I have a web service that returns multiple values. The current format of response looks like this
<ns:return>
String....
</ns:return>
I have to have more meaningful responses that just 'return'. How can I do this with Axis 2.
I figured out the answer, You need to create an object and return the object as given below
return new workOrderResponse(workOrderId);
WorkOrderId object would need to have the required variables that needs to be returned along with the getters and setters
Related
How to verify response of below type which has dynamic value and need to be validated against test data in Examples section of scenario outline
Original response:(This is one of the key and value of the response, actual response has multiple key value. I am stuck at this point)
"NAVIGATION_KEY": "{"m_Schema":"Schema_DE_TEST","m_TableName":"PTR_DETAIL","m_KeyValues":[{"m_KeyName":"CTRY_CODE","m_KeyValue":"US"},{"m_KeyName":"CMP_CODE","m_KeyValue":"TEST"},{"m_KeyName":"PTNR_SEQ_NUM","m_KeyValue":"5648545"},{"m_KeyName":"TNS_ID","m_KeyValue":"845421"},{"m_KeyName":"TNS_TYPE","m_KeyValue":"SO"}]}",
Below is how i have parameterized, but it is not working. It is not replacing with the test data from Examples.
"NAVIGATION_KEY": "{"m_Schema":"Schema_DE_#(expectedOrg)","m_TableName":"PTR_DETAIL","m_KeyValues":[{"m_KeyName":"CTRY_CODE","m_KeyValue":"US"},{"m_KeyName":"CMP_CODE","m_KeyValue":"#(expectedOrg)"},{"m_KeyName":"PTNR_SEQ_NUM","m_KeyValue":"#notnull"},{"m_KeyName":"TNS_ID","m_KeyValue":"#notnull"},{"m_KeyName":"TNS_TYPE","m_KeyValue":"#(expectedType)"}]}",
I'm using Postman and wondering if I can use a stored JSON object to create variable for additional calls. For an example: I saved an array which include name and ID:
[{"id":28,"name":"Action"},{"id":12,"name":"Adventure"},
{"id":16,"name":"Animation"},{"id":35,"name":"Comedy"},
{"id":80,"name":"Crime"},{"id":99,"name":"Documentary"},
{"id":18,"name":"Drama"},{"id":10751,"name":"Family"},
{"id":14,"name":"Fantasy"},{"id":36,"name":"History"},
{"id":27,"name":"Horror"},{"id":10402,"name":"Music"},
{"id":9648,"name":"Mystery"},{"id":10749,"name":"Romance"},
{"id":878,"name":"Science Fiction"},{"id":10770,"name":"TV Movie"},
{"id":53,"name":"Thriller"},{"id":10752,"name":"War"},
{"id":37,"name":"Western"}]
I'm triggering another API (second call) that retrieves only IDs, so the response is like this: "genre_ids": [35, 10402]
Is there a way to create an environment variable that looks for the IDs, fetch the relevant name from the second API and create a name oriented variable so on the case above 35=comedy and 10402=music so the variable will be: comedy,music?
to save environment variable you can do the following (see the snippets on the right side of postman):
postman.setEnvironmentVariable("variable_key", "variable_value");
if you want to save a global variable just do :
postman.setGlobalVariable("variable_key", "variable_value");
and then use them as you want.
Alexandre
Definitely it's possible with "Tests"(or Post-Request) script.
But since you have 2 requests(and Postman force you there should be 2 separated requests) you should save response from first request into variable with setEnvironmentVariable or setGlobalVariable and after getting response for 2nd request - to parse response for first one and iterate over it, looking up by id given.
In a certain scenario, I want to pass a field value(in string format) to the CouchDB and get associated doc (or only its id) which contains that particular string value in one its fields. In case, if no doc contains that particular field value, I would like CouchDB design functions to automatically create one and return the newly created doc.
I can accomplish this by making a GET request followed by a PUT request if there is no doc with that particular field value. Is there any way to get this done with just one POST request?
Design document functions (other than updates) cannot modify the data in any way.
So no, this is not possible.
You can write a list function to return you a new document if the results are empty, but it cannot save it automatically.
I wanted to fetch the List of Entities from database at Front end.
So I have written POST REST HTTP call in Spring MVC.
But I read the HTTP documentation which says whenever you have to retrieve data from database prefer GET call.
So, Is it there is any I can replace the POST call to GET call from angular JS and pass list of Integers.
But, GET HTTP has many drawbacks like : the length of URL is limited.Considering the case where we have to fetch 1000 entities from database.
Please suggest me the possible way to get the entities or write GET REST API in Spring MVC for list of integers(refers to ID's of Entities).
For Example : Consider there are 100 books in book table, But I want only few books, say id : 5,65,42,10,53,87,34,23.
Thats why I am passing this List of Id's in a List of Integer in POST call.
Currently stuck how to convert this to GET call. In Short, how to pass List of Integers through GET REST call.
I prefer a variant through HTTP path variable for your problem, because of in REST ideology a resource ID is passed after a resource name 'http://../resource/id' and HTTP parameters are used for filtering.
Through HTTP parameters
If you need to pass your ids through HTTP parameters, see an axample below:
Here is your Spring MVC controller method:
#RequestMapping(value = "/books", params = "ids", method = RequestMethod.GET)
#ResponseBody
Object getBooksById_params(#RequestParam List<Integer> ids) {
return "ids=" + ids.toString();
}
And you can make a call using next variants:
http://server:port/ctx/books?ids=5,65,42
http://server:port/ctx/books?ids=5&ids=65&ids=42
Also take a look this discussion: https://stackoverflow.com/a/9547490/1881761
Through HTTP path variables
Also you can pass your ids through path variable, see an example below:
#RequestMapping(value = "/books/{ids}", method = RequestMethod.GET)
#ResponseBody
Object getBooksById_pathVariable(#PathVariable List<Integer> ids) {
return "ids=" + ids.toString();
}
And your call will be look like this: http://server:port/ctx/books/5,65,42
Pros of GET HTTP call : It is always used for retrieval of Data.(From this perspective : we should implemented for each and every and retrieval)
Through HTTP parameters
If you need to pass your ids through HTTP parameters, see an axample below:
Here is your Spring MVC controller method:
#RequestMapping(value = "/book", params = "ids", method = RequestMethod.GET)
#ResponseBody
Object getBooksById_params(#RequestParam List<Integer> ids) {
return "ids=" + ids.toString();
}
It works fine but for exceptional case : say URI is above 2048 characters. It means there are many Id's in the list(eg : 1000)
then its throws an exception :
return 414 (Request-URI Too Long)
which is http://www.checkupdown.com/status/E414.html
After some research MY UNDERSTANDING is : The HTTP protocol does not place any a priori limit on the lenght of a URI. Servers MUST be able to handle the URI of any resources they serve, and SHOULD be able to handle URIs of unbounded length if they provide GET-based forms that could generate such URIs. A server SHOULD return 414(Request_URI Too Long) status if a URI is longer than the server can handle.
I have also gone through sites like to get the GET URI length :
http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec3.html#sec3.2.1
So conclusion, is stick to POST call when there can be variable URI length at runtime for not getting such exception[return 414 (Request-URI Too Long)]
Alternatively, to allow for complex queries you'll need to give the query its own rest language. So to create a query you POST to /library/query then you edit it with things like POST /library/query/12345 with data {id:34} and then you execute the query with GET /library/books?query=12345
Simply you can call list like this:
***/users?id=1&id=2
If you want to read entities from your API you have to use a GET call.
The better way to get them all is to use a query params as filter.
REST DESIGN cannot retrieve more than one entity each time by id.
An example:
GET /library/books/58731 -> returns only one book identified by 58731
GET /library/books?numPages>70 returns all the books with more than 70 pages
I think that If you need to retrieve a lot of books because they have some logic that all matches, try to put it as a queryString.
Another example:
GET /library/books?stored>20150101 returns all the books added to library on 2015
If you give us more information about the collection and the requirements we will answer more directly.
I would like to do something like:
App.Model.find({unique_attribute_a: 'foo'}).objectAt(0).get('attribute_b')`
basically first finding a model by its unique attribute that is NOT its ID, then getting another attribute of that model. (objectAt(0) is used because find by attribute returns a RecordArray.)
The problem is App.Model.find({unique_attribute_a: 'foo'}).objectAt(0) is always undefined. I don't know why.
Please see the problem in the jsbin.
It looks like you want to use a filter rather than a find (or in this case a findQuery). Example here: http://jsbin.com/iwiruw/438
App.Model.find({ unique_attribute_a: 'foo' }) converts the query to an ajax query string:
/model?unique_attribute_a=foo
Ember data expects your server to return a filtered response. Ember Data then loads this response into an ImmutableArray and makes no assumption about what you were trying to find, it just knows the server returned something that matched your query and groups that result into a non-changable array (you can still modify the record, just not the array).
App.Model.filtler on the other hand just filters the local store based on your filter function. It does have one "magical" side affect where it will do App.Model.find behind the scenes if there are no models in the store although I am not sure if this is intended.
Typically I avoid filters as it can have some performance issues with large data sets and ember data. A filter must materialize every record which can be slow if you have thousands of records
Someone on irc gave me this answer. Then I modified it to make it work completely. Basically I should have used filtered.
App.Office.filter( function(e){return e.get('unique_attribute_a') == 'foo'}).objectAt(0)
Then I can get the attribute like:
App.Office.filter( function(e){return e.get('unique_attribute_a') == 'foo'}).objectAt(0).get('attribute_b')
See the code in jsbin.
Does anyone know WHY filter works but find doesn't? They both return RecordArrays.