I'm a Neo4j/Spring-data newbie so apologies if this is something obvious but I looked here and there and can't quite figure out if it's a bug or feature.
I'm using SDN 3.1.0 and Neo4j 2.0.4, running in memory for now (for testing).
I have a super simple POJO that I try to save into Neo4j using SDN. It looks like so:
#NodeEntity
public class Weekday {
#GraphId
private Long id;
#Indexed(unique = true)
public DayOfWeek weekdayCode;
}
Everything works beautifully when I make it non-uniquely indexed, or not indexed at all. It works fine with unique constraint when I make it a String as well. (Well, sort of, I'm aware that it doesn't throw an exception but silently updates existing one - this is not perfect but I found JIRA issue related to that). Unfortunately the moment I try to save it as enum with unique constraint I get an exception:
org.springframework.dao.InvalidDataAccessResourceUsageException: Error executing statement MERGE (n:`Weekday` {`weekdayCode`: {value}}) ON CREATE SET n={props} return n; nested exception is org.springframework.dao.InvalidDataAccessResourceUsageException: Error executing statement MERGE (n:`Weekday` {`weekdayCode`: {value}}) ON CREATE SET n={props} return n; nested exception is java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: [MONDAY:java.time.DayOfWeek] is not a supported property value
at org.springframework.data.neo4j.support.query.CypherQueryEngineImpl.query(CypherQueryEngineImpl.java:61)
at org.springframework.data.neo4j.support.schema.SchemaIndexProvider.merge(SchemaIndexProvider.java:114)
at [...]
Caused by: org.springframework.dao.InvalidDataAccessResourceUsageException: Error executing statement MERGE (n:`Weekday` {`weekdayCode`: {value}}) ON CREATE SET n={props} return n; nested exception is java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: [MONDAY:java.time.DayOfWeek] is not a supported property value
at org.springframework.data.neo4j.support.query.CypherQueryEngineImpl.parseAndExecuteQuery(CypherQueryEngineImpl.java:72)
at org.springframework.data.neo4j.support.query.CypherQueryEngineImpl.query(CypherQueryEngineImpl.java:58)
... 63 more
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: [MONDAY:java.time.DayOfWeek] is not a supported property value
at org.neo4j.kernel.api.properties.PropertyConversion.convertProperty(PropertyConversion.java:107)
at org.neo4j.kernel.api.properties.Property.property(Property.java:51)
at [...]
This, as far as I can see, is because the unique field is put into a map "props", and the contents of the map is not automatically converted so it sends an enum to Neo4j, which obviously it doesn't like.
Is this expected or should I raise a bug with SDN?
If that's expected behaviour, do I have any alternatives other than making the field a String?
I'm not sure if it is a real bug, however I had a similar problem using my own Enum class.
So, you could try something like this:
Create the converters
Register them in neo4j
First create your converters like:
#Component
public class StringToDayOfWeekConverter implements Converter<String, DayOfWeek> {
#Override
public DayOfWeek convert(String source) {
return DayOfWeek.valueOf(source);
}
}
#Component
public class DayOfWeekToStringConverter implements Converter<DayOfWeek, String> {
#Override
public String convert(DayOfWeek source) {
return source.name();
}
}
Then you register the converters, so neo4j can use them:
#Configuration
#EnableNeo4jRepositories("my.repository.package")
#EnableTransactionManagement
public class MyNeo4jConfiguration extends Neo4jConfiguration {
#Autowired
private StringToDayOfWeekConverter stringToDayOfWeekConverter;
#Autowired
private DayOfWeekToStringConverter dayOfWeekToStringConverter;
#Override
protected ConversionService neo4jConversionService() throws Exception {
ConverterRegistry converterRegistry = (ConverterRegistry) super.neo4jConversionService();
converterRegistry.addConverter(stringToDayOfWeekConverter);
converterRegistry.addConverter(dayOfWeekToStringConverter);
return (ConversionService) converterRegistry;
}
}
create an converter extends EnumStringConverter such like this:
package com.noopu.pyramid.domain.model.converter;
import com..pyramid.common.UserType;
import org.neo4j.ogm.typeconversion.EnumStringConverter;
public class UserTypeStringConverter extends EnumStringConverter {
public UserTypeStringConverter ( ) {
super ( UserType.class );
}
}
and used #Converter annotation like under:
package com.noopu.pyramid.domain.model;
import com.noopu.pyramid.common.UserType;
import com.noopu.pyramid.domain.model.converter.UserTypeStringConverter;
import lombok.Data;
import org.neo4j.ogm.annotation.GraphId;
import org.neo4j.ogm.annotation.Index;
import org.neo4j.ogm.annotation.NodeEntity;
import org.neo4j.ogm.annotation.typeconversion.Convert;
import java.io.Serializable;
#NodeEntity
#Data
public class User implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 8979348201709416439L;
#GraphId
private Long graphId;
#Index
protected Long id;
#Index(unique = true)
private Long uid;
#Index(unique = true)
private String phone;
#Index
#Convert(UserTypeStringConverter.class)
private UserType type;
}
Related
I am trying to store a geo_point type data in datastore via GCP Java client library. I figured out how to do for a Date type data, but could not get a clue which GeoPoint class I use for this.
import com.google.datastore.v1.Entity;
import static com.google.datastore.v1.client.DatastoreHelper.makeValue;
import java.util.Date;
...
public class WriteToDatastoreFromTwitter {
private static Value dValue(Date k) {
return makeValue(k).setExcludeFromIndexes(true).build();
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws TwitterException {
final Builder builder = Entity.newBuilder().
setKey(key).
putProperties("timestamp", dValue(tweet.getCreatedAt()));
// How can I add a `geo_point` data?
I am simply not sure if I should use classes outside of the datastore package, such as this: https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/standard/java/javadoc/com/google/appengine/api/search/GeoPoint
I figured out by myself. There is a class LatLng in a dependent package com.google.type to the datastore package and I could use this to successfully store geo_point data. Here's how you initialize the object:
import com.google.type.LatLng;
...
LatLng x = LatLng.
newBuilder().
setLatitude(loc.getLatitude()).
setLongitude(loc.getLongitude()).
build();
and in my case, I stored it by doing
private static Value gValue(LatLng k) {
return makeValue(k).setExcludeFromIndexes(true).build();
}
builder.putProperties("geo_point", gValue(x));
I do have a simple class like this:
package com.example.howtomocktest
import groovy.util.logging.Slf4j
import java.nio.channels.NotYetBoundException
#Slf4j
class ErrorLogger {
static void handleExceptions(Closure closure) {
try {
closure()
}catch (UnsupportedOperationException|NotYetBoundException ex) {
log.error ex.message
} catch (Exception ex) {
log.error 'Processing exception {}', ex
}
}
}
And I would like to write a test for it, here is a skeleton:
package com.example.howtomocktest
import org.slf4j.Logger
import spock.lang.Specification
import java.nio.channels.NotYetBoundException
import static com.example.howtomocktest.ErrorLogger.handleExceptions
class ErrorLoggerSpec extends Specification {
private static final UNSUPPORTED_EXCEPTION = { throw UnsupportedOperationException }
private static final NOT_YET_BOUND = { throw NotYetBoundException }
private static final STANDARD_EXCEPTION = { throw Exception }
private Logger logger = Mock(Logger.class)
def setup() {
}
def "Message logged when UnsupportedOperationException is thrown"() {
when:
handleExceptions {UNSUPPORTED_EXCEPTION}
then:
notThrown(UnsupportedOperationException)
1 * logger.error(_ as String) // doesn't work
}
def "Message logged when NotYetBoundException is thrown"() {
when:
handleExceptions {NOT_YET_BOUND}
then:
notThrown(NotYetBoundException)
1 * logger.error(_ as String) // doesn't work
}
def "Message about processing exception is logged when standard Exception is thrown"() {
when:
handleExceptions {STANDARD_EXCEPTION}
then:
notThrown(STANDARD_EXCEPTION)
1 * logger.error(_ as String) // doesn't work
}
}
The logger in ErrorLogger class is provided by StaticLoggerBinder, so my question is - how do I make it work so that those checks "1 * logger.error(_ as String)" would work? I can't find a proper way of mocking that logger inside of ErrorLogger class. I have thought about reflection and somehow accessing it, furthermore there was an idea with mockito injection (but how to do that if reference to an object is not even present in that class because of that Slf4j annotation!) Thanks in advance for all your feedback and advices.
EDIT: Here is an output of a test, even 1*logger.error(_) doesn't work.
Too few invocations for:
1*logger.error() (0 invocations)
Unmatched invocations (ordered by similarity):
What you would need to do is to replace the log field generated by the #Slf4j AST transformation with your mock.
However, this is not so easy to achieve, since the generated code is not really test-friendly.
A quick look at the generated code reveals that it corresponds to something like this:
class ErrorLogger {
private final static transient org.slf4j.Logger log =
org.slf4j.LoggerFactory.getLogger(ErrorLogger)
}
Since the log field is declared as private final it is not so easy to replace the value with your mock. It actually boils down to the exact same problem as described here. In addition, usages of this field is wrapped in isEnabled() methods, so for instance every time you invoke log.error(msg) it is replaced with:
if (log.isErrorEnabled()) {
log.error(msg)
}
So, how to solve this? I would suggest that you register an issue at the groovy issue tracker, where you ask for a more test-friendly implementation of the AST transformation. However, this won't help you much right now.
There are a couple of work-around solutions to this that you might consider.
Set the new field value in your test using the "awful hack" described in the stack overflow question mentioned above. I.e. make the field accessible using reflection and set the value. Remember to reset the value to the original during cleanup.
Add a getLog() method to your ErrorLogger class and use that method for access instead of direct field access. Then you may manipulate the metaClass to override the getLog() implementation. The problem with this approach is that you would have to modify the production code and add a getter, which kind of defies the purpose of using #Slf4j in the first place.
I'd also like to point out that there are several problems with your ErrorLoggerSpec class. These are hidden by the problems you've already encountered, so you would probably figure these out by yourself when they manifested themselves.
Even though it is a hack, I'll only provide code example for the first suggestion, since the second suggestion modifies the production code.
To isolate the hack, enable simple reuse and avoid forgetting to reset the value, I wrote it up as a JUnit rule (which can also be used in Spock).
import org.junit.rules.ExternalResource
import org.slf4j.Logger
import java.lang.reflect.Field
import java.lang.reflect.Modifier
public class ReplaceSlf4jLogger extends ExternalResource {
Field logField
Logger logger
Logger originalLogger
ReplaceSlf4jLogger(Class logClass, Logger logger) {
logField = logClass.getDeclaredField("log");
this.logger = logger
}
#Override
protected void before() throws Throwable {
logField.accessible = true
Field modifiersField = Field.getDeclaredField("modifiers")
modifiersField.accessible = true
modifiersField.setInt(logField, logField.getModifiers() & ~Modifier.FINAL)
originalLogger = (Logger) logField.get(null)
logField.set(null, logger)
}
#Override
protected void after() {
logField.set(null, originalLogger)
}
}
And here is the spec, after fixing all the small bugs and adding this rule. Changes are commented in the code:
import org.junit.Rule
import org.slf4j.Logger
import spock.lang.Specification
import java.nio.channels.NotYetBoundException
import static ErrorLogger.handleExceptions
class ErrorLoggerSpec extends Specification {
// NOTE: These three closures are changed to actually throw new instances of the exceptions
private static final UNSUPPORTED_EXCEPTION = { throw new UnsupportedOperationException() }
private static final NOT_YET_BOUND = { throw new NotYetBoundException() }
private static final STANDARD_EXCEPTION = { throw new Exception() }
private Logger logger = Mock(Logger.class)
#Rule ReplaceSlf4jLogger replaceSlf4jLogger = new ReplaceSlf4jLogger(ErrorLogger, logger)
def "Message logged when UnsupportedOperationException is thrown"() {
when:
handleExceptions UNSUPPORTED_EXCEPTION // Changed: used to be a closure within a closure!
then:
notThrown(UnsupportedOperationException)
1 * logger.isErrorEnabled() >> true // this call is added by the AST transformation
1 * logger.error(null) // no message is specified, results in a null message: _ as String does not match null
}
def "Message logged when NotYetBoundException is thrown"() {
when:
handleExceptions NOT_YET_BOUND // Changed: used to be a closure within a closure!
then:
notThrown(NotYetBoundException)
1 * logger.isErrorEnabled() >> true // this call is added by the AST transformation
1 * logger.error(null) // no message is specified, results in a null message: _ as String does not match null
}
def "Message about processing exception is logged when standard Exception is thrown"() {
when:
handleExceptions STANDARD_EXCEPTION // Changed: used to be a closure within a closure!
then:
notThrown(Exception) // Changed: you added the closure field instead of the class here
//1 * logger.isErrorEnabled() >> true // this call is NOT added by the AST transformation -- perhaps a bug?
1 * logger.error(_ as String, _ as Exception) // in this case, both a message and the exception is specified
}
}
If you are using Spring, you have acces to OutputCaptureRule
#Rule
OutputCaptureRule outputCaptureRule = new OutputCaptureRule()
def test(){
outputCaptureRule.getAll().contains("<your test output>")
}
I have a class called Product which has a property called id of type long. Below is the class
public class Product {
private long id;
}
The value of id is beyond the value which javascript can handle. I realized this after seeing the below link
Parse json in javascript - long numbers get rounded
I dont want to declare the field as String in the domain class. But I want to say to RestEasy that it has to send the value as a string in the json response.
How can I do this? I dont want to use any third party api. Is it possible in RestEasy. I have gone through the documentation but did not find any such annotation or may be I did not go through the documentation properly.
Can anyone please help. Thanks all in advance.
If you are using Jackson as JSON Serializer you can extend the JacksonJsonProvider:
#Provider
public class JsonProvider extends org.codehaus.jackson.JacksonJsonProvider {
public JsonProvider() {
ObjectMapper objectMapper = locateMapper(ObjectMapper.class, MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON_TYPE);
objectMapper.configure(org.codehaus.jackson.JsonGenerator.Feature.WRITE_NUMBERS_AS_STRINGS, true);
}
}
If you are using Jettison you can register a custom XmlAdapter:
public class LongAdapter extends XmlAdapter<String, Long> {
#Override
public String marshal(Long id) throws Exception {
if (id == null) {
return "";
}
return id.toString();
}
#Override
public Long unmarshal(String id) throws Exception {
return Long.parseLong(id);
}
}
I'm relatively new to JavaEE and web services, however, I'm using netbeans to generate my client and webservice resources. I have a resource "CustomerData" that represents a mysql database table and a value "rewardsPoints" representing a column in that table, however, I am unable to update the value due to a ConstraintViolationException, specifically:
javax.validation.ConstraintViolationException: Bean Validation constraint(s) violated while executing Automatic Bean Validation on callback event:'preUpdate'. Please refer to embedded ConstraintViolations for details.
I'm not familiar with the 'preUpdate' callback event, is it something I need to override? I can't seem to figure out exactly why this exception is being thrown, but, as I said, i'm very new to web service programming. Here are my classes:
#Stateless
#Path("customers")
public class CustomerDataFacadeREST extends AbstractFacade<CustomerData> {
#PersistenceContext(unitName = "CustomerPortalPU")
private EntityManager em;
public CustomerDataFacadeREST() {
super(CustomerData.class);
}
#PUT
#Path("{id}")
#Consumes({"application/xml", "application/json"})
public void edit(#PathParam("id") Integer id, CustomerData entity) {
super.edit(entity);
}
#GET
#Path("{id}")
#Produces({"application/xml", "application/json"})
public CustomerData find(#PathParam("id") Integer id) {
return super.find(id);
}
#GET
#Path("addPoints/{id}/{amount}")
#Produces({"text/plain"})
public String addPoints(#PathParam("id") Integer id, #PathParam("amount") int amount) {
CustomerData customer = find(id);
customer.getRewardsPoints(customer.getRewardsPoints() + amount);
em.persist(customer);
edit(customer);
return customer.getRewardsPoints();
}
#Override
protected EntityManager getEntityManager() {
return em;
}
}
And the CustomerData entity class:
#Entity
#Table(name = "tbl_customer_data")
#XmlRootElement
public class CustomerData implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
#Id
#GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.IDENTITY)
#Basic(optional = false)
#Column(name = "id")
private Integer id;
#Basic(optional = false)
#NotNull
#Column(name = "rewards_points")
private int rewardsPoints;
public CustomerData(Integer id, int rewardsPoints) {
this.id = id;
this.rewardsPoints = rewardsPoints;
}
public Integer getId() {
return id;
}
public void setId(Integer id) {
this.id = id;
}
public int getRewardsPoints() {
return rewardsPoints;
}
public void setRewardsPoints(int rewardsPoints) {
this.rewardsPoints = rewardsPoints;
}
}
When I try to access the URI:
http://localhost:8080/CustomerPortal/ws/customers/addPoints/1/5
to add 5 points to user with id 1 i get an HTTP 500 error and in the glassfish logs it says
[2013-11-05T03:28:11.733-0500] [glassfish 4.0] [WARNING] [ejb.system_exception] [javax.enterprise.system.container.ejb.com.sun.ejb.containers] [tid: _ThreadID=21 _ThreadName=http-listener-1(3)] [timeMillis: 1383640091733] [levelValue: 900] [[
EJB5184:A system exception occurred during an invocation on EJB CustomerDataFacadeREST, method: public java.lang.String com.webservice.entities.CustomerDataFacadeREST.addPoints(java.lang.Integer,int)]]
[2013-11-05T03:28:11.741-0500] [glassfish 4.0] [WARNING] [] [javax.enterprise.web] [tid: _ThreadID=21 _ThreadName=http-listener-1(3)] [timeMillis: 1383640091741] [levelValue: 900] [[
StandardWrapperValve[com.webservice.entities.ApplicationConfig]: Servlet.service() for servlet com.webservice.entities.ApplicationConfig threw exception
javax.validation.ConstraintViolationException: Bean Validation constraint(s) violated while executing Automatic Bean Validation on callback event:'preUpdate'. Please refer to embedded ConstraintViolations for details.
Any resources, insight or information regarding this issue would be extremely helpful.
The exception has little to do with web services: it has to do with Bean Validation instead.
In this case, since the Validation fails inside method addPoints (look at the stack trace) the only line that can cause it is when persisting or editing an Entity of type CustomerData. The only constraint you have in that class is that rewardsPoints should not be null. So, that's the cause of the exception.
However there some things that won't work in addPoints method:
You should check that find() method doesn't return a null object.
customer.getRewardsPoints(customer.getRewardsPoints() + amount) never sets the property (does it compile?)
EntityManager.persist() throws exception if the entity already exists. You probably want to remove that line if you only want to edit (update) the entity.
Note: I am not sure that the code you have posted is really compiling and causing that exception. That's probably caused by another version.
I have the following four classes: DataConsumer, DataProducer, SomeQualifier, a META-INF/beans.xml and a test. The class files are coded as follows:
public class DataConsumer {
private boolean loaded = false;
#Inject
#SomeQualifier
private String someString;
public void afterBeanDiscovery(
#Observes final AfterBeanDiscovery afterBeanDiscovery,
final BeanManager manager) {
loaded = true;
}
public boolean getLoaded() {
return loaded;
}
public String sayHello() {
return someString;
}
}
public class DataProducer {
#Produces
#SomeQualifier
private final String sample = "sample";
}
public #interface SomeQualifier {
}
The unit test looks like this.
public class WeldTest {
#Test
public void testHelloWorld() {
final WeldContainer weld = new Weld().initialize();
final DataConsumer consumer = weld.instance()
.select(DataConsumer.class).get();
Assert.assertEquals("sample", consumer.sayHello());
Assert.assertTrue(consumer.getLoaded());
}
}
However, it is failing on the assertTrue with getLoaded() it appears that the #Observes does not get fired.
Take a look at arquillian: www.arquillian.org. It'll take care of all of this for you.
I found a similar question that had answered my question
CDI - Observing Container Events
Although I am unable to use DataConsumer as both an Extension and a CDI managed bean. So it needs a third class just to be the Extension. However, because Extension have no access to managed beans since they are not created yet, I conclude that is no possible solution to use an #Observes AfterBeanDiscovery to modify the bean data. Even the BeanManager that gets passed in cannot find any of the beans.