How can I redirect execution errors of a c++ executable in bash? I've found that 2> helps while trying identify compilation errors:
g++ example.cpp 2> compErr.txt
But running the executable with that command still sends the errors to stdout:
$ ./a.out 2> e.txt
Floating point exception (core dumped)
Actually, the error "Floating point exception (core dumped)" does not come from the executable but from the shell! The messages from bash won't be suppressed by output redirection but there is a flag to enable/disable these messages.
You can install signal handlers for some of the errors which would cause the program to exit and write something to a suitable destination there. Some signals can't be intercepted and some other are hard to handle. That's the approach you can do from inside your code.
If you want to go further you could fork() your program first thing and have the actual work done in the child process. The parent process would essentially just waitpid() for the child process and use the information in the result structure received to report errors to a file.
I found something that worked in my terminal, here: http://bytes.com/topic/c/answers/822874-runtime-error-stderr-gcc-ubuntu-bash
In summary, a participant explained:
In this particular case, the reason that the string "Floating point exception" is not >redirected is that it is not produced by the process that runs ./{file} or anything that it invokes. Instead,it is being produced by the command-interpreter itself.
You can see this by telling the command interpreter to run another command interpreter, redirecting this sub-interpreter's error output. However, a bit of a >trick is required:
$ bash -c './{file}; true' >out 2>err
$ cat out
$ cat err
bash: line 1: 28106 Floating point exception./test_fail
Related
This is the Clang version of:
Make gdb quit automatically on successful termination?
How to have gdb exit if program succeeds, break if program crashes?
Running my application many times, programmatically, over a large number of possible inputs, I've occasionally encountered a segmentation fault.
I'd like each test invocation to be run under lldb so that I can get a backtrace for further debugging. If an invocation exits without a crash, I'd like lldb to automatically quit so that the test harness progresses to the next iteration. This way I can set the whole thing off over lunchtime and only have the suite interrupted when something crashes.
Bonus points for having lldb auto-quit in all cases, but first print a backtrace if the program crashed.
I'm currently able to automate at least the initial run command:
lldb -o run -f $CMD -- $ARGS
I'm having difficulty finding an online command reference but it looks like the -batch command line option will get you the basic "exit on success/prompt on fail" behaviour.
For a backtrace and auto-quit on failure I think you need the --source-on-crash option...
-K <filename>
--source-on-crash <filename>
When in batch mode, tells the debugger to source this file of lldb
commands if the target crashes.
So, create the command file with something like...
echo -e 'bt\nquit' > lldb.batch
and then invoke as...
lldb --batch -K lldb.batch -o run -f $CMD -- $ARGS
Why is gdb showing that the program exited during its startup, so before to stop at the first breakpoint in the main function ?
Some steps:
$ gdb --cd $programhome -tui -tty $reservedtty --args myprogram
b main
r
gdb shows:
Starting program: myprogram
During startup program exited with code 1.
I already tried to break at exit() function, without success.
Why is gdb exiting before to stop at the first breakpoint in the main function
GDB is not exiting. Your program does.
It does exit before reaching main.
This can happen for a few reasons, such as:
Corrupt binary -- the kernel rejects it in execve system call for some reason and not a single instruction of the program actually runs.
The dynamic linker rejects it (e.g. because some required library or symbol is missing)
Your shell refuses to execute the program (bad ~/.bashrc, bad $PATH, etc).
You can narrow down the actual cause by running the program outside GDB (does it run?), running without ~/.bashrc, using (gdb) catch syscall exit_group (on Linux), etc.
There was a permission issue accessing the secondary terminal port.
The gdb is being started with the parameter -tty which switches the input/output to another tty port (in that case pseudo: pts).
When the two terminals are opened by different users, that problem occurs, even if after the first logon you change the user with su command, the first user logged needed to be the same among the two ttys.
I am using Codeblocks for the first time to run a cpp program. While compling the program an error occurs, I want to know the line number from the program where the error is evoking or in other words I want to see the stack trace of the program.
How can achieve this?
You can also use gdb. To debug, compile with g++ and -g at the end of the command and then run your program with gdb (in linux, gdb ./NameOfYourProgram). Then, you type r to run it, and when an error occurs, just type where and you get the stack. You can also set breakpoints and perform steps with gdb to examine the bug further.
Is there any gcc option I can set that will give me the line number of the segmentation fault?
I know I can:
Debug line by line
Put printfs in the code to narrow down.
Edits:
bt / where on gdb give No stack.
Helpful suggestion
I don't know of a gcc option, but you should be able to run the application with gdb and then when it crashes, type where to take a look at the stack when it exited, which should get you close.
$ gdb blah
(gdb) run
(gdb) where
Edit for completeness:
You should also make sure to build the application with debug flags on using the -g gcc option to include line numbers in the executable.
Another option is to use the bt (backtrace) command.
Here's a complete shell/gdb session
$ gcc -ggdb myproj.c
$ gdb a.out
gdb> run --some-option=foo --other-option=bar
(gdb will say your program hit a segfault)
gdb> bt
(gdb prints a stack trace)
gdb> q
[are you sure, your program is still running]? y
$ emacs myproj.c # heh, I know what the error is now...
Happy hacking :-)
You can get gcc to print you a stacktrace when your program gets a SEGV signal, similar to how Java and other friendlier languages handle null pointer exceptions. See my answer here for more details:
how to generate a stacktace when my C++ app crashes ( using gcc compiler )
The nice thing about this is you can just leave it in your code; you don't need to run things through gdb to get the nice debug output.
If you compile with -g and follow the instructions there, you can use a command-line tool like addr2line to get file/line information from the output.
Run it under valgrind.
you also need to build with debug flags on -g
You can also open the core dump with gdb (you need -g though).
If all the preceding suggestions to compile with debugging (-g) and run under a debugger (gdb, run, bt) are not working for you, then:
Elementary: Maybe you're not running under the debugger, you're just trying to analyze the postmortem core dump. (If you start a debug session, but don't run the program, or if it exits, then when you ask for a backtrace, gdb will say "No stack" -- because there's no running program at all. Don't forget to type "run".) If it segfaulted, don't forget to add the third argument (core) when you run gdb, otherwise you start in the same state, not attached to any particular process or memory image.
Difficult: If your program is/was really running but your gdb is saying "No stack" perhaps your stack pointer is badly smashed. In which case, you may be a buffer overflow problem somewhere, severe enough to mash your runtime state entirely. GCC 4.1 supports the ProPolice "Stack Smashing Protector" that is enabled with -fstack-protector-all. It can be added to GCC 3.x with a patch.
There is no method for GCC to provide this information, you'll have to rely on an external program like GDB.
GDB can give you the line where a crash occurred with the "bt" (short for "backtrace") command after the program has seg faulted. This will give you not only the line of the crash, but the whole stack of the program (so you can see what called the function where the crash happened).
The No stack problem seems to happen when the program exit successfully.
For the record, I had this problem because I had forgotten a return in my code, which made my program exit with failure code.
So I know that logging compilation errors can be done as follows in the terminal
gcc -o objectname filename.c 2>'compilation_error_log.txt'
I get some memory error while executing the code and want to log that as well. I tried the same approach
./objectname 2>'Execution_error_log.txt'
but it's not working. Can someone tell me where the memory errors get stored so I can log them?
My error and output looks somewhat like this
./objectname arg
Expected Output.
*** Error in `./objectname': double free or corruption (!prev): 0x089d1008 ***
Aborted (core dumped)
I wanna log the expected output and the error messages
By default glibc error messaging is being written to /dev/tty, which isn't redirected to anywhere.
You can request messages in stderr by setting environment variable LIBC_FATAL_STDERR_ to 1. After that, you can 2> log.file.
Default behaviour is safe workaround when your application already closed stderr (or file descriptor 2), and fatal error happened after that.
Executing ./objectname arg 1 > compilation_error_log.txt 2>&1 in ash should work. Basically you have to provide the redirection to a file and then redirect the error stream to the stdin file descriptor.