My input is of this format: (xxx)yyyy(zz)(eee)fff where {x,y,z,e,f} are all numbers. But fff is optional though.
Input: x = (123)4567(89)(660)
Expected output: Only the eeepart i.e. the number inside 3rd "()" i.e. 660 in my example.
I am able to achieve this so far:
re.search("\((\d*)\)", x).group()
Output: (123)
Expected: (660)
I am surely missing something fundamental. Please advise.
Edit 1: Just added fff to the input data format.
You could find all those matches that have round braces (), and print the third match with findall
import re
n = "(123)4567(89)(660)999"
r = re.findall("\(\d*\)", n)
print(r[2])
Output:
(660)
The (eee) part is identical to the (xxx) part in your regex. If you don't provide an anchor, or some sequencing requirement, then an unanchored search will match the first thing it finds, which is (xxx) in your case.
If you know the (eee) always appears at the end of the string, you could append an "at-end" anchor ($) to force the match at the end. Or perhaps you could append a following character, like a space or comma or something.
Otherwise, you might do well to match the other parts of the pattern and not capture them:
pattern = r'[0-9()]{13}\((\d{3})\)'
If you want to get the third group of numbers in brackets, you need to skip the first two groups which you can do with a repeating non-capturing group which looks for a set of digits enclosed in () followed by some number of non ( characters:
x = '(123)4567(89)(660)'
print(re.search("(?:\(\d+\)[^(]*){2}(\(\d+\))", x).group(1))
Output:
(660)
Demo on rextester
I have string formulas like this:
?{a,b,c,d}
It can be can be embedded like this:
?{a,b,c,?{x,y,z}}
or this is the same:
?{a,b,c,
?{x,y,z}
}
So I have to find those commas, what are in the second and greather "level" brackets.
In the example below I marked the "levels" where I have to find all commas:
?{a,b,c,
?{x,y, <--Those
?{1,2,3} <--Those
}
}
I've tried with lookahead and lookbehind, but I'm totally confused now :/
Here is my latest working try, but it is not good at all:
OnlineRegex
Update:
To avoid misunderstanding, I don't want to count the commas.
I'd like to get groups of commas to replace them.
The condition is find the commas where more than one "open tags" before it like this: ?{
.. without closing tag like this: }
Examlpe.:
In this case I have not replace any commas:
?{1,2,3} ?{a,b,c}
But in this case I have to replace commas between a b c
?{1,2,3,?{a,b,c}}
For the examples which you have provided, the following regex works(gives the desired output as mentioned by you):
(?<!^\?{[^{}]*),(?=[\s\S]*(?:\s*}){2,})
For String ?{a,b,c,d}, see Demo1 No Match
For String, ?{a,b,c,?{x,y,z}}, see Demo2 Match successful
For String,
?{a,b,c,
?{x,y,z}
}
see Demo3 Match Successful
For String,
?{a,b,c,
?{x,y,
?{1,2,3}
}
}
see Demo4 Match Successful
For String ?{1,2,3} ?{a,b,c} ?{1,2,3} ?{a,b,c}, see Demo5 No Match
Explanation:
(?<!^\?{[^{}]*), - negative lookbehind to discard the 1st level commas. The logic applied here is it should not match the comma which is preceded by start of the string followed by ?{ followed by 0+ occurrences of any character except { or }
(?=[\s\S]*(?:\s*}){2,}) - The comma matched above must be followed by atleast 2 occurrences of }(consecutive or having only whitespaces between them)
Your question is rather unclear #norbre, but I presume you'd like to extract (i.e. "count") the number of commas.
You can't do this with a regex. Regexps can't count number of occurences. However, you can use this to extract the "internal part" and then use a spreadsheet formula to count number of commas:
^(?:\?{[a-zA-Z0-9,]+?,\n??\s*?\?{)([a-zA-Z0-9,?{}\n\s]+?(?:\n*?\s*?|})+)(?:[a-zA-Z0-9,\n\s]*})$
Try: https://regex101.com/r/Rr0eFo/5
Examples
1.
Input:
?{a,b,c,?{e,f},1,2,3}
Output:
e,f}
2.
Input:
?{a,b,c,
?{x,y,z,e,
?{1,2,3,?{f,g,3},4,5,6}
}
,d,e,f}
Output:
x,y,z,e,
?{1,2,3,?{f,g,3},4,5,6}
}
3.
Input:
?{a,b,c,?{e},1,2,3}
Output:
e}
(note that there are no commas here!)
One caveat however. As I have said, regexps can't count number of occurences.
Hence, the following sample (don't know if it's valid or not for your case) would return wrong match:
?{a,b,c,?{e,f}
,1,2,3,?{a,b}
}
Output:
e,f}
,1,2,3,?{a,b}
OK replacing commas is another story so I'll add another answer.
Your regexp engine would need to support recursion.
Still I don't see a way to do it with one regex - one match would either contain the first comma or contain everything between the braces!
What I suggest is to use one regexp to get "what is inside the inner braces", run a replace (, => "") and assemble the whole line again using submatches from the regexp.
Here it is: (\?{[^?{}]*)((?>[^?{}]|(?R))+?)([^?{}]*?\})
Try: https://regex101.com/r/IzTeY0/3
Example 1:
Input:
?{a,b,c,
?{x,y,z,e,
?{1,2,3,?{f,g,3},4,5,6}
}
,d,e,f}
Submatches:
1. ?{a,b,c,
2. ?{x,y,z,e,
?{1,2,3,?{f,g,3},4,5,6}
}
3.
,d,e,f}
Replace all commas in submatch 2 with anything you want, then reassamble the whole string using submatches 1 and 3.
Again, this would break the regexp:
?{a,b,c,?{e,f}
,1,2,3,?{a,b}
}
Submatch 2 would look like this:
?{e,f}
,1,2,3,?{a,b}
I need to capture numbers and dots between brackets on lines containing the string 0020,000d, for example:
I: (0020,000d) UI [1.2.410.200001.1104.20160720104648421 ] # 38, 1 StudyInstanceUID
Using this regexp 0020,000d.*\[([\.0-9]+)\] I can match the needed value only if it doesn't have a space inside the brackets. How can I match the needed value ignoring any other character?.
Edit
If I use this regexp 0020,000d.*\[([\.0-9(\s|^\s))]+)\] I can capture numbers and dots and/or spaces, now if the string contains a space how can I capture in a group everything but the space?.
To clarify, I want to extract the 1.2.410.200001.1104.20160720104648421 string.
Codifying my (apparently helpful) answer from the comments:
You just need to allow zero or more spaces after the numbers-and-dots sequence before the closing bracket:
0020,000d.*\[([.0-9]+) *\]
Also, please note that you don't need to escape a dot in a character class.
Try this
let regex = /(?!\[)[.\d]+(?=[(\s)*\]])/g
let str = 'I: (0020,000d) UI [1.2.410.200001.1104.20160720104648421 ]'
let result = str.match(regex);
console.log(result);
I have a list of email addresses which take various forms:
john#smith.com
Angie <angie#aol.com>
"Mark Jones" <mark#jones.com>
I'm trying to cut only the email portion from each. Ex: I only want the angie#aol.com from the second item in the list. In other words, I want to match everything between < and > or match everything if it doesn't exist.
I know this can be done in 2 steps:
Capture on (?<=\<)(.*)(?=\>).
If there is no match, use the entire text.
But now I'm wondering: Can both steps be reduced into one simple regular expression?
What about:
(?<=\<).*(?=\>)|^[^<]*$
^[^>]*$ will match the entire string, but only if it doesn't contain a <. And that's OR'ed (|) with what you had.
Explanation:
^ - start of string
[^<] - not-< character
[^<]* - zero or more not-< characters
$ - end of string
You're after an exclusive or operator. Have a look here.
(\<.+\#.+\..+\>) matches those email addresses in side <> only...
(\<.+\#.+\..+\>)|(.+) matches everything instead of matching the first condition in the OR then skipping the second.
Depending on what language you are using to implement this regex, you might be able to use an inbuilt exclusive or operator. Otherwise, you might need to put a bit of logic in there to use the string if no matches are found. E.g. (pseudo type code):
string = 'your data above';
if( regex_finds_match ( '(\<.+\#.+\..+\>)', string ) ) {
// found match, use the match
str_to_use = regex_match(es);
} else {
// didn't find a match:
str_to_use = string;
}
It is possible, but your current logic is probably simpler. Here is what I came up with, email address will always be in the first capturing group:
^(?:.*<|)(.*?)(?:>|$)
Example: http://rubular.com/r/8tKHaYYY4T
I need a regex to get numeric values that can be
111.111,11
111,111.11
111,111
And separate the integer and decimal portions so I can store in a DB with the correct syntax
I tried ([0-9]{1,3}[,.]?)+([,.][0-9]{2})? With no success since it doesn't detect the second part :(
The result should look like:
111.111,11 -> $1 = 111111; $2 = 11
First Answer:
This matches #,###,##0.00:
^[+-]?[0-9]{1,3}(?:\,?[0-9]{3})*(?:\.[0-9]{2})?$
And this matches #.###.##0,00:
^[+-]?[0-9]{1,3}(?:\.?[0-9]{3})*(?:\,[0-9]{2})?$
Joining the two (there are smarter/shorter ways to write it, but it works):
(?:^[+-]?[0-9]{1,3}(?:\,?[0-9]{3})*(?:\.[0-9]{2})?$)
|(?:^[+-]?[0-9]{1,3}(?:\.?[0-9]{3})*(?:\,[0-9]{2})?$)
You can also, add a capturing group to the last comma (or dot) to check which one was used.
Second Answer:
As pointed by Alan M, my previous solution could fail to reject a value like 11,111111.00 where a comma is missing, but the other isn't. After some tests I reached the following regex that avoids this problem:
^[+-]?[0-9]{1,3}
(?:(?<comma>\,?)[0-9]{3})?
(?:\k<comma>[0-9]{3})*
(?:\.[0-9]{2})?$
This deserves some explanation:
^[+-]?[0-9]{1,3} matches the first (1 to 3) digits;
(?:(?<comma>\,?)[0-9]{3})? matches on optional comma followed by more 3 digits, and captures the comma (or the inexistence of one) in a group called 'comma';
(?:\k<comma>[0-9]{3})* matches zero-to-any repetitions of the comma used before (if any) followed by 3 digits;
(?:\.[0-9]{2})?$ matches optional "cents" at the end of the string.
Of course, that will only cover #,###,##0.00 (not #.###.##0,00), but you can always join the regexes like I did above.
Final Answer:
Now, a complete solution. Indentations and line breaks are there for readability only.
^[+-]?[0-9]{1,3}
(?:
(?:\,[0-9]{3})*
(?:.[0-9]{2})?
|
(?:\.[0-9]{3})*
(?:\,[0-9]{2})?
|
[0-9]*
(?:[\.\,][0-9]{2})?
)$
And this variation captures the separators used:
^[+-]?[0-9]{1,3}
(?:
(?:(?<thousand>\,)[0-9]{3})*
(?:(?<decimal>\.)[0-9]{2})?
|
(?:(?<thousand>\.)[0-9]{3})*
(?:(?<decimal>\,)[0-9]{2})?
|
[0-9]*
(?:(?<decimal>[\.\,])[0-9]{2})?
)$
edit 1: "cents" are now optional;
edit 2: text added;
edit 3: second solution added;
edit 4: complete solution added;
edit 5: headings added;
edit 6: capturing added;
edit 7: last answer broke in two versions;
I would at first use this regex to determine wether a comma or a dot is used as a comma delimiter (It fetches the last of the two):
[0-9,\.]*([,\.])[0-9]*
I would then strip all of the other sign (which the previous didn't match). If there were no matches, you already have an integer and can skip the next steps. The removal of the chosen sign can easily be done with a regex, but there are also many other functions which can do this faster/better.
You are then left with a number in the form of an integer possible followed by a comma or a dot and then the decimals, where the integer- and decimal-part easily can be separated from eachother with the following regex.
([0-9]+)[,\.]?([0-9]*)
Good luck!
Edit:
Here is an example made in python, I assume the code should be self-explaining, if it is not, just ask.
import re
input = str(raw_input())
delimiterRegex = re.compile('[0-9,\.]*([,\.])[0-9]*')
splitRegex = re.compile('([0-9]+)[,\.]?([0-9]*)')
delimiter = re.findall(delimiterRegex, input)
if (delimiter[0] == ','):
input = re.sub('[\.]*','', input)
elif (delimiter[0] == '.'):
input = re.sub('[,]*','', input)
print input
With this code, the following inputs gives this:
111.111,11
111111,11
111,111.11
111111.11
111,111
111,111
After this step, one can now easily modify the string to match your needs.
How about
/(\d{1,3}(?:,\d{3})*)(\.\d{2})?/
if you care about validating that the commas separate every 3 digits exactly,
or
/(\d[\d,]*)(\.\d{2})?/
if you don't.
If I'm interpreting your question correctly so that you are saying the result SHOULD look like what you say is "would" look like, then I think you just need to leave the comma out of the character class, since it is used as a separator and not a part of what is to be matched.
So get rid of the "." first, then match the two parts.
$value = "111,111.11";
$value =~ s/\.//g;
$value =~ m/(\d+)(?:,(\d+))?/;
$1 = leading integers with periods removed
$2 = either undef if it didn't exist, or the post-comma digits if they do exist.
See Perl's Regexp::Common::number.