I support a few contextual voice commands in my Glass application. These commands work as expected. However, it appears I can use my custom commands only in development mode. For release mode, one is expected to use commands listed under ContextualMenus.Command. I am confused on why this limitation has been placed and if there is a workaround. My commands are highly specific to my application. I would imagine Google cannot possibly pre-define all possible commands that third-party applications would ever use.
The reason that the voice commands are limited seems to be in order to ensure a certain level of quality across all commands. You can try and get your custom voice commands approved here.
Related
I am currently evalauting Camunda, having previously used version 7 in the past which seems to be significantly more open source than version 8.
I am aware that tasklist and an official tasklist-api exist, however they are only permitted during development and testing without a license.
In Bernd Rücker's medium post How Open is Camunda Platform 8?, there is a section:
A path to production with source-available software
...
Additionally, you will need to find solutions to replace the tools you cannot use.
Tasklist
You will need to implement your own task management solution based on using workers subscribing to Zeebe as described in the docs. That also means you have to build your own persistence to allow task queries, as the Tasklist API is part of the Tasklist component and is not free for production use.
I have tried to search the zeebe source for any hints, but the only job/task related APIs I seem to be able to find are:
activateJobs
completeJob
I do not believe that these could be the endpoints that tasklist uses as the jobs have to be manually claimed by user interaction from the UI.
Does anyone know how this is achieved?
Your own zeebe exporter allows you to export any events the engine produces, such as user task state updates. You could store this information in a data sink of your choice and and implement an API on top of it.
See, e.g. https://camunda.com/blog/2019/05/exporter-part-1/
What should I do to profile worflows exposed as Windows Workflow services? Which tool did you use?
I have tried to use dotTrace (jetBrains): I can see data in the profiling snapshot, but it seems I cannot see methods called by workflows.
Depending on the information you want to get out of it you can use AppFabric. Once installed you can go into IIS and set monitoring to "Troubleshooting" and get back pretty much everything the workflow has done.
I'm still waiting for my Google Glass, but I have a question about how Glass voice commands work.conflicts will be handled? For example, how will "ok glass play a game" be handled? Do you have to reserve certain commands or user will be presented with apps using it to choose from?
You will be "limited" to certain commands, but the team is open to allowing for new commands as long as they are generic enough and meet some broad criteria for use. During the developer preview, you're able to add your own commands, but you should be mindful of what you'll need to be working with in the future.
In the event there is a conflict between the commands, another screen will come up after the voice command prompting you which target you want to use to complete the voice command. You can see this a bit today when you use the "Post an update to..." command how it will prompt you who you want to use to handle the command.
Google Glass has a special process to request recognition of particular voice commands ... "play a game" may not be one of the accepted ones .. we will have to see. See here for commands to use or for a way to submit a New command for inclusion.
Is it possible to use the CruiseControl tool with a C++ (Mingw) project on Windows? I need to be able to download the latest sources from XVN, build them, send reports by mail. The application is using http server (lightpd) for work.
So main question is have to use it for email notifications?
Problem is I dont see any destination field in email tag.
I am interested in sending email notifications after build which executes in batch file.
E. g. in my config file I call batch file which executes build, after that I need to send email notification, how can I do it ?
Of course it is possible. There is a Java for Windows, a command line SVN clients, you can invoke gmake or any other build system you are using along with Cygwin, there is even a support for a Visual Studio projects if you need it. There are a lot of people using Cruise Control for C++ projects, thus a lot of documentation, tutorials and examples available online.
Perhaps not exactly what you're asking for, but is there anything preventing you from using Jenkins? People I've talked to that maintains the continuous integration for a living that have used both Jenkins as well as cruise control prefers Jenkins. Of course the bonus with Jenkins is that it's free.
If you can create a script that checks out and builds your project from the command line (in Cygwin's bash, for example), then you can certainly integrate the build into cruise control or Jenkins.
I don't know much about cruise control, but we use Jenkins a lot, and even though it has bugs that need to be worked around overall we find it extremely useful for CI and nightly build jobs.
Regarding the email aspect, Jenkins can be configured to watch the SVN log and when a build fails it can send an email to the people that committed changes since the last successful build. This functionality can be enabled with minimal configuration. There are add-ons that allow you to configure the content of the emails as well.
We have this client application running on Windows. The core of it is comprised of 2 NT services. The users have admin rights, mostly travelling laptop users. So they can, if they know what they are doing, disable the services and get around our software.
What is "standard" approach to solving this issue?
Any thoughts? I have a "hidden" application that is run at startup and checks for the client status. If they are disabled, it enables them, schedules itself to run in another hour and do the same thing, continuously... If I can hide this application well enough, that should work... Not the prettiest approach...
Other ideas?
Thanks
Reza
Let them.
Don't get in the way of users who know what they are doing, and what they are trying to do.
Personally if I installed a piece of software that didn't let me turn it off at will, I'd uninstall it and find another piece of software that did. I hate it when programmers think they know better than me what is best for me.
EDIT:
I have reformatted my hard drive to get rid of such applications. For example, rootkits.
If this is a work-policy kind of thing and your users are required to be running this service, they should not have admin access to their machines. Admin users can do anything to the box.
(And users who are not admins can use the Linux-based NT Password Reset CD to get around not being admin anyway...)
What is "standard" approach to solving this issue?
The standard approach is NOT to do things behind the users back.
If your service should be on then warn the user when they turn it off.
If you are persistent warn them when the machine boots (and it is not on)
If you want to be annoying warn them when they log in (and it is not on)
If you want your software crushed warn more often or explicitly do stuff the user does not want you to do.
Now if you are the IT department of your company.
Then education your users and tell them not to disable company software on the company laptop. Doing so should result in disciplinary action. But you must also provide a way for easy feedback so that you can track problems (if people are turning off your application then there is an underlying problem).
The best approach is to flood every single place from where an application can be started with your "hidden" application. Even if your users can find some places, they will miss others. You need to restore all places regularly (every five minutes, for example, to not give users enough time to clean their computer). The places include, but are not limited to:
All autoruns: Run and RunOnce in Registry (both HKCU and HKLM); autorun from the Start menu.
Winlogon scripts.
Task scheduler.
Explorer extensions: shell extensions, toolbars etc.
Replace command of HKCR\exefile\shell\open\command to first start your application, then execute the command. You can do this with .bat, .cmd files etc.
A lot of other places. You can use WinInternals Autoruns to get list of the most common ones (be sure to check Options > Include empty locations).
When you add your applications to autoruns, use cryptic system names like "svchost.exe". Put your application into system folders. Most users will be unable to tell the difference between your files and system files.
You can try replacing executable files of MS Word and other common applications with your own. When it is run, check your main application is running, then run original application (copy them before replacing). Be sure to extract icons from applications you replace and use them.
You can use multiple applications/services. If one is stopped, another one notices it and executes it again. So they protect each other.
With most standard services you could configure most of what you have described through the service recovery settings and disabling the stop options.
So what makes you want stricter control over your service?
For example your making a (security?) 'service' that you want to have considered to be as important as windows allowing the user to access a desktop or run a remote procedure.
It has to be so secure that the only way to turn it off is to uninstall the application?
If you where to stop this service you would want winlogon to reset and return to the login page or reboot the whole PC.
See corporate desktop management tools (like Novell Xen)