So in my CSE course we are given a header file to use right now for our programs that we're writing.
Unfortunately I can't get terminal to compile using that header, it gives quite a few errors (compiling with just 'g++'). Also, when I'm at my university and I'm using PuTTY I get the same errors while using this header. However, I don't get the errors when I compile with 'g++ -std=c++14'.
I've tried compiling with this command on terminal on my mac, but it says it doesn't recognize the c++14 part.
dhcp-10-202-147-243:hw1pr1 Admin$ g++ -std=c++14 hw1pr1.cpp
error: invalid value 'c++14' in '-std=c++14'
Any help on how I could get this to work would be greatly appreciated. Hopefully this all made some sort of sense.
Here's the error I get when I compile with the header file I'm talking about in terminal with just g++.
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/../lib/c++/v1/ext/hash_map:212:5: warning:
Use of the header <ext/hash_map> is deprecated. Migrate to <unordered_map>
[-W#warnings]
# warning Use of the header <ext/hash_map> is deprecated. Migrate to ...
^
In file included from read_first_name.cpp:1:
./std_lib_facilities_4.h:43:20: error: no matching function for call to object
of type 'hash<char *>'
return hash<char*>()(s.c_str());
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Toolchains/XcodeDefault.xctoolchain/usr/bin/../lib/c++/v1/ext/__hash:39:12: note:
candidate function not viable: 1st argument ('const value_type *'
(aka 'const char *')) would lose const qualifier
size_t operator()(char *__c) const _NOEXCEPT
^
In file included from read_first_name.cpp:1:
./std_lib_facilities_4.h:112:8: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0
is always false [-Wtautological-compare]
if (i<0||size()<=i) throw Range_error(i);
~^~
./std_lib_facilities_4.h:118:8: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0
is always false [-Wtautological-compare]
if (i<0||size()<=i) throw Range_error(i);
~^~
3 warnings and 1 error generated.
This error doesn't happen and the program will compile fully when I use PuTTY and 'g++ std=c++14'
There's lots of change between C++ standards, so what is valid in one revision need not be in another.
g++ defaults to -std=gnu++98 for C++, which is the decades old C++98-standard enhanced with GNU extensions (most of which are conformant).
Choose the proper revision: -std=c++1y -pedantic is a very close approximation to C++14.
What changes introduced in C++14 can potentially break a program written in C++11?
Looking at what you say you're having to use and the name format of that .cpp file, I think I'm in the same class. A year later, looks like, but here's my solution for archive's sake:
The std_lib_facilities.h header comes with the Bjarne Stroustrup textbook, "Programming: Principles and Practices Using C++". For those unaware, Bjarne Stroustrup invented C++ (he has a pretty good idea what he's talking about). Incidentally, the book is a fantastic way to learn C++, if one takes the time to actually read it. The std_lib_facilities.h header is just a convenient header file for beginners in C++, containing links to all the major standard libraries used in the textbook, as well as some helper functions that help account for potential mistakes or errors, or are just convenient for learning (such as an error() function that handles simple exception throwing for the student, or adding an "out of bounds" check for vectors). It's ultimately just a way to allow students to hop right into code without having to learn specifics about the header.
Stroustrup keeps updated with C++ and thus includes several libraries that require the c++11 standard. The CSCE department wants its students (at least in this early class) to connect to the department's Unix system and compile from there, in order to avoid confusion with downloading and updating compilers.
I happened to already have had a couple C++ classes beforehand, and thus already had g++ set up on my Ubuntu laptop. I avoided including the std_lib_facilities for as long as possible since I was getting the same error as Topic Creator Joe, where g++ didn't recognize the "c++11" part (manually including the required libraries worked fine until we had to use a class from the textbook that used one of the header's helper functions) . Eventually, I found a help topic online that advised me simply to update my g++ compiler to 4.7 or higher, since 4.6 and lower doesn't have support for C++11 (or, of course, C++14). It was oddly rather involved compared to updates one might be used to on Mac or Windows, and I doubt the exact process would apply, but that is (was?) likely the problem: it's just an older version of g++, and it needs an update to compile C++11 and later. I recommend searching for ways to update g++/gcc for Mac.
Should, y'know, anyone else with this problem stumble upon this and not have their problem solved yet.
Related
I'm starting a project using C++, which I haven't used before outside of a handful of school projects - nowhere near the scope of what I'm tackling now.
My goal is to try my best to follow the C++ Core Guidelines as I work to avoid errors, improve performance, and most importantly: improve maintainability of my code.
I've been running into literally hundreds of issues ranging from my g++ / Clang++ versions not being right to standard libraries not being found to g++ using the wrong version of C++ for compilation to very basic functions not behaving as expected - and I haven't even started to look into autotools, so I expect many more headaches to follow.
This question is specific to one part of the C++ Core Guidelines, though. Interfaces 6: Prefer Expects() for expressing preconditions
I tried writing the following simple code:
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
int square(int x) {
Expects(x > 0);
return x * x;
}
int main() {
cout << square(3) << endl;
return 0;
}
This threw an error in g++:
$> g++ -std=c++17 main.cpp
main.cpp: In function ‘int square(int)’:
main.cpp:7:2: error: ‘Expects’ was not declared in this scope
Expects(x > 0);
^~~~~~~
-> [1]
I tried using Clang, as well, but it has an entirely different (and unrelated) problem:
$> clang++ -x c++ main.cpp
main.cpp:1:10: fatal error: 'iostream' file not found
#include <iostream>
^~~~~~~~~~
1 error generated.
-> [1]
I haven't figured out how to fix that one yet, so I'm not bothering with it.
Expects is part of the GSL library. You have to use some GSL library implementation, which you can find on Github:
https://github.com/martinmoene/gsl-lite
https://github.com/Microsoft/GSL
These are the ones I have off the top of my head.
The CPP Guidelines likely allude to the "contracts" proposal which provides the same checks via attributes. It was scheduled for C++20, but later removed for lack of consensus on its scope. See p1823r0 and a standard committee member's Reddit thread on the rationale leading to the removal.
Apart from GSL, Excepts exists also in C++20 not in C++17 with a little different syntax
https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/attributes/contract
I just tried compiling code that I wrote a while ago using Gnu g++ in C++11 mode, to see if the code will need reworking anytime soon (I also plan to test it in C++17 mode for the same reason).
I found that the kill() function caused a compiler error and it seems that the kill function no longer exists in the signal.h header.
I just looked at http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/csignal/ as a reference which seems to confirm this is not just a Gnu-specific omission, but seems to be in the standard.
I can't find a rationale for this omission anywhere, nor can I find any proposal for how I should manage processes without it. Can anyone point me in the right direction?
C++ standard function is raise.
kill is a POSIX function that requires POSIX process id pid_t, none of which is required in C++ standard.
OK, I was too quick to post that question, of course fork/kill etc are not part of the C++ standard in the first place but are common additions on unix-like platforms.
My real problem was that I used the wrong compiler switch. For anyone else hitting this problem, to get strict C++11 standard, use:
g++ -std=c++11
But to get the C++11 standard plus non-standard extensions use:
g++ -std=gnu++11
Using the latter, I can build and call fork/kill no problem.
I've been trying to learn unit testing on my own following along a book.
Code in the book use the C++11 standard and have a line like this:
auto variable = function(parameter);
When I first compiled it I got this warning:
warning: 'auto' changes meaning in C++11; please remove it [-Wc++0x-compat]
No biggie, I could fix that by checking the following box in the Project->Build options... menu:
[ ] Have g++ follow the C++ 11 ISO C++ language standard [-std=c++11]
Now, however, I get new errors related to Google Mock in the gtest-port.h :
| | In function 'int testing::internal::posix::StrCaseCmp(const char*, const char*)':
|1719| error: '_stricmp' was not declared in this scope
| | In function 'char* testing::internal::posix::StrDup(const char*)':
|1721| error: '_strdup' was not declared in this scope
| | In function 'FILE* testing::internal::posix::FDOpen(int, const char*)':|
|1779| error: 'fdopen' was not declared in this scope
Searching for this problem yielded little for me but I did try and define the target OS as it was a suggested solution in case it was not correctly identified automatically. Adding GTEST_OS_WINDOWS=1 and/or GTEST_OS_WINDOWS_DESKTOP=1 in the projects defines changed nothing.
I realize this is easily fixed in this instance by just providing the correct type instead of using auto but I'd like to find a solution for this if possible. Replacing auto and not having the -std=c++11 option checked makes the code work as intended so the library works.
I'm using Code::Blocks 13.12 , MinGW/g++ 4.8.1-4 and Google Mock 1.7 in Windows.
Thanks for reading =)
The answer here lies in the functions which are missing declarations: _stricmp, _strdup and fdopen. The first two are Microsoft versions of the POSIX functions stricmp and strdup. Note that you are specifying the use of the C++11 ISO standard which does not contain items in the POSIX standard. By specifying --std=gnu++11 you are telling the compiler to accept a hybrid of C++11 and POSIX along with GNU extensions.
Interestingly I cannot replicate this with GCC 4.8.2 on Linux so there is the possibility that something else is going on in the Google Mock headers when compiling on Windows.
Answering for anyone still facing the same issue:
The source of this issue might be in your CMakeLists file.
Set your compiler flags to -std=gnu++ instead of -std=c++
One way to do it would be to include
set(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS "-std=gnu++0x")
to your CMakeLists file.
I am porting a project from Windows to Linux/Ubuntu, which involves using open software called "PST SDK"
(http://pstsdk.codeplex.com) written in c++. This has not been updated since 2010 but it works fine in
Windows and supposedly works/did work in Linux. I set up a demo program with nothing more than including
the header files (the library is all headers, nothing to link). I had a lot of errors but got them
fixed by using g++ instead of gcc, and fiddling with the location of the library files and required
boost files.
However once I tried making some calls, I ran into problems. I got a few things working, but the
following code:
std::vector<pstsdk::folder> folderlist;
folderlist.push_back(folder);
causes this compile error:
error: 'pstsdk::property_bag& pstsdk::property_bag::operator=(const pstsdk::property_bag&)' is private
(There is a lot of other veribiage about what was instantiated from what file). Here is the compile command:
g++ -c -I/usr/local/include -Iboost_1_46_1 -Ipstsdk -I/usr/local/include/mysql ostdemo.cpp
It is specifically the push_back call causing the errors - take that out and they go away. Of course
that is critical to the working of my program. Any idea what this could be? I assume it has
something to do with my compiler version or switches, but I can't figure it out. I am not much of
a c++ programmer so any help would be appreciated.
Your vector::push_back() requires that the type is copy-assignable. Obviously, your pstsdk::folder is not copy-assignable due to the assignment operator being private.
What are the requirements for a type to be placed in a vector? It depends on whether you're using pre-C++11 or C++11, plus what operations you plan to do on these types. See here:
http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/container/vector
Pay attention to CopyAssignable, CopyConstructible, MoveAssignable and MoveConstructible
So the case of it working with Windows as opposed to Linux:
Remember that "Windows" and "Linux" are not C++ compilers. You need to expand on this and tell us what version of the g++ compiler you're using on each OS.
I'm currently writing a very simple game engine for an assignment and to make the code a lot nicer I've decided to use a vector math library. One of my lecturers showed me the Sony Vector Math library which is used in the Bullet Physics engine and it's great as far as I can see. I've got it working on Linux nicely but I'm having problems porting it to work on OS X (intel, Snow Leopard). I have included the files correctly in my project but the C++ version of the library doesn't seem to compile. I can get the C version of the library working but it has a fairly nasty API compared to the C++ version and the whole reason of using this library was to neaten the code in the first place.
http://glosx.blogspot.com/2008/07/sony-vector-math-library.html
This blog post that I've stumbled upon seems to suggest something's up with the compiler? It's fairly short so I couldn't take a lot of information from it.
When I try to use the C++ version I get the following errors (expanded view of each error):
/usr/include/vectormath/cpp/../SSE/cpp/vectormath_aos.h:156:0
/usr/include/vectormath/cpp/../SSE/cpp/vectormath_aos.h:156:
error: '__forceinline' does not name a type
second error:
/Developer/apps/gl test/main.cpp:7:0 In file included from /Developer/apps/gl test/main.cpp
/usr/include/vectormath/cpp/vectormath_aos.h:38:0 In file included from
/usr/include/vectormath/cpp/vectormath_aos.h
/usr/include/vectormath/cpp/../SSE/cpp/vectormath_aos.h:330:0 In file included from
/usr/include/vectormath/cpp/../SSE/cpp/vectormath_aos.h
/usr/include/vectormath/cpp/../SSE/cpp/vecidx_aos.h:45:0 Expected constructor, destructor,
or type conversion before '(' token in /usr/include/vectormath/cpp/../SSE/cpp/vecidx_aos.h
Finally two errors at the end of the main.cpp file:
Expected '}' at the end of input
Expected '}' at the end of input
I've Googled my heart out but I can't seem to find any answers or anything to point me in the right direction so any help will be greatly received.
Thanks,
__forceinline is a reserved word that is supported by only a couple compilers. Clearly, your compiler does not support the __forceinline keyword and the code in question is non-portable.
A very poor workaround would be to pass a new define to your compiler that gives the keyword the correct meaning. E.g.: -D__forceinline=inline or -D__forceinline=__attribute__((always_inline)) (Thanks Paul!)
The SSE version was assumed to be only for Microsoft Visual Studio. For other platforms (Mac etc) you can use the scalar version.
Bullet\Extras\vectormathlibrary\include\vectormath\scalar\cpp
It looks like someone's fixed this up and posted a patched version in response to this very issue.
Now GCC compliant.
Which compiler are you using on OS X ? There are 4 to choose from in the standard Xcode 3.2 install and the default is gcc 4.2. You might be better off trying gcc 4.0.