I'd like to transition one element as it changes to another element.
I've got 3 examples:
one that works, but uses a list of items that are kept around (jsfiddle)
one that doesnt work, and only keeps one item around, depending on the state (jsfiddle)
another one that doesn't work, that keeps both items around and hides/shows them (jsfiddle using hide/show)
What I want is more like the second one, which is a very slight variation of the first attempt that works.
Option 1:
/** #jsx React.DOM */
var ReactTransitionGroup = React.addons.TransitionGroup;
var TodoList = React.createClass({
getInitialState: function() {
return {items: ['hello', 'world', 'click', 'me']};
},
handleAdd: function() {
var newItems =
this.state.items.concat([prompt('Enter some text')]);
this.setState({items: newItems});
},
handleRemove: function(i) {
var newItems = this.state.items;
newItems.splice(i, 1)
this.setState({items: newItems});
},
render: function() {
var items = this.state.items.map(function(item, i) {
return (
<div key={item} onClick={this.handleRemove.bind(this, i)}>
{item}
</div>
);
}.bind(this));
return (
<div>
<div><button onClick={this.handleAdd} /></div>
<ReactTransitionGroup transitionName="example">
{items}
</ReactTransitionGroup>
</div>
);
}
});
var app = React.renderComponent(<TodoList />, document.body);
Option 2:
JSX that doesn't work, but is closer to what I'd like to do (really, hide one view, and show another)
/** #jsx React.DOM */
var ReactTransitionGroup = React.addons.TransitionGroup;
var Test = React.createClass({
getInitialState: function() {
return {showOne:true}
},
onClick: function() {
this.setState({showOne:! this.state.showOne});
},
render: function() {
var result;
if (this.state.showOne)
{
result = <div ref="a">One</div>
}
else
{
result = <div ref="a">Two</div>
}
return (
<div>
<div><button onClick={this.onClick}>switch state</button></div>
<ReactTransitionGroup transitionName="example">
{result}
</ReactTransitionGroup>
</div>
);
}
});
var app = React.renderComponent(<Test />, document.body);
Option 3:
Uses hide/show to keep the 2 views around, but still doesn't work.
/** #jsx React.DOM */
var ReactTransitionGroup = React.addons.TransitionGroup;
var Test = React.createClass({
getInitialState: function() {
return {showOne:true}
},
onClick: function() {
this.setState({showOne:! this.state.showOne});
},
render: function() {
var result;
var c1 = this.state.showOne ? "hide" : "show";
var c2 = this.state.showOne ? "show" : "hide";
return (
<div>
<div><button onClick={this.onClick}>switch state</button></div>
<ReactTransitionGroup transitionName="example">
<div className={c1}>One</div>
<div className={c2}>Two</div>
</ReactTransitionGroup>
</div>
);
}
});
var app = React.renderComponent(<Test />, document.body);
So long story short - How can I make a transition execute on switching from one main "component" to another? I don't get why option 1 works, but option 2 doesn't!
React is just changing the content of the DOM because that's all that changed. Give the elements unique keys to make them animate.
if (this.state.showOne)
{
result = <div key="one">One</div>
}
else
{
result = <div key="two">Two</div>
}
JSFiddle
I used Michelle Treys answer to solve a similar problem using React-Router (1.0.1). Its not clear from the api that the key is needed. I was following React-routers suggestion to render a routes children in a parent as follows:
render() {
return (
<div id='app-wrapper'>
<ReactTransitionGroup component='div' className='transition-wrapper'>
{this.props.children}
</ReactTransitionGroup>
</div>
);
}
However the componentWillEnter only triggered on page load. Following Michelle's solution, I cloned a the children as per the react-router updates and added a key as follows:
render() {
const { location } = this.props;
return (
<div id='app-wrapper'>
<ReactTransitionGroup component='div' className='transition-wrapper'>
{React.cloneElement(this.props.children, {
key: location.pathname,
})}
</ReactTransitionGroup>
</div>
);
}
Thanks for the fix. Cheers
Related
I'm trying to get Apollo gql to load more posts after clicking a button. So it would load the next 15 results, every time you click - load more.
This is my current code
import Layout from "./Layout";
import Post from "./Post";
import client from "./ApolloClient";
import { useQuery } from "#apollo/react-hooks"
import gql from "graphql-tag";
const POSTS_QUERY = gql`
query {
posts(first: 15) {
nodes {
title
slug
postId
featuredImage {
sourceUrl
}
}
}
}
`;
const Posts = props => {
let currPage = 0;
const { posts } = props;
const { loading, error, data, fetchMore } = useQuery(
POSTS_QUERY,
{
variables: {
offset: 0,
limit: 15
},
fetchPolicy: "cache-and-network"
});
function onLoadMore() {
fetchMore({
variables: {
offset: data.posts.length
},
updateQuery: (prev, { fetchMoreResult }) => {
if (!fetchMoreResult) return prev;
return Object.assign({}, prev, {
posts: [...prev.posts, ...fetchMoreResult.posts]
});
}
});
}
if (loading) return (
<div className="container mx-auto py-6">
<div className="flex flex-wrap">
Loading...
</div>
</div>
);
if (error) return (
<div className="container mx-auto py-6">
<div className="flex flex-wrap">
Oops, there was an error :( Please try again later.
</div>
</div>
);
return (
<div className="container mx-auto py-6">
<div className="flex flex-wrap">
{data.posts.nodes.length
? data.posts.nodes.map(post => <Post key={post.postId} post={post} />)
: ""}
</div>
<button onClick={() => { onLoadMore() }}>Load More</button>
</div>
);
};
export default Posts;
When you click load more it refreshes the query and console errors
Invalid attempt to spread non-iterable instance
I have been loading for solutions but a lot of the examples are previous or next pages like traditional pagination. Or a cursor based infinite loader which I don't want. I just want more posts added to the list onClick.
Any advise is appreciated, thank you.
Your current POSTS_QUERY it isn't accepting variables, so first you need change this:
const POSTS_QUERY = gql`
query postQuery($first: Int!, $offset: Int!) {
posts(first: $first, offset: $offset) {
nodes {
title
slug
postId
featuredImage {
sourceUrl
}
}
}
}
`;
Now, it will use the variables listed in your useQuery and fetchMore.
And to finish the error is because updateQuery isn't correct, change it to:
function onLoadMore() {
fetchMore({
variables: {
offset: data.posts.nodes.length
},
updateQuery: (prev, { fetchMoreResult }) => {
if (!fetchMoreResult) return prev;
return { posts: { nodes: [...prev.posts.nodes, ...fetchMoreResult.posts.nodes] } };
});
}
});
}
I would suggest useState hook to manage a variable that stores current offset in the dataset, place a useEffect to watch changes to that offset, the offset value in passed as query variable to load data. Remove fetchmore, useEffect hook will do the job.
When user clicks on load more button, you just need to update offset value, that will trigger the query and update data.
const [offset,setOffset] = React.useState(0)
const [results, setResults] = React.useState([])
const { loading, error, data } = useQuery(
POSTS_QUERY,
{
variables: {
offset: offset,
limit: 15
},
fetchPolicy: "cache-and-network"
}
);
React.useEffect(() => {
const newResults = [...results, ...data]
setResults(newResults)
}, [data])
function onLoadMore() {
setOffset(results.data.length)
}
I'm using Telerik for MVC and trying to get the multi-select to populate with the initial values in an Edit scenario.
<script>
function filterProducts() {
return {
manufacturerId: $("#ServiceBulletinItem_ManufacturerId").val()
};
}
function onManufacturerChange(e) {
var v = e.sender.dataItem().Value;
$.post("#Url.Action("GetCascadeProducts", "Components")", { manufacturerId: v }, function (result) {
var grid = $("#ServiceBulletinItem_ApplicableProducts").data("kendoMultiSelect")
grid.setDataSource(result)
});
}
function InitialPopulate(manId) {
$.post("#Url.Action("GetCascadeProducts", "Components")", { manufacturerId: manId }, function (result) {
var grid = $("#ServiceBulletinItem_ApplicableProducts").data("kendoMultiSelect")
grid.setDataSource(result)
});
}
$(document).ready(function () {
$('.control-datepicker').Zebra_DatePicker();
var m = $("#ServiceBulletinItem_ManufacturerId").val();
InitialPopulate(m);
});
</script>
<div class="form-group">
#Html.LabelFor(m => m.ManufacturerList, "Manufacturer", htmlAttributes: new { #class = "control-label col-md-2" })
<div class="col-md-10">
#(Html.Kendo().DropDownListFor(m => m.ServiceBulletinItem.ManufacturerId)
.HtmlAttributes(new { #class = "col-md-6 form-control" })
.Filter("contains")
.DataValueField("Value")
.DataTextField("Text")
.BindTo((IEnumerable<SelectListItem>)Model.ManufacturerSelectList)
.HtmlAttributes(new { style = "width:70%;" }).Events(e =>
{
e.Change("onManufacturerChange");
})
)
</div >
</div >
<div class="form-group">
#Html.LabelFor(m => m.ProductList, "Product", htmlAttributes: new { #class = "control-label col-md-2" })
<div class="col-md-10">
#(Html.Kendo().MultiSelectFor(m => m.ServiceBulletinItem.ApplicableProducts)
.AutoClose(false)
.DataTextField("ProductName")
.DataValueField("ProductId")
.Placeholder("Select products...")
)
</div>
</div>
I'm trying to populate the manufacturer drop down and the Product multiSelect. The ApplicableProducts item is an IEnumerable representing the ProductId's of all those previously selected and I know that when I select the manufacturer and it calls the GetCascadeProducts controller method it will return back a collection of ProductId and ProductName for all the manufacturers products of which those productId is the ApplicableProducts property should exist.
On document.ready I can call the InitialPopulate method with the manufacturerID which will populate the multiSelect items but can't seem to populate the initial values.
I couldnt get the binding working correctly so ended up using
#(Html.Kendo().MultiSelect()
.Name("ServiceBulletinItem_ApplicableProducts")
.AutoClose(false)
.DataTextField("ProductName")
.DataValueField("ProductId")
.Placeholder("Select products 2...")
.AutoBind(false)
)
and then on the using the following code on document ready to make an ajax call to populate the manufacturer and product controls
function PopulateProductsInitial(manId) {
$.post("#Url.Action("GetCascadeProducts", "Components")", { manufacturerId: manId }, function (result) {
var grid = $("#ServiceBulletinItem_ApplicableProducts").data("kendoMultiSelect")
grid.setDataSource(result);
var s = $("#ServiceBulletinItem_Id").val();
$.post("#Url.Action("GetSBProducts", "ServiceBulletins")", { Id: s}, function (result) {
var arr = [];
result.forEach(function (element) {
arr.push(element.ProductId);
});
var grid = $("#ServiceBulletinItem_ApplicableProducts").data("kendoMultiSelect")
grid.value(arr);
});
});
}
}
$(document).ready(function () {
//Populate Initial Values
PopulateProductsInitial($("#ServiceBulletinItem_ManufacturerId").val());
$('#YourButton').click(SendForm);
});
The problem then became sending the selected items back to the controller when the edit was complete which again seemed convoluted because the control was not bound and therefore I had to make an Ajax call to submit the data.
function SendForm() {
var items = $("#ServiceBulletinItem_ApplicableProducts").data("kendoMultiSelect").value();
//Manipulate into ServiceBulletinViewModel for the save
var data = {
Id: $("#ServiceBulletinItem_Id").val(),
ServiceBulletinItem: {
Id: $("#ServiceBulletinItem_Id").val(),
ManufacturerId: $("#ServiceBulletinItem_ManufacturerId").val(),
IssueDate: $('#ServiceBulletinItem_IssueDate').val(),
Heading: $('#ServiceBulletinItem_Heading').val(),
Details: $('#ServiceBulletinItem_Details').val(),
Url: $('#ServiceBulletinItem_Url').val(),
SelectedProducts: items
}
}
$.ajax({
type: 'POST',
url: '/ServiceBulletins/Edit',
contentType: 'application/json',
data: JSON.stringify(data),
success: function (result) {
//Your success code here..
if (result.redirectUrl != null) {
window.location = result.redirectUrl;
}
},
error: function (jqXHR) {
if (jqXHR.status === 200) {
alert("Value Not found");
}
}
});
}
It all seemed a lot more convoluted than any of the demo's that teleriks and I couldnt find any good examples of binding from remote sources which looked similar.
As the binding is convention based I'm wondering if its possible to simplify the ajax calling for the post functionality with the correct naming of the controls so that I can simply get the selected items on the multiselect control or if the ajax post is the way to go.
I would like to iterate over this json string and input the values into a react component: {"users":[{"name":"jkhhjjh","url":"/users/240/individual_show"},{"name":"bob","url":"/users/241/individual_show"}]}
I can currently make one component from the first or second object within the json index but I cannot iterate over the whole string. My react-jsx code is below:
enter code here
var FriendInfo = React.createClass({
getInitialState: function() {
return {
url: '',
name: ''
};
},
componentDidMount: function() {
$.get(this.props.source, function(user) {
var users= user["users"][0];
if (this.isMounted()) {
this.setState({url: users.url,
url: users.url,
name: users.name
});
}
}.bind(this));
},
render: function() {
return (
<div className="friendInfo">
<img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/92/SRC-TV.svg/140px-SRC-TV.svg.png"></img>
<a href={this.state.url}>{this.state.name}</a>
</div>
);
}
});
var RequestLinks= React.createClass({
render: function() {
return (
<div className="requestLinks" style={{float:"right"}}>
accept
deny
</div>
);
}
});
var FriendBox = React.createClass({
render: function() {
return (
<div className="friendBox">
<FriendInfo source="/individual_relationships/show"/>
<RequestLinks />
</div>
);
}
});
React.render(<FriendBox />, document.getElementById('test'));`enter code here`
After the line var users= user["users"][0] I am able to insert the data into one iteration of the component. I would like to make a loop that would iterate over user["users"][0] and user["users"][1] to make two components on the page. How would I go about doing this?
You need to make use of map function which returns array of indivisual elements.
var FriendInfo = React.createClass({
getInitialState: function () {
return {
users: []
};
},
componentDidMount: function () {
$.get(this.props.source, function (user) {
var users = user["users"];
if (this.isMounted()) {
this.setState({users: users});
}
}.bind(this));
},
render: function () {
return (
<div>
{
this.state.users.map(function (user) {
return <div className="friendInfo">
<img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/92/SRC-TV.svg/140px-SRC-TV.svg.png"></img>
<a href={user.url}>{user.name}</a>
</div>
})
}
</div>
);
}
});
var RequestLinks = React.createClass({
render: function () {
return (
<div className="requestLinks" style={{float: "right"}}>
accept
deny
</div>
);
}
});
var FriendBox = React.createClass({
render: function () {
return (
<div className="friendBox">
<FriendInfo source="/individual_relationships/show"/>
<RequestLinks />
</div>
);
}
});
React.render(<FriendBox />, document.getElementById('test'));
on a crusade to learn ember, I'm trying to create a blog with it, and now I'm on the pagination step.
Everything is working, except all of my posts with an id of over 100 don't show up in the beginning.
This is what my PostsIndexController looks like ->
Blog.PostsIndexController = Ember.ArrayController.extend({
sortProperties: ['id'],
sortAscending: false,
page: 1,
perPage: 8,
totalPages: (function() {
return Math.ceil(this.get('length') / this.get('perPage'));
}).property('length', 'perPage'),
pages: (function() {
var collection = Ember.A();
for(var i = 0; i < this.get('totalPages'); i++) {
collection.pushObject(Ember.Object.create({
number: i + 1
}));
}
return collection;
}).property('totalPages'),
hasPages: (function() {
return this.get('totalPages') > 1;
}).property('totalPages'),
prevPage: (function() {
var page = this.get('page');
var totalPages = this.get('totalPages');
if(page > 1 && totalPages > 1) {
return page - 1;
} else {
return null;
}
}).property('page', 'totalPages'),
nextPage: (function() {
var page = this.get('page');
var totalPages = this.get('totalPages');
if(page < totalPages && totalPages > 1) {
return page + 1;
} else {
return null;
}
}).property('page', 'totalPages'),
paginatedContent: (function() {
var start = (this.get('page') - 1) * this.get('perPage');
var end = start + this.get('perPage');
return this.get('arrangedContent').slice(start, end);
}).property('page', 'totalPages', 'arrangedContent.[]'),
selectPage: function(number) {
this.set('page', number);
}
});
and this is what my template looks like ->
{{#each post in paginatedContent}}
{{ render 'posts/post' post}}
{{/each}}
{{#if hasPages}}
<div class="pagination">
{{#if prevPage}}
<a href="#" class="previous_page" rel="previous" {{action "selectPage" prevPage}}>← Newer</a>
{{else}}
<span class="previous_page disabled">← Newer</span>
{{/if}}
{{#if nextPage}}
<a href="#" class="next_page" rel="next" {{action "selectPage" nextPage}}>Older →</a>
{{else}}
<span class="next_page disabled">Older →</span>
{{/if}}
</div>
{{/if}}
I think the problem is in the way arrangedContent is setting up the array --
paginatedContent: (function() {
var start = (this.get('page') - 1) * this.get('perPage');
var end = start + this.get('perPage');
return this.get('arrangedContent').slice(start, end);
}).property('page', 'totalPages', 'arrangedContent.[]'),
But, am a bit confused with what arrangedContent is, and how to fix this issue. Help much appreciated!
I Haven't quite figured out why this happened, but instead of sorting by id, I just sorted by created_at, which fixed the issue.
sortProperties: ['created_at'],
You can create an other "real" numeric type ID for the model, and order by this field. Works fine!
App.Msgboard = DS.Model.extend({
numericId: function(){
var id = this.get('id');
if (id) { return +id; }
}.property('id'),
name: DS.attr('string')
});
With reference to Simple Login implementation for Dojo MVC / - there is one point i don't understand. With regards to sample from phusick, the login dialog class does a call of dom.byId("dialog-template") - "dialog-template" is an id from the script which is the template for the dialog and should be present in an html template - not in the main html. So if I remove that, the call to dom.byId would fail
so my code structure is as follows
main.html ( calls Only main.js is called - nothing more)
main.js ( Contains the following)
require([
"dojo/_base/declare","dojo/_base/lang","dojo/on","dojo/dom","dojo/Evented",
"dojo/_base/Deferred","dojo/json","dijit/_Widget","dijit/_TemplatedMixin",
"dijit/_WidgetsInTemplateMixin","dijit/Dialog",
"widgets/LoginDialog",
"widgets/LoginController",
"dijit/form/Form","dijit/form/ValidationTextBox","dijit/form/Button",
"dojo/domReady!"
], function(
declare,lang,on,dom,Evented,Deferred,JSON,
_Widget,
_TemplatedMixin,
_WidgetsInTemplateMixin,
Dialog,
LoginDialog,
LoginController
) {
// provide username & password in constructor
// since we do not have web service here to authenticate against
var loginController = new LoginController({username: "user", password: "user"});
var loginDialog = new LoginDialog({ controller: loginController});
loginDialog.startup();
loginDialog.show();
loginDialog.on("cancel", function() {
console.log("Login cancelled.");
});
loginDialog.on("error", function() {
console.log("Login error.");
});
loginDialog.on("success", function() {
console.log("Login success.");
console.log(JSON.stringify(this.form.get("value")));
});
});
Now LoginDialog.js and LoginDialogTemplate.html is the templatised widget for the dialog
and LoginController.js is the controller.
My LoginDialog.js is
define([
"dojo/_base/declare","dojo/_base/lang","dojo/on","dojo/dom","dojo/Evented","dojo/_base/Deferred","dojo/json",
"dijit/_Widget","dijit/_TemplatedMixin","dijit/_WidgetsInTemplateMixin",
"dijit/Dialog","dijit/form/Form","dijit/form/ValidationTextBox","dijit/form/Button",
"dojo/text!templates/loginDialogTemplate.html",
"dojo/text!templates/loginFormTemplate.html",
"dojo/domReady!"
], function(
declare,lang,on,dom,Evented,Deferred,JSON,
_Widget,
_TemplatedMixin,
_WidgetsInTemplateMixin,
Dialog,
Form,
Button,
template
) {
return declare([ Dialog, Evented], {
READY: 0,
BUSY: 1,
title: "Login Dialog",
message: "",
busyLabel: "Working...",
// Binding property values to DOM nodes in templates
// see: http://www.enterprisedojo.com/2010/10/02/lessons-in-widgetry-binding-property-values-to-dom-nodes-in-templates/
attributeMap: lang.delegate(dijit._Widget.prototype.attributeMap, {
message: {
node: "messageNode",
type: "innerHTML"
}
}),
constructor: function(/*Object*/ kwArgs) {
lang.mixin(this, kwArgs);
var dialogTemplate = dom.byId("dialog-template").textContent;
var formTemplate = dom.byId("login-form-template").textContent;
var template = lang.replace(dialogTemplate, {
form: formTemplate
});
var contentWidget = new (declare(
[_Widget, _TemplatedMixin, _WidgetsInTemplateMixin],
{
templateString: template
}
));
contentWidget.startup();
var content = this.content = contentWidget;
this.form = content.form;
// shortcuts
this.submitButton = content.submitButton;
this.cancelButton = content.cancelButton;
this.messageNode = content.messageNode;
},
postCreate: function() {
this.inherited(arguments);
this.readyState= this.READY;
this.okLabel = this.submitButton.get("label");
this.connect(this.submitButton, "onClick", "onSubmit");
this.connect(this.cancelButton, "onClick", "onCancel");
this.watch("readyState", lang.hitch(this, "_onReadyStateChange"));
this.form.watch("state", lang.hitch(this, "_onValidStateChange"));
this._onValidStateChange();
},
onSubmit: function() {
this.set("readyState", this.BUSY);
this.set("message", "");
var data = this.form.get("value");
var auth = this.controller.login(data);
Deferred.when(auth, lang.hitch(this, function(loginSuccess) {
if (loginSuccess === true) {
this.onLoginSuccess();
return;
}
this.onLoginError();
}));
},
onLoginSuccess: function() {
this.set("readyState", this.READY);
this.set("message", "Login sucessful.");
this.emit("success");
},
onLoginError: function() {
this.set("readyState", this.READY);
this.set("message", "Please try again.");
this.emit("error");
},
onCancel: function() {
this.emit("cancel");
},
_onValidStateChange: function() {
this.submitButton.set("disabled", !!this.form.get("state").length);
},
_onReadyStateChange: function() {
var isBusy = this.get("readyState") == this.BUSY;
this.submitButton.set("label", isBusy ? this.busyLabel : this.okLabel);
this.submitButton.set("disabled", isBusy);
}
});
});
My loginDialogTemplate.html is as follows
<script type="text/template" id="dialog-template">
<div style="width:300px;">
<div class="dijitDialogPaneContentArea">
<div data-dojo-attach-point="contentNode">
{form}
</div>
</div>
<div class="dijitDialogPaneActionBar">
<div
class="message"
data-dojo-attach-point="messageNode"
></div>
<button
data-dojo-type="dijit.form.Button"
data-dojo-props=""
data-dojo-attach-point="submitButton"
>
OK
</button>
<button
data-dojo-type="dijit.form.Button"
data-dojo-attach-point="cancelButton"
>
Cancel
</button>
</div>
</div>
</script>
Since the template has the id="dialog-template" so I guess when the widget calls the dom.byId("dialog-template"), it throws an error "TypeError: dom.byId(...) is null" at the line :-> var dialogTemplate = dom.byId("dialog-template").textContent;
So what am I doing wrong here?
If i use all the template scripts in the main html it works fine.
Asif,
Since you're passing in the templates in the define function, you don't need the dom.byId() to get the content. Try this:
Remove the elements from your HTML templates.
In LoginDialog.js, change your function arguments to:
...
Button,
dialogTemplate,
formTemplate
You'll need the formTemplate for the next change. I used 'dialogTemplate' instead of your 'template' so it's more obvious how it's replacing the code from the example. Next, change the beginning of the constructor to:
constructor: function(/*Object*/ kwArgs) {
lang.mixin(this, kwArgs);
//var dialogTemplate = dom.byId("dialog-template").textContent;
//var formTemplate = dom.byId("login-form-template").textContent;
var template = lang.replace(dialogTemplate, {
form: formTemplate
});
var contentWidget = new (declare(
...
I only left the commented code in so you can see what I changed. What it does is create a new template string called 'template' by substituting the {form} placeholder in your dialogTemplate HTML with the formTemplate you passed in. Then it's using that new template string to create the widget.