scripting library and function templating - c++

Context
I'm currently working on my own library for loading custom script inside c++ applications.
Here's some sample code for explaining what it's doing:
script part:
test.ctv
script
{
object player = access("player");
player.posX = 1 + 2;
access("map").load("map.txt");
}
C++ part:
test.cpp
class Player : public Loadable{
private:
friend class cTVScript::scriptExecutor;
primaryLoadable<int> posX;
stringLoadable name;
public:
Player() : Loadable(&posX, "posX", &name, "name");
}
class Map : public Loadable{
private:
friend class cTVScript::scriptExecutor;
std::string mapName;
public:
void load(std::string map) {
mapName = map;
}
Map() : Loadable(&load, "load") {}
}
int main() {
Player *p = new Player();
Map *m = new Map();
cTVScript::LoadScript("test.ctv");
cTVScript::AddObject(p, "player");
cTVScript::AddObject(m, "map");
std::cout << player.posX.get() << std::endl; // for example purpose we just assume that posX are public
std::cout << player.mapName.get() << std::endl; // same for mapName
}
Problem
Variable accessing and using by the cTVScript::scriptExecutor is quite simple,
but my main problem is elsewhere:
How, in c++, can I save and call method/functions with differents prototype?
Some trick with the compiler could make it easier? (like knowing the type and numbers of arguments?)
Current Work-Around
Make the user define a sub-fonction like AccessibleLoad:
class Map{
[...]
public:
void load(std::string map) {
mapName = map;
}
static void AccessibleLoad(cTVScript::CallingPack& pack) {
/* arguments */
std::string map;
pack.loadArguments(map); // here the user ask for each arguments
/*calling object */
Map* _this;
pack.loadCallingObject(_this); // and here he ask for the calling object
_this->load(map);
}
Map() : Loadable(&AccessibleLoad, "load") {}
}
So!
Is there a trick or some way i could make it more easy for using functions/methodes in my library? (like constructing these functions with the compiler? (don't think so but better to ask))
Edit
There's news! I got my own answer, and i'll post it (but it's a bit long)
(by the way, english is not my native language so if i made an error, said me so, i'll edit)

doing the C++ -> your script call. This is c++11 by the way
You will need some form of packer that can take a type and add it in.
class SomeClassYouCanCallAScriptFunction {
// the order of these templates matter or else
// the one bellow will not be able to find the one higher
template<class T, class... Args>
callFunction(string name){
// run your code to call your scripted function
// arguments has the arguments array
}
template<class T, class... Args>
callFunction(string name, T var){
// last one
// either this
arguments.pack<T>(var);
// or this
arguments.pack(to_string(var));
// or the like
// now do the next one
callFunction(name);
}
template<class T, class... Args>
callFunction(string name, T var, Args... args){
// either this
arguments.pack<T>(var);
// or this
arguments.pack(to_string(var));
// or the like
// now do the next one
callFunction(name, args...);
}
}
someClass.callFunction("scriptFunc", "ya", 42, someVectMaybe);
The otherway around the best you can do is provide a arguments variable and let the user get a argument passed in like arguments.get<T>(index)

Detail On the Context
For more Understanding (and if one want to re-use my solution), I'l detail the context of what i'm doing:
There's a top level (accessible only by the cTVScript::Executor)
And a low level (Visible (or almost) by the user)
top Level (or Non-typed part)
/*
* Non-Typed Part
*/
class Loadable{
public:
virtual std::string getAsString() { return ""; }
};
struct parametersPack{
public:
Loadable* returnValue;
std::vector<Loadable*> arguments;
};
Low Level (or typed-part)
class StringLoadable : public Loadable{
private:
std::string value;
public:
StringLoadable(std::string _s) : value(_s) {}
virtual std::string getAsString() { return value; }
virtual std::string get() { return value; }
virtual std::string& getRef() { return value; }
};
template<typename type>
class primaryLoadable : public Loadable{
private:
type value;
public:
primaryLoadable(type _v) : value(_v) {}
virtual std::string getAsString() { return std::to_string(value); }
type get() {return value;}
type& getRef() {return value;}
};
Save Function with non-matching prototype
A Parent Function Class (for stocking them):
class functionLoadable : public Loadable{
public:
virtual void call(parametersPack& pack) = 0;
};
And Sub-Function (one with void return and other with typed-Return)
/*
* Static Loadable Function
*/
template <typename Return, typename... Arguments>
class StaticLoadableFunction : public functionLoadable{
private:
Return (*fn)(Arguments...);
public:
Return calling(Arguments... args) {
Return value = fn(args...);
return (value);
}
virtual void call(parametersPack& pack) {
Unpacker::applyFunc(pack.arguments, fn);
}
StaticLoadableFunction(Return (*_fn)(Arguments...)) : fn(_fn){}
};
template <typename... Arguments>
class StaticLoadableFunction<void, Arguments...> : public functionLoadable{
private:
void (*fn)(Arguments...);
public:
void calling(Arguments... args) {
fn(args...);
}
virtual void call(parametersPack& pack) {
Unpacker::applyFunc(pack.arguments, fn);
}
StaticLoadableFunction(void (*_fn)(Arguments...)) : fn(_fn){}
};
Now the work of the unpacker
First I need to unpack my arguments from my std::vector
/*
* Unpacking all arguments
*/
template<unsigned int N>
struct helper;
template<unsigned int N>
struct helper{
template <typename ReturnType, typename... Arguments, typename ...final>
static ReturnType applyFunc(std::vector<Loadable*> parameters, ReturnType (*fn)(Arguments...), final&&... args) {
return (helper<N - 1>::applyFunc
(parameters, fn,
convertLoadableTo< typename parametersType<N - 1, Arguments...>::type >
::transform(parameters[N-1]),
args...));
}
};
template<>
struct helper<0>{
template <typename ReturnType, typename ...Arguments, typename ...final>
static ReturnType applyFunc(std::vector<Loadable*> parameters, ReturnType (*fn)(Arguments...), final&&... args) {
return (fn( args... ));
}
};
template <typename ReturnType, typename ...Arguments>
ReturnType applyFunc(std::vector<Loadable*> args, ReturnType (*fn)(Arguments...)) {
return (helper<sizeof...(Arguments)>::applyFunc(args, fn));
}
I know want to know wich type are in each recursion:
/*
* Getting Parameters type N in variadic Templates
*/
template <int N, typename... T>
struct parametersType;
template <typename T0, typename... T>
struct parametersType<0, T0, T...> {
typedef T0 type;
};
template <int N, typename T0, typename... T>
struct parametersType<N, T0, T...> {
typedef typename parametersType<N-1, T...>::type type;
};
And then downcast my Loadable* object into primaryLoadable<> or StringLoadable
/*
* Treat For Each Type
*/
template <typename arg>
struct convertLoadableTo;
template <typename arg>
struct convertLoadableTo{ // int, double...etc
static arg transform(Loadable* l) {
primaryLoadable<arg>* _l =
dynamic_cast< primaryLoadable<arg>* >(l);
if (!_l)
throw;
return (_l->get());
}
};
template <typename arg>
struct convertLoadableTo<arg&>{ // int&, double&...etc
static arg& transform(Loadable* l) {
primaryLoadable<arg>* _l =
dynamic_cast< primaryLoadable<arg>* >(l);
if (!_l)
throw;
return (_l->getRef());
}
};
template <>
struct convertLoadableTo<std::string>{ // int&, double&...etc
static std::string transform(Loadable* l) {
StringLoadable* _l =
dynamic_cast< StringLoadable* >(l);
if (!_l)
throw;
return (_l->get());
}
};
template <>
struct convertLoadableTo<std::string&>{ // int&, double&...etc
static std::string& transform(Loadable* l) {
StringLoadable* _l =
dynamic_cast< StringLoadable* >(l);
if (!_l)
throw;
return (_l->getRef());
}
};
That's the end!
If you wanna know more detail please mp me!

Related

C++ method with multiple parameter packs

Consider the following simplified piece of code for a variant class. Most of it is for informational purposes, the question is about the conditional_invoke method.
// Possible types in variant.
enum class variant_type { empty, int32, string };
// Actual data store.
union variant_data {
std::int32_t val_int32;
std::string val_string;
inline variant_data(void) { /* Leave uninitialised */ }
inline ~variant_data(void) { /* Let variant do clean up. */ }
};
// Type traits which allow inferring which type to use (these are actually generated by a macro).
template<variant_type T> struct variant_type_traits { };
template<class T> struct variant_reverse_traits { };
template<> struct variant_type_traits<variant_type::int32> {
typedef std::int32_t type;
inline static type *get(variant_data& d) { return &d.val_int32; }
};
template<> struct variant_reverse_traits<std::int32_t> {
static const variant_type type = variant_type::int32;
inline static std::int32_t *get(variant_data& d) { return &d.val_int32; }
};
template<> struct variant_type_traits<variant_type::string> {
typedef std::string type;
inline static type *get(variant_data& d) { return &d.val_string; }
};
template<> struct variant_reverse_traits<std::string> {
static const variant_type type = variant_type::string;
inline static std::string *get(variant_data& d) { return &d.val_string; }
};
// The actual variant class.
class variant {
public:
inline variant(void) : type(variant_type::empty) { }
inline ~variant(void) {
this->conditional_invoke<destruct>();
}
template<class T> inline variant(const T value) : type(variant_type::empty) {
this->set<T>(value);
}
template<class T> void set(const T& value) {
this->conditional_invoke<destruct>();
std::cout << "Calling data constructor ..." << std::endl;
::new (variant_reverse_traits<T>::get(this->data)) T(value);
this->type = variant_reverse_traits<T>::type;
}
variant_data data;
variant_type type;
private:
template<variant_type T> struct destruct {
typedef typename variant_type_traits<T>::type type;
static void invoke(type& v) {
std::cout << "Calling data destructor ..." << std::endl;
v.~type();
}
};
template<template<variant_type> class F, class... P>
inline void conditional_invoke(P&&... params) {
this->conditional_invoke0<F, variant_type::int32, variant_type::string, P...>(std::forward<P>(params)...);
}
template<template<variant_type> class F, variant_type T, variant_type... U, class... P>
void conditional_invoke0(P&&... params) {
if (this->type == T) {
F<T>::invoke(*variant_type_traits<T>::get(this->data), std::forward<P>(params)...);
}
this->conditional_invoke0<F, U..., P...>(std::forward<P>(params)...);
}
template<template<variant_type> class F, class... P>
inline void conditional_invoke0(P&&... params) { }
};
The code works this way, i.e. it works as long as the parameter list P... for the functor is empty. If I add another functor like
template<variant_type T> struct print {
typedef typename variant_type_traits<T>::type type;
static void invoke(type& v, std::ostream& stream) {
stream << v;
}
};
and try to invoke it
friend inline std::ostream& operator <<(std::ostream& lhs, variant& rhs) {
rhs.conditional_invoke<print>(lhs);
return lhs;
}
the compiler VS 20115 complains
error C2672: 'variant::conditional_invoke0': no matching overloaded function found
or gcc respectively
error: no matching function for call to 'variant::conditional_invoke0 >&>(std::basic_ostream&)'
I guess the compiler cannot decide when U... ends and when P... starts. Is there any way to work around the issue?
You'll have to make both parameter packs deducible. That is, let the type and non-type template parameters be part of a function parameter list. For that, introduce a dummy structure:
template <variant_type...>
struct variant_type_list {};
and let the compiler deduce the variant_type... pack from a function call:
template <template <variant_type> class F
, variant_type T
, variant_type... U
, typename... P>
void conditional_invoke0(variant_type_list<T, U...> t
, P&&... params)
{
if (this->type == T)
{
F<T>::invoke(*variant_type_traits<T>::get(this->data)
, std::forward<P>(params)...);
}
this->conditional_invoke0<F>(variant_type_list<U...>{}
, std::forward<P>(params)...);
}
To break recursive calls, introduce an overload with an empty variant_type_list:
template <template <variant_type> class F, typename... P>
void conditional_invoke0(variant_type_list<>, P&&... params) {}
When calling the invoker for the first time, provide variant_types as an argument:
this->conditional_invoke0<F>(variant_type_list<variant_type::int32, variant_type::string>{}
, std::forward<P>(params)...);
DEMO

Variadic members in non-template class

I'm trying to write a class Invocation which has a templated constructor:
template<typename F>
class Invocation {
public:
template<typename... Args>
Invocation(F&& f, Args&&... args)
{ /* store f and args somewhere for later use */ }
...
};
Normally I would parameterize the Invocation class itself with both F and Args..., but in this case I need a uniform type for a given F, so I'm trying to find a way to store args... of any types inside a Invocation<F>, and to incur as little performance hit as possible. (This might not be the best design, but it can be an interesting exercise.)
One thought is to use virtual functions:
template<typename F>
class ArgsBase {
public:
// discard return value
virtual void invoke(F&& f) = 0;
};
template<typename F, typename... Ts>
class Args : public ArgsBase<F> {
public:
Args(Ts&&... args) : args_(std::forward<Ts>(args)...) {}
void invoke(F&& f) override
{
/* somehow call f with args_ (something like std::apply) */
...
}
private:
std::tuple<Ts&&...> args_;
};
And then in the Invocation<F> class, we can for example have an std::unique_ptr<ArgsBase<F>> member, which points to an Args<F, Ts...> object created in the Invocation<F> ctor. And we can call its invoke virtual method when needed.
This is just one random idea I came up with. Is there any other way to achieve this? Ideally without the overhead of virtual functions or anything like that?
UPDATE: Thanks to the comments/answers that suggest using std::function or lambdas. I should've made it clear that I'm actually interested in a more general case, i.e., the variadic stuff might not be arguments to a callable. It can be just anything that I want to store in a class whose type is not parameterized by the types of these stuff.
As mentioned in comment, I wouldn't worry about storing arguments by value. The compiler's copy-elision can be generous.
Particularly if you offer the class an r-value invoke:
#include <tuple>
template<typename F>
class ArgsBase {
public:
// discard return value
virtual void invoke(F&& f) const & = 0;
virtual void invoke(F&& f) && = 0;
};
template<typename F, class... FunctionArgs>
class Args : public ArgsBase<F> {
public:
template<class...Ts>
Args(Ts&&... args) : args_(std::forward<Ts>(args)...) {}
template<std::size_t...Is, class Tuple>
static void invoke_impl(F& f, std::index_sequence<Is...>, Tuple&& t)
{
f(std::get<Is>(std::forward<Tuple>(t))...);
}
void invoke(F&& f) const & override
{
invoke_impl(f,
std::make_index_sequence<std::tuple_size<tuple_type>::value>(),
args_);
/* somehow call f with args_ (something like std::apply) */
}
void invoke(F&& f) && override
{
invoke_impl(f,
std::make_index_sequence<std::tuple_size<tuple_type>::value>(),
std::move(args_));
/* somehow call f with args_ (something like std::apply) */
}
private:
using tuple_type = std::tuple<FunctionArgs...>;
tuple_type args_;
};
template<class Callable, class...MyArgs>
auto later(MyArgs&&...args) {
return Args<Callable, std::decay_t<MyArgs>...>(std::forward<MyArgs>(args)...);
}
void foo(const std::string&, std::string)
{
}
int main()
{
auto l = later<decltype(&foo)>(std::string("hello"), std::string("world"));
l.invoke(foo);
std::move(l).invoke(foo);
}
If you're trying to save a function call with its parameters for later invocation, you could use lambdas packaged in std::function objects:
template<typename F, typename ... Args>
std::function<void()> createInvocation(F f, const Args& ... args)
{
return [f,args...]() { f(args...); };
}
Then you could use it like this:
void myFunc(int a, int b)
{
std::cout << "Invoked: " << a + b << std::endl;
}
int main() {
auto invocation = createInvocation(myFunc, 1, 2);
invocation();
return 0;
}
UPDATE: If you wanted to create a generic non-templated container type, you can wrap a tuple into a type that itself derives from a non-templated type. The main problem then is accessing the underlying data. This can be solved by creating a static function dispatch table that for a given tuple type, redirects queries so that std::get, which requires a compile-time constant index template parameter, can instead be invoked with a dynamically provided function parameter. Here is an implementation that achieves this:
class GenericTupleContainer
{
public:
virtual const void* getItemAtIndex(size_t index) = 0;
};
template<typename ... T>
class TupleContainer : public GenericTupleContainer
{
public:
TupleContainer(T&& ... args)
: data(std::forward<T>(args)...)
{}
const void* getItemAtIndex(size_t index) override
{
if(index >= sizeof...(T))
throw std::runtime_error("Invalid index");
return dispatchTable[index](data);
}
private:
template<size_t index>
static const void* getItemAtIdx(const std::tuple<T...>& data)
{
return &std::get<index>(data);
}
using GetterFn = const void*(*)(const std::tuple<T...>&);
static GetterFn* initDispatchTable()
{
static GetterFn dispatchTable[sizeof...(T)];
populateDispatchTable<sizeof...(T)>(dispatchTable, std::integral_constant<bool, sizeof...(T) == 0>());
return dispatchTable;
}
static GetterFn* dispatchTable;
template<size_t idx>
static void populateDispatchTable(GetterFn* table, std::false_type);
template<size_t idx>
static void populateDispatchTable(GetterFn* table, std::true_type)
{
//terminating call - do nothing
}
std::tuple<T...> data;
};
template<typename ... T>
typename TupleContainer<T...>::GetterFn* TupleContainer<T...>::dispatchTable = TupleContainer<T...>::initDispatchTable();
template<typename ... T>
template<size_t idx>
void TupleContainer<T...>::populateDispatchTable(GetterFn* table, std::false_type)
{
table[idx-1] = &TupleContainer<T...>::template getItemAtIdx<idx-1>;
populateDispatchTable<idx-1>(table, std::integral_constant<bool, idx-1 == 0>() );
}
template<typename ... T>
auto createTupleContainer(T&& ... args)
{
return new TupleContainer<T...>(std::forward<T>(args)...);
}
Then you can use the above as follows:
int main() {
GenericTupleContainer* data = createTupleContainer(1, 2.0, "Hello");
std::cout << *(static_cast<const int*>(data->getItemAtIndex(0))) << std::endl;
std::cout << *(static_cast<const double*>(data->getItemAtIndex(1))) << std::endl;
std::cout << (static_cast<const char*>(data->getItemAtIndex(2))) << std::endl;
return 0;
}
As you can see from the above usage, you've achieved the aim of wrapping an arbitrary templated tuple into a non-templated type, in such a way that you can access the component members with a normal (function) index parameter instead of a template one. Now the return type of such a getter has to be universal, so I've chosen to use void* here, which is not ideal. But you can develop this idea to make this container give more useful information about the types of its data tuple members. Also, note that this does use a virtual function. With some further work you can get rid of this as well, although you won't be able to get rid of at least one function pointer lookup (i.e. the lookup in the dispatch table) - this is the price paid for gaining the flexibility of being able to use a runtime value to index into the tuple.

C++ Factory using variadic template issues

I'm just trying something out - I wanted to create a generic factory which will returns shared_ptr to a type.
I have a derived class which uses static methods to return a shared_ptr to the base class. The idea is that I'd like to be able to register these methods with a generic factory, but it can't determine which method to register at compile time. Perhaps there is a way of achieving this using SFINAE, but I'm just beginning to understand its complexities.
Apologies for the rather long code sample, also available at http://coliru.stacked-crooked.com/a/331e08de86004592
Enabling more than one of the factory methods in 'DerivedA' will cause a compile error.
#include <iostream>
#include <string>
#include <vector>
#include <unordered_map>
#include <memory>
// Factory which returns a shared_ptr of type T.
template<class T, class Tag, class... Args>
class NameFactory
{
public:
typedef std::function<std::shared_ptr<T>(Args...)> Function;
static NameFactory& instance();
void registerType(const std::string& type, const Function& createFunction);
std::shared_ptr<T> createObject(const std::string& type, Args&&... arguments);
private:
NameFactory() {}
std::unordered_map<std::string, Function> m_functionMap;
};
template<class T, class Tag, class... Args>
NameFactory<T, Tag, Args...>& NameFactory<T, Tag, Args...>::instance()
{
static NameFactory<T, Tag, Args...> m_instance;
return m_instance;
}
template<class T, class Tag, class... Args>
void NameFactory<T, Tag, Args...>::registerType(const std::string& type, const Function& createFunction)
{
m_functionMap[type] = createFunction;
}
template<class T, class Tag, class... Args>
std::shared_ptr<T> NameFactory<T, Tag, Args...>::createObject(const std::string& type, Args&&... arguments)
{
auto iter(m_functionMap.find(type));
if (iter != m_functionMap.end())
{
return (iter->second)(std::forward<Args>(arguments)...);
}
throw std::logic_error("Cannot find constructor for type '" + type + "'");
}
template<class T, class Tag, class... Args>
class NameFactoryRegistration
{
public:
typedef NameFactory<T, Tag, Args...> Factory;
NameFactoryRegistration(const std::string& type, const typename Factory::Function& createFunction)
{
Factory::instance().registerType(type, createFunction);
}
private:
};
class MyBase
{
public:
typedef std::shared_ptr<MyBase> SPtr;
};
class DerivedA : public MyBase
{
public:
static SPtr create()
{
return SPtr(new DerivedA);
}
// Enabling this factory method (and/or the two args method below causes an 'unresolved overloaded function type' error
//static SPtr create(const std::string& s)
//{
// return SPtr(new DerivedA(s));
//}
//static SPtr create(const std::string& s, double d)
//{
// return SPtr(new DerivedA(s,d));
//}
private:
DerivedA()
{
std::cout << "DerivedA - no args" << std::endl;
}
DerivedA(const std::string& s)
{
std::cout << "DerivedA - one arg: " << s << std::endl;
}
DerivedA(const std::string& s, double d)
{
std::cout << "DerivedA - two args: " << s << " : " << d << std::endl;
}
};
// Tags to help differentiate the factories
struct NoArgsReg;
struct SingleArgReg;
struct TwoArgReg;
typedef NameFactory<MyBase, NoArgsReg> NoArgsFactory;
typedef NameFactoryRegistration<MyBase, NoArgsReg> NoArgsRegistration;
typedef NameFactory<MyBase, SingleArgReg, const std::string&> SingleArgFactory;
typedef NameFactoryRegistration<MyBase, SingleArgReg, const std::string&> SingleArgRegistration;
typedef NameFactory<MyBase, TwoArgReg, const std::string&, double> TwoArgsFactory;
typedef NameFactoryRegistration<MyBase, TwoArgReg, const std::string&, double> TwoArgsRegistration;
// Register the factory methods into the NameFactory
NoArgsRegistration dAReg0("A", DerivedA::create);
//SingleArgRegistration dAReg1("A", DerivedA::create);
//TwoArgsRegistration dAReg2("A", DerivedA::create);
int main()
{
auto object0(NoArgsFactory::instance().createObject("A"));
// Not registered,
//auto object1(SingleArgFactory::instance().createObject("A","testString"));
//auto object2(TwoArgsFactory::instance().createObject("A","testString",3.142));
return 0;
}
The problem is that (before C++14) std::function<R(A...)> can be constructed from anything, not just from something which supports an R(A...) call. It should help if you add an overload of registerType which will take an R (&)(Args&&...) parameter.
The problem is that you cannot deduce the type in an overload set. Even if we simplify the example down to something that we could try to use SFINAE with, we're stuck:
#include <functional>
struct A {
static void create() { }
static void create(int ) { }
};
template <typename F,
typename = decltype(std::declval<F>()(std::declval<int>()))>
void foo(F ) { }
int main() {
foo(&A::create); // error, even in this case
}
You'd have to add explicit overloads for function pointers to handle this case, as there is an exception in the standard to allow for that:
void foo(void (*)(int)) { } // (1)
template <typename F,
typename = decltype(std::declval<F>()(std::declval<int>()))>
void foo(F ) { } // (2)
int main() {
foo(&A::create); // OK, calls (1)
}
In your specific example, that means adding two constructors:
// in Factory
using Function = std::function<std::shared_ptr<T>(Args...)>;
using FunctionPtr = std::shared_ptr<T>(*)(Args...);
// in Registration
using Function = typename Factory::Function;
using FunctionPtr = typename Factory::FunctionPtr;
NameFactoryRegistration(const std::string& type, const Function& createFunction) {
/* same as before */
}
NameFactoryRegistration(const std::string& type, FunctionPtr createFunction)
: NameFactoryRegistration(type, Function(createFunction))
{ }

Polymorphism, variadic template inheritance, slicing, boost::any type cast

This program compiles, but the boost::any cast fails. I suspect that slicing a template class this way confuses pointer arithmetic. The idea is that what is stored in the container
std::vector<boost::any> pressures;
are of different types, for example
Pressure<Printer>, or Pressure<Printer, Printer> etc.
Since I lose the type by storing it in a boost::any, I need to call Change without having to know the actual number of observers there are on a given pressure. I tried to solve it through polymorphism and virtual methods, but at least this attempt doesn't work.
Any suggestions?
#include <utility>
#include <tuple>
#include <iostream>
enum class EventType {UNKNOWN};
// Note: All Observers must implement OnNotify for any subject types they wish to observe
// Any unimplemented subject types that are used will result in a compiler error
template <typename Base> class Observer
{
public:
Observer() : obsID_(obsIDTracker_++) {}
template <typename T> void OnNotifyImpl(T &subject, EventType event)
{
static_cast<Base *>(this)->OnNotify(subject, event);
}
int GetID() const
{
return obsID_;
}
private:
int obsID_;
static int obsIDTracker_;
};
template <typename base> int Observer<base>::obsIDTracker_ = 0;
// Recursive helper structs for implementing calls to all observers held within subjects
template <int N, typename T, typename... Args> struct NotifyHelper
{
static void NotifyImpl(T &subject, EventType event,
std::tuple<Args...> &obs)
{
std::get<sizeof...(Args) - N>(obs).OnNotifyImpl(subject, event);
NotifyHelper<N - 1, T, Args...>::NotifyImpl(subject, event, obs);
}
};
template <typename T, typename... Args> struct NotifyHelper<0, T, Args...>
{
static void NotifyImpl(T &subject, EventType event,
std::tuple<Args...> &obs) {}
};
// See MakeSubject function for instance usage
template <typename T, typename... Obs> class Subject
{
public:
static const int NumberOfObservers = sizeof...(Obs);
Subject(std::tuple<Obs &...> &&obs) : observers(obs) {}
void NotifyAll(EventType event)
{
NotifyHelper<NumberOfObservers, T, Obs &...>::NotifyImpl(
*static_cast<T *>(this), event, observers);
}
private:
std::tuple<Obs &...> observers;
};
class PressureInterface
{
public:
virtual ~PressureInterface() {}
virtual void Change(int value) {}
};
// CRTP Abstract Base class for implementing static subject.
// Example Subclass Usage -- Pressure Sensor:
template <typename... Obs>
class Pressure : public PressureInterface, public Subject<Pressure<Obs...>, Obs...>
{
public:
typedef Subject<Pressure<Obs...>, Obs...> BaseType;
Pressure(std::tuple<Obs &...> &&observers, int pressure)
: BaseType(std::move(observers)), pressure_(pressure) {}
virtual void Change(int value)
{
pressure_ = value;
this->NotifyAll(EventType::UNKNOWN);
}
int GetPressure() const
{
return pressure_;
}
private:
int pressure_;
};
// CRTP Abstract Base class for implementing static subject.
// Example Subclass Usage -- Printing Observer:
class Printer : public Observer<Printer>
{
public:
Printer() : timesTriggered_(0) {}
template <typename... Args>
void OnNotify(Pressure<Args...> &subject, EventType event)
{
std::cout << "Observer ID: " << this->GetID() << std::endl;
switch (event)
{
case EventType::UNKNOWN:
{
std::cout << "Unknown Event -- Event #" << timesTriggered_++
<< std::endl;
std::cout << "Pressure: " << subject.GetPressure() << std::endl;
break;
}
default:
{
break;
}
}
}
private:
int timesTriggered_;
};
// Binding function for use with MakeSubject
// Arguments: observer objects to observe subject notifications
// Return: tuple of references to observers
template <typename... Obs> std::tuple<Obs &...> BindObservers(Obs &... obs)
{
return std::tuple<Obs &...>(obs...);
}
// Creator to ease subject creation
// Template Arguments: Subject subclass type
// Arguments: Result from BindObservers
// Any constructor arguments for Subject subclass
// Return: Subject subclass
// Example Usage:
// auto pressure = MakeSubject<Pressure>(BindObservers(printerObs), initialPressure);
template <template <typename...> class T, typename... Args, typename... Obs>
T<Obs...> MakeSubject(std::tuple<Obs &...> &&obs, Args &&... args)
{
return T<Obs...>(std::move(obs), args...);
}
#include <boost/any.hpp>
int main()
{
std::vector<boost::any> pressures;
Printer printerObs1;
Printer printerObs2;
const int initialPressure = 1;
auto pressure = MakeSubject<Pressure>(
BindObservers(printerObs1, printerObs2), initialPressure);
pressures.push_back(pressure);
pressure.Change(12);
decltype(pressure) *p = boost::any_cast<decltype(pressure)>(&pressures[0]);
p->Change(1999);
PressureInterface *qip = boost::any_cast<PressureInterface>(&pressures[0]); //This cast returns nullptr
std::cout << "The cast works\n";
if(nullptr != qip)
qip->Change(2001);
}
Edit
My first attempt at storing the address of the Change function:
std::vector<std::function<boost::any *>> pressures;
How do I push_back the address of the function? This doesn't work:
pressures.push_back(std::function<decltype(&pressure.Change>);
/home/idf/Documents/OrigObserverExam/ObserverExample.cpp|157|error: ISO C++ forbids taking the address of a bound member function to form a pointer to member function. Say '&Pressure<Printer, Printer>::Change' [-fpermissive]|
and then how do I extract it?
std::function<void(int)> *qip = boost::any_cast<std::function<void(int)>*>(&(pressures[0].Change));
std::cout << "The cast works\n";
if(nullptr != qip)
*qip(2001);
Edit 2
When I add the code suggested, I get an error:
/home/idf/Documents/OrigObserverExam/ObserverExample.cpp|167|error: 'decay_t' is not a member of 'std'|
#include <type_traits>
#include <boost/any.hpp>
struct changable {
boost::any data;
using do_change = void(*)(boost::any*, int);
do_change f = nullptr;
void change(int x) {
if (f) f(&data, x);
}
template<class T>
static do_change type_erase_change() {
return [](boost::any* a, int x){
T* t = boost::any_cast<T>(a);
if (t) t->Change(x);
};
}
template<class T>
changable( T&& t ):
data(std::forward<T>(t)),
f( type_erase_change<std::decay_t<T>>() )
{}
changable(changable const&)=default;
changable(changable &&)=default;
changable()=default;
};
Edit 3 C++14 installed:
How do I use this struct? I am able to say:
std::vector<changable> pressures;
and I am able to push_back a pressure
pressures.push_back(pressure);
However, I am uncertain how to call say pressures[0].Change(1999). If I say I get the error given:
pressures[0].Change(2000);
ObserverExample.cpp|199|error: '__gnu_cxx::__alloc_traits<std::allocator<changable> >::value_type' has no member named 'Change'
boost::any allows you to type cast back to the exact same type you put in. Not a parent type, the same type.
If you want to type erase invoking a method, try std::function<void()> or std::function<void(boost::any*)>.
Here is a type eraser of change(int) and a boost::any bundled together:
struct changable {
boost::any data;
using do_change = void(*)(boost::any*, int);
do_change f = nullptr;
void change(int x) {
if (f) f(&data, x);
}
template<class T>
static do_change type_erase_change() {
return [](boost::any* a, int x){
T* t = boost::any_cast<T>(a);
if (t) t->Change(x);
};
}
template<class T>
changable( T&& t ):
data(std::forward<T>(t)),
f( type_erase_change<std::decay_t<T>>() )
{}
changable(changable const&)=default;
changable(changable &&)=default;
changable()=default;
};
there is no need for an interface class that exposes Change. So long as the type passed to the above type-eraser has a Change(int) method, all is good.

Trying to learn BOOST::ANY Q1

This program segfaults on the call
p->Change(1999);
When I run it in the debugger, it appears that I enter the Change function, but on inspecting the this pointer is 0x00. I am obviously using BOOST::any incorrectly, but I am not sure what I am doing wrong?
I believe the return type of the auto below
//pressure type = Pressure<Printer, Printer>
auto pressure = MakeSubject<Pressure>(
BindObservers(printerObs1, printerObs2), initialPressure);
I might need to use decltype and auto with Boost::any when I say
boost::any_cast<Pressure<Printer>> // change Pressure<Printer> to use decltype<pressure> ?
but this stretches my understanding of what is going on.
// static_observer header file
#include <utility>
#include <tuple>
#include <iostream>
enum class EventType {UNKNOWN};
// Note: All Observers must implement OnNotify for any subject types they wish to observe
// Any unimplemented subject types that are used will result in a compiler error
template <typename Base> class Observer
{
public:
Observer() : obsID_(obsIDTracker_++) {}
template <typename T> void OnNotifyImpl(T &subject, EventType event)
{
static_cast<Base *>(this)->OnNotify(subject, event);
}
int GetID() const
{
return obsID_;
}
private:
int obsID_;
static int obsIDTracker_;
};
template <typename base> int Observer<base>::obsIDTracker_ = 0;
// Recursive helper structs for implementing calls to all observers held within subjects
template <int N, typename T, typename... Args> struct NotifyHelper
{
static void NotifyImpl(T &subject, EventType event,
std::tuple<Args...> &obs)
{
std::get<sizeof...(Args) - N>(obs).OnNotifyImpl(subject, event);
NotifyHelper<N - 1, T, Args...>::NotifyImpl(subject, event, obs);
}
};
template <typename T, typename... Args> struct NotifyHelper<0, T, Args...>
{
static void NotifyImpl(T &subject, EventType event,
std::tuple<Args...> &obs) {}
};
// See MakeSubject function for instance usage
template <typename T, typename... Obs> class Subject
{
public:
static const int NumberOfObservers = sizeof...(Obs);
Subject(std::tuple<Obs &...> &&obs) : observers(obs) {}
void NotifyAll(EventType event)
{
NotifyHelper<NumberOfObservers, T, Obs &...>::NotifyImpl(
*static_cast<T *>(this), event, observers);
}
private:
std::tuple<Obs &...> observers;
};
// CRTP Abstract Base class for implementing static subject.
// Example Subclass Usage -- Pressure Sensor:
template <typename... Obs>
class Pressure : public Subject<Pressure<Obs...>, Obs...>
{
public:
typedef Subject<Pressure<Obs...>, Obs...> BaseType;
Pressure(std::tuple<Obs &...> &&observers, int pressure)
: BaseType(std::move(observers)), pressure_(pressure) {}
void Change(int value)
{
pressure_ = value;
this->NotifyAll(EventType::UNKNOWN);
}
int GetPressure() const
{
return pressure_;
}
private:
int pressure_;
};
// CRTP Abstract Base class for implementing static subject.
// Example Subclass Usage -- Printing Observer:
class Printer : public Observer<Printer>
{
public:
Printer() : timesTriggered_(0) {}
template <typename... Args>
void OnNotify(Pressure<Args...> &subject, EventType event)
{
std::cout << "Observer ID: " << this->GetID() << std::endl;
switch (event)
{
case EventType::UNKNOWN:
{
std::cout << "Unknown Event -- Event #" << timesTriggered_++
<< std::endl;
std::cout << "Pressure: " << subject.GetPressure() << std::endl;
break;
}
default:
{
break;
}
}
}
private:
int timesTriggered_;
};
// Binding function for use with MakeSubject
// Arguments: observer objects to observe subject notifications
// Return: tuple of references to observers
template <typename... Obs> std::tuple<Obs &...> BindObservers(Obs &... obs)
{
return std::tuple<Obs &...>(obs...);
}
// Creator to ease subject creation
// Template Arguments: Subject subclass type
// Arguments: Result from BindObservers
// Any constructor arguments for Subject subclass
// Return: Subject subclass
// Example Usage:
// auto pressure = MakeSubject<Pressure>(BindObservers(printerObs), initialPressure);
template <template <typename...> class T, typename... Args, typename... Obs>
T<Obs...> MakeSubject(std::tuple<Obs &...> &&obs, Args &&... args)
{
return T<Obs...>(std::move(obs), args...);
}
#include <boost/any.hpp>
int main()
{
std::vector<boost::any> pressures;
Printer printerObs1;
Printer printerObs2;
const int initialPressure = 1;
auto pressure = MakeSubject<Pressure>(
BindObservers(printerObs1, printerObs2), initialPressure);
pressures.push_back(pressure);
pressure.Change(12);
Pressure<Printer> *p = boost::any_cast<Pressure<Printer>>(&pressures[0]);
p->Change(1999); //Bombs
}
Funny, once I asked the question the answer became obvious. This works:
decltype(pressure) *p = boost::any_cast<decltype(pressure)>(&pressures[0]);
p->Change(1999);