i have a getrank button which is supposed to make get request to the server
So for this i wrote a Getrank function in controller inside which i have this
var self = this;
this.store.find('post',"1").then(function(data){
self.set('mydata',data);
console.log(self.get('mydata'));
},
function(error){
alert(error);
})
It returns a class.,instead i need a json to work on
Is it a normal behaviour or am i doing something wrong?
If you need a JSON response use jQuery's getJSON method. Ember-Data gives you client side records that it manages with a plethora of additional functionality.
Ember and Ember Data are two different products and Ember works just fine without Ember-Data using POJOs
Related
I'm using Django REST Framework, not Rails (which seems to have several magical gems to make everything work swiftly with Ember) and I've been having some difficulties trying to figure out how Ember expects responses. I'm using Ember CLI, thus I'm also using Ember data.
The documentation states only the typical GET usage, when I'm simply retrieving an object or an array of objects. Documentation states:
The JSON payload should be an object that contains the record inside a root property
And about conventions:
Attribute names in your JSON payload should be the camelCased versions of the attributes in your Ember.js models.
No problem with that.
1. But how should the API respond when there are errors?
Ok, so documentation also states you could use ajaxError to check jqXHR status for an error and then return a populated DS.Error for the record. However, how should I return different kind of errors. For example, let's say the user session is now invalid and because of that the server couldn't delete a record as requested.
2. How will Ember submit requests?
I'm quite new to REST in general. I think Ember simply use the appropriate verb for the action it wants: GET, POST, PUT, DELETE. I think it's quite clear it will send all the model's field to POST a new one, but how about DELETE? Will Ember send all the record or just the ID to delete an object?
Generally you should be able to see the requests Ember makes by just opening your browser dev tools and seeing the network requests.
Ember data likes the api to respond with an errors hash, something like this:
{"errors":{"title":["can't be blank"]}}
Then as long as you define a function to handle the error case:
Ember.Controller.extend({
actions: {
deleteUser: function() {
var user = this.model;
function success() {
// do something cool?
}
function failure() {
user.rollback();
}
user.destroyRecord().then(success, failure);
}
}
});
then user.errors will be automatically populated and you can do an if user.errors in your template.
How can I get my web api to understand the format returned by ember data?
ember data is sending like this:
{client: {firstName:"",lastName:""}}
As far as I understand web api is looking for
{firstName:"",lastName:""}
After so much googling I finally get the right terms and figured out how to do it. Simple serilizer update on the ember data side:
App.ApplicationSerializer = DS.RESTSerializer.extend({
serializeIntoHash: function (hash, type, record, options) {
Ember.merge(hash, this.serialize(record, options));
}
});
I have a again which I can't answer for my self properly, maybe because of my lack in expierience with EmberJS.
I have to develop a management interface in EmberJS, using Symfony 2 for the backend, which should act and feel like a desktop application. So far so good, but since alot of people will work with the data inside this application, i would really like to use a WebSocket adapter implementation for EmberJS, since every connected client should always know about changes in entities immediately (or asap). I could write a WebSocket adapter for EmberJS but my problem here is that the WebSocket will do much more then RESTful operations, also the server will send messages without any EmberJS request (e.g. an entity changed and the server broadcasting this change to all clients). That means that i need a "command" structure on top of RESTful operations which, as far as my expierience goes, will not work with a pure DS Adapter.
For example:
Maybe i will trigger a controller method that will send a websocket message like this:
{command: "say", parameters: {message: "Hello guys!"} }
This command is not Entity (DS) related and will never go into the application store.
Another example would be like this:
{command: "load entity", parameters: {type: "Vendor\Bundle\Entity\Type", id: 43} }
Which would load an entity which should be stored in the application store.
Well, as i said, im not that familiar with EmberJS that I could figure out which the best approach could be. Should I bypass the DS Adapter completely and check for "isDirty" and just the push methods after loading entities? I'm happy about any idea you have!
As far as I understand your question, you want to push changes from your backend to your single page app?
You can push custom JSON into your application's store in Ember by using self.store.push('modelName', json). Have a look at the docs for a better undestanding.
So for example if your server sends you JSON via websocket that looks like this
{
- "message": {
"type": "fooModel",
"data": {
... // Model attributes here
}
}
}
you can push the data into your store. The following snippet would work with SocketIO for example:
App.ApplicationRoute = Ember.Route.extend({
activate: function() {
// connect to the websocket once we enter the application route
var socket = window.io.connect('http://localhost:8080');
var self = this;
socket.on('message', function(data){
self.store.push(data.type, data.item);
});
}
});
You can easily modify this snippet to fit your needs.
I'm using Ember 1.4 with EmberData beta 7. The routes in my application are fairly straight forward and looks like this. ScenarioController and StratsControllers are ArrayControllers. StratsStratController is an ObjectController.
App.Router.map(function () {
this.route('scenarios', {path: "/scenarios"});
this.resource('strats', {path: "/"}, function() {
this.route('strat', {path: "/strat/:strat_id"});
});
});
When I first transitioned into the 'strats' route, Ember calls the findAll method, which makes a request to my server for all 'strat' instances as expected. My server returns all data associated with the 'strat' model, side loading all related hasMany records. Then I transitioned to the scenarios route, and Ember calls findAll to fetch all 'scenario' instances, which was also as expected. However, when I transitioned back to the 'strats' route via the browser's back button, I see another GET message from Ember to my server requesting all 'strat' instances again. This surprised me. Why did Ember make another call to findAll for the 'strat' instances when it already has it in DS.store? Is this expected behavior?
I think its because its a live array of data, so ember checks to see if anything has changed in the mean time. You can change the data to a static array using the toArray() method but the way it is currently means that any updates to the database are automatically reflected on the client.
I have just come across this in the docs:
FINDING ALL RECORDS OF A TYPE
1
var posts = this.store.find('post'); // => GET /posts
To get a list of records already loaded into the store, without making another network request, use all instead.
1
var posts = this.store.all('post'); // => no network request
find returns a DS.PromiseArray that fulfills to a DS.RecordArray and all directly returns a DS.RecordArray.
It's important to note that DS.RecordArray is not a JavaScript array. It is an object that implements Ember.Enumerable. This is important because, for example, if you want to retrieve records by index, the [] notation will not work--you'll have to use objectAt(index) instead.
We are using version pre4 of ember.
We have a framework (SignalR) working parallel with ember that handles real-time notifications to our application. In the older versions of ember we were able to access the global reference of the router / controller. But with the new version of Ember this is no longer possible. (This is fine)
We have tried different approaches like setting up a global controller in the top route:
setupController: function(){
app.appController = this.controllerFor('app');
}
and sending an event to this controller, which bubbles up to the route like this:
notificator.update = function (context) {
app.appController.send('notificationOccured', context);
});
But this feels like working against the Ember team which just removed the global references.
So now to the big question: is there a better way to access the router or a controller from outside Ember? Preferably send an event to either with a context.
All help is appreciated!
So now to the big question: is there a better way to access the router or a controller from outside Ember? Preferably send an event to either with a context.
Yes. This sounds like a good fit for the ember instrumentation module. Have an appropriate controller subscribe to SignalR events, then trigger them whenever your app handles real-time notification.
First, add a method to ApplicationController for processing updates. If not defined here the event would bubble to the router.
App.ApplicationController = Ember.Controller.extend({
count: 0,
name: 'default',
signalrNotificationOccured: function(context) {
this.incrementProperty('count');
this.set('name', context.name);
}
});
Next, setup your ApplicationController by subscribing to the signalr.notificationOccured event. Use the before callback to log the event and send it's payload to the controller.
App.ApplicationRoute = Ember.Route.extend({
setupController: function (controller, model) {
Ember.Instrumentation.subscribe("signalr.notificationOccured", {
before: function(name, timestamp, payload) {
console.log('Recieved ', name, ' at ' + timestamp + ' with payload: ', payload);
controller.send('signalrNotificationOccured', payload);
},
after: function() {}
});
}
});
Then from your SignalR Application, use Ember.Instrumentation.instrument to send payload to your ApplicationController as follows:
notificator.update = function (context) {
Ember.Instrumentation.instrument("signalr.notificationOccured", context);
});
I posted a working copy with simulated SignalR notifications here: http://jsbin.com/iyexuf/1/edit
Docs on the instrumentation module can be found here, also check out the specs for more examples.
You probably shouldn't be doing this but here's a way to get access to the application's controllers, views, models and router instances. When your application is initialized, controllers, views, models and router are all registered in the application container __container__
APP.__container__.lookup('controller:foo').get('content');
APP.__container__.lookup('view:foo').get('templateName');
APP.__container__.lookup('router:main');
What i think you should do is encapsulate calls to the 3rd party library inside Ember and let Ember manage the whole application. See this attempt to make JQuery UI ember-aware