I have a sample midterm question that I am not too sure about. Here it is:
#include <iostream.h>
void f( int i )
{
if( i = 4 || i = 5 ) return;
cout << "hello world\n" ;
}
int main()
{
f( 3 );
f( 4 );
f( 5 );
return 0;
}
So I understand that the logical OR operator has a higher precedence and that it is read left to right. I also understand that what's being used is an assignment operator instead of the relational operator. I just dont get how to make sense of it all. The first thing the compiler would check would be 4 || i? How is that evaluated and what happens after that?
Let's add all the implied parentheses (remembering that || has higher precedence than = and that = is right-associative):
i = ((4 || i) = 5)
So, it first evaluates 4 || i, which evaluates to true (actually, it even ignores i, since 4 is true and || short-circuits). It then tries to assign 5 to this, which errors out.
As written, the code doesn't compile, since operator precedence means it's i = ((4 || i) = 5) or something, and you can't assign to a temporary value like (4 || i).
If the operations are supposed to be assignment = rather than comparison == for some reason, and the assignment expressions are supposed to be the operands of ||, then you'd need parentheses
(i = 4) || (i = 5)
As you say, the result of i=4 is 4 (or, more exactly, an lvalue referring to i, which now has the value 4). That's used in a boolean context, so it's converted to bool by comparing it with zero: zero would become false, and any other value becomes true.
Since the first operand of || is true, the second isn't evaluated, and the overall result is true. So i is left with the value 4, then the function returns. The program won't print anything, whatever values you pass to the function.
It would make rather more sense using comparison operations
i == 4 || i == 5
meaning the function would only print something when the argument is neither 4 nor 5; so it would just print once in your example, for f(3).
Note that <iostream.h> hasn't been a standard header for decades. You're being taught an obsolete version of the language, using some extremely dubious code. You should get yourself a good book and stop wasting time on this course.
The compiler shall isuue an error because expression 4 || i is not a lvalue and may not be assigned.
As for the expression itself then the value of it is always equal to true because 4 is not equal to zero.
Related
I am currently learning from an SDL2/OpenGL2 example code, for ImGui. Then, I ran into a line (and a few more alike) as shown below. I believe this part binds SDL mouse events to IMGUI API. However, I do not quite understand how it works.
io.MouseDown[0] = g_MousePressed[0] || (mouseMask & SDL_BUTTON(SDL_BUTTON_LEFT)) != 0
where,
ImGuiIO& io = ImGui::GetIO();
bool mouseDown[5]; // a member of ImGuiIO struct
static bool g_MousePressed[3] = { false, false, false };
Uint32 mouseMask = SDL_GetMouseState(&mx, &my);
(I hope above is enough information...)
What makes me the most confused is the the last part, not equal to 0. I could understand it, if it was a simple assignment of the result of an And and an Or operations. However, there is not equal to zero following at the end and I have not seen this before. I would like to get some help to understand this code please.
expression != 0
is a boolean expression and thus evaluates to either true or false which can be converted to integer values of 0 or 1.
#include <iostream>
int main() {
constexpr size_t SDL_BUTTON = 5;
for (size_t mouseMask = 0; mouseMask < 16; ++mouseMask) {
std::cout << mouseMask << ' '
<< (mouseMask & SDL_BUTTON) << ' '
<< ((mouseMask & SDL_BUTTON) != 0) << '\n';
}
}
Live demo: http://ideone.com/jcmosg
Since || is the logical or operator, we are performing a logical comparison that tests whether io.MouseDown != 0 or (mouseMask & SDL_BUTTON(SDL_BUTTON_LEFT)) != 0 and yields a boolean value (true or false) promoted to whatever type io.mouseDown[0] is.
The code could actually have been written as:
io.MouseDown[0] = g_MousePressed[0] || (mouseMask & SDL_BUTTON(SDL_BUTTON_LEFT))
or
const bool wasPressed = g_mousePressed[0];
const bool newPress = mouseMask & SDL_BUTTON(SDL_BUTTON_LEFT);
const either = (wasPressed == true) || (newPress == true);
io.MouseDown[0] = either;
or
if (g_mousePressed[0])
io.MouseDown[0] = 1;
else if (mouseMask & SDL_BUTTON(SDL_BUTTON_LEFT))
io.MouseDown[0] = 1;
else
io.MouseDown[0] = 0;
See http://ideone.com/TAadn2
If you are intending to learn, find yourself a good sandbox (an empty project file or an online ide like ideone.com etc) and teach yourself to experiment with pieces of code you don't immediately understand.
An expression a = b || c!=0 means a = (b!=0) || (c!=0). In boolean logic, b and b!=0 are equivalent. That's what I think the most confusing part. Once this is understood, there should be no problem.
Note that this expression should not be confused with a=b|c!=0, where | is a binary operation called "bit-wise or", as opposed to the logical operation ||, which is the logical "or". When doing b|c!=0, c!=0 is calculated first to yield a logical value 0 or 1, then b|0 or b|1 is calculated to do nothing (first case) or reset the last bit of the binary code of b to 1 (second case). Finally, that result is assigned to a. In this case, b and b!=0 are not equivalent, because the bit-wise or | is used instead of the logical or ||.
Similarly, & is the "bit-wise and" operator, while && is the logical "and". These two should not be confused either.
Notice that != has a higher precedence than ||, so the whole expression is indeed a simple assignment of the result of an OR.
The !=0 part is a way to turn the result of applying a bitmask into bool, as #AlekDepler said. Funny thing is its pretty much redundant (if mouseMask is of built-in integral type) as implicit conversion from say int to bool works exactly like !=0.
How can I convert C code to C++? When I try my best, I failed every time.
Can anyone help me?
In particular, I'm trying to understand the following:
v=v%10?v%(5*r)*n--:v/10
I know if v == v mod 10,v%(5*r)*n--. if not, v/10. But I don't understand v%(5*r)*n--.
Here's the code in context:
long v=1,r=1e9;
main(n){
for(scanf("%d",&n);v=v%10?v%(5*r)*n--:v/10;n||printf("%d",v%r));
}
This C expression is also valid in C++. Expression v%(5*r)*n-- is equivalent to expression v % ((5*r)*(n--)) due to operator precedence rules. Postfix decrement operator --(it decreases a variable by one) will evaluate first, what remains is an expression of type A % B * C. Since operators % (remainder) and * (multiplication) are on the same precedence level, left to right associativity rule will be applied. Therefore, we have v % ((5*r)*(n--)). For more information check out these links:
http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/operator_precedence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operator_associativity
You also do no understand the ternary operator. In your case, the whole statement v=v%10?v%(5*r)*n--:v/10 means: if v%10 is true (different from zero) then assign result of v%(5*r)*n-- to variable v, otherwise assign result of v/10 to variable v. For more information check out
http://www.cprogramming.com/reference/operators/ternary-operator.html
Btw, please note that the person writing this blog produces some awful code. You probably do not want to learn from it.
Your definition for main is bad. C++ does not allow implicit typing for functions1, and main takes either zero or two arguments; it should be written as
int main( int argc, char **argv )
{
...
}
if the program takes any command line arguments2 and
int main( void )
{
...
}
if it doesn't3.
The expression v=v%10?v%(5*r)*n--:v/10 is equally valid (if unspeakably ugly) in C and C++, so that's not an issue.
The expression n||printf("%d",v%r) is a bit of a head-scratcher, though; what do you think it's trying to accomplish?
Edit
Sorry, wasn't quite awake when I wrote that last bit. Obviously, the intent of that expression is to only write the value of v%r when n is 0.
The || is the logical-or operator - the expression a || b evaluates to 1 if either a or b is non-zero, or 0 if both a and b are zero. The operator short-circuits; if a is non-zero, then the result of a || b is 1 regardless of the value of b, so b won't be evaluated at all.
Thus, in the expression n || printf( "%d", v%r ), if n is non-zero, then the printf call won't be executed.
Note that the line
for(scanf("%d",&n);v=v%10?v%(5*r)*n--:v/10;n||printf("%d",v%r));
is hideous; even with some whitespace it would be hard to follow and debug. This should not be taken as an example of good code. That style of programming is only suitable for the IOCCC, except that it's not ugly enough for that particular competition.
A better way to write it for C++ would be
#include <iostream>
int main( void )
{
long v=1,r=1e9; // no reason to make these global
int n;
if ( std::cin >> n )
{
while ( v ) // v != 0
{
if ( v % 10 )
v = v % (5 * r) * n--; // whitespace is your friend, use it
else
v = v / 10;
if ( n ) // n != 0
std::cout << v % r;
}
}
else
{
std::cerr << "Error while reading \"n\"...try again" << std::endl;
}
return 0;
}
1. Neither does C since the 1999 standard, and it's bad practice anyway.
2. You don't have to use the names argc and argv, although they are the common convention.
3. Implementations may provide additional signatures for main (such as extra arguments in addition to argc and argv), but those additional signatures must be documented; don't assume any random signature is going to be valid.
This question already has an answer here:
The Definitive C++ Book Guide and List
(1 answer)
Closed 7 years ago.
I'm less than a year into C++ development (focused on other languages prior to this) and I'm looking at a guy's code who's been doing this for two decades. I've never seen this syntax before and hopefully someone can be of some help.
bool b; // There exists a Boolean variable.
int i; // There exists an integer variable.
sscanf(value, "%d", &i); // The int is assigned from a scan.
b = (i != 0); // I have never seen this syntax before.
I get that the boolean is being assigned from the int that was just scanned, but I don't get the (* != 0) aspects of what's going on. Could someone explain why this person who knows the language much better than I is doing syntax like this?
Have a read here:
http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/operator_comparison
The result of operator != is a bool. So the person is saying "compare the value in i with 0". If 'i' is not equal to 0, then the '!=' returns true.
So in effect the value in b is "true if 'i' is anything but zero"
EDIT: In response to the OP's comment on this, yes you could have a similar situation if you used any other operator which returns bool. Of course when used with an int type, the != means negative numbers evaluate to true. If > 0 were used then both 0 and negative numbers would evaluate to false.
The expression (i != 0) evaluates to a boolean value, true if the expression is true (i.e. if i is non-zero) and false otherwise.
This value is then assigned to b.
You'd get the same result from b = i;, if you prefer brevity to explicitness, due to the standard boolean conversion from numeric types which gives false for zero and true for non-zero.
Or b = (i != 0) ? true : false; if you like extraneous verbosity.
(i != 0) is an expression that evaluates to true or false. Hence, b gets the value of true/false depending on the value of i.
This is fairly fundamental syntax. The != operator performs a "not equal to" comparison.
You may be being confused by the shorthand of initialising a bool directly from the result of a comparison operator, but the syntax itself is not esoteric.
The program is essentially equivalent to:
bool b;
int i;
sscanf(value, "%d", &i);
if (i != 0)
b = true;
else
b = false;
The key is that i != 0 is itself an expression that evaluates to true or false, not some magic that may only be used in an if statement.
Basically, if the condition (i not_equal_to 0 ) is satisfied, b gets the value "true". Else b gets the value "false".
Here, "i != 0" is a boolean expression that will be true if "i" is non-zero and false if it is zero.
All that is happening here is the result of that expression is being assigned to a variable.
You could also do things like...
boolean canDrinkAlcohol = (person.age() >= 18 && person.country.equals("UK") || person.age() >= 21 && person.county.equals("US"));
...
if(canDrinkAlcohol) {
...
}
or something
This question already has answers here:
Is Short Circuit Evaluation guaranteed In C++ as it is in Java?
(2 answers)
Closed 9 years ago.
main()
{
int k = 5;
if(++k <5 && k++/5 || ++k<=8); // how to compiler compile this statement
print f("%d",k);
}
// Here answer is 7 but why ?
++k < 5 evaluates to false (6 < 5 = false), so the RHS of the && operator is not evaluated (as the result is already known to be false). ++k <= 8 is then evaluated (7 <= 8 = true), so the result of the complete expression is true, and k has been incremented twice, making its final value 7.
Note that && and || are short circuit boolean operators - if the result of the expression can be determined by the left hand argument then the right hand argument is not evaluated.
Note also that, unlike most operators, short circuit operators define sequence points within an expression, which makes it legitimate in the example above to modify k more than once in the same expression (in general this is not permitted without intervening sequence points and results in Undefined Behaviour).
Unlike many questions like this, it appears to me that your code actually has defined behavior.
Both && and || impose sequence points. More specifically, they first evaluate their left operand. Then there's a sequence point1. Then (if and only if necessary to determine the result) they evaluate their right operand.
It's probably also worth mentioning that due to the relative precedence of && and ||, the expression: if(++k <5 && k++/5 || ++k<=8) is equivalent to: if((++k <5 && k++/5) || ++k<=8).
So, let's take things one step at a time:
int k = 5;
if(++k <5 &&
So, first it evaluates this much. This increments k, so its value becomes 6. Then it compares to see if that's less than 5, which obviously produces false.
k++/5
Since the previous result was false, this operand is not evaluated (because false && <anything> still always produces false as the result).
|| ++k<=8);
So, when execution gets to here, it has false || <something>. Since the result of false | x is x, it needs to evaluate the right operand to get the correct result. Therefore, it evaluates ++k again, so k is incremented to 7. It then compares the result to 8, and finds that (obviously) 7 is less than or equal to 8 -- therefore, the null statement following the if is executed (though, being a null statement, it does nothing).
So, after the if statement, k has been incremented twice, so it's 7.
In C++11, the phrase "sequence point" has been replaced with phrases like "sequenced before", as in: "If the second expression is evaluated, every value computation and side effect associated with the first expression is sequenced before every value computation and side effect associated with the second expression." Ultimately, the effect is the same though.
In following:
for && "something" is evaluated when first condition is True
for || "something" is evaluated when first condition is False
( (++k <5) && (k++/5) ) || (++k<=8)
( 6 < 5 AND something ) OR something
( False AND something ) OR something
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
False OR 7 < 8
False OR True
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
True
So k comes out to be 7
Initially k is assigned 5, in your declaration, then in following if condition:
++k < 5 && k++ / 5 || ++k <= 8
// ^
// evaluates
Increments k to 6 then its and LHS of && operand evaluates false.
6 < 5 && k++ / 5 || ++k <= 8
// ^ ^^^^^^^
// 0 not evaluates
Then because of Short-Circuit behavior of && operator k++ / 5 will not evaluates.
Short-Circuit behavior of && operator is:
0 && any_expression == 0, so any_expression not need to evaluate.
So above step 2 conditional expression becomes:
0 || ++k <= 8
// ^^^^^^^^
// evaluates
Increments k to 7 then its:
0 || 7 <= 8
because you have ; after if, so no matter whether if condition will evaluates True or False printf() will be called with k = 7.
Here is a block of code. Can anyone explain what it means to have a pair of numbers enclosed inside parentheses. (This is in C++.)
int a = 2, b = 2, c = 3, d = 1;
if((a,b)<(c,d))
cout<<"case1"<<endl;
else
cout<<"case2";
That's the comma operator; it evaluates the thing on the left, throws the result out, and returns the result on the right. Since evaluating an int variable has no side-effects, that if is semantically equivalent to
if(b < d)
Or if the value are changing or taken as an input by user you can use && (and), || (or) logical operators to sort out your codes
if ((a<c) && (b<d))
or
if ((a<c) || (b<d))
That way you can make cases the way you like. Check about operators here http://www.cplusplus.com/doc/tutorial/operators/