Stata: Combine table command with ttest and output latex - stata

For regression output, I usually use a combination of eststo to store estimations, estadd to add the R2 and additional tests, then estab to output the lot.
I need to do the same with the table command. I need the mean, median and N for a variable across three by variables and would like to add stars for the result of a ttest==1 on the mean and signtest==1 on the median. I have three by variables, so I've been using table to collate the mean, median and N, which I'm calling like the following pseudo-code:
sysuse auto,clear
table foreign rep78 , ///
contents(mean price median price n price) format(%9.2f)
ttest price==1, by(foreign rep78)
signtest price=1, by(foreign rep78)
I've tried esttab and estpost to no avail. I've also looked at tabstat, tablemat and summarize as alternatives to table, but they don't allow three by variables.
How can I create this table, add the stars for the ttest and signtest p-values and output the full table?

The main point in your question seems to be producing a LaTeX table. However, you show "pseudo-code", that looks pretty much like Stata code, with the caveat that it is illegal.
In particular, for the ttest you can only have one variable in the by() option. But notice that ttest allows also the by: prefix (you can use both, in fact). Their reasons-to-be are different. On the other hand, signtest does not allow a by() option but it does allow the by: prefix. So you should probably clarify what you want to do before creating the table.
If you are trying to use the by: prefix in both cases and afterwards produce a table, you can create a grouping variable, and put the commands in a loop. In this way, you can try tabulating the saved results for each group using the ESTOUT module (by Ben Jann in SSC). Something like:
*clear all
set more off
sysuse auto
keep price foreign rep78
* create group variable
egen grou = group(foreign rep78)
* tests by group
forvalues i = 1/8 {
ttest price == 1 if grou == `i'
signtest price = 1 if grou == `i'
*<complete with estout syntax>
}
See help by, help egen (the group function), help estout and help saved results.

Related

Skewness in Stata

I have tried many different combinations of sktest and sadly nothing works.
I was almost certain that sktest will work with by combination but it doesn't.
The issue is: I have binary data gender (male 0 and female 1) and I want to measure the skewness of returns for each (male and female) in the variable returns. Can you please advise?
I was hoping for a result similar to what we get when we run e.g. by gender: summarize returns
Different questions are bundled together here.
Testing
If you want to run sktest for different groups, you can just repeat the command
sysuse auto, clear
sktest price if foreign == 1
sktest price if foreign == 0
or write your own wrapper program to do the same. sktest in essence shows P-values but no summary measures.
Or do something like this:
preserve
statsby , by(foreign) : sktest price
list
restore
Measuring
If you want to see (moment-based) skewmess measures, you can just repeat summarize
bysort foreign: summarize price, detail
A wrapper is already available on SSC that is more selective.
moments price, by(foreign)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Group | n mean SD skewness kurtosis
----------+-----------------------------------------------------------
Domestic | 52 6072.423 3097.104 1.778 5.090
Foreign | 22 6384.682 2621.915 1.215 3.555
----------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Warnings
Stata uses one estimator for moment-based skewness. There are others.
There are many ways to measure skewness. Those others mentioned in Section 7 of this paper are not a complete list; perhaps the most important omission is L-skewness (see lmoments from SSC).

Stata creating output for IV regression with bysort

So I am running an 2SLS model by interview year and I have many interview years and different models. I want to present the first-stage results first and then after reassuring the reader that they are solid move on to the interesting results.
Example of Table A (first stage):
Year DV Coef SE F N
1 A 0.5 0.1 100 1000
2 A 0.8 0.2 10 1500
3 B -0.6 0.4 800 800
Table B with the main results would look the same just without the F-Stat.
I searched on the web about how to create those tables automatically in Stata, but despite finding many questions I didn't find an answer that worked for me. From those different posts and help-files I build something that is nearly there.
It creates the table I want for the main results with the F-Stat together by some variable (Step A in the code). However, when I move on to do the same for the first stage it only saves the last wave as I restore the estimates. I understand why Stata does it like that, but I cannot think of a way of convincing it to do what I want.
clear all
*Install user-written commands
ssc install outreg2, replace
ssc install ivreg210, replace
*load data
sysuse auto, clear
*run example model (obviously the model itself is bogus)
********************************************************
*Step A: creates the IV results by foreign plus the F-Statistic
bys foreign: ///
outreg2 using output1-IV-F, label excel stats(coef se) dec(2) adds(F-Test, e(widstat)) nocons nor2 keep(mpg) replace: ///
ivreg210 price headroom trunk (mpg=rep78 ), savefirst first
*Step B: creates the first stage results in a seperate table
bys foreign: ///
ivreg210 price headroom trunk (mpg=rep78 ), savefirst first
est restore _ivreg210_mpg
outreg2 using output1_1st-stage, replace keep(rep78)
cap erase output1-IV-F
cap erase output1_1st-stage
So ideally I would only run the model once and have the F-Stat in the first-stage table, but I can fix that manually. The biggest issue I have is how to store the estimates when using bysort. If anyone has any suggestions about that, I would greatly appreciate it.
Thanks!
ssc install estout
then you can store whatever result you want for later use, even after a bysort.
eststo clear
sysuse auto, clear
bysort foreign: eststo: reg price weight mpg
esttab, label nodepvar nonumber
This is a round-about solution. It works, but really isn't the proper solution I was/am looking for. The "trick" is to run the 1st stage as a separate model.
clear all
*Install user-written commands
ssc install outreg2, replace
ssc install ivreg210, replace
*load data
sysuse auto, clear
*run example model (obviously the model itself is bogus)
********************************************************
*Step A: creates the IV results by foreign plus the F-Statistic
bys foreign: ///
outreg2 using output1-IV-F, label excel stats(coef se) dec(2) adds(F-Test, e(widstat)) nocons nor2 keep(mpg) replace: ///
ivreg210 price headroom trunk (mpg=rep78 ), savefirst first
*Step B: creates the first stage results in a seperate table
bys foreign: ///
ivreg210 price headroom trunk (mpg=rep78 ), savefirst first
est restore _ivreg210_mpg
outreg2 using output1_1st-stage1, replace keep(rep78)
*************
/* NEW BIT */
*************
*Step C: creates the first stage results in a seperate table
bys foreign: ///
outreg2 using output1_1st_NEW, label excel stats(coef se) dec(2) nocons nor2 keep(rep78) replace: ///
reg mpg headroom trunk rep78
cap erase output1-IV-F
cap erase output1_1st-stage1
cap erase output1_1st_NEW

How to add more lines to esttab summarize summary stat table

I am trying to use esttab to create a LaTeX table with summary statistics using the summarize command. I can use code like the following to do this if I summarize multiple variables at once:
sysuse auto, clear
global vars price mpg headroom
eststo clear
eststo: estpost sum $vars, listwise
esttab est*, cells("count mean(fmt(2)) sd") nomtitles nonumber noobs
However, I am not sure how to summarize one line, store it, summarize another, store it, etc., and then combine all of them in the same table without creating unnecessary columns. I may want to summarize each variable individually if I want to make individualized restrictions by variable on which observations to summarize.
Here is code that doesn't get me what I want. Specifically, it does not put the summary statistics for each variable under the same column, but instead creates new columns, each set of which correspond to a different variable.
eststo clear
gen count = 1
foreach i in $vars {
eststo: estpost sum `i' if `i'>count
replace count = count+1
}
esttab est*, cells("count mean(fmt(2)) sd") nomtitles nonumber noobs
What should I change to get me my desired result?
Your problem is analogous to stacking models; instead of "models" you have summaries. The user-written command estout doesn't stack models, so one way out is to create your own matrix and feed it to estout (or esttab):
clear
set more off
*----- example data -----
sysuse auto
*----- two-variable example -----
eststo clear
// process price
estpost summarize price
matrix mymat = e(mean), e(count)
// process mpg
estpost summarize mpg if mpg > 15
matrix mymat = mymat \ e(mean), e(count)
// finish formatting matrix
matrix colnames mymat = mean count
matrix rownames mymat = price mpg
matrix list mymat
// tabulate
esttab matrix(mymat), nomtitles
With additional work, you can automatize the steps.
See http://repec.org/bocode/e/estout/advanced.html#advanced901 for another example.
You can use the fragment and append options to make tables line-by-line. You might want to do one variable without the fragment option to generate the same table header/footer, then cut-and-paste the remaining lines into this table.

Computing and plotting difference in group means

In what follows I plot the mean of an outcome of interest (price) by a grouping variable (foreign) for each possible value taken by the fake variable time:
sysuse auto, clear
gen time = rep78 - 3
bysort foreign time: egen avg_p = mean(price)
scatter avg_p time if (foreign==0 & time>=0) || ///
scatter avg_p time if (foreign==1 & time>=0), ///
legend(order(1 "Domestic" 2 "Foreign")) ///
ytitle("Average price") xlab(#3)
What I would like to do is to plot the difference in the two group means over time, not the two separate means.
I am surely missing something, but to me it looks complicated because the information about the averages is stored "vertically" (in avg_p).
The easiest way to do this is to arguably use linear regression to estimate the differences:
/* Regression Way */
drop if time < 0 | missing(time)
reg price i.foreign##i.time
margins, dydx(foreign) at(time =(0(1)2))
marginsplot, noci title("Foreign vs Domestic Difference in Price")
If regression is hard to wrap your mind around, the other is involves mangling the data with a reshape:
/* Transform the Data */
keep price time foreign
collapse (mean) price, by(time foreign)
reshape wide price, i(time) j(foreign)
gen diff = price1-price0
tw connected diff time
Here is another approach. graph dot will happily plot means.
sysuse auto, clear
set scheme s1color
collapse price if inrange(rep78, 3, 5), by(foreign rep78)
reshape wide price, i(rep78) j(foreign)
rename price0 Domestic
label var Domestic
rename price1 Foreign
label var Foreign
graph dot (asis) Domestic Foreign, over(rep78) vertical ///
marker(1, ms(Oh)) marker(2, ms(+))

Syntax for bootstrap estimates from ttest command

I am attempting to demonstrated characteristics of various tests for small samples of data. I would like to demonstrate the performance of the t-test, t-test with bootstrap estimation and the ranksum test. I am interested in obtaining the p-value for each test on multiple sets of data using simulate. However, I cannot obtain t-test estimates using the bootstrap prefix and ttest command.
The data is generated by:
clear
set obs 60
gen level = abs(rnormal(0,1))
gen group = "A"
replace group = "B" if [_n] >30
bootstrap, reps(100): ttest level, by(group)
bootstrap _b, reps(100): ttest level, by(group)
bootstrap boot_p = e(p), reps(100): ttest level, by(group)
The errors for each of the procedures in order are:
expression list required
invalid expression: _b
'e(p)' evaluated to missing in full sample
These results are not consistent with the documentation for the bootstrap prefix. Is there some problem with specification of e or r class objects and ttest ?
Edit:
Understanding now that r-class is the correct group of scalars, I still do not generate a variable 'p' given the code provided in the solution. Additionally:
clear
set more off
set obs 60
gen level = abs(rnormal(0,1))
gen group = "A"
replace group = "B" if [_n] >30
bootstrap p=r(p), reps(100): ttest level, by(group)
display r(p)
does not return the p-value.
ttest is an r-class command and stores its reults in r(). You seem to expect for it to save results in e(), like an e-class command. The norm is that the latter kind fit models; ttest is not in this category.
The two-sided p-value is stored in r(p), as indicated in help ttest:
clear
set more off
set obs 60
gen level = abs(rnormal(0,1))
gen group = "A"
replace group = "B" if [_n] >30
bootstrap p=r(p), reps(100): ttest level, by(group)