I see several suspicious things in this code:
COMMTIMEOUTS is never set. MS docs say "Unpredictable results can occur if you fail to set the time-out values". But I tried setting this, and it didn't help.
Many methods (e.g. ReadString) will go into a tight loop and hammer the port with repeated reads if they don't get data immediately . This seems to explain the high CPU usage.
Many methods have their own timeout handling, using GetTickCount(). Isn't that what COMMTIMEOUTS is for?
In the new C# (WinForms) program, all these serial routines are called directly from the main thread, from a MultiMediaTimer event. Maybe should be run in a different thread?
BytesInQue method seems to be a bottleneck. If I break to debugger when CPU usage is high, that's usually where the program stops. Also, adding a Sleep(21) to this method before calling ClearCommError seems to resolve the XP problem, but exacerbates the CPU usage problem.
Code just seems unnecessarily complicated.
My Questions
Can anyone explain why this only works with a C# program on a small number of XP systems?
Any suggestions on how to rewrite this? Pointers to good sample code would be most welcome.
There are some serious problems with that class and it makes things even worse that there is a Microsoft copyright on it.
There is nothing special about this class. And it makes me wonder why it even exists except as an Adapter over Create/Read/WriteFile. You wouldnt even need this class if you used the SerialPort class in the .NET Framework.
Your CPU usage is because the code goes into an infinite loop while waiting for the device to have enough available data. The code might as well say while(1); If you must stick with Win32 and C++ you can look into Completion Ports and setting the OVERLAPPED flag when invoking CreateFile. This way you can wait for data in a separate worker thread.
You need to be careful when communicating to multiple COM ports. It has been a long time since I've done C++ but I believe the static buffer szBuff in the Read and Write methods is static for ALL instances of that class. It means if you invoke Read against two different COM ports "at the same time" you will have unexpected results.
As for the problems on some of the XP machines, you will most certainly figure out the problem if you check GetLastError after each Read/Write and log the results. It should be checking GetLastError anyways as it sometimes isn't always an "error" but a request from the subsystem to do something else in order to get the result you want.
You can get rid of the the whole while loop for blocking if you set COMMTIMEOUTS correctly. If there is a specific timeout for a Read operation use SetCommTimeouts before you perform the read.
I set ReadIntervalTimeout to the max timeout to ensure that the Read won't return quicker than m_nTimeOut. This value will cause Read to return if the time elapses between any two bytes. If it was set to 2 milliseconds and the first byte came in at t, and the second came in at t+1, the third at t+4, ReadFile would of only returned the first two bytes since the interval between the bytes was surpassed. ReadTotalTimeoutConstant ensures that you will never wait longer than m_nTimeOut no matter what.
maxWait = BytesToRead * ReadTotalTimeoutMultiplier + ReadTotalTimeoutConstant. Thus (BytesToRead * 0) + m_nTimeout = m_nTimeout
BOOL CPort::SetupConnection(void)
{
// Snip...
COMMTIMEOUTS comTimeOut;
comTimeOut.ReadIntervalTimeout = m_nTimeOut; // Ensure's we wait the max timeout
comTimeOut.ReadTotalTimeoutMultiplier = 0;
comTimeOut.ReadTotalTimeoutConstant = m_nTimeOut;
comTimeOut.WriteTotalTimeoutMultiplier = 0;
comTimeOut.WriteTotalTimeoutConstant = m_nTimeOut;
SetCommTimeouts(m_hDevice,&comTimeOut);
}
// If return value != nBytesToRead check check GetLastError()
// Most likely Read timed out.
int CPort::BlockRead (char * pcInputBuffer, int nBytesToRead)
{
DWORD dwBytesRead;
if (FALSE == ReadFile(
m_hDevice,
pcInputBuffer,
nBytesToRead,
&dwBytesRead,
NULL))
{
// Check GetLastError
return dwBytesRead;
}
return dwBytesRead;
}
I have no idea if this is completely correct but it should give you an idea. Remove the ReadChar and ReadString methods and use this if your program relies on things being synchronous. Be careful about setting high time outs also. Communications are fast, in the milliseconds.
Here's a terminal program I wrote years ago (probably at least 15 years ago, now that I think about it). I just did a quick check, and under Windows 7 x64, it still seems to work reasonably well -- connects to my GPS, read, and displays the data coming from it.
If you look at the code, you can see that I didn't spend much time selecting the comm timeout values. I set them all to 1, intending to experiment with longer timeouts until the CPU usage was tolerable. To make a long story short, it uses so little CPU time I've never bothered. For example, on the Task Manager's CPU usage graph, I can't see any difference between it running and not. I've left it running collecting data from the GPS for a few hours at a time, and the Task Manager still says its total CPU usage is 0:00:00.
Bottom line: I'm pretty sure it could be more efficient -- but sometimes good enough is good enough. Given how heavily I don't use it any more, and the chances of ever adding anything like file transfer protocols, making it more efficient probably won't ever get to the top of the pile of things to do.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <conio.h>
#include <string.h>
#define STRICT
#define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN
#include <windows.h>
void system_error(char *name) {
// Retrieve, format, and print out a message from the last error. The
// `name' that's passed should be in the form of a present tense noun
// (phrase) such as "opening file".
//
char *ptr = NULL;
FormatMessage(
FORMAT_MESSAGE_ALLOCATE_BUFFER |
FORMAT_MESSAGE_FROM_SYSTEM,
0,
GetLastError(),
0,
(char *)&ptr,
1024,
NULL);
fprintf(stderr, "\nError %s: %s\n", name, ptr);
LocalFree(ptr);
}
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
int ch;
char buffer[64];
HANDLE file;
COMMTIMEOUTS timeouts;
DWORD read, written;
DCB port;
HANDLE keyboard = GetStdHandle(STD_INPUT_HANDLE);
HANDLE screen = GetStdHandle(STD_OUTPUT_HANDLE);
DWORD mode;
char port_name[128] = "\\\\.\\COM3";
char init[] = "";
if ( argc > 2 )
sprintf(port_name, "\\\\.\\COM%s", argv[1]);
// open the comm port.
file = CreateFile(port_name,
GENERIC_READ | GENERIC_WRITE,
0,
NULL,
OPEN_EXISTING,
0,
NULL);
if ( INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE == file) {
system_error("opening file");
return 1;
}
// get the current DCB, and adjust a few bits to our liking.
memset(&port, 0, sizeof(port));
port.DCBlength = sizeof(port);
if (!GetCommState(file, &port))
system_error("getting comm state");
if (!BuildCommDCB("baud=19200 parity=n data=8 stop=1", &port))
system_error("building comm DCB");
if (!SetCommState(file, &port))
system_error("adjusting port settings");
// set short timeouts on the comm port.
timeouts.ReadIntervalTimeout = 1;
timeouts.ReadTotalTimeoutMultiplier = 1;
timeouts.ReadTotalTimeoutConstant = 1;
timeouts.WriteTotalTimeoutMultiplier = 1;
timeouts.WriteTotalTimeoutConstant = 1;
if (!SetCommTimeouts(file, &timeouts))
system_error("setting port time-outs.");
// set keyboard to raw reading.
if (!GetConsoleMode(keyboard, &mode))
system_error("getting keyboard mode");
mode &= ~ ENABLE_PROCESSED_INPUT;
if (!SetConsoleMode(keyboard, mode))
system_error("setting keyboard mode");
if (!EscapeCommFunction(file, CLRDTR))
system_error("clearing DTR");
Sleep(200);
if (!EscapeCommFunction(file, SETDTR))
system_error("setting DTR");
if (!WriteFile(file, init, sizeof(init), &written, NULL))
system_error("writing data to port");
if (written != sizeof(init))
system_error("not all data written to port");
// basic terminal loop:
do {
// check for data on port and display it on screen.
ReadFile(file, buffer, sizeof(buffer), &read, NULL);
if (read)
WriteFile(screen, buffer, read, &written, NULL);
// check for keypress, and write any out the port.
if ( kbhit() ) {
ch = getch();
WriteFile(file, &ch, 1, &written, NULL);
}
// until user hits ctrl-backspace.
} while ( ch != 127);
// close up and go home.
CloseHandle(keyboard);
CloseHandle(file);
return 0;
}
I would add
Sleep(2);
to the while loop in CPort::WaitForQueToFill()
This will give the OS a chance to actually place some bytes in the queue.
I have a part of the project that is intended to re-read some portion of a file in a loop (prepended with the pointer movement to the beginning of the file). By start, the code opens the file and writes there the 'minimal data' correctly, but the further read (on the same file handle(!)) fails with error code 2 ('File not found').
Here the part of code related to the process:
virtual-mem-buffer.h:
/**
* Allocates and manages page-aligned virtual memory of the given amount
*/
class VirtualMemBuffer {
public:
explicit VirtualMemBuffer(size_t size) { /* skipped */ };
/* skipped */
protected:
void * data;
public:
const void * buff() const { return this->data; };
};
header-file.h:
static const size_t cFileSize = 4096;
typedef std::map<std::wstring, HANDLE> handlers_conrainer_type;
typedef std::pair<std::wstring, bool> item_type;
class Config {
public:
typedef std::vector<item_type > container_type;
container_type files;
/* skipped */
};
code-file.cpp (inside some function):
VirtualMemBuffer buffer(cFileSize);
Config config(...);
config->files.push_back(item_type(L"C:\\lock-file.lock", true));
/* skipped */
for (Config::container_type::const_iterator it = config->files.begin();
it != config->files.end();
++it)
{
HANDLE hFile = CreateFile(
(LPCWSTR)(it->first.c_str()),
GENERIC_READ | GENERIC_WRITE,
0,
NULL,
OPEN_ALWAYS,
FILE_ATTRIBUTE_NORMAL,
NULL);
if (hFile == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE) {
DWORD error = GetLastError();
// Could not open the file, ignore it
continue;
} else {
DWORD bytes_written = 0;
BOOL write_ok = WriteFile(
hFile,
buffer.buff(),
cFileSize,
&bytes_written,
NULL);
if (!write_ok || (bytes_written != (DWORD)(cFileSize))) {
// Could not initialize the file, skip the file
CloseHandle(hFile);
continue;
};
handlers_container.insert(
std::pair<std::wstring, HANDLE>(it->first, hFile)
);
};
};
/* skipped */
for (handlers_conrainer_type::const_iterator it = handlers_container.begin();
it != handlers_container.end();
++it)
{
DWORD bytes_read = 0;
LARGE_INTEGER li;
li.HighPart = 0;
li.LowPart = 0;
BOOL move_ok = SetFilePointerEx(it->second, li, NULL, FILE_BEGIN);
BOOL read_ok = ReadFile(
it->second,
buffer.buff(),
cFileSize,
&bytes_read,
NULL);
if (!read_ok || (bytes_read != cFileSize)) {
DWORD error = GetLastError(); // error == 2 :-(
/* skipped */
};
};
As you can see, SetFilePointerEx() and ReadFile() both operate on the same file handle. The first one (and CreateFile(), WriteFile() ) never failed, but ReadFile() never succeded.
Did anybody observe such a behavior or at least have any clue on this? What is wrong and how can it be fixed (or avoided)?
The code compiled on Windows XP SP3 using MS Visual C++ 2008 Express Edition
Thank you for your time and advices!
I have found the root of the problem - the error code for the ReadFile() fail was tested in MS VC++ debugger where (and when) the variable was actually out of the (block) scope and thus flooded with garbage. The value 2 was just a compiler preference for such condition.
I have just noticed that and added some further error checking and code around that, and found that the real error code is 998 ('Invalid access to memory location') which itself came from the VirtualMemBuffer class where VirtualAlloc() was called with PAGE_READONLY flag :-(.
So, it was my fault, sorry.
Thanks to everyone who spent time trying to help me with this problem.
Try FlushFileBuffers(handle) to commit the writes to disk before you try and read them