C++ Windows Forms Operating System Message capture - c++

I have a c++ windows form that can capture messages that are sent within the application using the following code:
protected:
virtual void WndProc(Message% m) override
{
switch (m.Msg)
{
case WM_USER:
MessageBox::Show("Encountered WM_USER message");
break;
case WM_DESTROY:
MessageBox::Show("Closing application..");
break;
default:
break;
}
__super::WndProc(m);
}
This correctly fires when a WM_USER message or WM_DESTROY message is sent in the application, but does not capture the messages when sent from other applications. I need to be able to access messages that are not explicitly meant for the window in the application.
The form is created and executed using
Application::Run(gcnew Form1());
which also starts the message loop.
Is it possible to access operating system messages in this method of using C++ and Windows Forms?

You WndProc method will execute whenever a message is processed by your window. If the method is not executing, then the obvious conclusion is that the messages you are hoping to capture are not being sent to your window.

Related

Winapi - Alternatives to WM_CLOSE

I know with Windows notification message, WM_CLOSE refers to closing the window via "X" button on the top right hand corner of the window.
Does anyone know the notification message for closing with File->Exit?
The reason I asked is because I'm trying to implement JNI native code to gracefully close window when user initiated system shutdown. refer to my earlier post (Winapi - SetWindowLongPtr in ShutdownBlockReasonCreate / Destroy implementation of JNI native code) for background.
When clicking on 'X' to close, confirmation dialog box comes up which prevents shutdown reason message from disappearing (when I expect it to disappear after a while). I know File->Exit from menu bar doesn't ask for confirmation, but how do I implement this using windows notification message?
After some digging around the only suggestions I found is to use DestroyWindow. So I tried closing the window using DestroyWindow() function, but it only "Destroys" the window, rather than ending the whole application. Here's my switch statement in my WndProc CallBack function:
switch (message) {
case WM_QUERYENDSESSION:
PostMessage(hWnd, WM_CLOSE, 0, 0);
return 0;
case WM_ENDSESSION:
PostMessage(hWnd, WM_CLOSE, 0, 0);
return 0;
case WM_CLOSE:
DestroyWindow(hWnd);
break;
case WM_NCDESTROY:
RemoveWindowSubclass(hWnd, AppWndProc, uIdSubclass);
break;
}
Any help would be much appreciated!
Cheers
I know with Windows notification message, WM_CLOSE refers to closing the window via "X" button on the top right hand corner of the window.
Actually, when the window's standard "X" button is clicked (or the standard "Close" item on the window's top-left corner menu is selected if enabled, or the window receives an ALT+F4 keystroke), a WM_SYSCOMMAND message is issued to the window with the wParam containing the SC_CLOSE flag. If that message is passed to DefWindowProc() (the default behavior), it then issues a WM_CLOSE message to the window.
See Closing the Window.
It is possible that other conditions can also cause a WM_CLOSE message to be issued.
Does anyone know the notification message for closing with File->Exit?
What happens when that menu item is selected is defined by the application, not the OS. The application can do whatever it wants, including destroying the window immediately if it wants to.
However, that being said, if the menu is a standard Win32 menu, then the window will receive a WM_COMMAND message containing the ID of the menu item that was selected, at least.
The reason I asked is because I'm trying to implement JNI native code to gracefully close window when user initiated system shutdown.
By default, you don't need to do anything for that. The OS automatically closes all open windows during system shutdown. Rather than closing your window manually, you should instead react to your window being closed, if you need to clean up any resources.
When clicking on 'X' to close, confirmation dialog box comes up which prevents shutdown reason message from disappearing (when I expect it to disappear after a while).
Then the application is not handling system shutdown correctly.
Most applications present such a confirmation box in response to receiving the WM_CLOSE message. If the confirmation is aborted, the application discards the message and moves on. However, applications shouldn't prompt the user for confirmation during system shutdown. But not all applications follow that rule.
I know File->Exit from menu bar doesn't ask for confirmation
Again, that is for the application to decide, not the OS.
how do I implement this using windows notification message? After some digging around the only suggestions I found is to use DestroyWindow.
Correct. Or, you can alternatively post a WM_QUIT message to the message queue instead. See the PostQuitMessage() function.
So I tried closing the window using DestroyWindow() function, but it only "Destroys" the window, rather than ending the whole application.
It is the application's responsibility to terminate itself, usually by exiting its message loop when its main window has been destroyed.
Here's my switch statement in my WndProc CallBack function:
There is no need to post WM_CLOSE in response to WM_QUERYENDSESSION or WM_ENDSESSION. Let the OS handle that for you.
If you don't want the confirmation to appear during system shutdown, change your code to something more like this:
bool shuttingDown = false;
LRESULT CALLBACK AppWndProc(
_In_ HWND hWnd,
_In_ UINT message,
_In_ WPARAM wParam,
_In_ LPARAM lParam,
_In_ UINT_PTR uIdSubclass,
_In_ DWORD_PTR dwRefData
) {
switch (message) {
case WM_QUERYENDSESSION:
shuttingDown = true;
break;
case WM_ENDSESSION:
if (wParam == FALSE)
shuttingDown = false;
break;
case WM_CLOSE:
if (shuttingDown) {
DestroyWindow(hWnd);
// or:
// PostQuitMessage(0);
return 0;
}
break;
case WM_NCDESTROY:
RemoveWindowSubclass(hWnd, AppWndProc, uIdSubclass);
break;
}
return DefSubclassProc(hWnd, message, wParam, lParam);
}
There's no specific message to handle your File>Exit. You must handle it as any other menu item:
Define an identifier for your menu item. Choose anything you want, it has no particular meaning for windows.
When constructing your menu, specifiy this identifier in AppendMenu/InsertMenu/etc. or in your resource file
In your window procedure, intercept the WM_COMMAND message. If LOWORD(wParam) corresponds to the identifier, this means that the menu item has been activated
A typical way of handling an exit command is to send a WM_CLOSE message, as you are already doing in your example code.
So you will avoid code duplication and be sure that the behavior will be the same regardless of how the user choose to exit your application (via menu, click on the "x", or Alt+F4)
In the handing of WM_CLOSE, you can choose to show a message box, destroy the window, post a quit message, or whatever else you want. BY default the DefWindowProc calls DestroyWindow, which in turn sends the WM_DESTROY message.
Note that WM_CLOSE is also triggered when selecting the "Close" item of the system menu (Alt+Space or click on the window icon on the left next to the window title)

Win32 Application is not destroyed

I am in the process of learning the Win32 API. I have a problem where the window is visibly closed but the application is running in the background (I can see this using the Windows 10 task manager). Here is my code that closes the window:
case WM_CLOSE:
DestroyWindow(hwnd);
break;
case WM_DESTROY:
PostQuitMessage(0);
break;
My application is called a.exe and you can see it in this screenshot I took of the Windows 10 task manager.
Read the docs:
"The PostQuitMessage function posts a WM_QUIT message to the thread's message queue and returns immediately; the function simply indicates to the system that the thread is requesting to quit at some time in the future.
When the thread retrieves the WM_QUIT message from its message queue, it should exit its message loop and return control to the system. The exit value returned to the system must be the wParam parameter of the WM_QUIT message.
The WM_QUIT message is not associated with a window and therefore will never be received through a window's window procedure. It is retrieved only by the GetMessage or PeekMessage functions."
See think link also.
I have discovered the issue. Thanks for all the help but the window was actually being closed but the console was still open in the background. I was running:
FreeConsole();
and that was hiding the console. When I closed the window the console kept running and I am now closing the console as well and it works.

Why can't I get a WM_DESTROY or WM_CLOSE message outside a window procedure?

I wanted to read out messages in my message loop right before I dispatch them to my window procedure. Most messages I tried reading like this were read correctly, but when I close the window, a WM_CLOSE or WM_DESTROY message could not be read as it seems as if they were never received. Here's what i do:
void Framework::Run(){
while(running){
MSG msg;
while(PeakMessage(&msg, NULL, 0, 0)){
TranslateMessage(&msg);
switch(msg.message){
case WM_DESTROY:
PostQuitMessage(0);
break;
case WM_QUIT:
running = false;
break;
//...other cases...
}
DispatchMessage(&msg);
}
//...
}
}
I put a breakpoint at the first case, but even when I close the window (by clicking the 'X') the breakpoint is never hit. Though, when I check for WM_DESTROY in the window procedure, it gets read and every thing goes fine. Why not outside it?
Are such messages sent directly to the window proc? How?
A message loop only sees messages that are posted to the calling thread's message queue. Not all messages go through the message queue. WM_DESTROY is one such message. What you should be doing instead is handling the messages in the window procedure so you see every message that the window receives, whether the message went through the message queue or not.
If you need to look at messages for a window you are not creating yourself, or for a standard window that has a system-provided window procedure, you can subclass the window using SetWindowLongPtr(GWLP_WNDPROC) or SetWindowSubclass(). See Subclassing Controls for more details.

Blocking Keyboard Play/Pause Button in Win 8

I am writing an application that needs to temporarily disable the Play/Pause button that appears on multimedia keyboards.
Normally, a key can be blocked quite easily by installing a low level keyboard hook (WH_KEYBOARD_LL) where the KeyboardProc intercepts the key (in this case VK_MEDIA_PLAY_PAUSE) and returns 1 instead of calling CallNextHookEx. I have tried this with other keys (including the Windows key VK_LWIN) and this works perfectly. I also have no problems with this method under Windows 7 where all keys, including VK_MEDIA_PLAY_PAUSE get blocked.
Windows 8 is a different story. When my application has input focus, everything works as expected, meaning the VK_MEDIA_PLAY_PAUSE key gets blocked and no other application responds to it. However, when my application loses focus, my hook procedure gets called (this was verified by sending out a OutputDebugString) but other applications respond to key even though I return 1. As soon as my app gets focus again, everything is block as it should.
After some investigation, I found that the multimedia keys not only generate keystrokes but also generate WM_APPCOMMAND messages so I added ShellProc (WH_SHELL) hook with the following hook procedure:
LRESULT __declspec(dllexport)__stdcall CALLBACK ShellProc(int nCode,WPARAM wParam,LPARAM lParam)
{
// Do we have to handle this message?
if (nCode == HSHELL_APPCOMMAND)
{
OutputDebugStringX(">>>>> HSHELL_APPCOMMAND");
// Process the hook if the hNotifyWnd window handle is valid
short AppCommand = GET_APPCOMMAND_LPARAM(lParam);
switch (AppCommand)
{
case APPCOMMAND_MEDIA_NEXTTRACK:
case APPCOMMAND_MEDIA_PLAY_PAUSE:
case APPCOMMAND_MEDIA_PREVIOUSTRACK:
case APPCOMMAND_MEDIA_STOP:
OutputDebugString(">>>>>ShellProc got a media command");
return 1;
}
}
// Call the next handler in the chain
return CallNextHookEx (hsh, nCode, wParam, lParam);
}
This procedure is only getting called when my app has input focus. Whenever I have input focus and return 1 the Play/Pause command gets blocked. As soon as I lose focus the procedure does not get called/hooked.
Anyone have any idea as to what is going on? As I have mentioned, the code works for other keys, just not the multimedia keys. Everything works fine in Windows 7.
Alternatively, can anyone suggest another way of blocking the multimedia keyboards Play/Pause button?
From the MSDN documentation for ShellProc:
HSHELL_APPCOMMAND: The user completed an input event (for example, pressed an application command button on the mouse or an application command key on the keyboard), and the application did not handle the WM_APPCOMMAND message generated by that input. [Emphasis added.]
The emphasized portion suggests that your hook callback only gets called after an application ignores the WM_APPCOMMAND. In other words, you're too late.
To catch the message in flight, I think you need a different type of hook. Perhaps WH_GETMESSAGE or WH_CALLWNDPROC.
But why are you trying to prevent the users from interacting with their applications as they choose?

How to get WM_POWERBROADCAST message in CWinApp?

I create the class that inherited CWinApp and this class has a timer (use a window timer).
When PC go sleep mode and wake-up, timer callback is called exact time of wake-up. I want to make to not call the timer callback when PC is resuming from suspend.
So I tried to use WM_POWERBROADCAST message. But this message didn't catch in PreTranslateMessage() API. Also I tried SetWindowLong() with my own API but still didn't catch the WM_POWERBROADCAST message.
Is there any way to get WM_POWERBROADCAST in CWinApp?
In a Visual Studio C++ MFC application you will need to add an ON_MESSAGE() to your message map looking for the WM_POWERBROADCAST message as in this example:
BEGIN_MESSAGE_MAP(CFrameworkWndApp, CWinApp)
//{{AFX_MSG_MAP(CFrameworkWndApp)
ON_WM_CHAR()
ON_WM_TIMER()
//}}AFX_MSG_MAP
ON_MESSAGE(WM_POWERBROADCAST, OnPowerMsgRcvd)
END_MESSAGE_MAP()
Then you will need to add the message handler function along with the class definition change to declare the member function for the message handler so that you can check the wParam variable for the message type as in this skeleton. Remember to return an LRESULT value indicating if you handled the message or not.
// Handle the WM_POWERBROADCAST message to process a message concerning power management
// such as going to Sleep or Waking Up.
LRESULT CFrameworkWndApp::OnPowerMsgRcvd(WPARAM wParam, LPARAM lParam)
{
LRESULT lrProcessed = 0; // indicate if message processed or not
switch (wParam) {
case PBT_APMPOWERSTATUSCHANGE:
TRACE0("PBT_APMPOWERSTATUSCHANGE received\n");
break;
case PBT_APMRESUMEAUTOMATIC:
TRACE0("PBT_APMRESUMEAUTOMATIC received\n");
break;
case PBT_APMRESUMESUSPEND:
TRACE0("PBT_APMRESUMESUSPEND received\n");
break;
case PBT_APMSUSPEND:
TRACE0("PBT_APMSUSPEND received\n");
break;
}
// indicate if framework needs to handle message or we did ourselves.
return lrProcessed;
}
See Microsoft documentation - Power Management as well as the particular subsection of that documentation Microsoft documentation - WM_POWERBROADCAST message for details on handling the message.
See also the SetThreadExecutionState() function which affects how Windows determines whether an application is active or not and whether sleep mode should be entered or not.
See also the following Stack Overflow postings:
WM_POWERBROADCAST message not caught in MFC Dlg
WM_POWERBROADCAST not received by message-only window in Windows XP
How to receive WM_POWERBROADCAST inside of a thread?
How can I detect suspend on Windows Mobile?
How to detect Windows suspend message?
It is a Windows message. It gets sent to all Top-Level windows. So, in order to catch this message, create a handler in your main window