Is there anyway to permanently force yiic inside protected folder of my application, to always (no matter, what) use customized table name for migrations?
The only way, I found is "standard" way of yiic migrate --migrationTable=migrations. But this is very bad approach. Any (accidental or intentional) miss / forget in adding this extra parameter and entire migration will crack, as yiic will create new, empty tbl_migration table, instead of use proper migrations one.
class MyMigrateCommand extends MigrateCommand {
public $migrationTable='migrations';
}
Also you can update yiic.php file:
...
$app = Yii::createConsoleApplication($config);
$statConfig = require_once(dirname(__FILE__).'/config/console.php');
$app->configure($statConfig);
$app->commandRunner->commands = $statConfig['commandMap'];
...
and add into config:
...
'commandMap' => array(
'class'=>'system.cli.commands.MigrateCommand',
'migrationTable'=>'stat_tbl_migration',
),
...
Related
I want to use http://tabulator.info/ with ember. I don't understand the documentation nor can I find any guides on configuration for ember. How can I start by creating a simple table?
Looking at the examples on the site, http://tabulator.info/, it seems that tabulator only needs an element to work (and some config).
So, our end goal is going to be to use a modifier with the ability to pass the tabulator config to it.
So, this is what we'll end up with:
<div {{tabulator someConfig}}></div>
Now, unfortunately, it looks like tabulator only accepts an id in its constructor. so we'll need to dynamically add that in to appears tabulator.
First thing you'll want to do is install https://github.com/ember-modifier/ember-modifier (be sure to read the docs as this is fun stuff)
Then, create a file in your app, app/modifiers/tabulator.js
and use these contents:
import Modifier from 'ember-modifier';
import Tabulator from 'tabulator';
import { guidFor } from '#ember/object/internals';
export default class TabulatorModifier extends Modifier {
id = guidFor(this);
get config() {
return this.args.positional[0];
}
didInstall() {
this.element.id = this.id;
let config = th
this.tabulator = new Tabulator(`#${this.id}`, this.config);
}
}
And then maybe in a component or controller or something, you'd have something like:
export default class MyComponent extends Component {
get myConfig() {
return { ... };
}
}
<div {{tabulator this.myConfig}}></div>
and that should be it.
You'll want to import the CSS in your app.css
I'm using ML.NET in an ASP.NET Core application, and I am using the following code in Startup:
var builder = services.AddPredictionEnginePool<Foo, Bar>();
if (File.Exists("model.zip"))
{
builder.FromFile(String.Empty, "model.zip", true);
}
If model.zip doesn't exist, I create it later in the middleware. How do I add it to the PredictionEnginePool that is injected?
There are no options to load a model via PredictionEnginePool, and instantiating or injecting a PredictionEnginePoolBuilder isn't an option as it requires IServiceCollection (so must be configured during Startup.ConfigureServices).
The only option I can see at the moment is to set a flag if the file doesn't exist at startup, and then restart the service after model.zip is created in the middleware later on (using IApplicationLifetime.StopApplication), but I really don't like this as an option.
PredictionEnginePool is designed in such a way that you can write your own ModelLoader implementation. Out of the box, Microsoft.Extensions.ML has 2 loaders, File and Uri. When those don't meet your needs, you can drop down and write your own.
See https://github.com/dotnet/machinelearning-samples/pull/560 which changes one of the dotnet/machine-learning samples to use an "in-memory" model loader, it doesn't get the model from a file or a Uri. You can follow the same pattern and write whatever code you need to get your model.
public class InMemoryModelLoader : ModelLoader
{
private readonly ITransformer _model;
public InMemoryModelLoader(ITransformer model)
{
_model = model;
}
public override ITransformer GetModel() => _model;
public override IChangeToken GetReloadToken() =>
// This IChangeToken will never notify a change.
new CancellationChangeToken(CancellationToken.None);
}
And then in Startup.cs
services.AddPredictionEnginePool<ImageInputData, ImageLabelPredictions>();
services.AddOptions<PredictionEnginePoolOptions<ImageInputData, ImageLabelPredictions>>()
.Configure(options =>
{
options.ModelLoader = new InMemoryModelLoader(_mlnetModel);
});
How could I get the name / version of the next migration to execute? Something similar to migrations:latest but more like migrations:next. I need this as input to another command so it needs to be parseable output (can't really just use migrations:status).
You can use the Configuration object of the Doctrine migrations bundle. This is even (somewhat) documented as custom configuration.
Here is a minimal code example that works for me:
public function migrationVersionAction(EntityManagerInterface $em, ParameterBagInterface $parameters) {
$connection = $em->getConnection();
$configuration = new \Doctrine\Migrations\Configuration\Configuration($connection);
$configuration->setMigrationsNamespace($parameters->get('doctrine_migrations.namespace'));
$configuration->setMigrationsDirectory($parameters->get('doctrine_migrations.dir_name'));
$configuration->setMigrationsTableName($parameters->get('doctrine_migrations.table_name'));
return new JsonResponse([
'prev' => $configuration->resolveVersionAlias('prev'),
'current' => $configuration->resolveVersionAlias('current'),
'next' => $configuration->resolveVersionAlias('next'),
'latest' => $configuration->resolveVersionAlias('latest')
]);
}
You might want to set the remaining parameters as well though, especially if they differ from the defaults. For this, the configuration documentation might help in addition to the link above.
i tried to implement the file upload via doctrine/lifecycle callbacks as described here:
http://symfony.com/doc/current/cookbook/doctrine/file_uploads.html#using-lifecycle-callbacks
So far it works, but the PrePersist/PreUpdate Event is not fired, the function "preUpload" is not called.
Functions like "upload" and "removeUpload" triggered by other lifecycle events are called correctly.
Does anyone have an idea why the event is not fired or a solution for this problem?
Thanks
I have another solution to this problem:
My entity has a field "updatedAt" which is a timestamp of the last update. Since this field gets set anyway (by the timestampable extension of Gedmo) I just use this field to trick doctrine into believing that the entitiy was updated.
Before I persist the entity I set this field manually doing
if( $editForm['file']->getData() )
$entity->setUpdateAt(new \DateTime());
This way the entity gets persisted (because it has changed) and the preUpdate and postUpdate functions are called properly.
Of course this only works if your entity has a field that you can exploit like that.
You need to change tracking policies.
Full explanation.
there's a much simpler solution compared with changing tracking policies and other solutions:
in controller:
if ($form->isValid()) {
...
if ($form->get('file')->getData() != NULL) {//user have uploaded a new file
$file = $form->get('file')->getData();//get 'UploadedFile' object
$news->setPath($file->getClientOriginalName());//change field that holds file's path in db to a temporary value,i.e original file name uploaded by user
}
...
}
this way you have changed a persisted field (here it is path field), so PreUpdate() & PostUpdate() are triggered then you should change path field value to any thing you like (i.e timestamp) in PreUpdate() function so in the end correct value is persisted to DB.
A trick could be to modify the entity no matter what..on postLoad.
1 Create an updatedAt field.
/**
* Date/Time of the update
*
* #var \Datetime
* #ORM\Column(name="updated_at", type="datetime")
*/
private $updatedAt;
2 Create a postLoad() function that will modify your entity anyway:
/**
* #ORM\PostLoad()
*/
public function postLoad()
{
$this->updatedAt = new \DateTime();
}
3 Just update that field correctly on prePersist:
/**
* #ORM\PrePersist()
* #ORM\PreUpdate()
*/
public function preUpload()
{
$this->updatedAt = new \DateTime();
//...update your picture
}
This is basically a slight variation of #philipphoffmann's answer:
What i do is that i modify an attribute before persisting to trigger the preUpdate event, then i undo this modification in the listener:
$entity->setToken($entity->getToken()."_tmp");
$em->flush();
In my listener:
public function preUpdate(LifecycleEventArgs $args)
{
$entity = $args->getEntity();
if ($entity instanceof MyEntity) {
$entity->setToken(str_replace('_tmp', '', $entity->getToken()));
//...
}
}
Another option is to display the database field where the filename is stored as a hidden input field and when the file upload input changes set that to empty so it ends up triggering doctrine's update events. So in the form builder you could have something like this:
->add('path', 'text', array('required' => false,'label' => 'Photo file name', 'attr' => array('class' => 'invisible')))
->add('file', 'file', array('label' => 'Photo', 'attr' => array('class' => 'uploader','data-target' => 'iddp_rorschachbundle_institutiontype_path')))
Path is a property managed by doctrine (equal to the field name in the db table) and file is the virtual property to handle uploads (not managed by doctrine). The css class simply sets the display to none. And then a simple js to change the value of the hidden input field
$('.uploader').change(function(){
var t = $(this).attr('data-target');
//clear input value
$("#"+t).val('');
});
For me, it worked good when I just manually called these methods in the controller.
Do you have checked your metadata cache driver option in your config.yml file?If it exists, just try to comment this line:
metadata_cache_driver: whateverTheStorage
Like this:
#metadata_cache_driver: whateverTheStorage
I am using both Zend framework and Django, and they both have they strengths and weakness, but they are both good framworks in their own way.
I do want to create a highly modular web application, like this example:
modules:
Admin
cms
articles
sections
...
...
...
I also want all modules to be self contained with all confid and template files.
I have been looking into a way to solve this is zend the last days, but adding one omer level to the module setup doesn't feel right. I am sure this could be done, but should I? I have also included Doctrine to my zend application that could give me even more problems in my module setup!
When we are talking about Django this is easy to implement (Easy as in concept, not in implementation time or whatever) and a great way to create web apps. But one of the downsides of Django is the web hosing part. There are some web hosts offering Django support, but not that many..
So then I guess the question is what have the most value; rapid modular development versus hosting options!
Well, comments are welcome!
Thanks
You can implement sub-modules with relatively little effort in ZF. Let's say you have directory structure such as:
application/
modules/
admin/
cms/
controllers/
views/
controllers/
views/
You'd register the modules like this in your bootstrap (sub-modules use _ to separate the sub-module from the main module):
$frontController->setControllerDirectory(array(
'default' => APPLICATION_PATH . '/modules/default/controllers',
'admin' => APPLICATION_PATH . '/modules/admin/controllers',
'admin_cms' => APPLICATION_PATH . '/modules/admin/cms/controllers'
));
The issue with this is that it would actually use an underline in the URL instead of a slash, so eg: "admin_cms/conteroller/action" instead of "admin/cms/controller/action". While this "works", it's not pretty. One way to solve the issue is to provide your own route for the default route. Since the default Zend_Controller_Router_Route_Module does it almost right, you can simply extend from it and add the wanted behavior:
<?php
class App_Router_Route_Module extends Zend_Controller_Router_Route_Module
{
public function __construct()
{
$frontController = Zend_Controller_Front::getInstance();
$dispatcher = $frontController->getDispatcher();
$request = $frontController->getRequest();
parent::__construct(array(), $dispatcher, $request);
}
public function match($path)
{
// Get front controller instance
$frontController = Zend_Controller_Front::getInstance();
// Parse path parts
$parts = explode('/', $path);
// Get all registered modules
$modules = $frontController->getControllerDirectory();
// Check if we're in default module
if (count($parts) == 0 || !isset($modules[$parts[0]]))
array_unshift($parts, $frontController->getDefaultModule());
// Module name
$module = $parts[0];
// While there are more parts to parse
while (isset($parts[1])) {
// Construct new module name
$module .= '_' . $parts[1];
// If module doesn't exist, stop processing
if (!isset($modules[$module]))
break;
// Replace the parts with the new module name
array_splice($parts, 0, 2, $module);
}
// Put path back together
$path = implode('/', $parts);
// Let Zend's module router deal with the rest
return parent::match($path);
}
}
And in your bootstrap:
$router = Zend_Controller_Front::getInstance()->getRouter();
$router->addRoute('default', new App_Router_Route_Module);
What this does is traverse the path as long as it finds a module, and transparently rewrites the path so that the default Zend_Controller_Router_Route_Module can do the real work. For example the following path: "/admin/cms/article/edit" will be transformed into "/admin_cms/article/edit", which allows the standard convention of the ZF's ":module/:controller/:action" do the magic.
This allows you to have nice modular structure with self-contained modules, while still use pretty, logical URLs. One thing you want to make note of is that if you use Zend_Navigation and specify the navigation items using module/controller/action parameters, you need to tell ZF how to correctly build the URL using "/" instead of "_" in module names (by default ZF uses the :module/:controller/:action spec when it builds the URLs). You can do this by implementing your own Zend_Controller_Action_Helper_Url, like this:
<?php
class App_Router_Helper_Url extends Zend_Controller_Action_Helper_Url
{
public function url($urlOptions = array(), $name = null, $reset = false, $encode = false)
{
// Replace the _ with / in the module name
$urlOptions['module'] = str_replace('_', '/', $urlOptions['module']);
// Let the router do rest of the work
return $this->getFrontController()->getRouter()->assemble($urlOptions, $name, $reset, $encode);
}
}
And in your bootstrap:
Zend_Controller_Action_HelperBroker::addHelper(new App_Router_Helper_Url);
Now Zend_Navigation works nicely with your sub-module support as well.
I (despite of being happy ZF user) would go for Django. In ZF the "fully-modular" application is kind of holly grail. It's nearly impossible (or at least without extreme effort) to create selfcontained modules, instalable like "copy this folder into your modules directory" :) Not sure about Django, but from what I head it's simplier there...