In my EmberJS application I am displaying a list of Appointments. In an action in the AppointmentController I need to get the appointments owner, but the owner always returns "undefined".
My files:
models/appointment.js
import DS from 'ember-data';
export default DS.Model.extend({
appointmentStatus: DS.attr('number'),
owner: DS.hasMany('person'),
date: DS.attr('Date')
});
models/person.js
import DS from 'ember-data';
export default DS.Model.extend({
name: DS.attr('string')
});
templates/appointmentlist.js
{{#each appointment in controller}}
<div>
{{appointment.date}} <button type="button" {{action 'doIt'}}>Do something!</button>
</div>
{{/each }}
controllers/appointmentlist.js
export default Ember.ArrayController.extend({
itemController: 'appointment'
});
controllers/appointment.js
export default Ember.ObjectController.extend({
actions:{
doIt: function(){
var appointment = this.get('model');
var owner = appointment.get('owner'); //returns undefined
//Do something with owner
}
}
});
Now, I know I can change the owner-property to owner: DS.hasMany('person', {async: true}), and then handle the promise returned from appointment.get('owner');, but that is not what I want.
I have discovered that if I do this {{appointment.owner}} or this {{appointment.owner.name}} in the appointmentlist template, the owner record is fetched from the server. So I guess Ember does not load relationships unless they are used in the template.
I think that the solution to my problem is to use the appointmentlists route to fetch the record in the belongsTo relationship. But I can't figure out how.
Maybe something like this?
routes/appointmentlist.js
export default Ember.Route.extend({
model: function() {
return this.store.find('appointment');
},
afterModel: function(appointments){
//what to do
}
});
EDIT
I did this:
routes/appointmentlist.js
export default Ember.Route.extend({
model: function() {
return this.store.find('appointment');
},
afterModel: function(appointments){
$.each(appointments.content, function(i, appointment){
var owner= appointment.get('owner')
});
}
});
and it works, but I do not like the solution...
You are still asynchronously loading those records, so if you are fast enough you could still get undefined. It'd be better to return a promise from the afterModel hook, or just modify the model hook to do it all.
model: function() {
return this.store.find('appointment').then(function(appointments){
return Ember.RSVP.all(appointments.getEach('owner')).then(function(){
return appointments;
});
});
}
or
model: function() {
return this.store.find('appointment');
},
afterModel: function(model, transition){
return Ember.RSVP.all(model.getEach('owner'));
}
Another way to go is:
export default Ember.Controller.extend({
modelChanged: function(){
this.set('loadingRelations',true);
Ember.RSVP.all(this.get('model').getEach('owner')).then(()=>{
this.set('loadingRelations',false);
});
}.observes('model')
});
This way the transition finishes faster and the relations are loaded afterwards. The loading-state can be observed through loadingRelations.
When there are a lot of relations to load I think this gives a better UX.
You want to load all the assocations in the route, because you want to use Fastboot for search engines and better first time site opened experience.
Holding your assocation loading after primary models are loaded, might not be the best decision.
I am using a syntax to load all assocations in the route:
let store = this.store;
let pagePromise = store.findRecord('page', params.page_id);
let pageItemsPromise = pagePromise.then(function(page) {
return page.get('pageItems');
});
return this.hashPromises({
page: pagePromise,
pageItems: pageItemsPromise
});
And for this.hashPromises I got a mixin:
import Ember from 'ember';
export default Ember.Mixin.create({
hashPromises: function(hash) {
let keys = Object.keys(hash);
return Ember.RSVP.hashSettled(hash).then(function(vals) {
let returnedHash = {};
keys.forEach(function(key) {
returnedHash[key] = vals[key].value;
});
return returnedHash;
});
}
});
Related
So what I am doing is extremely basic: rendering model data to the template.
Upon setting the model hook, the {{model}} object doesn't show data in the corresponding template.
Here's my code:
contact (route):
user: Ember.inject.service('current-user'),
model: function()
{
// var that = this;
// console.log('whats being returned bitch: ', this.store.findRecord('contact', this.get('user').contactID));
//return this.store.findRecord('contact', this.get('user').contactID);
var records = this.store.findRecord('contact', this.get('user').contactID);
var promise = Ember.RSVP.defer();
// console.log('promise', promise.resolve());
// records.addObserver('isLoaded', function() {
// // console.log('records.getv', records);
promise.resolve(records);
//});
return promise;
},
setupController: function(controller)
{
// Get the parameters for the current route every time as they might change from one record to another
var params = this.paramsFor('dashboard.contact');
console.log('params', params);
// Set the data in the current instance of the object, this is required. Unless this is done the route will display the same data every time
this.module = Ember.String.capitalize(params.module);
this.id = params.id;
this.data = this.store.find(this.module,this.id);
// Set the data in the controller so that any data bound in the view can get re-rendered
controller.set('id',this.id);
controller.set('model',this.data);
controller.set('module',this.module);
}
});
First i was trying just this but it was not displaying data, then i tried deferring the promise and resolving it (like this) and finally i tried setting up the controller (setupController function) but that didn't work either since params is empty for some reason :/
contact(template):
<h1> Contact! </h1>
{{#each model as |contact|}}
<h3>{{contact.name}}</h3>
<h3>{{contact.password_c}}</h3>
{{/each}}
contact(model):
import DS from 'ember-data';
export default DS.Model.extend({
name: DS.attr('string'),
password_c: DS.attr('string'),
birthdate: DS.attr('string'),
assistant: DS.attr('string'),
account_name: DS.attr('string'),
email1: DS.attr('string'),
facebook: DS.attr('string'),
phone_home:DS.attr('string')
// address: Ember.computed('primary_address_street', 'primary_address_state',
// 'primary_address_city', 'primary_address_country', function() {
// return '${this.get('primary_address_street')} ${this.get('primary_address_state')} ${this.get('primary_address_city')} ${this.get('primary_address_country')}';
// })
});
Please help!
Let's assume this is your router
// app/router.js
import Ember from 'ember';
var Router = Ember.Router.extend({
});
Router.map(function() {
this.route('contacts', {path: '/contacts/:contact_id'});
});
export default Router;
and your model
// app/models/contact.js
import DS from 'ember-data';
export default DS.Model.extend({
name: DS.attr('string'),
password_c: DS.attr('string'),
});
then this is would be your contacts.js route it will have a very important role and We'll be using Ember Data's findRecord to retrieve an individual record from the data store.
// app/routes/contacts.js
import Ember from 'ember';
export default Ember.Route.extend({
model(param){
return this.store.findRecord('contact',param.contact_id);
}
});
note: this param is very important.The param is passed from the URL into the model. This posts model has an id that can be accessed via contact_id. It uses that id to look up the record so it can be returned. By default the template with the same name, contacts, will have access to this model.
Here we use Ember Data's findAll. This simply returns back all the records in the post data store.
// app/routes/application.js
import Ember from 'ember';
export default Ember.Route.extend({
model() {
return this.store.findAll('contact');
}
});
now
// app/templates/application.hbs
{{#each model as |contact|}}
<h3>{{contact.name}}</h3>
<h3>{{contact.password_c}}</h3>
{{/each}}
As I don't have access to see your service and all your code I tried to simplify the way you can return all contact and get that and also how you can pass Param easily.
for more information : https://guides.emberjs.com/v2.7.0/tutorial/ember-data/
You can follow this codes and customize as you would like, I hope it will resolve your problem.
UPDATE:
If you have already your user data and it's ok, then remove {{#each}}
and let's have {{contact.name}}, that should work, you just need #each
while you have all contact like this.store.findAll('contact'); or if
you are in you must have this {{model.name}}, then model would be
contact !
So i have the following models:
var User = DS.Model.extend({
name: DS.attr('string'),
defaultRealm: DS.belongsTo('realm', { async: true })
});
var Realm = DS.Model.extend({
name: DS.attr('string')
});
My router and route look like:
App.Router.map(function() {
this.route('index', { path: '/:user_id' });
this.route('realm', { path: '/realms/:realm_id' });
});
App.UserRoute = Em.Route.extend(
model: function (params) {
return this.store.find('user', params.user_id);
},
setupController: function (controller, model) {
controller.set('model', model);
}
);
And in my index template i have the following:
{{#link-to 'realm' model.defaultRealm}}
Realm
{{/link-to}}
Now everything works as expected except that the link-to generates a url like /realms/<App.RealmModel:ember728:541ddd0f29909d0000b6d407> instead of /realms/541ddd0f29909d0000b6d407. It looks like instead of serializing the id of the model it's serializing the entire DS.Model object (defaultRealm is actually a PromiseObject due to the relationship being async). What's going on here?
Current workaround:
Use an observer on the controller and use realmId in the template. Is this really necessary?
App.IndexController = Em.ObjectController.extend({
realmId: null,
modelObserver: Em.observer('model', function () {
var self = this;
self.get('model.defaultRealm').then(function (realm) {
self.set('realmId', realm.get('id'));
});
});
});
Versions:
ember#1.7.0
ember-data#1.0.0-beta.10
handlebars#1.3.0
When building the url it uses the serialize hook to find the realm_id on the route. You can easily work around this by using the id, there is likely something else wrong with it, but I'll have to play with it later.
{{#link-to 'realms' defaultRealm.id}}
Realm
{{/link-to}}
Example with async: http://emberjs.jsbin.com/OxIDiVU/1107/edit
I've got the following 2 controllers:
controllers/student/index.js
import Ember from 'ember';
export default Ember.ObjectController.extend({
hasDebt: function(){
var totalCredit = this.get('totalCredit');
var totalCreditSpent = this.get('totalCreditSpent');
if (totalCreditSpent > totalCredit)
{
return true;
}
return false;
}.property('payments.#each', 'lessons.#each'),
});
controllers/students.js
import Ember from 'ember';
export default Ember.ArrayController.extend({
itemController: 'student/index',
sortProperties: ['fullName'],
sortAscending: true,
debts: function(){
var allDebts = [];
var totalDebts = 0;
this.forEach(function(student){
if (student.get('hasDebt'))
{
allDebts.push({
name: student.get('fullName'),
amount: student.get('availableCredit')
});
totalDebts += student.get('availableCredit');
}
});
return {'all': allDebts, 'total': totalDebts};
}.property('this.#each.payments', 'this.#each.lessons'),
});
And everything is working as expected. I'm able to access the hasDebt property of each element through the itemController.
Now I'd like to show the debts in a dashboard in the IndexRoute, so I've created the following additional controller, hoping to be able to access the StudentsController by using needs:
controllers/index.js
import Ember from 'ember';
export default Ember.Controller.extend({
needs: ['students'],
debts: function(){
var debts = [];
console.log( this.get('controllers.students.debts') );
this.get('controllers.students').forEach(function(student){
console.log('student');
});
return debts;
}.property(''),
});
I seem unable to access the StudentsController and any of its properties.
What am I doing wrong?
I believe that a computed property must observe a property in order to ever be populated. In your example:
controllers/index.js
export default Ember.Controller.extend({
needs: ['students'],
students: Em.computed.alias('controllers.students'),
debts: function() {
...
}.property('students.debts')
});
In this example I also made it a little easier to use Students by providing a Computed Alias mapped to students in the controller.
Debugging
It's also very handy to use the browser's console when debugging. Try running something like the following and see what comes back.
App.__container__.lookup('controller:index').get('students')
This assumes your application exists under the App namespace.
I am trying to implement a controller needing another (CampaignsNew needing AppsIndex), which looks like
App.CampaignsNewController = Ember.Controller.extend({
needs: ['appsIndex']
});
And in my CampaignsNew template I am showing it via
{{#if controllers.appsIndex.content.isUpdating}}
{{view App.SpinnerView}}
{{else}}
{{#each controllers.appsIndex.content}}
{{name}}
{{/each}}
{{/if}}
However controllers.appsIndex.content.isUpdating is never true. I.e. it attempts to show the data before it has been loaded.
My AppsIndex route has the model overridden:
App.AppsIndexRoute = Ember.Route.extend({
model: function(controller) {
var store = this.get('store').findAll('app');
}
...
});
I can get it to work if I put the same code within my CampaignsNew route and modify the template to each through controller.content. Which says to me that needs is not using the route? It also works if I go to the /apps page and it loads the data, and then navigate to the /campaigns/new page.
How do I get this to work? Thanks!
Edit:
As requested, the relevant parts of my router:
App.Router.map(function() {
this.resource('apps', function() {
...
});
this.resource('campaigns', function() {
this.route('new');
});
});
And the AppsIndex is accessed at /apps and CampaignsNew is at /campaigns/new
Edit2:
After implementing the suggestion by #kingpin2k, I've found that Ember is throwing an error. Below are the updated files and the error received.
App.CampaignsNewController = Ember.ObjectController.extend({
pageTitle: 'New Campaign'
});
App.CampaignsNewRoute = Ember.Route.extend({
model: function(controller) {
return Ember.RSVP.hash({
campaign: this.store.createRecord('campaign'),
apps: this.store.find('app')
});
// return this.store.createRecord('campaign');
},
setupController: function(controller, model){
controller.set('apps', model.apps);
this._super(controller, model.campaign);
}
});
Ember throws this error:
Error while loading route: Error: Assertion Failed: Cannot delegate set('apps', <DS.RecordArray:ember689>) to the 'content' property of object proxy <App.CampaignsNewController:ember756>: its 'content' is undefined.
I read online that this is because the content object doesn't exist. If I set it like so:
App.CampaignsNewController = Ember.ObjectController.extend({
content: Ember.Object.create(),
...
});
Then the page loads without error, and when inspecting the Ember Chrome extension, I can see the data has loaded. But it doesn't show on the page. Which I suppose happened because the content object existed and so Ember didn't wait for the model's promise to fulfill before rendering the template. Seems odd that you should have to define content in such a way though. Any insight on how to handle this?
Edit3: Question answered for me in another thread
Based on your router, apps isn't a parent of campaigns/new.
This means someone could hit #/campaigns/new and Ember would hit ApplicationRoute, CampaignsRoute, and CampaignsNewRoute to populate the necessary information for the url requested. Using needs as a way of communicating between controllers really only makes sense in an ancestral pattern (aka communicating with your parents, grandparents etc).
Just as another quick note, AppsIndex is a route of Apps, it won't be hit when your url includes a child. e.g.
Router
this.resource('apps', function() {
this.resource('chocolate', function(){
.....
});
});
Url being hit
#/apps/chocolate
Routes that will be hit
ApplicationRoute
AppsRoute
ChocolateRoute
ChocolateIndexRoute
The index route is only hit when you don't specify a route of a resource, and you are hitting that exact resource (aka nothing past that resource).
Update
You can return multiple models from a particular hook:
App.FooRoute = Em.Route.extend({
model: function(){
return Em.RSVP.hash({
cows: this.store.find('cows'),
dogs: this.store.find('dogs')
});
}
});
If you want the main model to still be cows, you could switch this up at the setupController level.
App.FooRoute = Em.Route.extend({
model: function(){
return Em.RSVP.hash({
cows: this.store.find('cows'),
dogs: this.store.find('dogs')
});
},
setupController: function(controller, model){
controller.set('dogs', model.dogs); // there is a property on the controller called dogs with the dogs
this._super(controller, model.cows); // the model backing the controller is cows
}
});
Check out the second answer here, EmberJS: How to load multiple models on the same route? (the first is correct as well, just doesn't mention the gotchas of returning multiple models from the model hook).
You can also just set the property during the setupController, though this means it won't be available when the page has loaded, but asynchronously later.
Which controller?
Use Controller if you aren't going to back your controller with a model.
App.FooRoute = Em.Route.extend({
model: function(){
return undefined;
}
});
Use ObjectController, if you are going to set the model of the controller as something, that isn't a collection.
App.FooRoute = Em.Route.extend({
model: function(){
return Em.RSVP.hash({
cows: this.store.find('cows'),
dogs: this.store.find('dogs')
});
}
});
Use ArrayController if that something is going to be a collection of some sort.
App.FooRoute = Em.Route.extend({
model: function(){
return ['asdf','fdsasfd'];
}
});
Note
If you override the setupController, it won't set the model of the controller unless you explicitly tell it to, or use this._super.
App.FooRoute = Em.Route.extend({
model: function(){
return Em.RSVP.hash({
cows: this.store.find('cows'),
dogs: this.store.find('dogs')
});
},
setupController: function(controller, model){
controller.set('cows', model.cows);
controller.set('dogs', model.dogs);
// uh oh, model isn't set on the controller, it should just be Controller
// or you should define one of them as the model
// controller.set('model', model.cows); or
// this._super(controller, model.cows); this does the default setupController method
// in this particular case, ArrayController
}
});
I'm working with
Ember RC3
Ember Data Revision 12
Handlebars RC3
I have Ember Data sideloading relationships on many of my models, so that I can template the sideloaded relationships like so:
// Models
App.Client = DS.Model.extend({
company: DS.attr('string'),
accountNumber: DS.attr('string'),
startDate: DS.attr('mysqlDate'),
// Relationships
campaigns: DS.hasMany('App.Campaign'),
users: DS.hasMany('App.User'),
phones: DS.hasMany('App.Phone'),
addresses: DS.hasMany('App.Address')
});
App.User = DS.Model.extend({
email: DS.attr('string'),
password: DS.attr('string'),
// Relationships
userType: DS.belongsTo('App.UserType'),
role: DS.belongsTo('App.Role'),
clients: DS.hasMany('App.Client'),
phones: DS.hasMany('App.Phone'),
addresses: DS.hasMany('App.Address')
});
<!-- template -->
<script type="text/x-handlebars" data-template-name="user/index">
<h2>{{email}}</h2>
<h5>Clients</h5>
<ul>
{{#each client in model.clients}}
<li>{{client.company}}</li>
{{/each}}
</ul>
</script>
This works wonderfully...except for every 1 in 10 reloads or so. Every once in a while the sideloaded relationship (in this case the hasMany relationship model.clients) DOES NOT render to the template while all other model properties (not relationships) DO render to the template. What's weird is that it only does this every once in a while.
I'm not quite sure yet how I can set up a js fiddle for this problem, so I wanted to ask:
Where in the call stack could I set a break point to see what properties will actually get rendered?
I'm using {{debugger}} in the template in question, I'm just not sure where the best place would be to inspect the application state in the call stack.
So, my problem was two-fold. First Problem: Here's my router map and routes:
App.Router.map(function() {
this.resource('users', function() {
this.route('create');
this.resource('user', { path: ':user_id' }, function() {
this.route('edit');
this.route('delete');
});
});
});
App.UsersRoute = Ember.Route.extend({
model: function() {
return App.User.find();
}
});
// Default for this route
App.UserRoute = Ember.Route.extend({
model: function(params) {
return App.User.find(params.user_id);
}
});
Therefore, when navigating to the route 'clients/3' the DS.JSONSerializer would do an extract() for the UserRoute and an extractMany() for the UsersRoute. However, interestingly enough, most of the time extractMany() (for getting a JSON return of all of the users) would occur before extract() for the single user and its sideloaded properties. When this happened the sideloaded properties would indeed render to the template. However, every once in a while extract() would come before extractMany() (it asynchronosly "beat" the extract many), the sideloaded properties would not render. I think this is because if the extract() occured first that model would then be reset when the extractMany() then occurred for all of the models, which when extracting many do not have sideloaded properties.
I fixed this first problem by doing the following:
App.Router.map(function() {
this.resource('users', function() {
this.route('create');
});
this.resource('user', { path: 'user/:user_id' }, function() {
this.route('edit');
this.route('delete');
});
});
This prevented both models from being extracted in the same route, but the following might have solved both problems.
Second Problem: When navigating away from client/3 to clients and then back to client/3 again, the model would get reset just like the first problem—-sideloaded properties would get dropped.
The way to fix this was to use the UserRoute's activate hook to reload the model.
App.UserRoute = Ember.Route.extend({
activate: function() {
this.modelFor('user').reload();
}
});
This will force the model to be reloaded with the sideloaded properties every time this route 'activates', which is needed of this particular app we're building anyway.
Hope this helps somebody!
You may want to have a custom property that observes your association and print its content in the console.
printRelationship: function() {
console.log(model.clients.get('length'), model.clients);
}.computed(model.clients.#each);