I spent ours on getting the solution for my little regex problem.
Assuming I have a string containing german umlauts. e.g. "Brötchenkörbe".
I need the best regex condition to match ALL 'ö' except the last one, if the occurrence of 'ö' is > 1
(else) If there is only ONE 'ö' in the string, I want to match that character as well.
So that I would get the following results:
Brötchenkörbe
Möhrenlösungslöcher
Löschwagen
I found an expression that does match every 'ö', except the last one. But the is no match, if the 'ö' occures only one time:
/(ö(?=[^.]*[ö]))/
does anyone get the trick?
I need that expression to work on a filter on my solr server.
Background: I use a stemm-Filter to stemm words in german. but the used filter "SnowballPorterFilter" does change every umlaut (öäüÖÄÜ) to (oauOAU).
Only the last umlaut need to be changed from that filter, so that I want to use a regex-filter ("PatternReplaceFilterFactory") which protects all other umlauts from that change, and reverse that protection after running that stemm-filter.
e.g.: Möhrenlösungslöcher gets "M#o#hrenl#o#sungslöcher" , filter does "M#o#hrenl#o#sungsloch" , and then reverse protection to "Möhrenlösungsloch"
Qeole got the solution:
In three steps:
Place umlauts to fix between # signs with following regex:
/(^([^äöü]*))(ä|ö|ü)|(ä|ö|ü)(?![^äöü]*$)/gm
(replace with $1#$3$4#)
All umlauts to fix are now between # signs. So let's keep going…
Change all #ä# to #a#.
Repeat for #ö# and #ü#.
Related
I have this regex that's worked well so far that splits 'name=value' pairs separated by a given character.
(?s)([^\s=]+)=(.*?)(?=\s+[^\s=]+=|\Z)
I know the separator, but the problem is in the example below (tab separated):
usrName=Wilma sev=4 cat=Detection CommandLine="C:\powershell.exe" -Enc 0ATQBpAG0AAcABDAHIAZQBkAHMAIgA= IOCValue= ProcessEndTime=2023-01-18 15:51:05
https://regex101.com/r/1wgVxs/5
Some values can have no value in the case of 'IOCValue' which works as expected, however some values like the CommandLine are giving me up to -Enc as one match and the remainder to the next pair as another.
What I'm hoping to get out from the above is:
usrName=Wilma
sev=4
cat=Detection
CommandLine="C:\powershell.exe" -Enc 0ATQBpAG0AAcABDAHIAZQBkAHMAIgA=
IOCValue=
ProcessEndTime=2023-01-18 15:51:05
But I'm getting:
usrName=Wilma
sev=4
cat=Detection
CommandLine="C:\powershell.exe" -Enc
0ATQBpAG0AAcABDAHIAZQBkAHMAIgA=
IOCValue=
ProcessEndTime=2023-01-18 15:51:05
Given I know the separator is a tab I think what I need is to only look for name=value pairs when they are at the start of the line or proceeded by the separator (tab). Is this possible?
Note, I can expect a space separator too, but I have a less performant and messy non-regex version I can send these too, so presume tab.
You may use this simplified regex:
(?s)([^\s=]+)=(.*?)(?=\t|\Z)
Updated RegEx Demo
Here, lookahead (?=\t|\Z) will make sure that value part is followed by either a tab character or end position.
Let's say I have a string of 2 characters. Using regex (as a thought exercise), I want to accept it only if the first character has an ascii value bigger than that of the second character.
ae should not match because a is before e in the the ascii table.
ea, za and aA should match for the opposite reason
f$ should match because $ is before letters in the ascii table.
It doesn't matter if aa or a matches or not, I'm only interested in the base case. Any flavor of regex is allowed.
Can it be done ? What if we restrict the problem to lowercase letters only ? What if we restrict it to [abc] only ? What if we invert the condition (accept when the characters are ordered from smallest to biggest) ? What if I want it to work for N characters instead of 2 ?
I guess that'd be almost impossible for me to do it then, however bobble-bubble impressively solved the problem with:
^~*\}*\|*\{*z*y*x*w*v*u*t*s*r*q*p*o*n*m*l*k*j*i*h*g*f*e*d*c*b*a*`*_*\^*\]*\\*\[*Z*Y*X*W*V*U*T*S*R*Q*P*O*N*M*L*K*J*I*H*G*F*E*D*C*B*A*#*\?*\>*\=*\<*;*\:*9*8*7*6*5*4*3*2*1*0*\/*\.*\-*,*\+*\**\)*\(*'*&*%*\$*\#*"*\!*$(?!^)
bobble bubble RegEx Demo
Maybe for abc only or some short sequences we would approach solving the problem with some expression similar to,
^(abc|ab|ac|bc|a|b|c)$
^(?:abc|ab|ac|bc|a|b|c)$
that might help you to see how you would go about it.
RegEx Demo 1
You can simplify that to:
^(a?b?c?)$
^(?:a?b?c?)$
RegEx Demo 2
but I'm not so sure about it.
The number of chars you're trying to allow is irrelevant to the problem you are trying to solve:
because you can simply add an independent statement, if you will, for that, such as with:
(?!.{n})
where n-1 would be the number of chars allowed, which in this case would be
(?!.{3})^(?:a?b?c?)$
(?!.{3})^(a?b?c?)$
RegEx Demo 3
A regex is not the best tool for the job.
But it's doable. A naive approach is to enumerate all the printable ascii characters and their corresponding lower range:
\x21[ -\x20]|\x22[ -\x21]|\x23[ -\x22]|\x24[ -\x23]|\x25[ -\x24]|\x26[ -\x25]|\x27[ -\x26]|\x28[ -\x27]|\x29[ -\x28]|\x2a[ -\x29]|\x2b[ -\x2a]|\x2c[ -\x2b]|\x2d[ -\x2c]|\x2e[ -\x2d]|\x2f[ -\x2e]|\x30[ -\x2f]|\x31[ -\x30]|\x32[ -\x31]|\x33[ -\x32]|\x34[ -\x33]|\x35[ -\x34]|\x36[ -\x35]|\x37[ -\x36]|\x38[ -\x37]|\x39[ -\x38]|\x3a[ -\x39]|\x3b[ -\x3a]|\x3c[ -\x3b]|\x3d[ -\x3c]|\x3e[ -\x3d]|\x3f[ -\x3e]|\x40[ -\x3f]|\x41[ -\x40]|\x42[ -\x41]|\x43[ -\x42]|\x44[ -\x43]|\x45[ -\x44]|\x46[ -\x45]|\x47[ -\x46]|\x48[ -\x47]|\x49[ -\x48]|\x4a[ -\x49]|\x4b[ -\x4a]|\x4c[ -\x4b]|\x4d[ -\x4c]|\x4e[ -\x4d]|\x4f[ -\x4e]|\x50[ -\x4f]|\x51[ -\x50]|\x52[ -\x51]|\x53[ -\x52]|\x54[ -\x53]|\x55[ -\x54]|\x56[ -\x55]|\x57[ -\x56]|\x58[ -\x57]|\x59[ -\x58]|\x5a[ -\x59]|\x5b[ -\x5a]|\x5c[ -\x5b]|\x5d[ -\x5c]|\x5e[ -\x5d]|\x5f[ -\x5e]|\x60[ -\x5f]|\x61[ -\x60]|\x62[ -\x61]|\x63[ -\x62]|\x64[ -\x63]|\x65[ -\x64]|\x66[ -\x65]|\x67[ -\x66]|\x68[ -\x67]|\x69[ -\x68]|\x6a[ -\x69]|\x6b[ -\x6a]|\x6c[ -\x6b]|\x6d[ -\x6c]|\x6e[ -\x6d]|\x6f[ -\x6e]|\x70[ -\x6f]|\x71[ -\x70]|\x72[ -\x71]|\x73[ -\x72]|\x74[ -\x73]|\x75[ -\x74]|\x76[ -\x75]|\x77[ -\x76]|\x78[ -\x77]|\x79[ -\x78]|\x7a[ -\x79]|\x7b[ -\x7a]|\x7c[ -\x7b]|\x7d[ -\x7c]|\x7e[ -\x7d]|\x7f[ -\x7e]
Try it online!
A (better) alternative is to enumerate the ascii characters in reverse order and use the ^ and $ anchors to assert there is nothing else unmatched. This should work for any string length:
^\x7f?\x7e?\x7d?\x7c?\x7b?z?y?x?w?v?u?t?s?r?q?p?o?n?m?l?k?j?i?h?g?f?e?d?c?b?a?`?\x5f?\x5e?\x5d?\x5c?\x5b?Z?Y?X?W?V?U?T?S?R?Q?P?O?N?M?L?K?J?I?H?G?F?E?D?C?B?A?#?\x3f?\x3e?\x3d?\x3c?\x3b?\x3a?9?8?7?6?5?4?3?2?1?0?\x2f?\x2e?\x2d?\x2c?\x2b?\x2a?\x29?\x28?\x27?\x26?\x25?\x24?\x23?\x22?\x21?\x20?$
Try it online!
You may replace ? with * if you want to allow duplicate characters.
ps: some people can come up with absurdly long regexes when they aren't the right tool for the job: to parse email, html or the present question.
I made a regex which inserts a space where ever there is any of the characters
-:\*_/;, present for example JET*AIRWAYS\INDIA/858701/IDBI 05/05/05;05:05:05 a/c should beJET* AIRWAYS\ INDIA/ 858701/ IDBI 05/05/05; 05:05:05 a/c
The regex I used is (?!a\/c|w\/d|m\/s|s\/w|m\/o)(\D-|\D:|\D\*|\D_|\D\\|\D\/|\D\;)
I have added some words exceptions like a/c w/d etc. \D conditions given to avoid date/time values getting separated, but this created an issue, the numbers followed by the above mentioned characters never get split.
My requirement is
1. Insert a space after characters -:\*_/;,
2. but date and time should not get split which may have / :
3. need exception on words like a/c w/d
The following is the full code
Private Function formatColon(oldString As String) As String
Dim reg As New RegExp: reg.Global = True: reg.Pattern = "(?!a\/c|w\/d|m\/s|s\/w|m\/o)(\D-|\D:|\D\*|\D_|\D\\|\D\/|\D\;)" '"(\D:|\D/|\D-|^w/d)"
Dim newString As String: newString = reg.Replace(oldString, "$1 ")
formatColon = XtraspaceKill(newString)
End Function
I would use 3 replacements.
Replace all date and time special characters with a special macro that should never be found in your text, e.g. for 05/15/2018 4:06 PM, something based on your name:
05MANUMOHANSLASH15MANUMOHANSLASH2018 4MANUMOHANCOLON06 PM
You can encode exceptions too, like this:
aMANUMOHANSLASHc
Now run your original regex to replace all special characters.
Finally, unreplace the macros MANUMOHANSLASH and MANUMOHANCOLON.
Meanwhile, let me tell you why this is complicated in a single regex.
If trying to do this in a single regex, you have to ask, for each / or :, "Am I a part of a date or time?"
To answer that, you need to use lookahead and lookbehind assertions, the latter of which Microsoft has finally added support for.
But given a /, you don't know if you're between the first and second, or second and third parts of the date. Similar for time.
The number of cases you need to consider will render your regex unmaintainably complex.
So please just use a few separate replacements :-)
I had this question a couple of times before, and I still couldn't find a good answer..
In my current problem, I have a console program output (string) that looks like this:
Number of assemblies processed = 1200
Number of assemblies uninstalled = 1197
Number of failures = 3
Now I want to extract those numbers and to check if there were failures. (That's a gacutil.exe output, btw.) In other words, I want to match any number [0-9]+ in the string that is preceded by 'failures = '.
How would I do that? I want to get the number only. Of course I can match the whole thing like /failures = [0-9]+/ .. and then trim the first characters with length("failures = ") or something like that. The point is, I don't want to do that, it's a lame workaround.
Because it's odd; if my pattern-to-match-but-not-into-output ("failures = ") comes after the thing i want to extract ([0-9]+), there is a way to do it:
pattern(?=expression)
To show the absurdity of this, if the whole file was processed backwards, I could use:
[0-9]+(?= = seruliaf)
... so, is there no forward-way? :T
pattern(?=expression) is a regex positive lookahead and what you are looking for is a regex positive lookbehind that goes like this (?<=expression)pattern but this feature is not supported by all flavors of regex. It depends which language you are using.
more infos at regular-expressions.info for comparison of Lookaround feature scroll down 2/3 on this page.
If your console output does actually look like that throughout, try splitting the string on "=" when the word "failure" is found, then get the last element (or the 2nd element). You did not say what your language is, but any decent language with string splitting capability would do the job. For example
gacutil.exe.... | ruby -F"=" -ane "print $F[-1] if /failure/"
Is it possible to write a regular expression that matches all strings that does not only contain numbers? If we have these strings:
abc
a4c
4bc
ab4
123
It should match the four first, but not the last one. I have tried fiddling around in RegexBuddy with lookaheads and stuff, but I can't seem to figure it out.
(?!^\d+$)^.+$
This says lookahead for lines that do not contain all digits and match the entire line.
Unless I am missing something, I think the most concise regex is...
/\D/
...or in other words, is there a not-digit in the string?
jjnguy had it correct (if slightly redundant) in an earlier revision.
.*?[^0-9].*
#Chad, your regex,
\b.*[a-zA-Z]+.*\b
should probably allow for non letters (eg, punctuation) even though Svish's examples didn't include one. Svish's primary requirement was: not all be digits.
\b.*[^0-9]+.*\b
Then, you don't need the + in there since all you need is to guarantee 1 non-digit is in there (more might be in there as covered by the .* on the ends).
\b.*[^0-9].*\b
Next, you can do away with the \b on either end since these are unnecessary constraints (invoking reference to alphanum and _).
.*[^0-9].*
Finally, note that this last regex shows that the problem can be solved with just the basics, those basics which have existed for decades (eg, no need for the look-ahead feature). In English, the question was logically equivalent to simply asking that 1 counter-example character be found within a string.
We can test this regex in a browser by copying the following into the location bar, replacing the string "6576576i7567" with whatever you want to test.
javascript:alert(new String("6576576i7567").match(".*[^0-9].*"));
/^\d*[a-z][a-z\d]*$/
Or, case insensitive version:
/^\d*[a-z][a-z\d]*$/i
May be a digit at the beginning, then at least one letter, then letters or digits
Try this:
/^.*\D+.*$/
It returns true if there is any simbol, that is not a number. Works fine with all languages.
Since you said "match", not just validate, the following regex will match correctly
\b.*[a-zA-Z]+.*\b
Passing Tests:
abc
a4c
4bc
ab4
1b1
11b
b11
Failing Tests:
123
if you are trying to match worlds that have at least one letter but they are formed by numbers and letters (or just letters), this is what I have used:
(\d*[a-zA-Z]+\d*)+
If we want to restrict valid characters so that string can be made from a limited set of characters, try this:
(?!^\d+$)^[a-zA-Z0-9_-]{3,}$
or
(?!^\d+$)^[\w-]{3,}$
/\w+/:
Matches any letter, number or underscore. any word character
.*[^0-9]{1,}.*
Works fine for us.
We want to use the used answer, but it's not working within YANG model.
And the one I provided here is easy to understand and it's clear:
start and end could be any chars, but, but there must be at least one NON NUMERICAL characters, which is greatest.
I am using /^[0-9]*$/gm in my JavaScript code to see if string is only numbers. If yes then it should fail otherwise it will return the string.
Below is working code snippet with test cases:
function isValidURL(string) {
var res = string.match(/^[0-9]*$/gm);
if (res == null)
return string;
else
return "fail";
};
var testCase1 = "abc";
console.log(isValidURL(testCase1)); // abc
var testCase2 = "a4c";
console.log(isValidURL(testCase2)); // a4c
var testCase3 = "4bc";
console.log(isValidURL(testCase3)); // 4bc
var testCase4 = "ab4";
console.log(isValidURL(testCase4)); // ab4
var testCase5 = "123"; // fail here
console.log(isValidURL(testCase5));
I had to do something similar in MySQL and the following whilst over simplified seems to have worked for me:
where fieldname regexp ^[a-zA-Z0-9]+$
and fieldname NOT REGEXP ^[0-9]+$
This shows all fields that are alphabetical and alphanumeric but any fields that are just numeric are hidden. This seems to work.
example:
name1 - Displayed
name - Displayed
name2 - Displayed
name3 - Displayed
name4 - Displayed
n4ame - Displayed
324234234 - Not Displayed