Given an XML document, I'd like to be able to pick out individual key/value pairsfrom a particular tag:
<aaa>key0:val0 key1:val1 key2:va2</aaa>
I'd like to get back
key0:val0
key1:val1
key2:val2
So far I have
(?<=<aaa>).*(?=<\/aaa>)
Which will match everything inside, but as one result.
I also have
[^\s][\w]*:[\w]*[^\s] which will also match correctly in groups on this:
key0:val0 key1:val1 key2:va2
But not with the tags. I believe this is an issue with searching for subgroups and I'm not sure how to get around it.
Thanks!
You cannot combine the two expressions in the way you want, because you have to match each occurrence of "key:value".
So in what you came up with - (?<=<abc>)([\w]*:[\w]*[\s]*)+(?=<\/abc>) - there are two matching groups. The bigger one matches everything inside the tags, while the other matches a single "key:value" occurrence. The regex engine cannot give each individual occurence because it does not work that way. So it just gives you the last one.
If you think in python, on the matcher object obtained after applying you regex, you will have access to matcher.group(1) and matcher.group(2), because you have two matching ( ) groups in the regex.
But what you want is the n occurences of "key:value". So it's easier to just run the simpler \w+:\w+ regex on the string inside the tags.
I uploaded this one at parsemarket, and I'm not sure its what you are looking for, but maybe something like this:
(<aaa>)((\w+:\w+\s)*(\w+:\w+)*)(<\/aaa>)
AFAIK, unless you know how many k:v pairs are in the tags, you can't capture all of them in one regex. So, if there are only three, you could do something like this:
<(?:aaa)>(\w+:\w+\s*)+(\w+:\w+\s*)+(\w+:\w+\s*)+<(?:\/aaa)>
But I would think you would want to do some sort of loop with whatever language you are using. Or, as some of the comments suggest, use the parser classes in the language. I've used BeautifulSoup in Python for HTML.
Related
As you know, Google links can be pretty unwieldy:
https://www.google.com/search?q=some+search+here&source=hp&newwindow=1&ei=A_23ssOllsUx&oq=some+se....
I have MANY Google links saved that I would like to clean up to make them look like so:
https://www.google.com/search?q=some+search+here
The only issue is that I cannot figure out the correct regex pattern for Vim to do this.
I figure it must be something like this:
:%s/&source=[^&].*//
:%s/&source=[^&].*[^&]//
:%s/&source=.*[^&]//
But none of these are working; they start at &source, and replace until the end of the line.
Also, the search?q=some+search+here can appear anywhere after the .com/, so I cannot rely on it being in the same place every time.
So, what is the correct Vim regex pattern to use in order to clean up these links?
Your example can easily be dealt with by using a very simple pattern:
:%s/&.*
because you want to keep everything that comes before the second parameter, which is marked by the first & in the string.
But, if the q parameter can be anywhere in the query string, as in:
https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&newwindow=1&q=some+search+here&ei=A_23ssOllsUx&oq=some+se....
then no amount of capturing or whatnot will be enough to cover every possible case with a single pattern, let alone a readable one. At this point, scripting is really the only reasonable approach, preferably with a language that understands URLs.
--- EDIT ---
Hmm, scratch that. The following seems to work across the board:
:%s#^\(https://www.google.com/search?\)\(.*\)\(q=.\{-}\)&.*#\1\3
We use # as separator because of the many / in a typical URL.
We capture a first group, up to and including the ? that marks the beginning of the query string.
We match whatever comes between the ? and the first occurrence of q= without capturing it.
We capture a second group, the q parameter, up to and excluding the next &.
We replace the whole thing with the first capture group followed by the second capture group.
I searched the web up and down couldn't find anything that would be a working solution.
Let's say I have multiple occurrence of <u></u><font color="green"></font><i></i><div></div><big></big>
like this:
<u></u><font color="green"></font><i></i><div></div><big></big><u></u><font color="green"></font><i></i><div></div><big></big><u></u><font color="green"></font><i></i><div></div><big></big><u></u><font color="green"></font><i></i><div></div><big></big><u></u><font color="green"></font><i></i><div></div><big></big>
I want it to be reduced to just one occurrence: <u></u><font color="green"></font><i></i><div></div><big></big>
The tags are not always the same. Basically I want multiple occurrences of tags that repeat again and again with no words between them to be reduced to just one occurrence. Hope it makes sense.
I'm not entirely sure what you're after. This is a bit of a hack, but it might get you started.
Use (<.*>)\1+ as your search string, then replace with $1. You may need to run that a couple times.
I'm searching some xml and my tool is regex. (my only tools in this case are editors so I"m using either eclipse or notepad++). I need to find all elements which contain attributes that have values containing two periods not adjacent.
so it would find attr1 and attr3 in this:
<myelement attr1 = "ab.cd.ef", attr2="ab", attr3="zy.sa.xa"/>
I've tried this and variations in notepad++
^(([^\"\.])*(\")[^\"\.]*[\.][^\"\.]*[\.][^\"\.]*[\"])+$
but it isn't picking up second attributes with values containing two periods.
I'm going to keep trying but if someone can point me to an answer I'd appreciate it.
I think you can't do this with regex.
Unless you create a monster regex that will create a blackhole swallowing all the life in the Earth (politely saying of course).
Bear in mind that you don't have logic in regex you just use pattern matching, for instance a number is just a number you can't say if I get 1 then get 3 also in a simple way.
You can use if then else in regex like:
(?(?=condition)(then1|then2|then3)|(else1|else2|else3))
But what you want to do is to nest if conditions with multiple conditions for each case, like if 1 then 3 | if 2 then 4 | if 3 then 5 creating an enormous pattern nested.
Another regex approach would be to have multiple regex lookarounds (look ahead in this case) what will do your regex impossible to read.
I think you might find more useful a Xpath or Xquery expressions for this. That it's a better approach to match xml than regex.
I'm searching some xml and my tool is regex.
That's a bit like saying that you are cutting down trees and your tool is a screwdriver. Get the right tool for the job: an XML parser and an XPath engine.
Hi I have a Stylesheet where i use xsl:analyze-string with the following regex:
(&journal_abbrevs;)[\s ]*([0-9]{{4}})[,][\s ][S]?[\.]?[\s ]?([0-9]{{1,4}})([\s ][(][0-9]{{1,4}}[)])?
You don't need to look at the whole thing :)
&journal_abbrevs; looks like this:
"example-String1|example-String2|example-String3|..."
What I need to do know is exclude one of the strings in &journal_abbrevs; from this regex. E.g. I don't want example-String1 to be matched.
Any ideas on how to do that ?
It seems XSLT regex does not support look-around. So I don't think you'll be able to get a solution for this that does not involve writing out all strings from journal_abbrevs in your regex. Related question.
To minimize the amount of writing out, you could split journal_abbrevs into say journal_abbrevs1, journal_abbrevs2 and journal_abbrevs3 (or how many you decide to use) and only write out whichever one that contains the string you wish to exclude. If journal_abbrevs1 contains the string, you'd then end up with something like:
((&journal_abbrevs2;)|(&journal_abbrevs3;)|example-String2|example-String3|...)...
If it supported look-around, you could've used a very simple:
(?!example-String1)(&journal_abbrevs;)...
Hopefully someone can help me out. Been all over google now.
I'm doing some zone-ocr of documents, and want to extract some text with regex. It is always like this:
"Til: Name Name Name org.nr 12323123".
I want to extract the name-part, it can be 1-4 names, but "Til:" and "org.nr" is always before and after.
Anyone?
If you can't use capturing groups (check your documentation) you can try this:
(?<=Til:).*?(?=org\.nr)
This solution is using look behind and lookahead assertions, but those are not supported from every regex flavour. If they are working, this regex will return only the part you want, because the parts in the assertions are not matched, it checks only if the patterns in the assertions are there.
Use the pattern:
Til:(.*)org\.nr
Then take the second group to get the content between the parenthesis.